The effect of a low-energy food foam on appetite measures during a 1-day reduced-energy meal plan
Background/Objectives: We have previously shown that 500 ml of a foamed drink (‘foam’) significantly improved appetite versus a non-foamed control. The objectives of this research were to assess the effect of smaller volumes of foams on appetite, and the potential benefits of foam ingestion and its...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International Journal of Obesity 2015-02, Vol.39 (2), p.361-367 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 367 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 361 |
| container_title | International Journal of Obesity |
| container_volume | 39 |
| creator | Peters, H P F Koppenol, W P Schuring, E A H Abrahamse, S L Mela, D J |
| description | Background/Objectives:
We have previously shown that 500 ml of a foamed drink (‘foam’) significantly improved appetite versus a non-foamed control. The objectives of this research were to assess the effect of smaller volumes of foams on appetite, and the potential benefits of foam ingestion and its timing on appetite measures in a reduced-energy context.
Subjects/Methods:
Two randomized, parallel design studies (pre- and main study) were conducted using healthy adult subjects. Pre-study: 133 subjects (age 18–50 years, body mass index (BMI) 20–32 kg m
−2
) each consumed either 10, 25, 50, 100, 150 or 250 ml foamed meal replacer (~0.2 kcal ml
−1
), 150 min after a fixed breakfast. Main study: four groups of subjects (
n
=134; age 18–60 years, BMI 22.5–35.0 kg m
−2
) consumed 200 ml/22 kcal foam (based on pre-study results) immediately after main meals (M), after snacks (S), in-between snacks and main meals (I) or not at all (control, C) within 1 day of a reduced-energy meal plan consisting of three main meals and three snacks. Measurements included self-reported appetite (six scales, reported as area under the curve (AUC)) and (main study only) end-of-day appetite questionnaire.
Results:
Pre-study: the strongest effect on appetite was produced by 250 ml (consistent across scales), whereas 150 ml showed more pronounced effects than 100 and 50 ml in most scales. Volumes 10 and 25 ml had no effects on any scale. Main study: 200 ml foam reduced appetite AUC substantially in all treatments, particularly M (for example, hunger AUC reduced by 35% (
P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1038/ijo.2014.151 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2331626545</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A401907150</galeid><sourcerecordid>A401907150</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c657t-28eb2e07c9dd0e4071489336ce1405c4f401399bce1930371d7ad8703cb829353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFrHCEUxqU0NNu0t56LUMips33qqDPHEJq2EMglPYurz91ZZsapzlD2v6_LJiGBUARF-X3fe8-PkE8M1gxE863bxzUHVq-ZZG_IitVaVbJu9VuyAgG6AqnkOXmf8x4ApAT-jpxzCQ0TSqyIvd8hxRDQzTQGamkf_1Y4YtoeaIjRl80ONI7UThPO3Yx0QJuXhJn6JXXjtkhY5e2BJvSLQ_8oLlhPp96OH8hZsH3Gjw_nBfl98_3--md1e_fj1_XVbeWU1HPFG9xwBO1a7wFr0KxuWiGUQ1aDdHWogYm23ZR7K0Bo5rX1jQbhNg1vhRQX5MvJd0rxz4J5Nvu4pLGUNFwIpriS9X8ppiTXSkLxfKK2tkfTjSHOybqhy85clT7a0p08UutXqLI8Dp2LI4auvL8QXD4T7MoPzbsc-2Xu4phfgl9PoEsx54TBTKkbbDoYBuaYuimpm2PqpqRe8M8PQy2bAf0T_BhzAaoTkKdjZpieTf2a4T911rFD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1652765070</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of a low-energy food foam on appetite measures during a 1-day reduced-energy meal plan</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Nature Journals Online</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Peters, H P F ; Koppenol, W P ; Schuring, E A H ; Abrahamse, S L ; Mela, D J</creator><creatorcontrib>Peters, H P F ; Koppenol, W P ; Schuring, E A H ; Abrahamse, S L ; Mela, D J</creatorcontrib><description>Background/Objectives:
We have previously shown that 500 ml of a foamed drink (‘foam’) significantly improved appetite versus a non-foamed control. The objectives of this research were to assess the effect of smaller volumes of foams on appetite, and the potential benefits of foam ingestion and its timing on appetite measures in a reduced-energy context.
Subjects/Methods:
Two randomized, parallel design studies (pre- and main study) were conducted using healthy adult subjects. Pre-study: 133 subjects (age 18–50 years, body mass index (BMI) 20–32 kg m
−2
) each consumed either 10, 25, 50, 100, 150 or 250 ml foamed meal replacer (~0.2 kcal ml
−1
), 150 min after a fixed breakfast. Main study: four groups of subjects (
n
=134; age 18–60 years, BMI 22.5–35.0 kg m
−2
) consumed 200 ml/22 kcal foam (based on pre-study results) immediately after main meals (M), after snacks (S), in-between snacks and main meals (I) or not at all (control, C) within 1 day of a reduced-energy meal plan consisting of three main meals and three snacks. Measurements included self-reported appetite (six scales, reported as area under the curve (AUC)) and (main study only) end-of-day appetite questionnaire.
Results:
Pre-study: the strongest effect on appetite was produced by 250 ml (consistent across scales), whereas 150 ml showed more pronounced effects than 100 and 50 ml in most scales. Volumes 10 and 25 ml had no effects on any scale. Main study: 200 ml foam reduced appetite AUC substantially in all treatments, particularly M (for example, hunger AUC reduced by 35% (
P
<0.001), 28% (
P
<0.05) and 20% (P=0.11) for M, S and I, respectively versus C). A strong reduction in ‘appetite for a snack’ was seen for all timings (all
P
<0.05). The end-of-day appetite ratings confirmed these findings.
Conclusions:
Modest amounts of a low-energy foam can reduce appetite measures during a 1-day reduced-energy meal plan.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0307-0565</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5497</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2014.151</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25081363</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/700/2814 ; 692/700/2817 ; Adult ; Appetite ; Appetite - physiology ; Appetite loss ; Appetite Regulation ; Area Under Curve ; Beverages ; Body mass index ; Body size ; Diet ; Diet, Reducing - methods ; Energy ; Energy Intake ; Epidemiology ; Feeding Behavior ; Female ; Foams ; Food ; Health Promotion and Disease Prevention ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; Hunger ; Hunger - physiology ; Ingestion ; Internal Medicine ; Low-calorie diet ; Male ; Meals ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Medicine, Experimental ; Metabolic Diseases ; Middle Aged ; original-article ; Postprandial Period ; Public Health ; Questionnaires ; R&D ; Ratings & rankings ; Research & development ; Satiety Response - physiology ; Snack foods ; Weight control</subject><ispartof>International Journal of Obesity, 2015-02, Vol.39 (2), p.361-367</ispartof><rights>Macmillan Publishers Limited 2015</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Feb 2015</rights><rights>Macmillan Publishers Limited 2015.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c657t-28eb2e07c9dd0e4071489336ce1405c4f401399bce1930371d7ad8703cb829353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c657t-28eb2e07c9dd0e4071489336ce1405c4f401399bce1930371d7ad8703cb829353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/ijo.2014.151$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/ijo.2014.151$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25081363$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peters, H P F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koppenol, W P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuring, E A H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrahamse, S L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mela, D J</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of a low-energy food foam on appetite measures during a 1-day reduced-energy meal plan</title><title>International Journal of Obesity</title><addtitle>Int J Obes</addtitle><addtitle>Int J Obes (Lond)</addtitle><description>Background/Objectives:
We have previously shown that 500 ml of a foamed drink (‘foam’) significantly improved appetite versus a non-foamed control. The objectives of this research were to assess the effect of smaller volumes of foams on appetite, and the potential benefits of foam ingestion and its timing on appetite measures in a reduced-energy context.
Subjects/Methods:
Two randomized, parallel design studies (pre- and main study) were conducted using healthy adult subjects. Pre-study: 133 subjects (age 18–50 years, body mass index (BMI) 20–32 kg m
−2
) each consumed either 10, 25, 50, 100, 150 or 250 ml foamed meal replacer (~0.2 kcal ml
−1
), 150 min after a fixed breakfast. Main study: four groups of subjects (
n
=134; age 18–60 years, BMI 22.5–35.0 kg m
−2
) consumed 200 ml/22 kcal foam (based on pre-study results) immediately after main meals (M), after snacks (S), in-between snacks and main meals (I) or not at all (control, C) within 1 day of a reduced-energy meal plan consisting of three main meals and three snacks. Measurements included self-reported appetite (six scales, reported as area under the curve (AUC)) and (main study only) end-of-day appetite questionnaire.
Results:
Pre-study: the strongest effect on appetite was produced by 250 ml (consistent across scales), whereas 150 ml showed more pronounced effects than 100 and 50 ml in most scales. Volumes 10 and 25 ml had no effects on any scale. Main study: 200 ml foam reduced appetite AUC substantially in all treatments, particularly M (for example, hunger AUC reduced by 35% (
P
<0.001), 28% (
P
<0.05) and 20% (P=0.11) for M, S and I, respectively versus C). A strong reduction in ‘appetite for a snack’ was seen for all timings (all
P
<0.05). The end-of-day appetite ratings confirmed these findings.
Conclusions:
Modest amounts of a low-energy foam can reduce appetite measures during a 1-day reduced-energy meal plan.</description><subject>692/700/2814</subject><subject>692/700/2817</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Appetite</subject><subject>Appetite - physiology</subject><subject>Appetite loss</subject><subject>Appetite Regulation</subject><subject>Area Under Curve</subject><subject>Beverages</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diet, Reducing - methods</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy Intake</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foams</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Health Promotion and Disease Prevention</subject><subject>Healthy Volunteers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hunger</subject><subject>Hunger - physiology</subject><subject>Ingestion</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Low-calorie diet</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meals</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Metabolic Diseases</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>original-article</subject><subject>Postprandial Period</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Ratings & rankings</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Satiety Response - physiology</subject><subject>Snack foods</subject><subject>Weight control</subject><issn>0307-0565</issn><issn>1476-5497</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFrHCEUxqU0NNu0t56LUMips33qqDPHEJq2EMglPYurz91ZZsapzlD2v6_LJiGBUARF-X3fe8-PkE8M1gxE863bxzUHVq-ZZG_IitVaVbJu9VuyAgG6AqnkOXmf8x4ApAT-jpxzCQ0TSqyIvd8hxRDQzTQGamkf_1Y4YtoeaIjRl80ONI7UThPO3Yx0QJuXhJn6JXXjtkhY5e2BJvSLQ_8oLlhPp96OH8hZsH3Gjw_nBfl98_3--md1e_fj1_XVbeWU1HPFG9xwBO1a7wFr0KxuWiGUQ1aDdHWogYm23ZR7K0Bo5rX1jQbhNg1vhRQX5MvJd0rxz4J5Nvu4pLGUNFwIpriS9X8ppiTXSkLxfKK2tkfTjSHOybqhy85clT7a0p08UutXqLI8Dp2LI4auvL8QXD4T7MoPzbsc-2Xu4phfgl9PoEsx54TBTKkbbDoYBuaYuimpm2PqpqRe8M8PQy2bAf0T_BhzAaoTkKdjZpieTf2a4T911rFD</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>Peters, H P F</creator><creator>Koppenol, W P</creator><creator>Schuring, E A H</creator><creator>Abrahamse, S L</creator><creator>Mela, D J</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>The effect of a low-energy food foam on appetite measures during a 1-day reduced-energy meal plan</title><author>Peters, H P F ; Koppenol, W P ; Schuring, E A H ; Abrahamse, S L ; Mela, D J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c657t-28eb2e07c9dd0e4071489336ce1405c4f401399bce1930371d7ad8703cb829353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>692/700/2814</topic><topic>692/700/2817</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Appetite</topic><topic>Appetite - physiology</topic><topic>Appetite loss</topic><topic>Appetite Regulation</topic><topic>Area Under Curve</topic><topic>Beverages</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diet, Reducing - methods</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy Intake</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foams</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Health Promotion and Disease Prevention</topic><topic>Healthy Volunteers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hunger</topic><topic>Hunger - physiology</topic><topic>Ingestion</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Low-calorie diet</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meals</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Metabolic Diseases</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>original-article</topic><topic>Postprandial Period</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Ratings & rankings</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Satiety Response - physiology</topic><topic>Snack foods</topic><topic>Weight control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peters, H P F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koppenol, W P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuring, E A H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrahamse, S L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mela, D J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International Journal of Obesity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peters, H P F</au><au>Koppenol, W P</au><au>Schuring, E A H</au><au>Abrahamse, S L</au><au>Mela, D J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of a low-energy food foam on appetite measures during a 1-day reduced-energy meal plan</atitle><jtitle>International Journal of Obesity</jtitle><stitle>Int J Obes</stitle><addtitle>Int J Obes (Lond)</addtitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>361</spage><epage>367</epage><pages>361-367</pages><issn>0307-0565</issn><eissn>1476-5497</eissn><abstract>Background/Objectives:
We have previously shown that 500 ml of a foamed drink (‘foam’) significantly improved appetite versus a non-foamed control. The objectives of this research were to assess the effect of smaller volumes of foams on appetite, and the potential benefits of foam ingestion and its timing on appetite measures in a reduced-energy context.
Subjects/Methods:
Two randomized, parallel design studies (pre- and main study) were conducted using healthy adult subjects. Pre-study: 133 subjects (age 18–50 years, body mass index (BMI) 20–32 kg m
−2
) each consumed either 10, 25, 50, 100, 150 or 250 ml foamed meal replacer (~0.2 kcal ml
−1
), 150 min after a fixed breakfast. Main study: four groups of subjects (
n
=134; age 18–60 years, BMI 22.5–35.0 kg m
−2
) consumed 200 ml/22 kcal foam (based on pre-study results) immediately after main meals (M), after snacks (S), in-between snacks and main meals (I) or not at all (control, C) within 1 day of a reduced-energy meal plan consisting of three main meals and three snacks. Measurements included self-reported appetite (six scales, reported as area under the curve (AUC)) and (main study only) end-of-day appetite questionnaire.
Results:
Pre-study: the strongest effect on appetite was produced by 250 ml (consistent across scales), whereas 150 ml showed more pronounced effects than 100 and 50 ml in most scales. Volumes 10 and 25 ml had no effects on any scale. Main study: 200 ml foam reduced appetite AUC substantially in all treatments, particularly M (for example, hunger AUC reduced by 35% (
P
<0.001), 28% (
P
<0.05) and 20% (P=0.11) for M, S and I, respectively versus C). A strong reduction in ‘appetite for a snack’ was seen for all timings (all
P
<0.05). The end-of-day appetite ratings confirmed these findings.
Conclusions:
Modest amounts of a low-energy foam can reduce appetite measures during a 1-day reduced-energy meal plan.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>25081363</pmid><doi>10.1038/ijo.2014.151</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0307-0565 |
| ispartof | International Journal of Obesity, 2015-02, Vol.39 (2), p.361-367 |
| issn | 0307-0565 1476-5497 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2331626545 |
| source | MEDLINE; Nature Journals Online; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | 692/700/2814 692/700/2817 Adult Appetite Appetite - physiology Appetite loss Appetite Regulation Area Under Curve Beverages Body mass index Body size Diet Diet, Reducing - methods Energy Energy Intake Epidemiology Feeding Behavior Female Foams Food Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Healthy Volunteers Humans Hunger Hunger - physiology Ingestion Internal Medicine Low-calorie diet Male Meals Medical research Medicine Medicine & Public Health Medicine, Experimental Metabolic Diseases Middle Aged original-article Postprandial Period Public Health Questionnaires R&D Ratings & rankings Research & development Satiety Response - physiology Snack foods Weight control |
| title | The effect of a low-energy food foam on appetite measures during a 1-day reduced-energy meal plan |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T17%3A42%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20a%20low-energy%20food%20foam%20on%20appetite%20measures%20during%20a%201-day%20reduced-energy%20meal%20plan&rft.jtitle=International%20Journal%20of%20Obesity&rft.au=Peters,%20H%20P%20F&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=361&rft.epage=367&rft.pages=361-367&rft.issn=0307-0565&rft.eissn=1476-5497&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/ijo.2014.151&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA401907150%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1652765070&rft_id=info:pmid/25081363&rft_galeid=A401907150&rfr_iscdi=true |