Collaboration Patterns as a Function of Research Experience Among Mixed Researchers: A Mixed Methods Bibliometric Study

Onwuegbuzie et al. (2018) documented that the degree of collaboration is higher for mixed researchers than for qualitative and quantitative researchers. The present investigation examined the (a) link between the research experience of lead authors and their propensity to collaborate (Quantitative P...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Qualitative report 2019-12, Vol.24 (12), p.2954-2979
Hauptverfasser: Wachsmann, Melanie S, Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J, Hoisington, Susan, Gonzales, Vanessa, Wilcox, Rachael, Valle, Rachel, Aleisa, Majed
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2979
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2954
container_title Qualitative report
container_volume 24
creator Wachsmann, Melanie S
Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J
Hoisington, Susan
Gonzales, Vanessa
Wilcox, Rachael
Valle, Rachel
Aleisa, Majed
description Onwuegbuzie et al. (2018) documented that the degree of collaboration is higher for mixed researchers than for qualitative and quantitative researchers. The present investigation examined the (a) link between the research experience of lead authors and their propensity to collaborate (Quantitative Phase), and (b) role of research experience in collaborative mixed research studies (Qualitative Phase). Analyses of articles published in the Journal of Mixed Methods Research from 2007 (its inception) to the third issue in 2018 (time of data collection) revealed that the average research experience of lead authors decreased from 20.29 in 2007 to 14.24 in 2017 (last complete year), representing a significant reduction of 29.8%. No statistically significant relationship emerged between degree of collaboration and research experience. The qualitative phase yielded 3 themes and 9 subthemes that identified several differences and similarities between the desire for collaboration and research experience. In particular, for the least-experienced mixed methods researchers, collaboration might be associated with negative emotions (e.g., frustration, stress, anxiety) and this coupled with the lack of perceived weaknesses reported by the most-experienced sub-participants, suggest that years of experience have an impact on their affective state during the conduct of collaborative mixed methods research studies. Implications of these findings are discussed. Keywords: Mixed Methods Bibliometrics, Bibliometrics, Collaboration, Mixed Methods, Mixed Research
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2331238792</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2331238792</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-a1278ab099b1c8b26df6e435b8d14dc827c8653de3753f28e32d5a79edbd4b453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kG1LwzAcxIMoWKffIeDrQpM0Teq7WjYdbCg-vB55-NdldE1NUpzf3qFDODj4HdzBnaGMkqrImSD8HGWk4DQvSCku0VWMu6KgjFGRoa_W973SPqjk_ICfVUoQhojVUXgxDeYX-w6_QAQVzBbPDyMEB4MB3Oz98IHX7gD2P4cQ73BzgmtIW28jvne6d34PKTiDX9Nkv6_RRaf6CDcnn6H3xfytfcxXTw_LtlnlI5Es5YpQIZUu6loTIzWtbFdBybiWlpTWSCqMrDizwARnHZXAqOVK1GC1LXXJ2Qzd_vWOwX9OENNm56cwHCc3xwcIZVLUlP0Ak59aHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2331238792</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Collaboration Patterns as a Function of Research Experience Among Mixed Researchers: A Mixed Methods Bibliometric Study</title><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Wachsmann, Melanie S ; Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J ; Hoisington, Susan ; Gonzales, Vanessa ; Wilcox, Rachael ; Valle, Rachel ; Aleisa, Majed</creator><creatorcontrib>Wachsmann, Melanie S ; Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J ; Hoisington, Susan ; Gonzales, Vanessa ; Wilcox, Rachael ; Valle, Rachel ; Aleisa, Majed</creatorcontrib><description>Onwuegbuzie et al. (2018) documented that the degree of collaboration is higher for mixed researchers than for qualitative and quantitative researchers. The present investigation examined the (a) link between the research experience of lead authors and their propensity to collaborate (Quantitative Phase), and (b) role of research experience in collaborative mixed research studies (Qualitative Phase). Analyses of articles published in the Journal of Mixed Methods Research from 2007 (its inception) to the third issue in 2018 (time of data collection) revealed that the average research experience of lead authors decreased from 20.29 in 2007 to 14.24 in 2017 (last complete year), representing a significant reduction of 29.8%. No statistically significant relationship emerged between degree of collaboration and research experience. The qualitative phase yielded 3 themes and 9 subthemes that identified several differences and similarities between the desire for collaboration and research experience. In particular, for the least-experienced mixed methods researchers, collaboration might be associated with negative emotions (e.g., frustration, stress, anxiety) and this coupled with the lack of perceived weaknesses reported by the most-experienced sub-participants, suggest that years of experience have an impact on their affective state during the conduct of collaborative mixed methods research studies. Implications of these findings are discussed. Keywords: Mixed Methods Bibliometrics, Bibliometrics, Collaboration, Mixed Methods, Mixed Research</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-0147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2160-3715</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Fort Lauderdale: The Qualitative Report</publisher><subject>Bibliometrics ; Collaboration ; Data Analysis ; Data collection ; Education ; Literacy Education ; Mathematics Education ; Methods Research ; Mixed methods research ; Qualitative research ; Quantitative analysis ; Research methodology ; Researchers ; Sociology ; Studies ; Teams ; Validity ; Workloads</subject><ispartof>Qualitative report, 2019-12, Vol.24 (12), p.2954-2979</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27344,33774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wachsmann, Melanie S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoisington, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzales, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilcox, Rachael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valle, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aleisa, Majed</creatorcontrib><title>Collaboration Patterns as a Function of Research Experience Among Mixed Researchers: A Mixed Methods Bibliometric Study</title><title>Qualitative report</title><description>Onwuegbuzie et al. (2018) documented that the degree of collaboration is higher for mixed researchers than for qualitative and quantitative researchers. The present investigation examined the (a) link between the research experience of lead authors and their propensity to collaborate (Quantitative Phase), and (b) role of research experience in collaborative mixed research studies (Qualitative Phase). Analyses of articles published in the Journal of Mixed Methods Research from 2007 (its inception) to the third issue in 2018 (time of data collection) revealed that the average research experience of lead authors decreased from 20.29 in 2007 to 14.24 in 2017 (last complete year), representing a significant reduction of 29.8%. No statistically significant relationship emerged between degree of collaboration and research experience. The qualitative phase yielded 3 themes and 9 subthemes that identified several differences and similarities between the desire for collaboration and research experience. In particular, for the least-experienced mixed methods researchers, collaboration might be associated with negative emotions (e.g., frustration, stress, anxiety) and this coupled with the lack of perceived weaknesses reported by the most-experienced sub-participants, suggest that years of experience have an impact on their affective state during the conduct of collaborative mixed methods research studies. Implications of these findings are discussed. Keywords: Mixed Methods Bibliometrics, Bibliometrics, Collaboration, Mixed Methods, Mixed Research</description><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Literacy Education</subject><subject>Mathematics Education</subject><subject>Methods Research</subject><subject>Mixed methods research</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Workloads</subject><issn>1052-0147</issn><issn>2160-3715</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kG1LwzAcxIMoWKffIeDrQpM0Teq7WjYdbCg-vB55-NdldE1NUpzf3qFDODj4HdzBnaGMkqrImSD8HGWk4DQvSCku0VWMu6KgjFGRoa_W973SPqjk_ICfVUoQhojVUXgxDeYX-w6_QAQVzBbPDyMEB4MB3Oz98IHX7gD2P4cQ73BzgmtIW28jvne6d34PKTiDX9Nkv6_RRaf6CDcnn6H3xfytfcxXTw_LtlnlI5Es5YpQIZUu6loTIzWtbFdBybiWlpTWSCqMrDizwARnHZXAqOVK1GC1LXXJ2Qzd_vWOwX9OENNm56cwHCc3xwcIZVLUlP0Ak59aHw</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Wachsmann, Melanie S</creator><creator>Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J</creator><creator>Hoisington, Susan</creator><creator>Gonzales, Vanessa</creator><creator>Wilcox, Rachael</creator><creator>Valle, Rachel</creator><creator>Aleisa, Majed</creator><general>The Qualitative Report</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Collaboration Patterns as a Function of Research Experience Among Mixed Researchers: A Mixed Methods Bibliometric Study</title><author>Wachsmann, Melanie S ; Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J ; Hoisington, Susan ; Gonzales, Vanessa ; Wilcox, Rachael ; Valle, Rachel ; Aleisa, Majed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-a1278ab099b1c8b26df6e435b8d14dc827c8653de3753f28e32d5a79edbd4b453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Literacy Education</topic><topic>Mathematics Education</topic><topic>Methods Research</topic><topic>Mixed methods research</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Workloads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wachsmann, Melanie S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoisington, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzales, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilcox, Rachael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valle, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aleisa, Majed</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Qualitative report</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wachsmann, Melanie S</au><au>Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J</au><au>Hoisington, Susan</au><au>Gonzales, Vanessa</au><au>Wilcox, Rachael</au><au>Valle, Rachel</au><au>Aleisa, Majed</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Collaboration Patterns as a Function of Research Experience Among Mixed Researchers: A Mixed Methods Bibliometric Study</atitle><jtitle>Qualitative report</jtitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2954</spage><epage>2979</epage><pages>2954-2979</pages><issn>1052-0147</issn><eissn>2160-3715</eissn><abstract>Onwuegbuzie et al. (2018) documented that the degree of collaboration is higher for mixed researchers than for qualitative and quantitative researchers. The present investigation examined the (a) link between the research experience of lead authors and their propensity to collaborate (Quantitative Phase), and (b) role of research experience in collaborative mixed research studies (Qualitative Phase). Analyses of articles published in the Journal of Mixed Methods Research from 2007 (its inception) to the third issue in 2018 (time of data collection) revealed that the average research experience of lead authors decreased from 20.29 in 2007 to 14.24 in 2017 (last complete year), representing a significant reduction of 29.8%. No statistically significant relationship emerged between degree of collaboration and research experience. The qualitative phase yielded 3 themes and 9 subthemes that identified several differences and similarities between the desire for collaboration and research experience. In particular, for the least-experienced mixed methods researchers, collaboration might be associated with negative emotions (e.g., frustration, stress, anxiety) and this coupled with the lack of perceived weaknesses reported by the most-experienced sub-participants, suggest that years of experience have an impact on their affective state during the conduct of collaborative mixed methods research studies. Implications of these findings are discussed. Keywords: Mixed Methods Bibliometrics, Bibliometrics, Collaboration, Mixed Methods, Mixed Research</abstract><cop>Fort Lauderdale</cop><pub>The Qualitative Report</pub><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1052-0147
ispartof Qualitative report, 2019-12, Vol.24 (12), p.2954-2979
issn 1052-0147
2160-3715
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2331238792
source Directory of Open Access Journals; Sociological Abstracts; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Bibliometrics
Collaboration
Data Analysis
Data collection
Education
Literacy Education
Mathematics Education
Methods Research
Mixed methods research
Qualitative research
Quantitative analysis
Research methodology
Researchers
Sociology
Studies
Teams
Validity
Workloads
title Collaboration Patterns as a Function of Research Experience Among Mixed Researchers: A Mixed Methods Bibliometric Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T17%3A20%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Collaboration%20Patterns%20as%20a%20Function%20of%20Research%20Experience%20Among%20Mixed%20Researchers:%20A%20Mixed%20Methods%20Bibliometric%20Study&rft.jtitle=Qualitative%20report&rft.au=Wachsmann,%20Melanie%20S&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2954&rft.epage=2979&rft.pages=2954-2979&rft.issn=1052-0147&rft.eissn=2160-3715&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2331238792%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2331238792&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true