Collaboration Patterns as a Function of Research Experience Among Mixed Researchers: A Mixed Methods Bibliometric Study
Onwuegbuzie et al. (2018) documented that the degree of collaboration is higher for mixed researchers than for qualitative and quantitative researchers. The present investigation examined the (a) link between the research experience of lead authors and their propensity to collaborate (Quantitative P...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Qualitative report 2019-12, Vol.24 (12), p.2954-2979 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2979 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2954 |
container_title | Qualitative report |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Wachsmann, Melanie S Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J Hoisington, Susan Gonzales, Vanessa Wilcox, Rachael Valle, Rachel Aleisa, Majed |
description | Onwuegbuzie et al. (2018) documented that the degree of collaboration is higher for mixed researchers than for qualitative and quantitative researchers. The present investigation examined the (a) link between the research experience of lead authors and their propensity to collaborate (Quantitative Phase), and (b) role of research experience in collaborative mixed research studies (Qualitative Phase). Analyses of articles published in the Journal of Mixed Methods Research from 2007 (its inception) to the third issue in 2018 (time of data collection) revealed that the average research experience of lead authors decreased from 20.29 in 2007 to 14.24 in 2017 (last complete year), representing a significant reduction of 29.8%. No statistically significant relationship emerged between degree of collaboration and research experience. The qualitative phase yielded 3 themes and 9 subthemes that identified several differences and similarities between the desire for collaboration and research experience. In particular, for the least-experienced mixed methods researchers, collaboration might be associated with negative emotions (e.g., frustration, stress, anxiety) and this coupled with the lack of perceived weaknesses reported by the most-experienced sub-participants, suggest that years of experience have an impact on their affective state during the conduct of collaborative mixed methods research studies. Implications of these findings are discussed. Keywords: Mixed Methods Bibliometrics, Bibliometrics, Collaboration, Mixed Methods, Mixed Research |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2331238792</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2331238792</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-a1278ab099b1c8b26df6e435b8d14dc827c8653de3753f28e32d5a79edbd4b453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kG1LwzAcxIMoWKffIeDrQpM0Teq7WjYdbCg-vB55-NdldE1NUpzf3qFDODj4HdzBnaGMkqrImSD8HGWk4DQvSCku0VWMu6KgjFGRoa_W973SPqjk_ICfVUoQhojVUXgxDeYX-w6_QAQVzBbPDyMEB4MB3Oz98IHX7gD2P4cQ73BzgmtIW28jvne6d34PKTiDX9Nkv6_RRaf6CDcnn6H3xfytfcxXTw_LtlnlI5Es5YpQIZUu6loTIzWtbFdBybiWlpTWSCqMrDizwARnHZXAqOVK1GC1LXXJ2Qzd_vWOwX9OENNm56cwHCc3xwcIZVLUlP0Ak59aHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2331238792</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Collaboration Patterns as a Function of Research Experience Among Mixed Researchers: A Mixed Methods Bibliometric Study</title><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Wachsmann, Melanie S ; Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J ; Hoisington, Susan ; Gonzales, Vanessa ; Wilcox, Rachael ; Valle, Rachel ; Aleisa, Majed</creator><creatorcontrib>Wachsmann, Melanie S ; Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J ; Hoisington, Susan ; Gonzales, Vanessa ; Wilcox, Rachael ; Valle, Rachel ; Aleisa, Majed</creatorcontrib><description>Onwuegbuzie et al. (2018) documented that the degree of collaboration is higher for mixed researchers than for qualitative and quantitative researchers. The present investigation examined the (a) link between the research experience of lead authors and their propensity to collaborate (Quantitative Phase), and (b) role of research experience in collaborative mixed research studies (Qualitative Phase). Analyses of articles published in the Journal of Mixed Methods Research from 2007 (its inception) to the third issue in 2018 (time of data collection) revealed that the average research experience of lead authors decreased from 20.29 in 2007 to 14.24 in 2017 (last complete year), representing a significant reduction of 29.8%. No statistically significant relationship emerged between degree of collaboration and research experience. The qualitative phase yielded 3 themes and 9 subthemes that identified several differences and similarities between the desire for collaboration and research experience. In particular, for the least-experienced mixed methods researchers, collaboration might be associated with negative emotions (e.g., frustration, stress, anxiety) and this coupled with the lack of perceived weaknesses reported by the most-experienced sub-participants, suggest that years of experience have an impact on their affective state during the conduct of collaborative mixed methods research studies. Implications of these findings are discussed. Keywords: Mixed Methods Bibliometrics, Bibliometrics, Collaboration, Mixed Methods, Mixed Research</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-0147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2160-3715</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Fort Lauderdale: The Qualitative Report</publisher><subject>Bibliometrics ; Collaboration ; Data Analysis ; Data collection ; Education ; Literacy Education ; Mathematics Education ; Methods Research ; Mixed methods research ; Qualitative research ; Quantitative analysis ; Research methodology ; Researchers ; Sociology ; Studies ; Teams ; Validity ; Workloads</subject><ispartof>Qualitative report, 2019-12, Vol.24 (12), p.2954-2979</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27344,33774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wachsmann, Melanie S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoisington, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzales, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilcox, Rachael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valle, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aleisa, Majed</creatorcontrib><title>Collaboration Patterns as a Function of Research Experience Among Mixed Researchers: A Mixed Methods Bibliometric Study</title><title>Qualitative report</title><description>Onwuegbuzie et al. (2018) documented that the degree of collaboration is higher for mixed researchers than for qualitative and quantitative researchers. The present investigation examined the (a) link between the research experience of lead authors and their propensity to collaborate (Quantitative Phase), and (b) role of research experience in collaborative mixed research studies (Qualitative Phase). Analyses of articles published in the Journal of Mixed Methods Research from 2007 (its inception) to the third issue in 2018 (time of data collection) revealed that the average research experience of lead authors decreased from 20.29 in 2007 to 14.24 in 2017 (last complete year), representing a significant reduction of 29.8%. No statistically significant relationship emerged between degree of collaboration and research experience. The qualitative phase yielded 3 themes and 9 subthemes that identified several differences and similarities between the desire for collaboration and research experience. In particular, for the least-experienced mixed methods researchers, collaboration might be associated with negative emotions (e.g., frustration, stress, anxiety) and this coupled with the lack of perceived weaknesses reported by the most-experienced sub-participants, suggest that years of experience have an impact on their affective state during the conduct of collaborative mixed methods research studies. Implications of these findings are discussed. Keywords: Mixed Methods Bibliometrics, Bibliometrics, Collaboration, Mixed Methods, Mixed Research</description><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Literacy Education</subject><subject>Mathematics Education</subject><subject>Methods Research</subject><subject>Mixed methods research</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Workloads</subject><issn>1052-0147</issn><issn>2160-3715</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kG1LwzAcxIMoWKffIeDrQpM0Teq7WjYdbCg-vB55-NdldE1NUpzf3qFDODj4HdzBnaGMkqrImSD8HGWk4DQvSCku0VWMu6KgjFGRoa_W973SPqjk_ICfVUoQhojVUXgxDeYX-w6_QAQVzBbPDyMEB4MB3Oz98IHX7gD2P4cQ73BzgmtIW28jvne6d34PKTiDX9Nkv6_RRaf6CDcnn6H3xfytfcxXTw_LtlnlI5Es5YpQIZUu6loTIzWtbFdBybiWlpTWSCqMrDizwARnHZXAqOVK1GC1LXXJ2Qzd_vWOwX9OENNm56cwHCc3xwcIZVLUlP0Ak59aHw</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Wachsmann, Melanie S</creator><creator>Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J</creator><creator>Hoisington, Susan</creator><creator>Gonzales, Vanessa</creator><creator>Wilcox, Rachael</creator><creator>Valle, Rachel</creator><creator>Aleisa, Majed</creator><general>The Qualitative Report</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Collaboration Patterns as a Function of Research Experience Among Mixed Researchers: A Mixed Methods Bibliometric Study</title><author>Wachsmann, Melanie S ; Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J ; Hoisington, Susan ; Gonzales, Vanessa ; Wilcox, Rachael ; Valle, Rachel ; Aleisa, Majed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-a1278ab099b1c8b26df6e435b8d14dc827c8653de3753f28e32d5a79edbd4b453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Literacy Education</topic><topic>Mathematics Education</topic><topic>Methods Research</topic><topic>Mixed methods research</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Workloads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wachsmann, Melanie S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoisington, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzales, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilcox, Rachael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valle, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aleisa, Majed</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Qualitative report</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wachsmann, Melanie S</au><au>Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J</au><au>Hoisington, Susan</au><au>Gonzales, Vanessa</au><au>Wilcox, Rachael</au><au>Valle, Rachel</au><au>Aleisa, Majed</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Collaboration Patterns as a Function of Research Experience Among Mixed Researchers: A Mixed Methods Bibliometric Study</atitle><jtitle>Qualitative report</jtitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2954</spage><epage>2979</epage><pages>2954-2979</pages><issn>1052-0147</issn><eissn>2160-3715</eissn><abstract>Onwuegbuzie et al. (2018) documented that the degree of collaboration is higher for mixed researchers than for qualitative and quantitative researchers. The present investigation examined the (a) link between the research experience of lead authors and their propensity to collaborate (Quantitative Phase), and (b) role of research experience in collaborative mixed research studies (Qualitative Phase). Analyses of articles published in the Journal of Mixed Methods Research from 2007 (its inception) to the third issue in 2018 (time of data collection) revealed that the average research experience of lead authors decreased from 20.29 in 2007 to 14.24 in 2017 (last complete year), representing a significant reduction of 29.8%. No statistically significant relationship emerged between degree of collaboration and research experience. The qualitative phase yielded 3 themes and 9 subthemes that identified several differences and similarities between the desire for collaboration and research experience. In particular, for the least-experienced mixed methods researchers, collaboration might be associated with negative emotions (e.g., frustration, stress, anxiety) and this coupled with the lack of perceived weaknesses reported by the most-experienced sub-participants, suggest that years of experience have an impact on their affective state during the conduct of collaborative mixed methods research studies. Implications of these findings are discussed. Keywords: Mixed Methods Bibliometrics, Bibliometrics, Collaboration, Mixed Methods, Mixed Research</abstract><cop>Fort Lauderdale</cop><pub>The Qualitative Report</pub><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1052-0147 |
ispartof | Qualitative report, 2019-12, Vol.24 (12), p.2954-2979 |
issn | 1052-0147 2160-3715 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2331238792 |
source | Directory of Open Access Journals; Sociological Abstracts; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Bibliometrics Collaboration Data Analysis Data collection Education Literacy Education Mathematics Education Methods Research Mixed methods research Qualitative research Quantitative analysis Research methodology Researchers Sociology Studies Teams Validity Workloads |
title | Collaboration Patterns as a Function of Research Experience Among Mixed Researchers: A Mixed Methods Bibliometric Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T17%3A20%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Collaboration%20Patterns%20as%20a%20Function%20of%20Research%20Experience%20Among%20Mixed%20Researchers:%20A%20Mixed%20Methods%20Bibliometric%20Study&rft.jtitle=Qualitative%20report&rft.au=Wachsmann,%20Melanie%20S&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2954&rft.epage=2979&rft.pages=2954-2979&rft.issn=1052-0147&rft.eissn=2160-3715&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2331238792%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2331238792&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |