Serviceability limit state design of large concrete structures: Impact on reinforcement amounts and consequences of design code ambiguity
•SLS control of concrete can result in unexpected additional reinforcement amounts.•Results from SLS checks of concrete shells vary with load complexity.•The variation is due to the amount of choices pertinent to the calculation methods.•A parametric study of additional reinforcement from SLS checks...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Engineering structures 2019-12, Vol.201, p.109816, Article 109816 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 109816 |
container_title | Engineering structures |
container_volume | 201 |
creator | Basteskår, Mikael Engen, Morten Kanstad, Terje Johansen, Håvard Fosså, Kjell Tore |
description | •SLS control of concrete can result in unexpected additional reinforcement amounts.•Results from SLS checks of concrete shells vary with load complexity.•The variation is due to the amount of choices pertinent to the calculation methods.•A parametric study of additional reinforcement from SLS checks is proposed.•The SLS checks in Eurocode 2 can give several hundred percent increased demand.
Reinforced concrete is typically designed taking into account the critical load combination in the ultimate limit state (ULS), while further checked in the serviceability limit state (SLS). Experience shows that the SLS control can result in unexpected additional reinforcement amounts. This paper investigates this topic through (i) a case study and (ii) a parametric study. In the case study, different methods are used to check a cross section subject to membrane and plate forces. We found significant variation in the results using different methods, due to the amount of choices pertinent to the methods. The variation in results was found to increase with increasing load complexity. The parametric study shows the amount of additional reinforcement necessary due to crack width requirements compared to ULS design. The crack width requirements in Eurocode 2 is shown to require a relative increase of several hundred percent in reinforcement compared to ULS design, and an absolute increase, as a percentage of the effective concrete area, of 9%. We conclude that there are large discrepancies in subjective understanding of the crack width limitation requirements as well as in interpretation of the code provisions and calculation methods. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109816 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2330765162</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0141029619326008</els_id><sourcerecordid>2330765162</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-4f0e47da05d580e96e301b88ed3fca86c423e1346f273f4593796b3cfc1b58223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMtKxDAUDaLg-PgGA6475tGmqTsRXyC4UNchTW-GDNNkTFLBT_CvTam4dXXh3vO45yB0QcmaEiqutmvwm5TjZPKaEdqVbSepOEArKltetZzxQ7QitKYVYZ04RicpbQkhTEqyQt-vED-dAd27nctfeOdGl3HKOgMeILmNx8HinY4bwCZ4E6EcFrcpQrrGT-Nem4yDxxGctyEaGMFnrMcw-Zyw9sNMTPAxgTeQZrlfYRMGKLjebaZifYaOrN4lOP-dp-j9_u7t9rF6fnl4ur15rgyvea5qS6BuB02aoZEEOgGc0F5KGLg1WgpTMw6U18Kyltu66XjbiZ4ba2jfSMb4KbpcdPcxlJ9SVtswRV8sFeOctKKhYka1C8rEkFIEq_bRjTp-KUrU3Lvaqr_e1dy7WnovzJuFCSXEp4OoknFz9MFFKNghuH81fgBfM5OO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2330765162</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Serviceability limit state design of large concrete structures: Impact on reinforcement amounts and consequences of design code ambiguity</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Basteskår, Mikael ; Engen, Morten ; Kanstad, Terje ; Johansen, Håvard ; Fosså, Kjell Tore</creator><creatorcontrib>Basteskår, Mikael ; Engen, Morten ; Kanstad, Terje ; Johansen, Håvard ; Fosså, Kjell Tore</creatorcontrib><description>•SLS control of concrete can result in unexpected additional reinforcement amounts.•Results from SLS checks of concrete shells vary with load complexity.•The variation is due to the amount of choices pertinent to the calculation methods.•A parametric study of additional reinforcement from SLS checks is proposed.•The SLS checks in Eurocode 2 can give several hundred percent increased demand.
Reinforced concrete is typically designed taking into account the critical load combination in the ultimate limit state (ULS), while further checked in the serviceability limit state (SLS). Experience shows that the SLS control can result in unexpected additional reinforcement amounts. This paper investigates this topic through (i) a case study and (ii) a parametric study. In the case study, different methods are used to check a cross section subject to membrane and plate forces. We found significant variation in the results using different methods, due to the amount of choices pertinent to the methods. The variation in results was found to increase with increasing load complexity. The parametric study shows the amount of additional reinforcement necessary due to crack width requirements compared to ULS design. The crack width requirements in Eurocode 2 is shown to require a relative increase of several hundred percent in reinforcement compared to ULS design, and an absolute increase, as a percentage of the effective concrete area, of 9%. We conclude that there are large discrepancies in subjective understanding of the crack width limitation requirements as well as in interpretation of the code provisions and calculation methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-0296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109816</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Building codes ; Calculation methods ; Case studies ; Concrete ; Concrete structures ; Cracks ; Design ; Design codes ; Limit state design ; Plates (structural members) ; Reinforced concrete ; Reinforcement ; Serviceability limit state ; Shell structures</subject><ispartof>Engineering structures, 2019-12, Vol.201, p.109816, Article 109816</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Dec 15, 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-4f0e47da05d580e96e301b88ed3fca86c423e1346f273f4593796b3cfc1b58223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-4f0e47da05d580e96e301b88ed3fca86c423e1346f273f4593796b3cfc1b58223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029619326008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Basteskår, Mikael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engen, Morten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanstad, Terje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansen, Håvard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fosså, Kjell Tore</creatorcontrib><title>Serviceability limit state design of large concrete structures: Impact on reinforcement amounts and consequences of design code ambiguity</title><title>Engineering structures</title><description>•SLS control of concrete can result in unexpected additional reinforcement amounts.•Results from SLS checks of concrete shells vary with load complexity.•The variation is due to the amount of choices pertinent to the calculation methods.•A parametric study of additional reinforcement from SLS checks is proposed.•The SLS checks in Eurocode 2 can give several hundred percent increased demand.
Reinforced concrete is typically designed taking into account the critical load combination in the ultimate limit state (ULS), while further checked in the serviceability limit state (SLS). Experience shows that the SLS control can result in unexpected additional reinforcement amounts. This paper investigates this topic through (i) a case study and (ii) a parametric study. In the case study, different methods are used to check a cross section subject to membrane and plate forces. We found significant variation in the results using different methods, due to the amount of choices pertinent to the methods. The variation in results was found to increase with increasing load complexity. The parametric study shows the amount of additional reinforcement necessary due to crack width requirements compared to ULS design. The crack width requirements in Eurocode 2 is shown to require a relative increase of several hundred percent in reinforcement compared to ULS design, and an absolute increase, as a percentage of the effective concrete area, of 9%. We conclude that there are large discrepancies in subjective understanding of the crack width limitation requirements as well as in interpretation of the code provisions and calculation methods.</description><subject>Building codes</subject><subject>Calculation methods</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Concrete</subject><subject>Concrete structures</subject><subject>Cracks</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Design codes</subject><subject>Limit state design</subject><subject>Plates (structural members)</subject><subject>Reinforced concrete</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Serviceability limit state</subject><subject>Shell structures</subject><issn>0141-0296</issn><issn>1873-7323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUMtKxDAUDaLg-PgGA6475tGmqTsRXyC4UNchTW-GDNNkTFLBT_CvTam4dXXh3vO45yB0QcmaEiqutmvwm5TjZPKaEdqVbSepOEArKltetZzxQ7QitKYVYZ04RicpbQkhTEqyQt-vED-dAd27nctfeOdGl3HKOgMeILmNx8HinY4bwCZ4E6EcFrcpQrrGT-Nem4yDxxGctyEaGMFnrMcw-Zyw9sNMTPAxgTeQZrlfYRMGKLjebaZifYaOrN4lOP-dp-j9_u7t9rF6fnl4ur15rgyvea5qS6BuB02aoZEEOgGc0F5KGLg1WgpTMw6U18Kyltu66XjbiZ4ba2jfSMb4KbpcdPcxlJ9SVtswRV8sFeOctKKhYka1C8rEkFIEq_bRjTp-KUrU3Lvaqr_e1dy7WnovzJuFCSXEp4OoknFz9MFFKNghuH81fgBfM5OO</recordid><startdate>20191215</startdate><enddate>20191215</enddate><creator>Basteskår, Mikael</creator><creator>Engen, Morten</creator><creator>Kanstad, Terje</creator><creator>Johansen, Håvard</creator><creator>Fosså, Kjell Tore</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191215</creationdate><title>Serviceability limit state design of large concrete structures: Impact on reinforcement amounts and consequences of design code ambiguity</title><author>Basteskår, Mikael ; Engen, Morten ; Kanstad, Terje ; Johansen, Håvard ; Fosså, Kjell Tore</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-4f0e47da05d580e96e301b88ed3fca86c423e1346f273f4593796b3cfc1b58223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Building codes</topic><topic>Calculation methods</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Concrete</topic><topic>Concrete structures</topic><topic>Cracks</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Design codes</topic><topic>Limit state design</topic><topic>Plates (structural members)</topic><topic>Reinforced concrete</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Serviceability limit state</topic><topic>Shell structures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Basteskår, Mikael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engen, Morten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanstad, Terje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansen, Håvard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fosså, Kjell Tore</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Engineering structures</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Basteskår, Mikael</au><au>Engen, Morten</au><au>Kanstad, Terje</au><au>Johansen, Håvard</au><au>Fosså, Kjell Tore</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Serviceability limit state design of large concrete structures: Impact on reinforcement amounts and consequences of design code ambiguity</atitle><jtitle>Engineering structures</jtitle><date>2019-12-15</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>201</volume><spage>109816</spage><pages>109816-</pages><artnum>109816</artnum><issn>0141-0296</issn><eissn>1873-7323</eissn><abstract>•SLS control of concrete can result in unexpected additional reinforcement amounts.•Results from SLS checks of concrete shells vary with load complexity.•The variation is due to the amount of choices pertinent to the calculation methods.•A parametric study of additional reinforcement from SLS checks is proposed.•The SLS checks in Eurocode 2 can give several hundred percent increased demand.
Reinforced concrete is typically designed taking into account the critical load combination in the ultimate limit state (ULS), while further checked in the serviceability limit state (SLS). Experience shows that the SLS control can result in unexpected additional reinforcement amounts. This paper investigates this topic through (i) a case study and (ii) a parametric study. In the case study, different methods are used to check a cross section subject to membrane and plate forces. We found significant variation in the results using different methods, due to the amount of choices pertinent to the methods. The variation in results was found to increase with increasing load complexity. The parametric study shows the amount of additional reinforcement necessary due to crack width requirements compared to ULS design. The crack width requirements in Eurocode 2 is shown to require a relative increase of several hundred percent in reinforcement compared to ULS design, and an absolute increase, as a percentage of the effective concrete area, of 9%. We conclude that there are large discrepancies in subjective understanding of the crack width limitation requirements as well as in interpretation of the code provisions and calculation methods.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109816</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0141-0296 |
ispartof | Engineering structures, 2019-12, Vol.201, p.109816, Article 109816 |
issn | 0141-0296 1873-7323 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2330765162 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Building codes Calculation methods Case studies Concrete Concrete structures Cracks Design Design codes Limit state design Plates (structural members) Reinforced concrete Reinforcement Serviceability limit state Shell structures |
title | Serviceability limit state design of large concrete structures: Impact on reinforcement amounts and consequences of design code ambiguity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T14%3A12%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Serviceability%20limit%20state%20design%20of%20large%20concrete%20structures:%20Impact%20on%20reinforcement%20amounts%20and%20consequences%20of%20design%20code%20ambiguity&rft.jtitle=Engineering%20structures&rft.au=Bastesk%C3%A5r,%20Mikael&rft.date=2019-12-15&rft.volume=201&rft.spage=109816&rft.pages=109816-&rft.artnum=109816&rft.issn=0141-0296&rft.eissn=1873-7323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109816&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2330765162%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2330765162&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0141029619326008&rfr_iscdi=true |