Flexural behavior of three span continuous unbonded post-tensioned members with variable bonded reinforcement

•Available prediction methods underestimate predicted stress increase values in unbonded post-tensioned members at ultimate.•Bonded mild reinforcement has significant effect on the behavior of unbonded post-tensioned members.•The optimized collapse mechanism model provides the most accurate and cons...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Engineering structures 2019-12, Vol.200, p.109704, Article 109704
Hauptverfasser: Six, Philip, Tawadrous, Raed, Syndergaard, Parker, Maguire, Marc
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 109704
container_title Engineering structures
container_volume 200
creator Six, Philip
Tawadrous, Raed
Syndergaard, Parker
Maguire, Marc
description •Available prediction methods underestimate predicted stress increase values in unbonded post-tensioned members at ultimate.•Bonded mild reinforcement has significant effect on the behavior of unbonded post-tensioned members.•The optimized collapse mechanism model provides the most accurate and consistent stress increase prediction values.•Tendon stress increase prediction method has marginal effect on the flexural strength. Several methods have been proposed for calculating unbonded tendon stress increase at nominal bending resistance. Some of these methods are empirical approaches that are based on experimental observations or statistical analyses. However, more recently, some researchers developed methods that are based on collapse mechanisms that consider different parameters such as span-to-depth ratio, material properties, continuity, and inelastic hinge formation. All of these methods relied on simple span test data in model calibration with less consideration for continuous members because there are very few experiments available in the literature. Furthermore, there is a great need for additional experimental data in this area as the largest assembled database in the literature contains only 80 continuous unbonded tendon reinforced members, mostly two-span, driven by the expense and difficulty of such tests. In this study, the research team tested four three-span, 59.5 ft (18.1 m) long specimens with variable prestressing and mild reinforcement ratios. The accuracy of seven different prediction methods was evaluated for predicting stress increase in unbonded post-tensioned members. The comparison between measured and predicted stress increase values showed that all prediction methods conservatively predict tendon stress increase at nominal flexural resistance. The measured-to-predicted tendon stress increase ratio ranged from 1.8 to 3.5, at flexural failure, and measured stress increase ranged from 38.4 to 68.5 ksi (265–472 MPa). An optimized collapse mechanism model and the Japan Prestressed Concrete Engineering Association methods provided the most accurate prediction for tendon stress increase when compared to other prediction methods. Specimens reinforced with bonded mild reinforcement less than the minimum required by ACI 318-14 code showed less ductility than those reinforced with the minimum required reinforcement or more and obtained lower strand stress, indicating the specification is adequate.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109704
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2330586748</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0141029618330116</els_id><sourcerecordid>2330586748</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-e3ea2cbf80c8ff46d5e709759cd3af3abf8d2e774a9188ed6eeb26fadd0afd573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFPAyEQhYnRxFr9DZJ43grLdmGPTWPVpIkXPRMWBkvThQps1X8vpo1XT5OZeW8m70PolpIZJbS9387Av6ccR51nNaFdmXacNGdoQgVnFWc1O0cTQhtakbprL9FVSltCSC0EmaBhtYOvMaod7mGjDi5EHCzOmwiA0155rIPPzo9hTHj0ffAGDN6HlKsMPrngSzvA0ENM-NPlDT6o6FS_A3zSRnDehqhhAJ-v0YVVuwQ3pzpFb6uH1-VTtX55fF4u1pVmDcsVMFC17q0gWljbtGYOvISad9owZZkqG1MD543qqBBgWoC-bq0yhihr5pxN0d3x7j6GjxFSltswRl9eypoxMhctb0RR8aNKx5BSBCv30Q0qfktK5C9buZV_bOUvW3lkW5yLoxNKiIODKJN24DUYF6FoTXD_3vgBUHCLXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2330586748</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Flexural behavior of three span continuous unbonded post-tensioned members with variable bonded reinforcement</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Six, Philip ; Tawadrous, Raed ; Syndergaard, Parker ; Maguire, Marc</creator><creatorcontrib>Six, Philip ; Tawadrous, Raed ; Syndergaard, Parker ; Maguire, Marc</creatorcontrib><description>•Available prediction methods underestimate predicted stress increase values in unbonded post-tensioned members at ultimate.•Bonded mild reinforcement has significant effect on the behavior of unbonded post-tensioned members.•The optimized collapse mechanism model provides the most accurate and consistent stress increase prediction values.•Tendon stress increase prediction method has marginal effect on the flexural strength. Several methods have been proposed for calculating unbonded tendon stress increase at nominal bending resistance. Some of these methods are empirical approaches that are based on experimental observations or statistical analyses. However, more recently, some researchers developed methods that are based on collapse mechanisms that consider different parameters such as span-to-depth ratio, material properties, continuity, and inelastic hinge formation. All of these methods relied on simple span test data in model calibration with less consideration for continuous members because there are very few experiments available in the literature. Furthermore, there is a great need for additional experimental data in this area as the largest assembled database in the literature contains only 80 continuous unbonded tendon reinforced members, mostly two-span, driven by the expense and difficulty of such tests. In this study, the research team tested four three-span, 59.5 ft (18.1 m) long specimens with variable prestressing and mild reinforcement ratios. The accuracy of seven different prediction methods was evaluated for predicting stress increase in unbonded post-tensioned members. The comparison between measured and predicted stress increase values showed that all prediction methods conservatively predict tendon stress increase at nominal flexural resistance. The measured-to-predicted tendon stress increase ratio ranged from 1.8 to 3.5, at flexural failure, and measured stress increase ranged from 38.4 to 68.5 ksi (265–472 MPa). An optimized collapse mechanism model and the Japan Prestressed Concrete Engineering Association methods provided the most accurate prediction for tendon stress increase when compared to other prediction methods. Specimens reinforced with bonded mild reinforcement less than the minimum required by ACI 318-14 code showed less ductility than those reinforced with the minimum required reinforcement or more and obtained lower strand stress, indicating the specification is adequate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-0296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109704</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Calibration ; Collapse ; Ductility ; Empirical analysis ; Material properties ; Model testing ; Post-tensioning ; Predictions ; Prestressed concrete ; Prestressing ; Reinforcement ; Statistical analysis ; Stress ; Unbonded prestressing</subject><ispartof>Engineering structures, 2019-12, Vol.200, p.109704, Article 109704</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Dec 1, 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-e3ea2cbf80c8ff46d5e709759cd3af3abf8d2e774a9188ed6eeb26fadd0afd573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-e3ea2cbf80c8ff46d5e709759cd3af3abf8d2e774a9188ed6eeb26fadd0afd573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109704$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Six, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tawadrous, Raed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syndergaard, Parker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maguire, Marc</creatorcontrib><title>Flexural behavior of three span continuous unbonded post-tensioned members with variable bonded reinforcement</title><title>Engineering structures</title><description>•Available prediction methods underestimate predicted stress increase values in unbonded post-tensioned members at ultimate.•Bonded mild reinforcement has significant effect on the behavior of unbonded post-tensioned members.•The optimized collapse mechanism model provides the most accurate and consistent stress increase prediction values.•Tendon stress increase prediction method has marginal effect on the flexural strength. Several methods have been proposed for calculating unbonded tendon stress increase at nominal bending resistance. Some of these methods are empirical approaches that are based on experimental observations or statistical analyses. However, more recently, some researchers developed methods that are based on collapse mechanisms that consider different parameters such as span-to-depth ratio, material properties, continuity, and inelastic hinge formation. All of these methods relied on simple span test data in model calibration with less consideration for continuous members because there are very few experiments available in the literature. Furthermore, there is a great need for additional experimental data in this area as the largest assembled database in the literature contains only 80 continuous unbonded tendon reinforced members, mostly two-span, driven by the expense and difficulty of such tests. In this study, the research team tested four three-span, 59.5 ft (18.1 m) long specimens with variable prestressing and mild reinforcement ratios. The accuracy of seven different prediction methods was evaluated for predicting stress increase in unbonded post-tensioned members. The comparison between measured and predicted stress increase values showed that all prediction methods conservatively predict tendon stress increase at nominal flexural resistance. The measured-to-predicted tendon stress increase ratio ranged from 1.8 to 3.5, at flexural failure, and measured stress increase ranged from 38.4 to 68.5 ksi (265–472 MPa). An optimized collapse mechanism model and the Japan Prestressed Concrete Engineering Association methods provided the most accurate prediction for tendon stress increase when compared to other prediction methods. Specimens reinforced with bonded mild reinforcement less than the minimum required by ACI 318-14 code showed less ductility than those reinforced with the minimum required reinforcement or more and obtained lower strand stress, indicating the specification is adequate.</description><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Collapse</subject><subject>Ductility</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Material properties</subject><subject>Model testing</subject><subject>Post-tensioning</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Prestressed concrete</subject><subject>Prestressing</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Unbonded prestressing</subject><issn>0141-0296</issn><issn>1873-7323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEFPAyEQhYnRxFr9DZJ43grLdmGPTWPVpIkXPRMWBkvThQps1X8vpo1XT5OZeW8m70PolpIZJbS9387Av6ccR51nNaFdmXacNGdoQgVnFWc1O0cTQhtakbprL9FVSltCSC0EmaBhtYOvMaod7mGjDi5EHCzOmwiA0155rIPPzo9hTHj0ffAGDN6HlKsMPrngSzvA0ENM-NPlDT6o6FS_A3zSRnDehqhhAJ-v0YVVuwQ3pzpFb6uH1-VTtX55fF4u1pVmDcsVMFC17q0gWljbtGYOvISad9owZZkqG1MD543qqBBgWoC-bq0yhihr5pxN0d3x7j6GjxFSltswRl9eypoxMhctb0RR8aNKx5BSBCv30Q0qfktK5C9buZV_bOUvW3lkW5yLoxNKiIODKJN24DUYF6FoTXD_3vgBUHCLXA</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Six, Philip</creator><creator>Tawadrous, Raed</creator><creator>Syndergaard, Parker</creator><creator>Maguire, Marc</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Flexural behavior of three span continuous unbonded post-tensioned members with variable bonded reinforcement</title><author>Six, Philip ; Tawadrous, Raed ; Syndergaard, Parker ; Maguire, Marc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-e3ea2cbf80c8ff46d5e709759cd3af3abf8d2e774a9188ed6eeb26fadd0afd573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Collapse</topic><topic>Ductility</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Material properties</topic><topic>Model testing</topic><topic>Post-tensioning</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Prestressed concrete</topic><topic>Prestressing</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Unbonded prestressing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Six, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tawadrous, Raed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syndergaard, Parker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maguire, Marc</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Engineering structures</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Six, Philip</au><au>Tawadrous, Raed</au><au>Syndergaard, Parker</au><au>Maguire, Marc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Flexural behavior of three span continuous unbonded post-tensioned members with variable bonded reinforcement</atitle><jtitle>Engineering structures</jtitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>200</volume><spage>109704</spage><pages>109704-</pages><artnum>109704</artnum><issn>0141-0296</issn><eissn>1873-7323</eissn><abstract>•Available prediction methods underestimate predicted stress increase values in unbonded post-tensioned members at ultimate.•Bonded mild reinforcement has significant effect on the behavior of unbonded post-tensioned members.•The optimized collapse mechanism model provides the most accurate and consistent stress increase prediction values.•Tendon stress increase prediction method has marginal effect on the flexural strength. Several methods have been proposed for calculating unbonded tendon stress increase at nominal bending resistance. Some of these methods are empirical approaches that are based on experimental observations or statistical analyses. However, more recently, some researchers developed methods that are based on collapse mechanisms that consider different parameters such as span-to-depth ratio, material properties, continuity, and inelastic hinge formation. All of these methods relied on simple span test data in model calibration with less consideration for continuous members because there are very few experiments available in the literature. Furthermore, there is a great need for additional experimental data in this area as the largest assembled database in the literature contains only 80 continuous unbonded tendon reinforced members, mostly two-span, driven by the expense and difficulty of such tests. In this study, the research team tested four three-span, 59.5 ft (18.1 m) long specimens with variable prestressing and mild reinforcement ratios. The accuracy of seven different prediction methods was evaluated for predicting stress increase in unbonded post-tensioned members. The comparison between measured and predicted stress increase values showed that all prediction methods conservatively predict tendon stress increase at nominal flexural resistance. The measured-to-predicted tendon stress increase ratio ranged from 1.8 to 3.5, at flexural failure, and measured stress increase ranged from 38.4 to 68.5 ksi (265–472 MPa). An optimized collapse mechanism model and the Japan Prestressed Concrete Engineering Association methods provided the most accurate prediction for tendon stress increase when compared to other prediction methods. Specimens reinforced with bonded mild reinforcement less than the minimum required by ACI 318-14 code showed less ductility than those reinforced with the minimum required reinforcement or more and obtained lower strand stress, indicating the specification is adequate.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109704</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0141-0296
ispartof Engineering structures, 2019-12, Vol.200, p.109704, Article 109704
issn 0141-0296
1873-7323
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2330586748
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings
subjects Calibration
Collapse
Ductility
Empirical analysis
Material properties
Model testing
Post-tensioning
Predictions
Prestressed concrete
Prestressing
Reinforcement
Statistical analysis
Stress
Unbonded prestressing
title Flexural behavior of three span continuous unbonded post-tensioned members with variable bonded reinforcement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T13%3A52%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Flexural%20behavior%20of%20three%20span%20continuous%20unbonded%20post-tensioned%20members%20with%20variable%20bonded%20reinforcement&rft.jtitle=Engineering%20structures&rft.au=Six,%20Philip&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=200&rft.spage=109704&rft.pages=109704-&rft.artnum=109704&rft.issn=0141-0296&rft.eissn=1873-7323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109704&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2330586748%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2330586748&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0141029618330116&rfr_iscdi=true