Income, Labor Supply, and Urban Residence
The framework for urban spatial models as developed in the past 20 years contains 2 primary features-access and bid rent. In a recent article, William Wheaton has seriously damaged this framework by concluding that the long-run spatial equilibrium theory derived from bid rent ''contributes...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American economic review 1980-09, Vol.70 (4), p.805-811 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 811 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 805 |
container_title | The American economic review |
container_volume | 70 |
creator | Hekman, John S. |
description | The framework for urban spatial models as developed in the past 20 years contains 2 primary features-access and bid rent. In a recent article, William Wheaton has seriously damaged this framework by concluding that the long-run spatial equilibrium theory derived from bid rent ''contributes little to the explanation of US location-income patterns''. He finds that the theory developed by William Alonso, Richard Muth, and others produces a very weak tendency for middle- and upper-class income families to live at a greater distance than poor families from the central business area. It is argued that the Alonso-Muth theory is an important tool in understanding urban structure if one previously ignored factor is recognized-that the labor force participation of married women varies dramatically and inversely with the income of their husbands. Because middle- and lower-income households have more of their members in the labor force, these groups are brought closer to the central business district. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_233036665</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1803582</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1803582</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j192t-c01ce4273afefcf5f857b009f2887156f3e28c6be9f6bcc0aafbf8d91e03e2d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1jUFLxDAUhIMoWFf_gYeiJ2ELL0mbvBxl0XWhIKh7Lkn6Alt225p0D_vvraxXLzMM8zFzwTJuyrLQBvklywBAFChQXLOblDr4zVxn7GnT--FAy7y2boj553Ec96dlbvs230Zn-_yD0q6l3tMtuwp2n-juzxds-_rytXor6vf1ZvVcFx03Yio8cE-l0NIGCj5UASvtAEwQiJpXKkgS6JUjE5TzHqwNLmBrOMHctCgX7OG8O8bh-0hparrhGPv5shFSglRKVTP0-B_EBRqtZ4GZuj9TXZqG2Ixxd7Dx1HAEWaGQP6ACUpc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1289772890</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Income, Labor Supply, and Urban Residence</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Hekman, John S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hekman, John S.</creatorcontrib><description>The framework for urban spatial models as developed in the past 20 years contains 2 primary features-access and bid rent. In a recent article, William Wheaton has seriously damaged this framework by concluding that the long-run spatial equilibrium theory derived from bid rent ''contributes little to the explanation of US location-income patterns''. He finds that the theory developed by William Alonso, Richard Muth, and others produces a very weak tendency for middle- and upper-class income families to live at a greater distance than poor families from the central business area. It is argued that the Alonso-Muth theory is an important tool in understanding urban structure if one previously ignored factor is recognized-that the labor force participation of married women varies dramatically and inversely with the income of their husbands. Because middle- and lower-income households have more of their members in the labor force, these groups are brought closer to the central business district.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7981</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AENRAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Menasha, Wis: The American Economic Association</publisher><subject>Central business districts ; Housing ; Husbands ; Income ; Income elasticity of demand ; Labor force ; Labor supply ; Leisure time ; Median family income ; Residences ; SMSA ; Statistical analysis ; Studies ; Transportation costs ; Travel expenses ; Urban ; Wives ; Women ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>The American economic review, 1980-09, Vol.70 (4), p.805-811</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1980 American Economic Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Economic Association Sep 1980</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1803582$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1803582$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27846,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hekman, John S.</creatorcontrib><title>Income, Labor Supply, and Urban Residence</title><title>The American economic review</title><description>The framework for urban spatial models as developed in the past 20 years contains 2 primary features-access and bid rent. In a recent article, William Wheaton has seriously damaged this framework by concluding that the long-run spatial equilibrium theory derived from bid rent ''contributes little to the explanation of US location-income patterns''. He finds that the theory developed by William Alonso, Richard Muth, and others produces a very weak tendency for middle- and upper-class income families to live at a greater distance than poor families from the central business area. It is argued that the Alonso-Muth theory is an important tool in understanding urban structure if one previously ignored factor is recognized-that the labor force participation of married women varies dramatically and inversely with the income of their husbands. Because middle- and lower-income households have more of their members in the labor force, these groups are brought closer to the central business district.</description><subject>Central business districts</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Husbands</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Income elasticity of demand</subject><subject>Labor force</subject><subject>Labor supply</subject><subject>Leisure time</subject><subject>Median family income</subject><subject>Residences</subject><subject>SMSA</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Transportation costs</subject><subject>Travel expenses</subject><subject>Urban</subject><subject>Wives</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>0002-8282</issn><issn>1944-7981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1jUFLxDAUhIMoWFf_gYeiJ2ELL0mbvBxl0XWhIKh7Lkn6Alt225p0D_vvraxXLzMM8zFzwTJuyrLQBvklywBAFChQXLOblDr4zVxn7GnT--FAy7y2boj553Ec96dlbvs230Zn-_yD0q6l3tMtuwp2n-juzxds-_rytXor6vf1ZvVcFx03Yio8cE-l0NIGCj5UASvtAEwQiJpXKkgS6JUjE5TzHqwNLmBrOMHctCgX7OG8O8bh-0hparrhGPv5shFSglRKVTP0-B_EBRqtZ4GZuj9TXZqG2Ixxd7Dx1HAEWaGQP6ACUpc</recordid><startdate>19800901</startdate><enddate>19800901</enddate><creator>Hekman, John S.</creator><general>The American Economic Association</general><general>American Economic Association</general><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>HZAIM</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19800901</creationdate><title>Income, Labor Supply, and Urban Residence</title><author>Hekman, John S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j192t-c01ce4273afefcf5f857b009f2887156f3e28c6be9f6bcc0aafbf8d91e03e2d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><topic>Central business districts</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Husbands</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Income elasticity of demand</topic><topic>Labor force</topic><topic>Labor supply</topic><topic>Leisure time</topic><topic>Median family income</topic><topic>Residences</topic><topic>SMSA</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Transportation costs</topic><topic>Travel expenses</topic><topic>Urban</topic><topic>Wives</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hekman, John S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 26</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>The American economic review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hekman, John S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Income, Labor Supply, and Urban Residence</atitle><jtitle>The American economic review</jtitle><date>1980-09-01</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>805</spage><epage>811</epage><pages>805-811</pages><issn>0002-8282</issn><eissn>1944-7981</eissn><coden>AENRAA</coden><abstract>The framework for urban spatial models as developed in the past 20 years contains 2 primary features-access and bid rent. In a recent article, William Wheaton has seriously damaged this framework by concluding that the long-run spatial equilibrium theory derived from bid rent ''contributes little to the explanation of US location-income patterns''. He finds that the theory developed by William Alonso, Richard Muth, and others produces a very weak tendency for middle- and upper-class income families to live at a greater distance than poor families from the central business area. It is argued that the Alonso-Muth theory is an important tool in understanding urban structure if one previously ignored factor is recognized-that the labor force participation of married women varies dramatically and inversely with the income of their husbands. Because middle- and lower-income households have more of their members in the labor force, these groups are brought closer to the central business district.</abstract><cop>Menasha, Wis</cop><pub>The American Economic Association</pub><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-8282 |
ispartof | The American economic review, 1980-09, Vol.70 (4), p.805-811 |
issn | 0002-8282 1944-7981 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_233036665 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Periodicals Index Online; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Central business districts Housing Husbands Income Income elasticity of demand Labor force Labor supply Leisure time Median family income Residences SMSA Statistical analysis Studies Transportation costs Travel expenses Urban Wives Women Workforce |
title | Income, Labor Supply, and Urban Residence |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T16%3A51%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Income,%20Labor%20Supply,%20and%20Urban%20Residence&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20economic%20review&rft.au=Hekman,%20John%20S.&rft.date=1980-09-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=805&rft.epage=811&rft.pages=805-811&rft.issn=0002-8282&rft.eissn=1944-7981&rft.coden=AENRAA&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1803582%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1289772890&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1803582&rfr_iscdi=true |