Comparison of Attractive and Intercept Traps for Sampling Rove Beetles (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)

Field experiment was conducted to collect/sample staphylinid beetles with four different traps (flight intercept trap, Berlese funnel trap, light trap and pit fall trap) and net/hand collection from eleven selected locations of Punjab (Pakistan) in 2013 and 2014. Each locality was sampled for 4 days...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Entomological Research Society 2019-11, Vol.21 (3), p.257-269
Hauptverfasser: Nasir, Shabab, Nasir, Iram, HAfeez, Faisal, Yousaf, Iqra
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 269
container_issue 3
container_start_page 257
container_title Journal of Entomological Research Society
container_volume 21
creator Nasir, Shabab
Nasir, Iram
HAfeez, Faisal
Yousaf, Iqra
description Field experiment was conducted to collect/sample staphylinid beetles with four different traps (flight intercept trap, Berlese funnel trap, light trap and pit fall trap) and net/hand collection from eleven selected locations of Punjab (Pakistan) in 2013 and 2014. Each locality was sampled for 4 days with an interval of two months. Different abiotic factors were noted and Shannon diversity index was calculated for each locality. A total of 4386 specimens (beetles) were collected. Pit-fall traps were found most conducive and effective in sampling beetles followed by Berlese funnel traps and net/hand collection while light traps showed least efficiency. Maximum value of species richness and abundance was observed during Monsoon season (July-August). Paederus fuscipes was the most common species. The highest value of а-diversity index was observed from Sargodha during both years while in case of Shannon-Wiener index value, Murid Wala was the highest during 2013 and Gutwala during 2014. Changa Manga was the place with highest evenness value. The results of Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) also indicated that the abundance/number of beetles sampled with different collection methods had significant effects with locality and crop type while insignificant effects with time (years). We conclude that methods of trapping need refinement by installing traps for large duration in all study location keeping all conditions (biotic & abiotic) in view to enhance the efficiency of collection methods and exploration of staphylinid beetles.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2330032729</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2330032729</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p98t-d89157812d9e6008a0447fbd6d3a6d38babcb304a2950b5dec656b2eeba741b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjV1LwzAYhXOh4Jj7DwFv9KLwNmnaxrtZ_BgMBLf78aZ5qx1dE5NM8N8bcAcezs3DOVdsUUoQBQgFN2wV4xFyVC3KSi6Y6dzJYxijm7kb-DqlgH0af4jjbPlmThR68onvA_rIBxf4Dk9-GudP_uGy9USUJor8vnMTOZ91fOS7hP7rN0ujRXq4ZdcDTpFWl16y_cvzvnsrtu-vm269LbxuU2FbXaqmLYXVVAO0CFXVDMbWVmKmNWh6I6FCoRUYZamvVW0EkcGmKo2WS3b3P-uD-z5TTIejO4c5Px6ElABSNELLP-5CUTU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2330032729</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Attractive and Intercept Traps for Sampling Rove Beetles (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Nasir, Shabab ; Nasir, Iram ; HAfeez, Faisal ; Yousaf, Iqra</creator><creatorcontrib>Nasir, Shabab ; Nasir, Iram ; HAfeez, Faisal ; Yousaf, Iqra</creatorcontrib><description>Field experiment was conducted to collect/sample staphylinid beetles with four different traps (flight intercept trap, Berlese funnel trap, light trap and pit fall trap) and net/hand collection from eleven selected locations of Punjab (Pakistan) in 2013 and 2014. Each locality was sampled for 4 days with an interval of two months. Different abiotic factors were noted and Shannon diversity index was calculated for each locality. A total of 4386 specimens (beetles) were collected. Pit-fall traps were found most conducive and effective in sampling beetles followed by Berlese funnel traps and net/hand collection while light traps showed least efficiency. Maximum value of species richness and abundance was observed during Monsoon season (July-August). Paederus fuscipes was the most common species. The highest value of а-diversity index was observed from Sargodha during both years while in case of Shannon-Wiener index value, Murid Wala was the highest during 2013 and Gutwala during 2014. Changa Manga was the place with highest evenness value. The results of Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) also indicated that the abundance/number of beetles sampled with different collection methods had significant effects with locality and crop type while insignificant effects with time (years). We conclude that methods of trapping need refinement by installing traps for large duration in all study location keeping all conditions (biotic &amp; abiotic) in view to enhance the efficiency of collection methods and exploration of staphylinid beetles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1302-0250</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ankara: Journal of the Entomological Research Society</publisher><subject>Abiotic factors ; Abundance ; Alcohol ; Beetles ; Coleoptera ; Collection ; Crops ; Dermatitis ; Fungi ; Insects ; Laboratories ; Light ; Light traps ; Methods ; Sampling ; Species diversity ; Species richness ; Statistical models</subject><ispartof>Journal of Entomological Research Society, 2019-11, Vol.21 (3), p.257-269</ispartof><rights>Copyright Journal of the Entomological Research Society 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nasir, Shabab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasir, Iram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAfeez, Faisal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yousaf, Iqra</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Attractive and Intercept Traps for Sampling Rove Beetles (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)</title><title>Journal of Entomological Research Society</title><description>Field experiment was conducted to collect/sample staphylinid beetles with four different traps (flight intercept trap, Berlese funnel trap, light trap and pit fall trap) and net/hand collection from eleven selected locations of Punjab (Pakistan) in 2013 and 2014. Each locality was sampled for 4 days with an interval of two months. Different abiotic factors were noted and Shannon diversity index was calculated for each locality. A total of 4386 specimens (beetles) were collected. Pit-fall traps were found most conducive and effective in sampling beetles followed by Berlese funnel traps and net/hand collection while light traps showed least efficiency. Maximum value of species richness and abundance was observed during Monsoon season (July-August). Paederus fuscipes was the most common species. The highest value of а-diversity index was observed from Sargodha during both years while in case of Shannon-Wiener index value, Murid Wala was the highest during 2013 and Gutwala during 2014. Changa Manga was the place with highest evenness value. The results of Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) also indicated that the abundance/number of beetles sampled with different collection methods had significant effects with locality and crop type while insignificant effects with time (years). We conclude that methods of trapping need refinement by installing traps for large duration in all study location keeping all conditions (biotic &amp; abiotic) in view to enhance the efficiency of collection methods and exploration of staphylinid beetles.</description><subject>Abiotic factors</subject><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Alcohol</subject><subject>Beetles</subject><subject>Coleoptera</subject><subject>Collection</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Dermatitis</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Light traps</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><issn>1302-0250</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNotjV1LwzAYhXOh4Jj7DwFv9KLwNmnaxrtZ_BgMBLf78aZ5qx1dE5NM8N8bcAcezs3DOVdsUUoQBQgFN2wV4xFyVC3KSi6Y6dzJYxijm7kb-DqlgH0af4jjbPlmThR68onvA_rIBxf4Dk9-GudP_uGy9USUJor8vnMTOZ91fOS7hP7rN0ujRXq4ZdcDTpFWl16y_cvzvnsrtu-vm269LbxuU2FbXaqmLYXVVAO0CFXVDMbWVmKmNWh6I6FCoRUYZamvVW0EkcGmKo2WS3b3P-uD-z5TTIejO4c5Px6ElABSNELLP-5CUTU</recordid><startdate>20191122</startdate><enddate>20191122</enddate><creator>Nasir, Shabab</creator><creator>Nasir, Iram</creator><creator>HAfeez, Faisal</creator><creator>Yousaf, Iqra</creator><general>Journal of the Entomological Research Society</general><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EDSIH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191122</creationdate><title>Comparison of Attractive and Intercept Traps for Sampling Rove Beetles (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)</title><author>Nasir, Shabab ; Nasir, Iram ; HAfeez, Faisal ; Yousaf, Iqra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p98t-d89157812d9e6008a0447fbd6d3a6d38babcb304a2950b5dec656b2eeba741b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Abiotic factors</topic><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Alcohol</topic><topic>Beetles</topic><topic>Coleoptera</topic><topic>Collection</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Dermatitis</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Light traps</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nasir, Shabab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasir, Iram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAfeez, Faisal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yousaf, Iqra</creatorcontrib><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Turkey Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Journal of Entomological Research Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nasir, Shabab</au><au>Nasir, Iram</au><au>HAfeez, Faisal</au><au>Yousaf, Iqra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Attractive and Intercept Traps for Sampling Rove Beetles (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Entomological Research Society</jtitle><date>2019-11-22</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>257</spage><epage>269</epage><pages>257-269</pages><issn>1302-0250</issn><abstract>Field experiment was conducted to collect/sample staphylinid beetles with four different traps (flight intercept trap, Berlese funnel trap, light trap and pit fall trap) and net/hand collection from eleven selected locations of Punjab (Pakistan) in 2013 and 2014. Each locality was sampled for 4 days with an interval of two months. Different abiotic factors were noted and Shannon diversity index was calculated for each locality. A total of 4386 specimens (beetles) were collected. Pit-fall traps were found most conducive and effective in sampling beetles followed by Berlese funnel traps and net/hand collection while light traps showed least efficiency. Maximum value of species richness and abundance was observed during Monsoon season (July-August). Paederus fuscipes was the most common species. The highest value of а-diversity index was observed from Sargodha during both years while in case of Shannon-Wiener index value, Murid Wala was the highest during 2013 and Gutwala during 2014. Changa Manga was the place with highest evenness value. The results of Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) also indicated that the abundance/number of beetles sampled with different collection methods had significant effects with locality and crop type while insignificant effects with time (years). We conclude that methods of trapping need refinement by installing traps for large duration in all study location keeping all conditions (biotic &amp; abiotic) in view to enhance the efficiency of collection methods and exploration of staphylinid beetles.</abstract><cop>Ankara</cop><pub>Journal of the Entomological Research Society</pub><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1302-0250
ispartof Journal of Entomological Research Society, 2019-11, Vol.21 (3), p.257-269
issn 1302-0250
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2330032729
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Abiotic factors
Abundance
Alcohol
Beetles
Coleoptera
Collection
Crops
Dermatitis
Fungi
Insects
Laboratories
Light
Light traps
Methods
Sampling
Species diversity
Species richness
Statistical models
title Comparison of Attractive and Intercept Traps for Sampling Rove Beetles (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T03%3A17%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Attractive%20and%20Intercept%20Traps%20for%20Sampling%20Rove%20Beetles%20(Coleoptera:%20Staphylinidae)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Entomological%20Research%20Society&rft.au=Nasir,%20Shabab&rft.date=2019-11-22&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=257&rft.epage=269&rft.pages=257-269&rft.issn=1302-0250&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2330032729%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2330032729&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true