Reconciling global sustainability targets and local action for food production and climate change mitigation
•Global climate mitigation targets and local agricultural policies must be internally consistent.•We project the emission intensity of agriculture at global, regional and national levels.•Food production and climate mitigation require systemic changes beyond technological fixes.•Cross-scale thinking...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Global environmental change 2019-11, Vol.59, p.101983, Article 101983 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 101983 |
container_title | Global environmental change |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Gil, Juliana D.B. Daioglou, Vassilis van Ittersum, Martin Reidsma, Pytrik Doelman, Jonathan C. van Middelaar, Corina E. van Vuuren, Detlef P. |
description | •Global climate mitigation targets and local agricultural policies must be internally consistent.•We project the emission intensity of agriculture at global, regional and national levels.•Food production and climate mitigation require systemic changes beyond technological fixes.•Cross-scale thinking is needed for the operationalization of the Sustainable Development Goals.
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) imply country-led implementation. Yet, their achievement depends on sustainability targets compatible across different sectors and scales. Our study examines how the GHG emission intensity of agriculture (EIA) should evolve globally, regionally (Western Europe) and nationally (The Netherlands) under different socioeconomic pathways, so that two major aims of SDGs 2 and 13 (i.e. sufficient food production and climate change mitigation) are achieved simultaneously. Results show that, by 2050, relative to 2010 values, EIA should decrease at all three levels when measured on a product basis (GHG emissions per ton dry matter) and on a land basis (GHG emissions per ha). This indicates that, globally, agriculture should be intensified per unit area, while in Western Europe and even more so in the Netherlands additional emission reductions require increased production efficiency and lower production volumes. Projected reductions in methane and nitrous oxide emissions from enteric fermentation, manure management and fertilizer application in Dutch agriculture are much higher than what would be achieved through the extrapolation of current trends. Given the high costs of increasing production efficiency further, our analysis indicates the need for significantly more ambitious policy targets and systemic changes, including reduced consumption of animal-sourced food. Besides shedding light on the interaction between climate and agricultural strategies, our analysis illustrates the application of cross-scale thinking in the operationalization of the SDG agenda and underscores the need for concerted action amongst countries. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101983 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2330021791</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0959378019302286</els_id><sourcerecordid>2330021791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-309f7d02d13e4340aae5d27c2d0330246d589275eb1e265f58ed052aa22955923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUF1LAzEQDKJgrf4GAz5fzceld3ksxS8QBNHnkCZ7Z8o1qUla6L83x4mvLiwLs7OTySB0S8mCErq83y76IYA_mi-9YITKEZUtP0Mz2jaskrUU52hGpJAVb1pyia5S2pJSkvMZGt7BBG_c4HyPi9BGDzgdUtbO601B8wlnHXvICWtv8RBMIWiTXfC4C7F0sHgfgz1M2Egyg9vpDLg48j3gncuu1-P2Gl10ekhw8zvn6PPx4WP9XL2-Pb2sV6-VqUWbK05k11jCLOVQ85poDcKyxjBLOCesXlrRStYI2FBgS9GJFiwRTGvGpBCS8Tm6m3SLse8DpKy24RB9eVKxokAYbSQtrGZimRhSitCpfSzG40lRosZo1Vb9RavGaNUUbblcTZdQPnF0EFUyDrwB6yKYrGxw_2r8AO1Ph1o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2330021791</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reconciling global sustainability targets and local action for food production and climate change mitigation</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Gil, Juliana D.B. ; Daioglou, Vassilis ; van Ittersum, Martin ; Reidsma, Pytrik ; Doelman, Jonathan C. ; van Middelaar, Corina E. ; van Vuuren, Detlef P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gil, Juliana D.B. ; Daioglou, Vassilis ; van Ittersum, Martin ; Reidsma, Pytrik ; Doelman, Jonathan C. ; van Middelaar, Corina E. ; van Vuuren, Detlef P.</creatorcontrib><description>•Global climate mitigation targets and local agricultural policies must be internally consistent.•We project the emission intensity of agriculture at global, regional and national levels.•Food production and climate mitigation require systemic changes beyond technological fixes.•Cross-scale thinking is needed for the operationalization of the Sustainable Development Goals.
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) imply country-led implementation. Yet, their achievement depends on sustainability targets compatible across different sectors and scales. Our study examines how the GHG emission intensity of agriculture (EIA) should evolve globally, regionally (Western Europe) and nationally (The Netherlands) under different socioeconomic pathways, so that two major aims of SDGs 2 and 13 (i.e. sufficient food production and climate change mitigation) are achieved simultaneously. Results show that, by 2050, relative to 2010 values, EIA should decrease at all three levels when measured on a product basis (GHG emissions per ton dry matter) and on a land basis (GHG emissions per ha). This indicates that, globally, agriculture should be intensified per unit area, while in Western Europe and even more so in the Netherlands additional emission reductions require increased production efficiency and lower production volumes. Projected reductions in methane and nitrous oxide emissions from enteric fermentation, manure management and fertilizer application in Dutch agriculture are much higher than what would be achieved through the extrapolation of current trends. Given the high costs of increasing production efficiency further, our analysis indicates the need for significantly more ambitious policy targets and systemic changes, including reduced consumption of animal-sourced food. Besides shedding light on the interaction between climate and agricultural strategies, our analysis illustrates the application of cross-scale thinking in the operationalization of the SDG agenda and underscores the need for concerted action amongst countries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-3780</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9495</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101983</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural management ; Agriculture ; Ambition ; Animal-based foods ; Climate change ; Climate change mitigation ; Cost analysis ; Cross-scale analysis ; Dry matter ; Economic development ; Emission analysis ; Emission measurements ; Emissions ; Emissions control ; Extrapolation ; Fermentation ; Fertilizer application ; Food ; Food consumption ; Food production ; Food sources ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Mitigation ; Nitrous oxide ; Policy making ; Production ; Scenario analysis ; Socioeconomic factors ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Sustainable Development Goals ; Trade-offs</subject><ispartof>Global environmental change, 2019-11, Vol.59, p.101983, Article 101983</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Nov 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-309f7d02d13e4340aae5d27c2d0330246d589275eb1e265f58ed052aa22955923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-309f7d02d13e4340aae5d27c2d0330246d589275eb1e265f58ed052aa22955923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101983$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27866,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gil, Juliana D.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daioglou, Vassilis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Ittersum, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reidsma, Pytrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doelman, Jonathan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Middelaar, Corina E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Vuuren, Detlef P.</creatorcontrib><title>Reconciling global sustainability targets and local action for food production and climate change mitigation</title><title>Global environmental change</title><description>•Global climate mitigation targets and local agricultural policies must be internally consistent.•We project the emission intensity of agriculture at global, regional and national levels.•Food production and climate mitigation require systemic changes beyond technological fixes.•Cross-scale thinking is needed for the operationalization of the Sustainable Development Goals.
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) imply country-led implementation. Yet, their achievement depends on sustainability targets compatible across different sectors and scales. Our study examines how the GHG emission intensity of agriculture (EIA) should evolve globally, regionally (Western Europe) and nationally (The Netherlands) under different socioeconomic pathways, so that two major aims of SDGs 2 and 13 (i.e. sufficient food production and climate change mitigation) are achieved simultaneously. Results show that, by 2050, relative to 2010 values, EIA should decrease at all three levels when measured on a product basis (GHG emissions per ton dry matter) and on a land basis (GHG emissions per ha). This indicates that, globally, agriculture should be intensified per unit area, while in Western Europe and even more so in the Netherlands additional emission reductions require increased production efficiency and lower production volumes. Projected reductions in methane and nitrous oxide emissions from enteric fermentation, manure management and fertilizer application in Dutch agriculture are much higher than what would be achieved through the extrapolation of current trends. Given the high costs of increasing production efficiency further, our analysis indicates the need for significantly more ambitious policy targets and systemic changes, including reduced consumption of animal-sourced food. Besides shedding light on the interaction between climate and agricultural strategies, our analysis illustrates the application of cross-scale thinking in the operationalization of the SDG agenda and underscores the need for concerted action amongst countries.</description><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Ambition</subject><subject>Animal-based foods</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate change mitigation</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cross-scale analysis</subject><subject>Dry matter</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Emission measurements</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Extrapolation</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Fertilizer application</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food consumption</subject><subject>Food production</subject><subject>Food sources</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Nitrous oxide</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Production</subject><subject>Scenario analysis</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Sustainable Development Goals</subject><subject>Trade-offs</subject><issn>0959-3780</issn><issn>1872-9495</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUF1LAzEQDKJgrf4GAz5fzceld3ksxS8QBNHnkCZ7Z8o1qUla6L83x4mvLiwLs7OTySB0S8mCErq83y76IYA_mi-9YITKEZUtP0Mz2jaskrUU52hGpJAVb1pyia5S2pJSkvMZGt7BBG_c4HyPi9BGDzgdUtbO601B8wlnHXvICWtv8RBMIWiTXfC4C7F0sHgfgz1M2Egyg9vpDLg48j3gncuu1-P2Gl10ekhw8zvn6PPx4WP9XL2-Pb2sV6-VqUWbK05k11jCLOVQ85poDcKyxjBLOCesXlrRStYI2FBgS9GJFiwRTGvGpBCS8Tm6m3SLse8DpKy24RB9eVKxokAYbSQtrGZimRhSitCpfSzG40lRosZo1Vb9RavGaNUUbblcTZdQPnF0EFUyDrwB6yKYrGxw_2r8AO1Ph1o</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Gil, Juliana D.B.</creator><creator>Daioglou, Vassilis</creator><creator>van Ittersum, Martin</creator><creator>Reidsma, Pytrik</creator><creator>Doelman, Jonathan C.</creator><creator>van Middelaar, Corina E.</creator><creator>van Vuuren, Detlef P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Reconciling global sustainability targets and local action for food production and climate change mitigation</title><author>Gil, Juliana D.B. ; Daioglou, Vassilis ; van Ittersum, Martin ; Reidsma, Pytrik ; Doelman, Jonathan C. ; van Middelaar, Corina E. ; van Vuuren, Detlef P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-309f7d02d13e4340aae5d27c2d0330246d589275eb1e265f58ed052aa22955923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Ambition</topic><topic>Animal-based foods</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate change mitigation</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cross-scale analysis</topic><topic>Dry matter</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Emission measurements</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Extrapolation</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Fertilizer application</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food consumption</topic><topic>Food production</topic><topic>Food sources</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Nitrous oxide</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Production</topic><topic>Scenario analysis</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Sustainable Development Goals</topic><topic>Trade-offs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gil, Juliana D.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daioglou, Vassilis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Ittersum, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reidsma, Pytrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doelman, Jonathan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Middelaar, Corina E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Vuuren, Detlef P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Global environmental change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gil, Juliana D.B.</au><au>Daioglou, Vassilis</au><au>van Ittersum, Martin</au><au>Reidsma, Pytrik</au><au>Doelman, Jonathan C.</au><au>van Middelaar, Corina E.</au><au>van Vuuren, Detlef P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reconciling global sustainability targets and local action for food production and climate change mitigation</atitle><jtitle>Global environmental change</jtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>59</volume><spage>101983</spage><pages>101983-</pages><artnum>101983</artnum><issn>0959-3780</issn><eissn>1872-9495</eissn><abstract>•Global climate mitigation targets and local agricultural policies must be internally consistent.•We project the emission intensity of agriculture at global, regional and national levels.•Food production and climate mitigation require systemic changes beyond technological fixes.•Cross-scale thinking is needed for the operationalization of the Sustainable Development Goals.
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) imply country-led implementation. Yet, their achievement depends on sustainability targets compatible across different sectors and scales. Our study examines how the GHG emission intensity of agriculture (EIA) should evolve globally, regionally (Western Europe) and nationally (The Netherlands) under different socioeconomic pathways, so that two major aims of SDGs 2 and 13 (i.e. sufficient food production and climate change mitigation) are achieved simultaneously. Results show that, by 2050, relative to 2010 values, EIA should decrease at all three levels when measured on a product basis (GHG emissions per ton dry matter) and on a land basis (GHG emissions per ha). This indicates that, globally, agriculture should be intensified per unit area, while in Western Europe and even more so in the Netherlands additional emission reductions require increased production efficiency and lower production volumes. Projected reductions in methane and nitrous oxide emissions from enteric fermentation, manure management and fertilizer application in Dutch agriculture are much higher than what would be achieved through the extrapolation of current trends. Given the high costs of increasing production efficiency further, our analysis indicates the need for significantly more ambitious policy targets and systemic changes, including reduced consumption of animal-sourced food. Besides shedding light on the interaction between climate and agricultural strategies, our analysis illustrates the application of cross-scale thinking in the operationalization of the SDG agenda and underscores the need for concerted action amongst countries.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101983</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-3780 |
ispartof | Global environmental change, 2019-11, Vol.59, p.101983, Article 101983 |
issn | 0959-3780 1872-9495 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2330021791 |
source | PAIS Index; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Agricultural management Agriculture Ambition Animal-based foods Climate change Climate change mitigation Cost analysis Cross-scale analysis Dry matter Economic development Emission analysis Emission measurements Emissions Emissions control Extrapolation Fermentation Fertilizer application Food Food consumption Food production Food sources Greenhouse effect Greenhouse gases Mitigation Nitrous oxide Policy making Production Scenario analysis Socioeconomic factors Sustainability Sustainable development Sustainable Development Goals Trade-offs |
title | Reconciling global sustainability targets and local action for food production and climate change mitigation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T10%3A29%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reconciling%20global%20sustainability%20targets%20and%20local%20action%20for%20food%20production%20and%20climate%20change%20mitigation&rft.jtitle=Global%20environmental%20change&rft.au=Gil,%20Juliana%20D.B.&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=59&rft.spage=101983&rft.pages=101983-&rft.artnum=101983&rft.issn=0959-3780&rft.eissn=1872-9495&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101983&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2330021791%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2330021791&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0959378019302286&rfr_iscdi=true |