Large-scale load capacity tests on a geosynthetic encased column

Stone columns have been used to minimize the settlement of embankments on soft soils but their use in very soft soils can become challenging, partly because of the low confinement provided by the surrounding soil. Geosynthetic encased columns (GECs) have been successfully used to enhance to reduce s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geotextiles and geomembranes 2019-10, Vol.47 (5), p.632-641
Hauptverfasser: Alkhorshid, Nima R., Araujo, Gregório L.S., Palmeira, Ennio M., Zornberg, Jorge G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 641
container_issue 5
container_start_page 632
container_title Geotextiles and geomembranes
container_volume 47
creator Alkhorshid, Nima R.
Araujo, Gregório L.S.
Palmeira, Ennio M.
Zornberg, Jorge G.
description Stone columns have been used to minimize the settlement of embankments on soft soils but their use in very soft soils can become challenging, partly because of the low confinement provided by the surrounding soil. Geosynthetic encased columns (GECs) have been successfully used to enhance to reduce settlements of embankments on soft soils. This paper describes an investigation on the performance of encased columns constructed on a very soft soil using different types of encasement (three woven geotextiles with different values of tensile stiffness) and different column fill materials (sand, gravel and recycled construction and demolition waste, RCDW). The results of load capacity tests conducted on large-scale models constructed to simulate the different types of GECs indicate that the displacement method adopted during column installation can lead to an enhanced shear strength in the smear zone that develops within the very soft soil. In addition, breakage of the column fill material was found to affect the load-settlement response of gravel and RCDW columns. Furthermore, the excess pore water pressure generated in the surrounding soil during installation, was found to remain limited to radial distances smaller than three times the GEC diameter.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.103458
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2329721059</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0266114419300494</els_id><sourcerecordid>2329721059</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-8e14d7252aa832d24d0694225398bd65e93209b1f5daf066780abee1f51434343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1LAzEQDaJgrf4GA5635mt3k5ulaBUKXvQc0mS27rK7qUkq9t-bsuJV5jDM8N68eQ-hW0oWlNDqvlvswCf4HmBYMEJV3nJRyjM0o7JWBS-lOEczwqqqoFSIS3QVY0cIEbWSM_SwMWEHRbSmB9x747A1e2PbdMQJYorYj9jgrBCPY_qA1FoMozURMtD3h2G8RheN6SPc_PY5en96fFs9F5vX9ctquSkslywVEqhwNSuZMZIzx4QjlRKMlVzJratKUJwRtaVN6UxDqqqWxGwB8kwFP9Uc3U1398F_HvJruvOHMGZJzThTNaOkVBlVTygbfIwBGr0P7WDCUVOiT3HpTv_FpU9x6SmuzFxOTMgmvloIOto2WwXXBrBJO9_-e-MHibl2YQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2329721059</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Large-scale load capacity tests on a geosynthetic encased column</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Alkhorshid, Nima R. ; Araujo, Gregório L.S. ; Palmeira, Ennio M. ; Zornberg, Jorge G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Alkhorshid, Nima R. ; Araujo, Gregório L.S. ; Palmeira, Ennio M. ; Zornberg, Jorge G.</creatorcontrib><description>Stone columns have been used to minimize the settlement of embankments on soft soils but their use in very soft soils can become challenging, partly because of the low confinement provided by the surrounding soil. Geosynthetic encased columns (GECs) have been successfully used to enhance to reduce settlements of embankments on soft soils. This paper describes an investigation on the performance of encased columns constructed on a very soft soil using different types of encasement (three woven geotextiles with different values of tensile stiffness) and different column fill materials (sand, gravel and recycled construction and demolition waste, RCDW). The results of load capacity tests conducted on large-scale models constructed to simulate the different types of GECs indicate that the displacement method adopted during column installation can lead to an enhanced shear strength in the smear zone that develops within the very soft soil. In addition, breakage of the column fill material was found to affect the load-settlement response of gravel and RCDW columns. Furthermore, the excess pore water pressure generated in the surrounding soil during installation, was found to remain limited to radial distances smaller than three times the GEC diameter.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-1144</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.103458</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Essex: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Computer simulation ; Construction materials ; Demolition ; Embankment ; Embankments ; Encased column ; Geosynthetics ; Geotechnical fabrics ; Geotextile ; Gravel ; Large-scale test ; Pore water pressure ; Recycled materials ; Scale models ; Settling ; Shear strength ; Soft soil ; Soft soils ; Soil investigations ; Soil settlement ; Soils ; Stiffness ; Stone columns ; Tensile strength ; Textiles ; Waste disposal</subject><ispartof>Geotextiles and geomembranes, 2019-10, Vol.47 (5), p.632-641</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Oct 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-8e14d7252aa832d24d0694225398bd65e93209b1f5daf066780abee1f51434343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-8e14d7252aa832d24d0694225398bd65e93209b1f5daf066780abee1f51434343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.103458$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alkhorshid, Nima R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo, Gregório L.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmeira, Ennio M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zornberg, Jorge G.</creatorcontrib><title>Large-scale load capacity tests on a geosynthetic encased column</title><title>Geotextiles and geomembranes</title><description>Stone columns have been used to minimize the settlement of embankments on soft soils but their use in very soft soils can become challenging, partly because of the low confinement provided by the surrounding soil. Geosynthetic encased columns (GECs) have been successfully used to enhance to reduce settlements of embankments on soft soils. This paper describes an investigation on the performance of encased columns constructed on a very soft soil using different types of encasement (three woven geotextiles with different values of tensile stiffness) and different column fill materials (sand, gravel and recycled construction and demolition waste, RCDW). The results of load capacity tests conducted on large-scale models constructed to simulate the different types of GECs indicate that the displacement method adopted during column installation can lead to an enhanced shear strength in the smear zone that develops within the very soft soil. In addition, breakage of the column fill material was found to affect the load-settlement response of gravel and RCDW columns. Furthermore, the excess pore water pressure generated in the surrounding soil during installation, was found to remain limited to radial distances smaller than three times the GEC diameter.</description><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Construction materials</subject><subject>Demolition</subject><subject>Embankment</subject><subject>Embankments</subject><subject>Encased column</subject><subject>Geosynthetics</subject><subject>Geotechnical fabrics</subject><subject>Geotextile</subject><subject>Gravel</subject><subject>Large-scale test</subject><subject>Pore water pressure</subject><subject>Recycled materials</subject><subject>Scale models</subject><subject>Settling</subject><subject>Shear strength</subject><subject>Soft soil</subject><subject>Soft soils</subject><subject>Soil investigations</subject><subject>Soil settlement</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Stiffness</subject><subject>Stone columns</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><subject>Textiles</subject><subject>Waste disposal</subject><issn>0266-1144</issn><issn>1879-3584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUE1LAzEQDaJgrf4GA5635mt3k5ulaBUKXvQc0mS27rK7qUkq9t-bsuJV5jDM8N68eQ-hW0oWlNDqvlvswCf4HmBYMEJV3nJRyjM0o7JWBS-lOEczwqqqoFSIS3QVY0cIEbWSM_SwMWEHRbSmB9x747A1e2PbdMQJYorYj9jgrBCPY_qA1FoMozURMtD3h2G8RheN6SPc_PY5en96fFs9F5vX9ctquSkslywVEqhwNSuZMZIzx4QjlRKMlVzJratKUJwRtaVN6UxDqqqWxGwB8kwFP9Uc3U1398F_HvJruvOHMGZJzThTNaOkVBlVTygbfIwBGr0P7WDCUVOiT3HpTv_FpU9x6SmuzFxOTMgmvloIOto2WwXXBrBJO9_-e-MHibl2YQ</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Alkhorshid, Nima R.</creator><creator>Araujo, Gregório L.S.</creator><creator>Palmeira, Ennio M.</creator><creator>Zornberg, Jorge G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Large-scale load capacity tests on a geosynthetic encased column</title><author>Alkhorshid, Nima R. ; Araujo, Gregório L.S. ; Palmeira, Ennio M. ; Zornberg, Jorge G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-8e14d7252aa832d24d0694225398bd65e93209b1f5daf066780abee1f51434343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Construction materials</topic><topic>Demolition</topic><topic>Embankment</topic><topic>Embankments</topic><topic>Encased column</topic><topic>Geosynthetics</topic><topic>Geotechnical fabrics</topic><topic>Geotextile</topic><topic>Gravel</topic><topic>Large-scale test</topic><topic>Pore water pressure</topic><topic>Recycled materials</topic><topic>Scale models</topic><topic>Settling</topic><topic>Shear strength</topic><topic>Soft soil</topic><topic>Soft soils</topic><topic>Soil investigations</topic><topic>Soil settlement</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Stiffness</topic><topic>Stone columns</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><topic>Textiles</topic><topic>Waste disposal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alkhorshid, Nima R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo, Gregório L.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmeira, Ennio M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zornberg, Jorge G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Geotextiles and geomembranes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alkhorshid, Nima R.</au><au>Araujo, Gregório L.S.</au><au>Palmeira, Ennio M.</au><au>Zornberg, Jorge G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Large-scale load capacity tests on a geosynthetic encased column</atitle><jtitle>Geotextiles and geomembranes</jtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>632</spage><epage>641</epage><pages>632-641</pages><issn>0266-1144</issn><eissn>1879-3584</eissn><abstract>Stone columns have been used to minimize the settlement of embankments on soft soils but their use in very soft soils can become challenging, partly because of the low confinement provided by the surrounding soil. Geosynthetic encased columns (GECs) have been successfully used to enhance to reduce settlements of embankments on soft soils. This paper describes an investigation on the performance of encased columns constructed on a very soft soil using different types of encasement (three woven geotextiles with different values of tensile stiffness) and different column fill materials (sand, gravel and recycled construction and demolition waste, RCDW). The results of load capacity tests conducted on large-scale models constructed to simulate the different types of GECs indicate that the displacement method adopted during column installation can lead to an enhanced shear strength in the smear zone that develops within the very soft soil. In addition, breakage of the column fill material was found to affect the load-settlement response of gravel and RCDW columns. Furthermore, the excess pore water pressure generated in the surrounding soil during installation, was found to remain limited to radial distances smaller than three times the GEC diameter.</abstract><cop>Essex</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.103458</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0266-1144
ispartof Geotextiles and geomembranes, 2019-10, Vol.47 (5), p.632-641
issn 0266-1144
1879-3584
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2329721059
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings
subjects Computer simulation
Construction materials
Demolition
Embankment
Embankments
Encased column
Geosynthetics
Geotechnical fabrics
Geotextile
Gravel
Large-scale test
Pore water pressure
Recycled materials
Scale models
Settling
Shear strength
Soft soil
Soft soils
Soil investigations
Soil settlement
Soils
Stiffness
Stone columns
Tensile strength
Textiles
Waste disposal
title Large-scale load capacity tests on a geosynthetic encased column
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A13%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Large-scale%20load%20capacity%20tests%20on%20a%20geosynthetic%20encased%20column&rft.jtitle=Geotextiles%20and%20geomembranes&rft.au=Alkhorshid,%20Nima%20R.&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=632&rft.epage=641&rft.pages=632-641&rft.issn=0266-1144&rft.eissn=1879-3584&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.103458&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2329721059%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2329721059&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0266114419300494&rfr_iscdi=true