Selecting in or Selecting Out? Gender Gaps and Political Methodology in Europe
Studies investigating gender gaps in the doctoral training of political science students have focused so far overwhelmingly on the US context. Although important research within this context has made strides in identifying the persistent challenges to women’s incorporation in political methodology,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PS, political science & politics political science & politics, 2020-01, Vol.53 (1), p.122-127 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 127 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 122 |
container_title | PS, political science & politics |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Gatto, Malu A. C. Gohdes, Anita R. Traber, Denise van der Velden, Mariken A. C. G. |
description | Studies investigating gender gaps in the doctoral training of political science students have focused so far overwhelmingly on the US context. Although important research within this context has made strides in identifying the persistent challenges to women’s incorporation in political methodology, much remains unknown about whether women and men have different experiences in methods training during their PhD programs. We contribute to this debate by analyzing data from an original survey on the methods-training experiences of political science PhD students at different European universities. We assess whether gender gaps exist with respect to PhD students’ methods training and confidence in employing methods skills. Our findings show that women cover significantly fewer methods courses in their doctoral training. When women do participate in methods training, they show levels of method employment similar to their male colleagues. We discuss the implications of these findings in the context of European doctoral training. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1049096519001288 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2329706137</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2329706137</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-1918115e8bd7f61df418c71aeb46f97817c407b0cd2b875c247ddcfafb6710653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUEtLw0AQXkTBWv0B3hY8R3ey2ddJpNQoVCtUz2Gzj5oSs3E3OfTfm1LBg3OZGb4XfAhdA7kFAuJuA6RQRHEGihDIpTxBM2BUZExRdjrdE5wd8HN0kdKOTCMZmaHXjWudGZpui5sOh4j__vU43OPSddZFXOo-Yd1Z_BbaZmiMbvGLGz6DDW3Y7g_S5RhD7y7Rmddtcle_e44-Hpfvi6dstS6fFw-rzFDgQwYKJABzsrbCc7C-AGkEaFcX3CshQZiCiJoYm9dSMJMXwlrjta-5AMIZnaObo28fw_fo0lDtwhi7KbLKaa4E4UDFxIIjy8SQUnS-6mPzpeO-AlIdaqv-1UZ_AFJEXmI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2329706137</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selecting in or Selecting Out? Gender Gaps and Political Methodology in Europe</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Gatto, Malu A. C. ; Gohdes, Anita R. ; Traber, Denise ; van der Velden, Mariken A. C. G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gatto, Malu A. C. ; Gohdes, Anita R. ; Traber, Denise ; van der Velden, Mariken A. C. G.</creatorcontrib><description>Studies investigating gender gaps in the doctoral training of political science students have focused so far overwhelmingly on the US context. Although important research within this context has made strides in identifying the persistent challenges to women’s incorporation in political methodology, much remains unknown about whether women and men have different experiences in methods training during their PhD programs. We contribute to this debate by analyzing data from an original survey on the methods-training experiences of political science PhD students at different European universities. We assess whether gender gaps exist with respect to PhD students’ methods training and confidence in employing methods skills. Our findings show that women cover significantly fewer methods courses in their doctoral training. When women do participate in methods training, they show levels of method employment similar to their male colleagues. We discuss the implications of these findings in the context of European doctoral training.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-0965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5935</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1049096519001288</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>College students ; Conferences (Gatherings) ; Departments ; Disproportionate Representation ; Doctoral Programs ; Doctoral Students ; Elementary Education ; Elementary Schools ; Employment ; Females ; Gender ; Hungarian ; Males ; Mathematics Activities ; Measurement Techniques ; Methods ; Methods Courses ; Political science ; Politics ; Self evaluation ; Self Evaluation (Individuals) ; Skills ; Students ; Training ; Women</subject><ispartof>PS, political science & politics, 2020-01, Vol.53 (1), p.122-127</ispartof><rights>Copyright © American Political Science Association 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-1918115e8bd7f61df418c71aeb46f97817c407b0cd2b875c247ddcfafb6710653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-1918115e8bd7f61df418c71aeb46f97817c407b0cd2b875c247ddcfafb6710653</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0227-9183 ; 0000-0001-7367-8646 ; 0000-0003-4056-5770</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gatto, Malu A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gohdes, Anita R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Traber, Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Velden, Mariken A. C. G.</creatorcontrib><title>Selecting in or Selecting Out? Gender Gaps and Political Methodology in Europe</title><title>PS, political science & politics</title><description>Studies investigating gender gaps in the doctoral training of political science students have focused so far overwhelmingly on the US context. Although important research within this context has made strides in identifying the persistent challenges to women’s incorporation in political methodology, much remains unknown about whether women and men have different experiences in methods training during their PhD programs. We contribute to this debate by analyzing data from an original survey on the methods-training experiences of political science PhD students at different European universities. We assess whether gender gaps exist with respect to PhD students’ methods training and confidence in employing methods skills. Our findings show that women cover significantly fewer methods courses in their doctoral training. When women do participate in methods training, they show levels of method employment similar to their male colleagues. We discuss the implications of these findings in the context of European doctoral training.</description><subject>College students</subject><subject>Conferences (Gatherings)</subject><subject>Departments</subject><subject>Disproportionate Representation</subject><subject>Doctoral Programs</subject><subject>Doctoral Students</subject><subject>Elementary Education</subject><subject>Elementary Schools</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Hungarian</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Mathematics Activities</subject><subject>Measurement Techniques</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Methods Courses</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Self evaluation</subject><subject>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1049-0965</issn><issn>1537-5935</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNplUEtLw0AQXkTBWv0B3hY8R3ey2ddJpNQoVCtUz2Gzj5oSs3E3OfTfm1LBg3OZGb4XfAhdA7kFAuJuA6RQRHEGihDIpTxBM2BUZExRdjrdE5wd8HN0kdKOTCMZmaHXjWudGZpui5sOh4j__vU43OPSddZFXOo-Yd1Z_BbaZmiMbvGLGz6DDW3Y7g_S5RhD7y7Rmddtcle_e44-Hpfvi6dstS6fFw-rzFDgQwYKJABzsrbCc7C-AGkEaFcX3CshQZiCiJoYm9dSMJMXwlrjta-5AMIZnaObo28fw_fo0lDtwhi7KbLKaa4E4UDFxIIjy8SQUnS-6mPzpeO-AlIdaqv-1UZ_AFJEXmI</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Gatto, Malu A. C.</creator><creator>Gohdes, Anita R.</creator><creator>Traber, Denise</creator><creator>van der Velden, Mariken A. C. G.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0227-9183</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7367-8646</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4056-5770</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Selecting in or Selecting Out? Gender Gaps and Political Methodology in Europe</title><author>Gatto, Malu A. C. ; Gohdes, Anita R. ; Traber, Denise ; van der Velden, Mariken A. C. G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-1918115e8bd7f61df418c71aeb46f97817c407b0cd2b875c247ddcfafb6710653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>College students</topic><topic>Conferences (Gatherings)</topic><topic>Departments</topic><topic>Disproportionate Representation</topic><topic>Doctoral Programs</topic><topic>Doctoral Students</topic><topic>Elementary Education</topic><topic>Elementary Schools</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Hungarian</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Mathematics Activities</topic><topic>Measurement Techniques</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Methods Courses</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Self evaluation</topic><topic>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gatto, Malu A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gohdes, Anita R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Traber, Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Velden, Mariken A. C. G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>PS, political science & politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gatto, Malu A. C.</au><au>Gohdes, Anita R.</au><au>Traber, Denise</au><au>van der Velden, Mariken A. C. G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Selecting in or Selecting Out? Gender Gaps and Political Methodology in Europe</atitle><jtitle>PS, political science & politics</jtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>122</spage><epage>127</epage><pages>122-127</pages><issn>1049-0965</issn><eissn>1537-5935</eissn><abstract>Studies investigating gender gaps in the doctoral training of political science students have focused so far overwhelmingly on the US context. Although important research within this context has made strides in identifying the persistent challenges to women’s incorporation in political methodology, much remains unknown about whether women and men have different experiences in methods training during their PhD programs. We contribute to this debate by analyzing data from an original survey on the methods-training experiences of political science PhD students at different European universities. We assess whether gender gaps exist with respect to PhD students’ methods training and confidence in employing methods skills. Our findings show that women cover significantly fewer methods courses in their doctoral training. When women do participate in methods training, they show levels of method employment similar to their male colleagues. We discuss the implications of these findings in the context of European doctoral training.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1049096519001288</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0227-9183</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7367-8646</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4056-5770</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1049-0965 |
ispartof | PS, political science & politics, 2020-01, Vol.53 (1), p.122-127 |
issn | 1049-0965 1537-5935 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2329706137 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | College students Conferences (Gatherings) Departments Disproportionate Representation Doctoral Programs Doctoral Students Elementary Education Elementary Schools Employment Females Gender Hungarian Males Mathematics Activities Measurement Techniques Methods Methods Courses Political science Politics Self evaluation Self Evaluation (Individuals) Skills Students Training Women |
title | Selecting in or Selecting Out? Gender Gaps and Political Methodology in Europe |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T12%3A18%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selecting%20in%20or%20Selecting%20Out?%20Gender%20Gaps%20and%20Political%20Methodology%20in%20Europe&rft.jtitle=PS,%20political%20science%20&%20politics&rft.au=Gatto,%20Malu%20A.%20C.&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=122&rft.epage=127&rft.pages=122-127&rft.issn=1049-0965&rft.eissn=1537-5935&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1049096519001288&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2329706137%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2329706137&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |