Selecting in or Selecting Out? Gender Gaps and Political Methodology in Europe

Studies investigating gender gaps in the doctoral training of political science students have focused so far overwhelmingly on the US context. Although important research within this context has made strides in identifying the persistent challenges to women’s incorporation in political methodology,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PS, political science & politics political science & politics, 2020-01, Vol.53 (1), p.122-127
Hauptverfasser: Gatto, Malu A. C., Gohdes, Anita R., Traber, Denise, van der Velden, Mariken A. C. G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 127
container_issue 1
container_start_page 122
container_title PS, political science & politics
container_volume 53
creator Gatto, Malu A. C.
Gohdes, Anita R.
Traber, Denise
van der Velden, Mariken A. C. G.
description Studies investigating gender gaps in the doctoral training of political science students have focused so far overwhelmingly on the US context. Although important research within this context has made strides in identifying the persistent challenges to women’s incorporation in political methodology, much remains unknown about whether women and men have different experiences in methods training during their PhD programs. We contribute to this debate by analyzing data from an original survey on the methods-training experiences of political science PhD students at different European universities. We assess whether gender gaps exist with respect to PhD students’ methods training and confidence in employing methods skills. Our findings show that women cover significantly fewer methods courses in their doctoral training. When women do participate in methods training, they show levels of method employment similar to their male colleagues. We discuss the implications of these findings in the context of European doctoral training.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1049096519001288
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2329706137</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2329706137</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-1918115e8bd7f61df418c71aeb46f97817c407b0cd2b875c247ddcfafb6710653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUEtLw0AQXkTBWv0B3hY8R3ey2ddJpNQoVCtUz2Gzj5oSs3E3OfTfm1LBg3OZGb4XfAhdA7kFAuJuA6RQRHEGihDIpTxBM2BUZExRdjrdE5wd8HN0kdKOTCMZmaHXjWudGZpui5sOh4j__vU43OPSddZFXOo-Yd1Z_BbaZmiMbvGLGz6DDW3Y7g_S5RhD7y7Rmddtcle_e44-Hpfvi6dstS6fFw-rzFDgQwYKJABzsrbCc7C-AGkEaFcX3CshQZiCiJoYm9dSMJMXwlrjta-5AMIZnaObo28fw_fo0lDtwhi7KbLKaa4E4UDFxIIjy8SQUnS-6mPzpeO-AlIdaqv-1UZ_AFJEXmI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2329706137</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selecting in or Selecting Out? Gender Gaps and Political Methodology in Europe</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Gatto, Malu A. C. ; Gohdes, Anita R. ; Traber, Denise ; van der Velden, Mariken A. C. G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gatto, Malu A. C. ; Gohdes, Anita R. ; Traber, Denise ; van der Velden, Mariken A. C. G.</creatorcontrib><description>Studies investigating gender gaps in the doctoral training of political science students have focused so far overwhelmingly on the US context. Although important research within this context has made strides in identifying the persistent challenges to women’s incorporation in political methodology, much remains unknown about whether women and men have different experiences in methods training during their PhD programs. We contribute to this debate by analyzing data from an original survey on the methods-training experiences of political science PhD students at different European universities. We assess whether gender gaps exist with respect to PhD students’ methods training and confidence in employing methods skills. Our findings show that women cover significantly fewer methods courses in their doctoral training. When women do participate in methods training, they show levels of method employment similar to their male colleagues. We discuss the implications of these findings in the context of European doctoral training.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-0965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5935</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1049096519001288</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>College students ; Conferences (Gatherings) ; Departments ; Disproportionate Representation ; Doctoral Programs ; Doctoral Students ; Elementary Education ; Elementary Schools ; Employment ; Females ; Gender ; Hungarian ; Males ; Mathematics Activities ; Measurement Techniques ; Methods ; Methods Courses ; Political science ; Politics ; Self evaluation ; Self Evaluation (Individuals) ; Skills ; Students ; Training ; Women</subject><ispartof>PS, political science &amp; politics, 2020-01, Vol.53 (1), p.122-127</ispartof><rights>Copyright © American Political Science Association 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-1918115e8bd7f61df418c71aeb46f97817c407b0cd2b875c247ddcfafb6710653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-1918115e8bd7f61df418c71aeb46f97817c407b0cd2b875c247ddcfafb6710653</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0227-9183 ; 0000-0001-7367-8646 ; 0000-0003-4056-5770</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gatto, Malu A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gohdes, Anita R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Traber, Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Velden, Mariken A. C. G.</creatorcontrib><title>Selecting in or Selecting Out? Gender Gaps and Political Methodology in Europe</title><title>PS, political science &amp; politics</title><description>Studies investigating gender gaps in the doctoral training of political science students have focused so far overwhelmingly on the US context. Although important research within this context has made strides in identifying the persistent challenges to women’s incorporation in political methodology, much remains unknown about whether women and men have different experiences in methods training during their PhD programs. We contribute to this debate by analyzing data from an original survey on the methods-training experiences of political science PhD students at different European universities. We assess whether gender gaps exist with respect to PhD students’ methods training and confidence in employing methods skills. Our findings show that women cover significantly fewer methods courses in their doctoral training. When women do participate in methods training, they show levels of method employment similar to their male colleagues. We discuss the implications of these findings in the context of European doctoral training.</description><subject>College students</subject><subject>Conferences (Gatherings)</subject><subject>Departments</subject><subject>Disproportionate Representation</subject><subject>Doctoral Programs</subject><subject>Doctoral Students</subject><subject>Elementary Education</subject><subject>Elementary Schools</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Hungarian</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Mathematics Activities</subject><subject>Measurement Techniques</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Methods Courses</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Self evaluation</subject><subject>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1049-0965</issn><issn>1537-5935</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNplUEtLw0AQXkTBWv0B3hY8R3ey2ddJpNQoVCtUz2Gzj5oSs3E3OfTfm1LBg3OZGb4XfAhdA7kFAuJuA6RQRHEGihDIpTxBM2BUZExRdjrdE5wd8HN0kdKOTCMZmaHXjWudGZpui5sOh4j__vU43OPSddZFXOo-Yd1Z_BbaZmiMbvGLGz6DDW3Y7g_S5RhD7y7Rmddtcle_e44-Hpfvi6dstS6fFw-rzFDgQwYKJABzsrbCc7C-AGkEaFcX3CshQZiCiJoYm9dSMJMXwlrjta-5AMIZnaObo28fw_fo0lDtwhi7KbLKaa4E4UDFxIIjy8SQUnS-6mPzpeO-AlIdaqv-1UZ_AFJEXmI</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Gatto, Malu A. C.</creator><creator>Gohdes, Anita R.</creator><creator>Traber, Denise</creator><creator>van der Velden, Mariken A. C. G.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0227-9183</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7367-8646</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4056-5770</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Selecting in or Selecting Out? Gender Gaps and Political Methodology in Europe</title><author>Gatto, Malu A. C. ; Gohdes, Anita R. ; Traber, Denise ; van der Velden, Mariken A. C. G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-1918115e8bd7f61df418c71aeb46f97817c407b0cd2b875c247ddcfafb6710653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>College students</topic><topic>Conferences (Gatherings)</topic><topic>Departments</topic><topic>Disproportionate Representation</topic><topic>Doctoral Programs</topic><topic>Doctoral Students</topic><topic>Elementary Education</topic><topic>Elementary Schools</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Hungarian</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Mathematics Activities</topic><topic>Measurement Techniques</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Methods Courses</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Self evaluation</topic><topic>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gatto, Malu A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gohdes, Anita R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Traber, Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Velden, Mariken A. C. G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>PS, political science &amp; politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gatto, Malu A. C.</au><au>Gohdes, Anita R.</au><au>Traber, Denise</au><au>van der Velden, Mariken A. C. G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Selecting in or Selecting Out? Gender Gaps and Political Methodology in Europe</atitle><jtitle>PS, political science &amp; politics</jtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>122</spage><epage>127</epage><pages>122-127</pages><issn>1049-0965</issn><eissn>1537-5935</eissn><abstract>Studies investigating gender gaps in the doctoral training of political science students have focused so far overwhelmingly on the US context. Although important research within this context has made strides in identifying the persistent challenges to women’s incorporation in political methodology, much remains unknown about whether women and men have different experiences in methods training during their PhD programs. We contribute to this debate by analyzing data from an original survey on the methods-training experiences of political science PhD students at different European universities. We assess whether gender gaps exist with respect to PhD students’ methods training and confidence in employing methods skills. Our findings show that women cover significantly fewer methods courses in their doctoral training. When women do participate in methods training, they show levels of method employment similar to their male colleagues. We discuss the implications of these findings in the context of European doctoral training.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1049096519001288</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0227-9183</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7367-8646</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4056-5770</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1049-0965
ispartof PS, political science & politics, 2020-01, Vol.53 (1), p.122-127
issn 1049-0965
1537-5935
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2329706137
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects College students
Conferences (Gatherings)
Departments
Disproportionate Representation
Doctoral Programs
Doctoral Students
Elementary Education
Elementary Schools
Employment
Females
Gender
Hungarian
Males
Mathematics Activities
Measurement Techniques
Methods
Methods Courses
Political science
Politics
Self evaluation
Self Evaluation (Individuals)
Skills
Students
Training
Women
title Selecting in or Selecting Out? Gender Gaps and Political Methodology in Europe
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T12%3A18%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selecting%20in%20or%20Selecting%20Out?%20Gender%20Gaps%20and%20Political%20Methodology%20in%20Europe&rft.jtitle=PS,%20political%20science%20&%20politics&rft.au=Gatto,%20Malu%20A.%20C.&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=122&rft.epage=127&rft.pages=122-127&rft.issn=1049-0965&rft.eissn=1537-5935&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1049096519001288&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2329706137%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2329706137&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true