From ad-hoc modelling to strategic infrastructure: A manifesto for model management
Models are playing an increasingly prominent role in watershed management, and environmental management more generally. To successfully utilize model-based tools for governing water resources, modelling timelines must match decision making timelines, and modelling costs must fall within budget const...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental modelling & software : with environment data news 2020-01, Vol.123, p.104563, Article 104563 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 104563 |
container_title | Environmental modelling & software : with environment data news |
container_volume | 123 |
creator | Arnold, Thorsten Guillaume, Joseph H.A. Lahtinen, Tuomas J. Vervoort, R. Willem |
description | Models are playing an increasingly prominent role in watershed management, and environmental management more generally. To successfully utilize model-based tools for governing water resources, modelling timelines must match decision making timelines, and modelling costs must fall within budget constraints. Clarity on management options for modelling processes, and effective strategies, are likey to improve outcomes. This paper provides a first conceptualisation of model management and lays out its scope. We define management of numerical models (MNM) as governance, operational support, and administration of modelling, and argue that it is a universal activity that is crucial but often overlooked in organizations that rely on modelling. The paper lays out the leverage points available to a model manager, based on a review of model management practices in several fields, highlights lessons learned, and opportunities for further improvement as model management becomes a mainstream concern in both research and practice.
•Emerging explicit knowledge around managing numerical modelling (MNM) processes.•MNM improves return on investment in model-supported decision infrastructure.•Leverage points are procedural guidelines, cyberinfrastructure, knowledge management.•Blue-print approaches to MNM are not expected to be successful.•Consideration of context important - an agency's roles, capacity, and resources. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104563 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2329279624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1364815219308461</els_id><sourcerecordid>2329279624</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-7211b004e16d0dd6a6973e1d171463e70d3ad50c27a2b4b40aa10cb35b5ea0723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMtKAzEUDaJgfXyCMOB6al6TdNxIKVaFggt1HTLJnZqhM6lJpuDfmzLdu7rnHs65j4PQHcFzgol46OYwHKJv05xiUmeOV4KdoRlZSFYKScV5xkzwckEqeomuYuwwxhnzGfpYB98X2pbf3hS9t7DbuWFbJF_EFHSCrTOFG9qgczuaNAZ4LJZFrwfXQsyq1ofJduT0FnoY0g26aPUuwu2pXqOv9fPn6rXcvL-8rZab0rAFT6WkhDQYcyDCYmuFFrVkQCyRhAsGElumbYUNlZo2vOFYa4JNw6qmAo0lZdfofpq7D_5nzOeozo9hyCsVZbSmshaUZ1U1qUzwMQZo1T64XodfRbA65qc6dcpPHfNTU37Z9zT5IL9wcBBUNA4GA9YFMElZ7_6Z8AdOUnu7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2329279624</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>From ad-hoc modelling to strategic infrastructure: A manifesto for model management</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Arnold, Thorsten ; Guillaume, Joseph H.A. ; Lahtinen, Tuomas J. ; Vervoort, R. Willem</creator><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Thorsten ; Guillaume, Joseph H.A. ; Lahtinen, Tuomas J. ; Vervoort, R. Willem</creatorcontrib><description>Models are playing an increasingly prominent role in watershed management, and environmental management more generally. To successfully utilize model-based tools for governing water resources, modelling timelines must match decision making timelines, and modelling costs must fall within budget constraints. Clarity on management options for modelling processes, and effective strategies, are likey to improve outcomes. This paper provides a first conceptualisation of model management and lays out its scope. We define management of numerical models (MNM) as governance, operational support, and administration of modelling, and argue that it is a universal activity that is crucial but often overlooked in organizations that rely on modelling. The paper lays out the leverage points available to a model manager, based on a review of model management practices in several fields, highlights lessons learned, and opportunities for further improvement as model management becomes a mainstream concern in both research and practice.
•Emerging explicit knowledge around managing numerical modelling (MNM) processes.•MNM improves return on investment in model-supported decision infrastructure.•Leverage points are procedural guidelines, cyberinfrastructure, knowledge management.•Blue-print approaches to MNM are not expected to be successful.•Consideration of context important - an agency's roles, capacity, and resources.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-8152</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6726</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104563</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Constraint modelling ; Cyberinfrastructure ; Decision making ; Environmental management ; Knowledge management ; Mathematical models ; Model management ; Numerical models ; Resource management ; Water resources ; Watershed management ; Workflow</subject><ispartof>Environmental modelling & software : with environment data news, 2020-01, Vol.123, p.104563, Article 104563</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jan 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-7211b004e16d0dd6a6973e1d171463e70d3ad50c27a2b4b40aa10cb35b5ea0723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-7211b004e16d0dd6a6973e1d171463e70d3ad50c27a2b4b40aa10cb35b5ea0723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104563$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Thorsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guillaume, Joseph H.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lahtinen, Tuomas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vervoort, R. Willem</creatorcontrib><title>From ad-hoc modelling to strategic infrastructure: A manifesto for model management</title><title>Environmental modelling & software : with environment data news</title><description>Models are playing an increasingly prominent role in watershed management, and environmental management more generally. To successfully utilize model-based tools for governing water resources, modelling timelines must match decision making timelines, and modelling costs must fall within budget constraints. Clarity on management options for modelling processes, and effective strategies, are likey to improve outcomes. This paper provides a first conceptualisation of model management and lays out its scope. We define management of numerical models (MNM) as governance, operational support, and administration of modelling, and argue that it is a universal activity that is crucial but often overlooked in organizations that rely on modelling. The paper lays out the leverage points available to a model manager, based on a review of model management practices in several fields, highlights lessons learned, and opportunities for further improvement as model management becomes a mainstream concern in both research and practice.
•Emerging explicit knowledge around managing numerical modelling (MNM) processes.•MNM improves return on investment in model-supported decision infrastructure.•Leverage points are procedural guidelines, cyberinfrastructure, knowledge management.•Blue-print approaches to MNM are not expected to be successful.•Consideration of context important - an agency's roles, capacity, and resources.</description><subject>Constraint modelling</subject><subject>Cyberinfrastructure</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Model management</subject><subject>Numerical models</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Watershed management</subject><subject>Workflow</subject><issn>1364-8152</issn><issn>1873-6726</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUMtKAzEUDaJgfXyCMOB6al6TdNxIKVaFggt1HTLJnZqhM6lJpuDfmzLdu7rnHs65j4PQHcFzgol46OYwHKJv05xiUmeOV4KdoRlZSFYKScV5xkzwckEqeomuYuwwxhnzGfpYB98X2pbf3hS9t7DbuWFbJF_EFHSCrTOFG9qgczuaNAZ4LJZFrwfXQsyq1ofJduT0FnoY0g26aPUuwu2pXqOv9fPn6rXcvL-8rZab0rAFT6WkhDQYcyDCYmuFFrVkQCyRhAsGElumbYUNlZo2vOFYa4JNw6qmAo0lZdfofpq7D_5nzOeozo9hyCsVZbSmshaUZ1U1qUzwMQZo1T64XodfRbA65qc6dcpPHfNTU37Z9zT5IL9wcBBUNA4GA9YFMElZ7_6Z8AdOUnu7</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Arnold, Thorsten</creator><creator>Guillaume, Joseph H.A.</creator><creator>Lahtinen, Tuomas J.</creator><creator>Vervoort, R. Willem</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>From ad-hoc modelling to strategic infrastructure: A manifesto for model management</title><author>Arnold, Thorsten ; Guillaume, Joseph H.A. ; Lahtinen, Tuomas J. ; Vervoort, R. Willem</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-7211b004e16d0dd6a6973e1d171463e70d3ad50c27a2b4b40aa10cb35b5ea0723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Constraint modelling</topic><topic>Cyberinfrastructure</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Model management</topic><topic>Numerical models</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Watershed management</topic><topic>Workflow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Thorsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guillaume, Joseph H.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lahtinen, Tuomas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vervoort, R. Willem</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental modelling & software : with environment data news</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arnold, Thorsten</au><au>Guillaume, Joseph H.A.</au><au>Lahtinen, Tuomas J.</au><au>Vervoort, R. Willem</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>From ad-hoc modelling to strategic infrastructure: A manifesto for model management</atitle><jtitle>Environmental modelling & software : with environment data news</jtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>123</volume><spage>104563</spage><pages>104563-</pages><artnum>104563</artnum><issn>1364-8152</issn><eissn>1873-6726</eissn><abstract>Models are playing an increasingly prominent role in watershed management, and environmental management more generally. To successfully utilize model-based tools for governing water resources, modelling timelines must match decision making timelines, and modelling costs must fall within budget constraints. Clarity on management options for modelling processes, and effective strategies, are likey to improve outcomes. This paper provides a first conceptualisation of model management and lays out its scope. We define management of numerical models (MNM) as governance, operational support, and administration of modelling, and argue that it is a universal activity that is crucial but often overlooked in organizations that rely on modelling. The paper lays out the leverage points available to a model manager, based on a review of model management practices in several fields, highlights lessons learned, and opportunities for further improvement as model management becomes a mainstream concern in both research and practice.
•Emerging explicit knowledge around managing numerical modelling (MNM) processes.•MNM improves return on investment in model-supported decision infrastructure.•Leverage points are procedural guidelines, cyberinfrastructure, knowledge management.•Blue-print approaches to MNM are not expected to be successful.•Consideration of context important - an agency's roles, capacity, and resources.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104563</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1364-8152 |
ispartof | Environmental modelling & software : with environment data news, 2020-01, Vol.123, p.104563, Article 104563 |
issn | 1364-8152 1873-6726 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2329279624 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Constraint modelling Cyberinfrastructure Decision making Environmental management Knowledge management Mathematical models Model management Numerical models Resource management Water resources Watershed management Workflow |
title | From ad-hoc modelling to strategic infrastructure: A manifesto for model management |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A02%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=From%20ad-hoc%20modelling%20to%20strategic%20infrastructure:%20A%20manifesto%20for%20model%20management&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20modelling%20&%20software%20:%20with%20environment%20data%20news&rft.au=Arnold,%20Thorsten&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=123&rft.spage=104563&rft.pages=104563-&rft.artnum=104563&rft.issn=1364-8152&rft.eissn=1873-6726&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104563&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2329279624%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2329279624&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1364815219308461&rfr_iscdi=true |