Determining Rainwater Harvesting Storage Capacity with Particle Swarm Optimization
A reduction in the amount of available clean water is a universal problem, and the harvest of rainwater is one of the methods that can solve this issue. In this study, the smallest reservoir capacity that can collect rainwater falling on roofs is defined, using daily rainfall data spanning a 32-year...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water resources management 2019-11, Vol.33 (14), p.4749-4766 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4766 |
---|---|
container_issue | 14 |
container_start_page | 4749 |
container_title | Water resources management |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Saplioglu, Kemal Kucukerdem, Tulay Sugra Şenel, Fatih Ahmet |
description | A reduction in the amount of available clean water is a universal problem, and the harvest of rainwater is one of the methods that can solve this issue. In this study, the smallest reservoir capacity that can collect rainwater falling on roofs is defined, using daily rainfall data spanning a 32-year period for the cities Burdur, Isparta, and Antalya. Reservoir capacities with different roof areas being able to serve different needs are expressed using graphics. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is compared with classic methods like the mass curve method, and the minimum flaw method. While the mass curve method provides the best results among the classic methods, PSO offers similar results. This study is divided into two sections. The first section includes the optimization model, which is defined for annual fixed needs. The software created in this section is compared with the results obtained from the other methods and its accuracy is proven. In the second section, the software is created according to users’ changing needs, which is not available for the other methods. The biggest advantage of the software is to be able to define optimum reservoir capacity in accordance with changing water needs and user risk perception. In this paper, a sample study is conducted to show the difference between fixed needs and changing needs, with the advantage acquired via optimization according to changing needs being shown. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11269-019-02389-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2329105787</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2329105787</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-472e7b86bc0e3de711a61fab69494fdbdc4587c63427368feaa469e2541fbbfd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wNOC59V8bbI5StVWKFRaPYfZ3WxN6X6YpJb6601dwZuHYZjhfWZeXoSuCb4lGMs7TwgVKsUkFmW5StkJGpFMspSIDJ-iEVYUp1xyco4uvN9gHDGFR2j5YIJxjW1tu06WYNs9xDmZgfs0PhyXq9A5WJtkAj2UNhySvQ3vyQu4YMutSVZ7cE2y6INt7BcE27WX6KyGrTdXv32M3p4eXyezdL6YPk_u52nJiArRDDWyyEVRYsMqIwkBQWoohOKK11VRlTzLZSkYp5KJvDYAXChDM07qoqgrNkY3w93edR-76FZvup1r40tNGVUEZzKXUUUHVek6752pde9sA-6gCdbH7PSQnY7Z6Z_sNIsQGyAfxe3auL_T_1DfFtFy3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2329105787</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determining Rainwater Harvesting Storage Capacity with Particle Swarm Optimization</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Saplioglu, Kemal ; Kucukerdem, Tulay Sugra ; Şenel, Fatih Ahmet</creator><creatorcontrib>Saplioglu, Kemal ; Kucukerdem, Tulay Sugra ; Şenel, Fatih Ahmet</creatorcontrib><description>A reduction in the amount of available clean water is a universal problem, and the harvest of rainwater is one of the methods that can solve this issue. In this study, the smallest reservoir capacity that can collect rainwater falling on roofs is defined, using daily rainfall data spanning a 32-year period for the cities Burdur, Isparta, and Antalya. Reservoir capacities with different roof areas being able to serve different needs are expressed using graphics. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is compared with classic methods like the mass curve method, and the minimum flaw method. While the mass curve method provides the best results among the classic methods, PSO offers similar results. This study is divided into two sections. The first section includes the optimization model, which is defined for annual fixed needs. The software created in this section is compared with the results obtained from the other methods and its accuracy is proven. In the second section, the software is created according to users’ changing needs, which is not available for the other methods. The biggest advantage of the software is to be able to define optimum reservoir capacity in accordance with changing water needs and user risk perception. In this paper, a sample study is conducted to show the difference between fixed needs and changing needs, with the advantage acquired via optimization according to changing needs being shown.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0920-4741</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1650</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11269-019-02389-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Atmospheric Sciences ; Civil Engineering ; Computer programs ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Environment ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Graphics ; Hydrogeology ; Hydrologic data ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Methods ; Optimization ; Particle swarm optimization ; Rain ; Rain water ; Rainfall ; Reservoir capacity ; Reservoirs ; Risk perception ; Roofs ; Software ; Storage capacity ; Storage conditions ; Water demand ; Water harvesting</subject><ispartof>Water resources management, 2019-11, Vol.33 (14), p.4749-4766</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><rights>Water Resources Management is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-472e7b86bc0e3de711a61fab69494fdbdc4587c63427368feaa469e2541fbbfd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-472e7b86bc0e3de711a61fab69494fdbdc4587c63427368feaa469e2541fbbfd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1918-7277 ; 0000-0003-0016-8690 ; 0000-0002-1102-1718</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11269-019-02389-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-019-02389-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saplioglu, Kemal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kucukerdem, Tulay Sugra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Şenel, Fatih Ahmet</creatorcontrib><title>Determining Rainwater Harvesting Storage Capacity with Particle Swarm Optimization</title><title>Water resources management</title><addtitle>Water Resour Manage</addtitle><description>A reduction in the amount of available clean water is a universal problem, and the harvest of rainwater is one of the methods that can solve this issue. In this study, the smallest reservoir capacity that can collect rainwater falling on roofs is defined, using daily rainfall data spanning a 32-year period for the cities Burdur, Isparta, and Antalya. Reservoir capacities with different roof areas being able to serve different needs are expressed using graphics. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is compared with classic methods like the mass curve method, and the minimum flaw method. While the mass curve method provides the best results among the classic methods, PSO offers similar results. This study is divided into two sections. The first section includes the optimization model, which is defined for annual fixed needs. The software created in this section is compared with the results obtained from the other methods and its accuracy is proven. In the second section, the software is created according to users’ changing needs, which is not available for the other methods. The biggest advantage of the software is to be able to define optimum reservoir capacity in accordance with changing water needs and user risk perception. In this paper, a sample study is conducted to show the difference between fixed needs and changing needs, with the advantage acquired via optimization according to changing needs being shown.</description><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Computer programs</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Graphics</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Hydrologic data</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Particle swarm optimization</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rain water</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Reservoir capacity</subject><subject>Reservoirs</subject><subject>Risk perception</subject><subject>Roofs</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Storage capacity</subject><subject>Storage conditions</subject><subject>Water demand</subject><subject>Water harvesting</subject><issn>0920-4741</issn><issn>1573-1650</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wNOC59V8bbI5StVWKFRaPYfZ3WxN6X6YpJb6601dwZuHYZjhfWZeXoSuCb4lGMs7TwgVKsUkFmW5StkJGpFMspSIDJ-iEVYUp1xyco4uvN9gHDGFR2j5YIJxjW1tu06WYNs9xDmZgfs0PhyXq9A5WJtkAj2UNhySvQ3vyQu4YMutSVZ7cE2y6INt7BcE27WX6KyGrTdXv32M3p4eXyezdL6YPk_u52nJiArRDDWyyEVRYsMqIwkBQWoohOKK11VRlTzLZSkYp5KJvDYAXChDM07qoqgrNkY3w93edR-76FZvup1r40tNGVUEZzKXUUUHVek6752pde9sA-6gCdbH7PSQnY7Z6Z_sNIsQGyAfxe3auL_T_1DfFtFy3Q</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Saplioglu, Kemal</creator><creator>Kucukerdem, Tulay Sugra</creator><creator>Şenel, Fatih Ahmet</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1918-7277</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0016-8690</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1102-1718</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Determining Rainwater Harvesting Storage Capacity with Particle Swarm Optimization</title><author>Saplioglu, Kemal ; Kucukerdem, Tulay Sugra ; Şenel, Fatih Ahmet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-472e7b86bc0e3de711a61fab69494fdbdc4587c63427368feaa469e2541fbbfd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Computer programs</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Graphics</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Hydrologic data</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Particle swarm optimization</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rain water</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Reservoir capacity</topic><topic>Reservoirs</topic><topic>Risk perception</topic><topic>Roofs</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Storage capacity</topic><topic>Storage conditions</topic><topic>Water demand</topic><topic>Water harvesting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saplioglu, Kemal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kucukerdem, Tulay Sugra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Şenel, Fatih Ahmet</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water resources management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saplioglu, Kemal</au><au>Kucukerdem, Tulay Sugra</au><au>Şenel, Fatih Ahmet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determining Rainwater Harvesting Storage Capacity with Particle Swarm Optimization</atitle><jtitle>Water resources management</jtitle><stitle>Water Resour Manage</stitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>4749</spage><epage>4766</epage><pages>4749-4766</pages><issn>0920-4741</issn><eissn>1573-1650</eissn><abstract>A reduction in the amount of available clean water is a universal problem, and the harvest of rainwater is one of the methods that can solve this issue. In this study, the smallest reservoir capacity that can collect rainwater falling on roofs is defined, using daily rainfall data spanning a 32-year period for the cities Burdur, Isparta, and Antalya. Reservoir capacities with different roof areas being able to serve different needs are expressed using graphics. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is compared with classic methods like the mass curve method, and the minimum flaw method. While the mass curve method provides the best results among the classic methods, PSO offers similar results. This study is divided into two sections. The first section includes the optimization model, which is defined for annual fixed needs. The software created in this section is compared with the results obtained from the other methods and its accuracy is proven. In the second section, the software is created according to users’ changing needs, which is not available for the other methods. The biggest advantage of the software is to be able to define optimum reservoir capacity in accordance with changing water needs and user risk perception. In this paper, a sample study is conducted to show the difference between fixed needs and changing needs, with the advantage acquired via optimization according to changing needs being shown.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11269-019-02389-3</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1918-7277</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0016-8690</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1102-1718</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0920-4741 |
ispartof | Water resources management, 2019-11, Vol.33 (14), p.4749-4766 |
issn | 0920-4741 1573-1650 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2329105787 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Atmospheric Sciences Civil Engineering Computer programs Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Environment Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Graphics Hydrogeology Hydrologic data Hydrology/Water Resources Methods Optimization Particle swarm optimization Rain Rain water Rainfall Reservoir capacity Reservoirs Risk perception Roofs Software Storage capacity Storage conditions Water demand Water harvesting |
title | Determining Rainwater Harvesting Storage Capacity with Particle Swarm Optimization |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T11%3A10%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determining%20Rainwater%20Harvesting%20Storage%20Capacity%20with%20Particle%20Swarm%20Optimization&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20management&rft.au=Saplioglu,%20Kemal&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=4749&rft.epage=4766&rft.pages=4749-4766&rft.issn=0920-4741&rft.eissn=1573-1650&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11269-019-02389-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2329105787%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2329105787&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |