Determining Rainwater Harvesting Storage Capacity with Particle Swarm Optimization

A reduction in the amount of available clean water is a universal problem, and the harvest of rainwater is one of the methods that can solve this issue. In this study, the smallest reservoir capacity that can collect rainwater falling on roofs is defined, using daily rainfall data spanning a 32-year...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water resources management 2019-11, Vol.33 (14), p.4749-4766
Hauptverfasser: Saplioglu, Kemal, Kucukerdem, Tulay Sugra, Şenel, Fatih Ahmet
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4766
container_issue 14
container_start_page 4749
container_title Water resources management
container_volume 33
creator Saplioglu, Kemal
Kucukerdem, Tulay Sugra
Şenel, Fatih Ahmet
description A reduction in the amount of available clean water is a universal problem, and the harvest of rainwater is one of the methods that can solve this issue. In this study, the smallest reservoir capacity that can collect rainwater falling on roofs is defined, using daily rainfall data spanning a 32-year period for the cities Burdur, Isparta, and Antalya. Reservoir capacities with different roof areas being able to serve different needs are expressed using graphics. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is compared with classic methods like the mass curve method, and the minimum flaw method. While the mass curve method provides the best results among the classic methods, PSO offers similar results. This study is divided into two sections. The first section includes the optimization model, which is defined for annual fixed needs. The software created in this section is compared with the results obtained from the other methods and its accuracy is proven. In the second section, the software is created according to users’ changing needs, which is not available for the other methods. The biggest advantage of the software is to be able to define optimum reservoir capacity in accordance with changing water needs and user risk perception. In this paper, a sample study is conducted to show the difference between fixed needs and changing needs, with the advantage acquired via optimization according to changing needs being shown.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11269-019-02389-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2329105787</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2329105787</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-472e7b86bc0e3de711a61fab69494fdbdc4587c63427368feaa469e2541fbbfd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wNOC59V8bbI5StVWKFRaPYfZ3WxN6X6YpJb6601dwZuHYZjhfWZeXoSuCb4lGMs7TwgVKsUkFmW5StkJGpFMspSIDJ-iEVYUp1xyco4uvN9gHDGFR2j5YIJxjW1tu06WYNs9xDmZgfs0PhyXq9A5WJtkAj2UNhySvQ3vyQu4YMutSVZ7cE2y6INt7BcE27WX6KyGrTdXv32M3p4eXyezdL6YPk_u52nJiArRDDWyyEVRYsMqIwkBQWoohOKK11VRlTzLZSkYp5KJvDYAXChDM07qoqgrNkY3w93edR-76FZvup1r40tNGVUEZzKXUUUHVek6752pde9sA-6gCdbH7PSQnY7Z6Z_sNIsQGyAfxe3auL_T_1DfFtFy3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2329105787</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determining Rainwater Harvesting Storage Capacity with Particle Swarm Optimization</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Saplioglu, Kemal ; Kucukerdem, Tulay Sugra ; Şenel, Fatih Ahmet</creator><creatorcontrib>Saplioglu, Kemal ; Kucukerdem, Tulay Sugra ; Şenel, Fatih Ahmet</creatorcontrib><description>A reduction in the amount of available clean water is a universal problem, and the harvest of rainwater is one of the methods that can solve this issue. In this study, the smallest reservoir capacity that can collect rainwater falling on roofs is defined, using daily rainfall data spanning a 32-year period for the cities Burdur, Isparta, and Antalya. Reservoir capacities with different roof areas being able to serve different needs are expressed using graphics. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is compared with classic methods like the mass curve method, and the minimum flaw method. While the mass curve method provides the best results among the classic methods, PSO offers similar results. This study is divided into two sections. The first section includes the optimization model, which is defined for annual fixed needs. The software created in this section is compared with the results obtained from the other methods and its accuracy is proven. In the second section, the software is created according to users’ changing needs, which is not available for the other methods. The biggest advantage of the software is to be able to define optimum reservoir capacity in accordance with changing water needs and user risk perception. In this paper, a sample study is conducted to show the difference between fixed needs and changing needs, with the advantage acquired via optimization according to changing needs being shown.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0920-4741</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1650</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11269-019-02389-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Atmospheric Sciences ; Civil Engineering ; Computer programs ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Environment ; Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences ; Graphics ; Hydrogeology ; Hydrologic data ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Methods ; Optimization ; Particle swarm optimization ; Rain ; Rain water ; Rainfall ; Reservoir capacity ; Reservoirs ; Risk perception ; Roofs ; Software ; Storage capacity ; Storage conditions ; Water demand ; Water harvesting</subject><ispartof>Water resources management, 2019-11, Vol.33 (14), p.4749-4766</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><rights>Water Resources Management is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-472e7b86bc0e3de711a61fab69494fdbdc4587c63427368feaa469e2541fbbfd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-472e7b86bc0e3de711a61fab69494fdbdc4587c63427368feaa469e2541fbbfd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1918-7277 ; 0000-0003-0016-8690 ; 0000-0002-1102-1718</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11269-019-02389-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-019-02389-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saplioglu, Kemal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kucukerdem, Tulay Sugra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Şenel, Fatih Ahmet</creatorcontrib><title>Determining Rainwater Harvesting Storage Capacity with Particle Swarm Optimization</title><title>Water resources management</title><addtitle>Water Resour Manage</addtitle><description>A reduction in the amount of available clean water is a universal problem, and the harvest of rainwater is one of the methods that can solve this issue. In this study, the smallest reservoir capacity that can collect rainwater falling on roofs is defined, using daily rainfall data spanning a 32-year period for the cities Burdur, Isparta, and Antalya. Reservoir capacities with different roof areas being able to serve different needs are expressed using graphics. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is compared with classic methods like the mass curve method, and the minimum flaw method. While the mass curve method provides the best results among the classic methods, PSO offers similar results. This study is divided into two sections. The first section includes the optimization model, which is defined for annual fixed needs. The software created in this section is compared with the results obtained from the other methods and its accuracy is proven. In the second section, the software is created according to users’ changing needs, which is not available for the other methods. The biggest advantage of the software is to be able to define optimum reservoir capacity in accordance with changing water needs and user risk perception. In this paper, a sample study is conducted to show the difference between fixed needs and changing needs, with the advantage acquired via optimization according to changing needs being shown.</description><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Computer programs</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Graphics</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Hydrologic data</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Particle swarm optimization</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rain water</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Reservoir capacity</subject><subject>Reservoirs</subject><subject>Risk perception</subject><subject>Roofs</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Storage capacity</subject><subject>Storage conditions</subject><subject>Water demand</subject><subject>Water harvesting</subject><issn>0920-4741</issn><issn>1573-1650</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wNOC59V8bbI5StVWKFRaPYfZ3WxN6X6YpJb6601dwZuHYZjhfWZeXoSuCb4lGMs7TwgVKsUkFmW5StkJGpFMspSIDJ-iEVYUp1xyco4uvN9gHDGFR2j5YIJxjW1tu06WYNs9xDmZgfs0PhyXq9A5WJtkAj2UNhySvQ3vyQu4YMutSVZ7cE2y6INt7BcE27WX6KyGrTdXv32M3p4eXyezdL6YPk_u52nJiArRDDWyyEVRYsMqIwkBQWoohOKK11VRlTzLZSkYp5KJvDYAXChDM07qoqgrNkY3w93edR-76FZvup1r40tNGVUEZzKXUUUHVek6752pde9sA-6gCdbH7PSQnY7Z6Z_sNIsQGyAfxe3auL_T_1DfFtFy3Q</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Saplioglu, Kemal</creator><creator>Kucukerdem, Tulay Sugra</creator><creator>Şenel, Fatih Ahmet</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1918-7277</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0016-8690</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1102-1718</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Determining Rainwater Harvesting Storage Capacity with Particle Swarm Optimization</title><author>Saplioglu, Kemal ; Kucukerdem, Tulay Sugra ; Şenel, Fatih Ahmet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-472e7b86bc0e3de711a61fab69494fdbdc4587c63427368feaa469e2541fbbfd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Computer programs</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Graphics</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Hydrologic data</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Particle swarm optimization</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rain water</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Reservoir capacity</topic><topic>Reservoirs</topic><topic>Risk perception</topic><topic>Roofs</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Storage capacity</topic><topic>Storage conditions</topic><topic>Water demand</topic><topic>Water harvesting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saplioglu, Kemal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kucukerdem, Tulay Sugra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Şenel, Fatih Ahmet</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water resources management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saplioglu, Kemal</au><au>Kucukerdem, Tulay Sugra</au><au>Şenel, Fatih Ahmet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determining Rainwater Harvesting Storage Capacity with Particle Swarm Optimization</atitle><jtitle>Water resources management</jtitle><stitle>Water Resour Manage</stitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>4749</spage><epage>4766</epage><pages>4749-4766</pages><issn>0920-4741</issn><eissn>1573-1650</eissn><abstract>A reduction in the amount of available clean water is a universal problem, and the harvest of rainwater is one of the methods that can solve this issue. In this study, the smallest reservoir capacity that can collect rainwater falling on roofs is defined, using daily rainfall data spanning a 32-year period for the cities Burdur, Isparta, and Antalya. Reservoir capacities with different roof areas being able to serve different needs are expressed using graphics. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is compared with classic methods like the mass curve method, and the minimum flaw method. While the mass curve method provides the best results among the classic methods, PSO offers similar results. This study is divided into two sections. The first section includes the optimization model, which is defined for annual fixed needs. The software created in this section is compared with the results obtained from the other methods and its accuracy is proven. In the second section, the software is created according to users’ changing needs, which is not available for the other methods. The biggest advantage of the software is to be able to define optimum reservoir capacity in accordance with changing water needs and user risk perception. In this paper, a sample study is conducted to show the difference between fixed needs and changing needs, with the advantage acquired via optimization according to changing needs being shown.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11269-019-02389-3</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1918-7277</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0016-8690</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1102-1718</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0920-4741
ispartof Water resources management, 2019-11, Vol.33 (14), p.4749-4766
issn 0920-4741
1573-1650
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2329105787
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Atmospheric Sciences
Civil Engineering
Computer programs
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Environment
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Graphics
Hydrogeology
Hydrologic data
Hydrology/Water Resources
Methods
Optimization
Particle swarm optimization
Rain
Rain water
Rainfall
Reservoir capacity
Reservoirs
Risk perception
Roofs
Software
Storage capacity
Storage conditions
Water demand
Water harvesting
title Determining Rainwater Harvesting Storage Capacity with Particle Swarm Optimization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T11%3A10%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determining%20Rainwater%20Harvesting%20Storage%20Capacity%20with%20Particle%20Swarm%20Optimization&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20management&rft.au=Saplioglu,%20Kemal&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=4749&rft.epage=4766&rft.pages=4749-4766&rft.issn=0920-4741&rft.eissn=1573-1650&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11269-019-02389-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2329105787%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2329105787&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true