Novel hybrids of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) with several metaheuristic algorithms for spatial susceptibility assessment of seismic-induced landslide

Strong ground motions usually trigger lots of slope failures in the affected area. In this work, we analyse the occurrence likelihood of earthquake-triggered landslide by employing the ensembles of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS) with four well-known metaheuristics techniques, namely...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geomatics, natural hazards and risk natural hazards and risk, 2019-01, Vol.10 (1), p.1879-1911
Hauptverfasser: Moayedi, Hossein, Mehrabi, Mohammad, Kalantar, Bahareh, Abdullahi Mu'azu, Mohammed, A. Rashid, Ahmad Safuan, Foong, Loke Kok, Nguyen, Hoang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1911
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1879
container_title Geomatics, natural hazards and risk
container_volume 10
creator Moayedi, Hossein
Mehrabi, Mohammad
Kalantar, Bahareh
Abdullahi Mu'azu, Mohammed
A. Rashid, Ahmad Safuan
Foong, Loke Kok
Nguyen, Hoang
description Strong ground motions usually trigger lots of slope failures in the affected area. In this work, we analyse the occurrence likelihood of earthquake-triggered landslide by employing the ensembles of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS) with four well-known metaheuristics techniques, namely particle swarm optimization (PSO), genetic algorithm (GA), ant colony optimization (ACO), and differential evolution (DE) algorithms. Twelve landslide conditioning factors namely, elevation, slope degree, lithology, peak ground acceleration (PGA), stream power index (SPI), topographic wetness index (TWI), distance to road, distance to river, distance to fault, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), slope aspect, and plan curvature are considered within the geographic information system (GIS) to produce the required spatial database. In this paper, frequency ratio (FR) model is used to evaluate the spatial interaction between the landslides and conditioning factors. Meantime, among a total of 458 marked earthquake-induced landslides, 366 (80%) are specified to the learning process, and the remaining 92 (20%) landslides are used to evaluate the accuracy of applied models. The landslide susceptibility maps are generated in the GIS environment. Three accuracy criteria of mean square error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), and area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUROC) are used to develop a ranking system for comparing the integrity of the designed models. The total ranking scores (TRSs) of 15, 8, 10, and 18, respectively, obtained for PSO-ANFIS, GA-ANFIS, ACO-ANFIS, and DE-ANFIS revealed the superiority of the DE algorithm compared to other metaheuristics techniques. Also, the DE-ANFIS emerged as the fastest ensemble, due to the highest convergence speed obtained for this model.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/19475705.2019.1650126
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2328367847</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_31d8227db42c4b448a5821382eb2da8e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2328367847</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-dab43ca233d1f435cf2de698b2c8d29412e23d708944272c5b3d00c3346388ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uc1u1DAQjhBIVKWPgGSJCxyy9V8S742qorBSVQ7A2XLsSdcrJ148zlbpC_GaeLulR3yxNfP9zPirqveMrhhV9JKtZdd0tFlxytYr1jaU8fZVdXas103HxOuXN23eVheIO1qO4Kqj8qz6cxcPEMh26ZN3SOJAjDP77A9AJphTrIf58XEhfhogwWSB4IIZRvLx6u5m8-MTefB5SxAOkEwgI2SzLSyP2Vtiwn1MpT0iGWIiuDfZFxDOaKE49D74vBCDCIgjTPlojuBx9Lb2k5stOBLM5DB4B--qN4MJCBfP93n16-bLz-tv9e33r5vrq9vayobl2pleCmu4EI4NUjR24A7ateq5VY6vJePAheuoWkvJO26bXjhKrRCyFUrBIM6rzUnXRbPT--RHkxYdjddPhZjutUlluwBaMKc471wvuZW9lMo0ijOhOPTcGQVF68NJa5_i7xkw612c01TG17z8v2g7JbuCak4omyJiguHFlVF9jFj_i1gfI9bPERfe5xOvZBPTaB5iCk5ns4SYhmQm67GM-F-Jv4gVsFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2328367847</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Novel hybrids of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) with several metaheuristic algorithms for spatial susceptibility assessment of seismic-induced landslide</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Moayedi, Hossein ; Mehrabi, Mohammad ; Kalantar, Bahareh ; Abdullahi Mu'azu, Mohammed ; A. Rashid, Ahmad Safuan ; Foong, Loke Kok ; Nguyen, Hoang</creator><creatorcontrib>Moayedi, Hossein ; Mehrabi, Mohammad ; Kalantar, Bahareh ; Abdullahi Mu'azu, Mohammed ; A. Rashid, Ahmad Safuan ; Foong, Loke Kok ; Nguyen, Hoang</creatorcontrib><description>Strong ground motions usually trigger lots of slope failures in the affected area. In this work, we analyse the occurrence likelihood of earthquake-triggered landslide by employing the ensembles of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS) with four well-known metaheuristics techniques, namely particle swarm optimization (PSO), genetic algorithm (GA), ant colony optimization (ACO), and differential evolution (DE) algorithms. Twelve landslide conditioning factors namely, elevation, slope degree, lithology, peak ground acceleration (PGA), stream power index (SPI), topographic wetness index (TWI), distance to road, distance to river, distance to fault, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), slope aspect, and plan curvature are considered within the geographic information system (GIS) to produce the required spatial database. In this paper, frequency ratio (FR) model is used to evaluate the spatial interaction between the landslides and conditioning factors. Meantime, among a total of 458 marked earthquake-induced landslides, 366 (80%) are specified to the learning process, and the remaining 92 (20%) landslides are used to evaluate the accuracy of applied models. The landslide susceptibility maps are generated in the GIS environment. Three accuracy criteria of mean square error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), and area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUROC) are used to develop a ranking system for comparing the integrity of the designed models. The total ranking scores (TRSs) of 15, 8, 10, and 18, respectively, obtained for PSO-ANFIS, GA-ANFIS, ACO-ANFIS, and DE-ANFIS revealed the superiority of the DE algorithm compared to other metaheuristics techniques. Also, the DE-ANFIS emerged as the fastest ensemble, due to the highest convergence speed obtained for this model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1947-5705</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1947-5713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/19475705.2019.1650126</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Acceleration ; Accuracy ; Adaptive systems ; Algorithms ; ANFIS ; Ant colony optimization ; Artificial neural networks ; Distance ; Earthquake-triggered landslide ; Earthquakes ; Elevation ; Evaluation ; Evolutionary algorithms ; Evolutionary computation ; evolutionary optimization ; Fuzzy logic ; Fuzzy systems ; Gene mapping ; Genetic algorithms ; geographic information system ; Geographic information systems ; Geographical information systems ; Heuristic methods ; Hybrids ; Inference ; Information systems ; landslide susceptibility mapping ; Landslides ; Landslides &amp; mudslides ; Lithology ; Mean square errors ; Model accuracy ; Normalized difference vegetative index ; Particle swarm optimization ; Ranking ; Remote sensing ; Rivers ; Root-mean-square errors ; Seismic activity ; Seismic response ; Slopes ; Vegetation index ; Wetness index</subject><ispartof>Geomatics, natural hazards and risk, 2019-01, Vol.10 (1), p.1879-1911</ispartof><rights>2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited Trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2019</rights><rights>2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited Trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-dab43ca233d1f435cf2de698b2c8d29412e23d708944272c5b3d00c3346388ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-dab43ca233d1f435cf2de698b2c8d29412e23d708944272c5b3d00c3346388ef3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3843-0503 ; 0000-0002-2822-3463 ; 0000-0002-5625-1437</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/19475705.2019.1650126$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19475705.2019.1650126$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,2096,27479,27901,27902,59116,59117</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moayedi, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehrabi, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalantar, Bahareh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdullahi Mu'azu, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A. Rashid, Ahmad Safuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foong, Loke Kok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Hoang</creatorcontrib><title>Novel hybrids of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) with several metaheuristic algorithms for spatial susceptibility assessment of seismic-induced landslide</title><title>Geomatics, natural hazards and risk</title><description>Strong ground motions usually trigger lots of slope failures in the affected area. In this work, we analyse the occurrence likelihood of earthquake-triggered landslide by employing the ensembles of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS) with four well-known metaheuristics techniques, namely particle swarm optimization (PSO), genetic algorithm (GA), ant colony optimization (ACO), and differential evolution (DE) algorithms. Twelve landslide conditioning factors namely, elevation, slope degree, lithology, peak ground acceleration (PGA), stream power index (SPI), topographic wetness index (TWI), distance to road, distance to river, distance to fault, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), slope aspect, and plan curvature are considered within the geographic information system (GIS) to produce the required spatial database. In this paper, frequency ratio (FR) model is used to evaluate the spatial interaction between the landslides and conditioning factors. Meantime, among a total of 458 marked earthquake-induced landslides, 366 (80%) are specified to the learning process, and the remaining 92 (20%) landslides are used to evaluate the accuracy of applied models. The landslide susceptibility maps are generated in the GIS environment. Three accuracy criteria of mean square error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), and area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUROC) are used to develop a ranking system for comparing the integrity of the designed models. The total ranking scores (TRSs) of 15, 8, 10, and 18, respectively, obtained for PSO-ANFIS, GA-ANFIS, ACO-ANFIS, and DE-ANFIS revealed the superiority of the DE algorithm compared to other metaheuristics techniques. Also, the DE-ANFIS emerged as the fastest ensemble, due to the highest convergence speed obtained for this model.</description><subject>Acceleration</subject><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Adaptive systems</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>ANFIS</subject><subject>Ant colony optimization</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Distance</subject><subject>Earthquake-triggered landslide</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Evolutionary algorithms</subject><subject>Evolutionary computation</subject><subject>evolutionary optimization</subject><subject>Fuzzy logic</subject><subject>Fuzzy systems</subject><subject>Gene mapping</subject><subject>Genetic algorithms</subject><subject>geographic information system</subject><subject>Geographic information systems</subject><subject>Geographical information systems</subject><subject>Heuristic methods</subject><subject>Hybrids</subject><subject>Inference</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>landslide susceptibility mapping</subject><subject>Landslides</subject><subject>Landslides &amp; mudslides</subject><subject>Lithology</subject><subject>Mean square errors</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Normalized difference vegetative index</subject><subject>Particle swarm optimization</subject><subject>Ranking</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Root-mean-square errors</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Slopes</subject><subject>Vegetation index</subject><subject>Wetness index</subject><issn>1947-5705</issn><issn>1947-5713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uc1u1DAQjhBIVKWPgGSJCxyy9V8S742qorBSVQ7A2XLsSdcrJ148zlbpC_GaeLulR3yxNfP9zPirqveMrhhV9JKtZdd0tFlxytYr1jaU8fZVdXas103HxOuXN23eVheIO1qO4Kqj8qz6cxcPEMh26ZN3SOJAjDP77A9AJphTrIf58XEhfhogwWSB4IIZRvLx6u5m8-MTefB5SxAOkEwgI2SzLSyP2Vtiwn1MpT0iGWIiuDfZFxDOaKE49D74vBCDCIgjTPlojuBx9Lb2k5stOBLM5DB4B--qN4MJCBfP93n16-bLz-tv9e33r5vrq9vayobl2pleCmu4EI4NUjR24A7ateq5VY6vJePAheuoWkvJO26bXjhKrRCyFUrBIM6rzUnXRbPT--RHkxYdjddPhZjutUlluwBaMKc471wvuZW9lMo0ijOhOPTcGQVF68NJa5_i7xkw612c01TG17z8v2g7JbuCak4omyJiguHFlVF9jFj_i1gfI9bPERfe5xOvZBPTaB5iCk5ns4SYhmQm67GM-F-Jv4gVsFA</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Moayedi, Hossein</creator><creator>Mehrabi, Mohammad</creator><creator>Kalantar, Bahareh</creator><creator>Abdullahi Mu'azu, Mohammed</creator><creator>A. Rashid, Ahmad Safuan</creator><creator>Foong, Loke Kok</creator><creator>Nguyen, Hoang</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3843-0503</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2822-3463</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5625-1437</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Novel hybrids of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) with several metaheuristic algorithms for spatial susceptibility assessment of seismic-induced landslide</title><author>Moayedi, Hossein ; Mehrabi, Mohammad ; Kalantar, Bahareh ; Abdullahi Mu'azu, Mohammed ; A. Rashid, Ahmad Safuan ; Foong, Loke Kok ; Nguyen, Hoang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-dab43ca233d1f435cf2de698b2c8d29412e23d708944272c5b3d00c3346388ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acceleration</topic><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Adaptive systems</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>ANFIS</topic><topic>Ant colony optimization</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Distance</topic><topic>Earthquake-triggered landslide</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Evolutionary algorithms</topic><topic>Evolutionary computation</topic><topic>evolutionary optimization</topic><topic>Fuzzy logic</topic><topic>Fuzzy systems</topic><topic>Gene mapping</topic><topic>Genetic algorithms</topic><topic>geographic information system</topic><topic>Geographic information systems</topic><topic>Geographical information systems</topic><topic>Heuristic methods</topic><topic>Hybrids</topic><topic>Inference</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>landslide susceptibility mapping</topic><topic>Landslides</topic><topic>Landslides &amp; mudslides</topic><topic>Lithology</topic><topic>Mean square errors</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Normalized difference vegetative index</topic><topic>Particle swarm optimization</topic><topic>Ranking</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Root-mean-square errors</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Slopes</topic><topic>Vegetation index</topic><topic>Wetness index</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moayedi, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehrabi, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalantar, Bahareh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdullahi Mu'azu, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A. Rashid, Ahmad Safuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foong, Loke Kok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Hoang</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Geomatics, natural hazards and risk</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moayedi, Hossein</au><au>Mehrabi, Mohammad</au><au>Kalantar, Bahareh</au><au>Abdullahi Mu'azu, Mohammed</au><au>A. Rashid, Ahmad Safuan</au><au>Foong, Loke Kok</au><au>Nguyen, Hoang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Novel hybrids of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) with several metaheuristic algorithms for spatial susceptibility assessment of seismic-induced landslide</atitle><jtitle>Geomatics, natural hazards and risk</jtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1879</spage><epage>1911</epage><pages>1879-1911</pages><issn>1947-5705</issn><eissn>1947-5713</eissn><abstract>Strong ground motions usually trigger lots of slope failures in the affected area. In this work, we analyse the occurrence likelihood of earthquake-triggered landslide by employing the ensembles of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS) with four well-known metaheuristics techniques, namely particle swarm optimization (PSO), genetic algorithm (GA), ant colony optimization (ACO), and differential evolution (DE) algorithms. Twelve landslide conditioning factors namely, elevation, slope degree, lithology, peak ground acceleration (PGA), stream power index (SPI), topographic wetness index (TWI), distance to road, distance to river, distance to fault, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), slope aspect, and plan curvature are considered within the geographic information system (GIS) to produce the required spatial database. In this paper, frequency ratio (FR) model is used to evaluate the spatial interaction between the landslides and conditioning factors. Meantime, among a total of 458 marked earthquake-induced landslides, 366 (80%) are specified to the learning process, and the remaining 92 (20%) landslides are used to evaluate the accuracy of applied models. The landslide susceptibility maps are generated in the GIS environment. Three accuracy criteria of mean square error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), and area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUROC) are used to develop a ranking system for comparing the integrity of the designed models. The total ranking scores (TRSs) of 15, 8, 10, and 18, respectively, obtained for PSO-ANFIS, GA-ANFIS, ACO-ANFIS, and DE-ANFIS revealed the superiority of the DE algorithm compared to other metaheuristics techniques. Also, the DE-ANFIS emerged as the fastest ensemble, due to the highest convergence speed obtained for this model.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/19475705.2019.1650126</doi><tpages>33</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3843-0503</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2822-3463</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5625-1437</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1947-5705
ispartof Geomatics, natural hazards and risk, 2019-01, Vol.10 (1), p.1879-1911
issn 1947-5705
1947-5713
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2328367847
source Taylor & Francis Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Acceleration
Accuracy
Adaptive systems
Algorithms
ANFIS
Ant colony optimization
Artificial neural networks
Distance
Earthquake-triggered landslide
Earthquakes
Elevation
Evaluation
Evolutionary algorithms
Evolutionary computation
evolutionary optimization
Fuzzy logic
Fuzzy systems
Gene mapping
Genetic algorithms
geographic information system
Geographic information systems
Geographical information systems
Heuristic methods
Hybrids
Inference
Information systems
landslide susceptibility mapping
Landslides
Landslides & mudslides
Lithology
Mean square errors
Model accuracy
Normalized difference vegetative index
Particle swarm optimization
Ranking
Remote sensing
Rivers
Root-mean-square errors
Seismic activity
Seismic response
Slopes
Vegetation index
Wetness index
title Novel hybrids of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) with several metaheuristic algorithms for spatial susceptibility assessment of seismic-induced landslide
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A59%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Novel%20hybrids%20of%20adaptive%20neuro-fuzzy%20inference%20system%20(ANFIS)%20with%20several%20metaheuristic%20algorithms%20for%20spatial%20susceptibility%20assessment%20of%20seismic-induced%20landslide&rft.jtitle=Geomatics,%20natural%20hazards%20and%20risk&rft.au=Moayedi,%20Hossein&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1879&rft.epage=1911&rft.pages=1879-1911&rft.issn=1947-5705&rft.eissn=1947-5713&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/19475705.2019.1650126&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2328367847%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2328367847&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_31d8227db42c4b448a5821382eb2da8e&rfr_iscdi=true