Historical developments in Dutch gas systems: Unravelling safety concerns in gas provision
•Safety practices lag behind developments in gas provision.•Current safety practices are not prepared for renewable gasses.•Key functions related to gas provision are increasingly decentralized.•Risk factors are identified that threaten safety in gas provision. This paper identifies safety concerns...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Safety science 2020-01, Vol.121, p.147-157 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 157 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 147 |
container_title | Safety science |
container_volume | 121 |
creator | Riemersma, Ben Correljé, Aad F. Künneke, Rolf W. |
description | •Safety practices lag behind developments in gas provision.•Current safety practices are not prepared for renewable gasses.•Key functions related to gas provision are increasingly decentralized.•Risk factors are identified that threaten safety in gas provision.
This paper identifies safety concerns that arise from ongoing technical and institutional changes in the Dutch gas sector. The Netherlands has a well-developed gas infrastructure that primarily transports natural gas, although its constituting features are undergoing major changes. We identify three historical developments, and show how (1) ongoing effects of liberalization; (2) earthquakes in the Groningen-area; and (3) commitment to climate goals affect safety. Between trends of ongoing decentralization and a growing variety of gas producers, the most urgent concerns relate to the operation of low- and medium pressure distribution grids. Natural gas is losing its prominent role, leaving system operators faced with trade-offs induced by a declining share of customers. At the same time, responsibilities for new gas technologies are allocated over a growing number of actors. In illustrating how safety practices have evolved in line with incremental technological and institutional developments over the last half century, this article elaborates how sudden changes in constitutional features of infrastructural systems might jeopardize system safety. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.08.040 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2328303509</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0925753519302164</els_id><sourcerecordid>2328303509</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-b6505cd81b1f73a8f455f55854f65973e5acf75f0ec82eea0fdadf814189fa23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwB5giMSec7ThxEAviq0iVWMrCYrnOuThK42KnlfrvcSkz0y3Pe-_dQ8g1hYICrW67IkbjCga0KUAWUMIJmVBZNzmFkp2SCTRM5LXg4pxcxNgBAOUVnZDPmYujD87oPmtxh73frHEYY-aG7Gk7mq9spWMW93HEdbzLPoagE9S7YZVFbXHcZ8YPBsPwmziwm-B3Ljo_XJIzq_uIV39zShYvz4vHWT5_f317fJjnhtdszJeVAGFaSZfU1lxLWwphhZCitJVoao5CG1sLC2gkQ9RgW91aSUsqG6sZn5Kb49pU_L3FOKrOb8OQGhXjTHLgAppEsSNlgo8xoFWb4NY67BUFdVCoOnVQqA4KFUiVFKbQ_TGE6fydw6ASgend1gU0o2q9-y_-A__je9c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2328303509</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Historical developments in Dutch gas systems: Unravelling safety concerns in gas provision</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Riemersma, Ben ; Correljé, Aad F. ; Künneke, Rolf W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Riemersma, Ben ; Correljé, Aad F. ; Künneke, Rolf W.</creatorcontrib><description>•Safety practices lag behind developments in gas provision.•Current safety practices are not prepared for renewable gasses.•Key functions related to gas provision are increasingly decentralized.•Risk factors are identified that threaten safety in gas provision.
This paper identifies safety concerns that arise from ongoing technical and institutional changes in the Dutch gas sector. The Netherlands has a well-developed gas infrastructure that primarily transports natural gas, although its constituting features are undergoing major changes. We identify three historical developments, and show how (1) ongoing effects of liberalization; (2) earthquakes in the Groningen-area; and (3) commitment to climate goals affect safety. Between trends of ongoing decentralization and a growing variety of gas producers, the most urgent concerns relate to the operation of low- and medium pressure distribution grids. Natural gas is losing its prominent role, leaving system operators faced with trade-offs induced by a declining share of customers. At the same time, responsibilities for new gas technologies are allocated over a growing number of actors. In illustrating how safety practices have evolved in line with incremental technological and institutional developments over the last half century, this article elaborates how sudden changes in constitutional features of infrastructural systems might jeopardize system safety.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-7535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.08.040</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Changes ; Climate change ; Earthquakes ; Liberalization ; Natural gas ; Natural gas industry ; Pressure distribution ; Safety ; Safety management ; Seismic activity ; Stress concentration</subject><ispartof>Safety science, 2020-01, Vol.121, p.147-157</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jan 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-b6505cd81b1f73a8f455f55854f65973e5acf75f0ec82eea0fdadf814189fa23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-b6505cd81b1f73a8f455f55854f65973e5acf75f0ec82eea0fdadf814189fa23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.08.040$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Riemersma, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Correljé, Aad F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Künneke, Rolf W.</creatorcontrib><title>Historical developments in Dutch gas systems: Unravelling safety concerns in gas provision</title><title>Safety science</title><description>•Safety practices lag behind developments in gas provision.•Current safety practices are not prepared for renewable gasses.•Key functions related to gas provision are increasingly decentralized.•Risk factors are identified that threaten safety in gas provision.
This paper identifies safety concerns that arise from ongoing technical and institutional changes in the Dutch gas sector. The Netherlands has a well-developed gas infrastructure that primarily transports natural gas, although its constituting features are undergoing major changes. We identify three historical developments, and show how (1) ongoing effects of liberalization; (2) earthquakes in the Groningen-area; and (3) commitment to climate goals affect safety. Between trends of ongoing decentralization and a growing variety of gas producers, the most urgent concerns relate to the operation of low- and medium pressure distribution grids. Natural gas is losing its prominent role, leaving system operators faced with trade-offs induced by a declining share of customers. At the same time, responsibilities for new gas technologies are allocated over a growing number of actors. In illustrating how safety practices have evolved in line with incremental technological and institutional developments over the last half century, this article elaborates how sudden changes in constitutional features of infrastructural systems might jeopardize system safety.</description><subject>Changes</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Liberalization</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Natural gas industry</subject><subject>Pressure distribution</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Safety management</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Stress concentration</subject><issn>0925-7535</issn><issn>1879-1042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwB5giMSec7ThxEAviq0iVWMrCYrnOuThK42KnlfrvcSkz0y3Pe-_dQ8g1hYICrW67IkbjCga0KUAWUMIJmVBZNzmFkp2SCTRM5LXg4pxcxNgBAOUVnZDPmYujD87oPmtxh73frHEYY-aG7Gk7mq9spWMW93HEdbzLPoagE9S7YZVFbXHcZ8YPBsPwmziwm-B3Ljo_XJIzq_uIV39zShYvz4vHWT5_f317fJjnhtdszJeVAGFaSZfU1lxLWwphhZCitJVoao5CG1sLC2gkQ9RgW91aSUsqG6sZn5Kb49pU_L3FOKrOb8OQGhXjTHLgAppEsSNlgo8xoFWb4NY67BUFdVCoOnVQqA4KFUiVFKbQ_TGE6fydw6ASgend1gU0o2q9-y_-A__je9c</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Riemersma, Ben</creator><creator>Correljé, Aad F.</creator><creator>Künneke, Rolf W.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Historical developments in Dutch gas systems: Unravelling safety concerns in gas provision</title><author>Riemersma, Ben ; Correljé, Aad F. ; Künneke, Rolf W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-b6505cd81b1f73a8f455f55854f65973e5acf75f0ec82eea0fdadf814189fa23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Changes</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Liberalization</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Natural gas industry</topic><topic>Pressure distribution</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Safety management</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Stress concentration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Riemersma, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Correljé, Aad F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Künneke, Rolf W.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Safety science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Riemersma, Ben</au><au>Correljé, Aad F.</au><au>Künneke, Rolf W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Historical developments in Dutch gas systems: Unravelling safety concerns in gas provision</atitle><jtitle>Safety science</jtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>121</volume><spage>147</spage><epage>157</epage><pages>147-157</pages><issn>0925-7535</issn><eissn>1879-1042</eissn><abstract>•Safety practices lag behind developments in gas provision.•Current safety practices are not prepared for renewable gasses.•Key functions related to gas provision are increasingly decentralized.•Risk factors are identified that threaten safety in gas provision.
This paper identifies safety concerns that arise from ongoing technical and institutional changes in the Dutch gas sector. The Netherlands has a well-developed gas infrastructure that primarily transports natural gas, although its constituting features are undergoing major changes. We identify three historical developments, and show how (1) ongoing effects of liberalization; (2) earthquakes in the Groningen-area; and (3) commitment to climate goals affect safety. Between trends of ongoing decentralization and a growing variety of gas producers, the most urgent concerns relate to the operation of low- and medium pressure distribution grids. Natural gas is losing its prominent role, leaving system operators faced with trade-offs induced by a declining share of customers. At the same time, responsibilities for new gas technologies are allocated over a growing number of actors. In illustrating how safety practices have evolved in line with incremental technological and institutional developments over the last half century, this article elaborates how sudden changes in constitutional features of infrastructural systems might jeopardize system safety.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ssci.2019.08.040</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0925-7535 |
ispartof | Safety science, 2020-01, Vol.121, p.147-157 |
issn | 0925-7535 1879-1042 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2328303509 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Changes Climate change Earthquakes Liberalization Natural gas Natural gas industry Pressure distribution Safety Safety management Seismic activity Stress concentration |
title | Historical developments in Dutch gas systems: Unravelling safety concerns in gas provision |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T08%3A41%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Historical%20developments%20in%20Dutch%20gas%20systems:%20Unravelling%20safety%20concerns%20in%20gas%20provision&rft.jtitle=Safety%20science&rft.au=Riemersma,%20Ben&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=121&rft.spage=147&rft.epage=157&rft.pages=147-157&rft.issn=0925-7535&rft.eissn=1879-1042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.08.040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2328303509%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2328303509&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0925753519302164&rfr_iscdi=true |