Building a bridge between performance management, radical innovation, and innovation networks: A systematic literature review

Research on performance management (PM) of networks and radical innovation has largely developed along two isolated paths. On the one hand, a growing body of knowledge addresses the use of performance management systems in the context of networks (notably for production and incremental innovation)....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Creativity and innovation management 2019-12, Vol.28 (4), p.536-549
Hauptverfasser: Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos, Facin, Ana Lúcia Figueiredo, Hourneaux Junior, Flavio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 549
container_issue 4
container_start_page 536
container_title Creativity and innovation management
container_volume 28
creator Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos
Facin, Ana Lúcia Figueiredo
Hourneaux Junior, Flavio
description Research on performance management (PM) of networks and radical innovation has largely developed along two isolated paths. On the one hand, a growing body of knowledge addresses the use of performance management systems in the context of networks (notably for production and incremental innovation). On the other hand, radical innovation scholars have shown how innovation initiatives that are more uncertain demand the use of new approaches (e.g., new project management routines or different evaluative tools for portfolios). Some scholars even suggest that traditional PM may suppress radical innovation. Our study takes a different approach. It aims to bridge radical innovation and network performance management through a systematic review of the literature. Here, we adopt a hybrid approach that combines bibliometrics with content analysis. Whereas the literature often separates the issues of network performance management and radical innovation, our contribution expands the theory of network management and radical innovation by developing a conceptual framework based on these concepts, thus combining them. We also offer suggestions for further research on this approach. Our framework suggests that overall, the performance management of radical innovation networks presents different features (e.g., recursive rather than linear) and constructs (e.g., openness and unintended performance) from those of innovation network management.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/caim.12348
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2327707129</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2327707129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3018-8e5aa249a799486138875da033c64148ad78a1d89a776f0e9baa52dc3bbaba033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD9PwzAQxS0EEqWw8AkssaEG7DiNHbZS8adSEQvM1sW5VC6JU-ykVQe-OylhYOKGO73T795Jj5BLzm54X7cGbH3DY5GoIzLiSSojlWb8mIxYloqIpxk7JWchrBljiYj5iHzdd7YqrFtRoLm3xQppju0O0dEN-rLxNTiDtO-wwhpdO6EeCmugota5ZgutbdyEgiv-aOp6i8Z_hDs6o2EfWqz7vaGVbdFD23mkHrcWd-fkpIQq4MXvHJP3x4e3-XO0fH1azGfLyAjGVaRwChAnGcgsS1TKhVJyWgATwqQJTxQUUgEvVA_ItGSY5QDTuDAizyE_YGNyNfhufPPZYWj1uum861_qWMRSMsnjrKeuB8r4JgSPpd54W4Pfa870IV59iFf_xNvDfIB3tsL9P6SezxYvw803JkR_GQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2327707129</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Building a bridge between performance management, radical innovation, and innovation networks: A systematic literature review</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos ; Facin, Ana Lúcia Figueiredo ; Hourneaux Junior, Flavio</creator><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos ; Facin, Ana Lúcia Figueiredo ; Hourneaux Junior, Flavio</creatorcontrib><description>Research on performance management (PM) of networks and radical innovation has largely developed along two isolated paths. On the one hand, a growing body of knowledge addresses the use of performance management systems in the context of networks (notably for production and incremental innovation). On the other hand, radical innovation scholars have shown how innovation initiatives that are more uncertain demand the use of new approaches (e.g., new project management routines or different evaluative tools for portfolios). Some scholars even suggest that traditional PM may suppress radical innovation. Our study takes a different approach. It aims to bridge radical innovation and network performance management through a systematic review of the literature. Here, we adopt a hybrid approach that combines bibliometrics with content analysis. Whereas the literature often separates the issues of network performance management and radical innovation, our contribution expands the theory of network management and radical innovation by developing a conceptual framework based on these concepts, thus combining them. We also offer suggestions for further research on this approach. Our framework suggests that overall, the performance management of radical innovation networks presents different features (e.g., recursive rather than linear) and constructs (e.g., openness and unintended performance) from those of innovation network management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-1690</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8691</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/caim.12348</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bibliometrics ; Content analysis ; Innovations ; Literature reviews ; Management systems ; Network management systems ; Networks ; Performance management ; Project management ; Radicalism</subject><ispartof>Creativity and innovation management, 2019-12, Vol.28 (4), p.536-549</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3018-8e5aa249a799486138875da033c64148ad78a1d89a776f0e9baa52dc3bbaba033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3018-8e5aa249a799486138875da033c64148ad78a1d89a776f0e9baa52dc3bbaba033</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3913-4770 ; 0000-0003-0379-4574 ; 0000-0002-0165-7843</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcaim.12348$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcaim.12348$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Facin, Ana Lúcia Figueiredo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hourneaux Junior, Flavio</creatorcontrib><title>Building a bridge between performance management, radical innovation, and innovation networks: A systematic literature review</title><title>Creativity and innovation management</title><description>Research on performance management (PM) of networks and radical innovation has largely developed along two isolated paths. On the one hand, a growing body of knowledge addresses the use of performance management systems in the context of networks (notably for production and incremental innovation). On the other hand, radical innovation scholars have shown how innovation initiatives that are more uncertain demand the use of new approaches (e.g., new project management routines or different evaluative tools for portfolios). Some scholars even suggest that traditional PM may suppress radical innovation. Our study takes a different approach. It aims to bridge radical innovation and network performance management through a systematic review of the literature. Here, we adopt a hybrid approach that combines bibliometrics with content analysis. Whereas the literature often separates the issues of network performance management and radical innovation, our contribution expands the theory of network management and radical innovation by developing a conceptual framework based on these concepts, thus combining them. We also offer suggestions for further research on this approach. Our framework suggests that overall, the performance management of radical innovation networks presents different features (e.g., recursive rather than linear) and constructs (e.g., openness and unintended performance) from those of innovation network management.</description><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Management systems</subject><subject>Network management systems</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Performance management</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Radicalism</subject><issn>0963-1690</issn><issn>1467-8691</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD9PwzAQxS0EEqWw8AkssaEG7DiNHbZS8adSEQvM1sW5VC6JU-ykVQe-OylhYOKGO73T795Jj5BLzm54X7cGbH3DY5GoIzLiSSojlWb8mIxYloqIpxk7JWchrBljiYj5iHzdd7YqrFtRoLm3xQppju0O0dEN-rLxNTiDtO-wwhpdO6EeCmugota5ZgutbdyEgiv-aOp6i8Z_hDs6o2EfWqz7vaGVbdFD23mkHrcWd-fkpIQq4MXvHJP3x4e3-XO0fH1azGfLyAjGVaRwChAnGcgsS1TKhVJyWgATwqQJTxQUUgEvVA_ItGSY5QDTuDAizyE_YGNyNfhufPPZYWj1uum861_qWMRSMsnjrKeuB8r4JgSPpd54W4Pfa870IV59iFf_xNvDfIB3tsL9P6SezxYvw803JkR_GQ</recordid><startdate>201912</startdate><enddate>201912</enddate><creator>Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos</creator><creator>Facin, Ana Lúcia Figueiredo</creator><creator>Hourneaux Junior, Flavio</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>F29</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3913-4770</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0379-4574</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0165-7843</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201912</creationdate><title>Building a bridge between performance management, radical innovation, and innovation networks: A systematic literature review</title><author>Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos ; Facin, Ana Lúcia Figueiredo ; Hourneaux Junior, Flavio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3018-8e5aa249a799486138875da033c64148ad78a1d89a776f0e9baa52dc3bbaba033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Management systems</topic><topic>Network management systems</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Performance management</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Radicalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Facin, Ana Lúcia Figueiredo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hourneaux Junior, Flavio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Design &amp; Applied Arts Index (DAAI)</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Creativity and innovation management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos</au><au>Facin, Ana Lúcia Figueiredo</au><au>Hourneaux Junior, Flavio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Building a bridge between performance management, radical innovation, and innovation networks: A systematic literature review</atitle><jtitle>Creativity and innovation management</jtitle><date>2019-12</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>536</spage><epage>549</epage><pages>536-549</pages><issn>0963-1690</issn><eissn>1467-8691</eissn><abstract>Research on performance management (PM) of networks and radical innovation has largely developed along two isolated paths. On the one hand, a growing body of knowledge addresses the use of performance management systems in the context of networks (notably for production and incremental innovation). On the other hand, radical innovation scholars have shown how innovation initiatives that are more uncertain demand the use of new approaches (e.g., new project management routines or different evaluative tools for portfolios). Some scholars even suggest that traditional PM may suppress radical innovation. Our study takes a different approach. It aims to bridge radical innovation and network performance management through a systematic review of the literature. Here, we adopt a hybrid approach that combines bibliometrics with content analysis. Whereas the literature often separates the issues of network performance management and radical innovation, our contribution expands the theory of network management and radical innovation by developing a conceptual framework based on these concepts, thus combining them. We also offer suggestions for further research on this approach. Our framework suggests that overall, the performance management of radical innovation networks presents different features (e.g., recursive rather than linear) and constructs (e.g., openness and unintended performance) from those of innovation network management.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/caim.12348</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3913-4770</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0379-4574</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0165-7843</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0963-1690
ispartof Creativity and innovation management, 2019-12, Vol.28 (4), p.536-549
issn 0963-1690
1467-8691
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2327707129
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Bibliometrics
Content analysis
Innovations
Literature reviews
Management systems
Network management systems
Networks
Performance management
Project management
Radicalism
title Building a bridge between performance management, radical innovation, and innovation networks: A systematic literature review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T04%3A47%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Building%20a%20bridge%20between%20performance%20management,%20radical%20innovation,%20and%20innovation%20networks:%20A%20systematic%20literature%20review&rft.jtitle=Creativity%20and%20innovation%20management&rft.au=Gomes,%20Leonardo%20Augusto%20de%20Vasconcelos&rft.date=2019-12&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=536&rft.epage=549&rft.pages=536-549&rft.issn=0963-1690&rft.eissn=1467-8691&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/caim.12348&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2327707129%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2327707129&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true