Building a bridge between performance management, radical innovation, and innovation networks: A systematic literature review
Research on performance management (PM) of networks and radical innovation has largely developed along two isolated paths. On the one hand, a growing body of knowledge addresses the use of performance management systems in the context of networks (notably for production and incremental innovation)....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Creativity and innovation management 2019-12, Vol.28 (4), p.536-549 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 549 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 536 |
container_title | Creativity and innovation management |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos Facin, Ana Lúcia Figueiredo Hourneaux Junior, Flavio |
description | Research on performance management (PM) of networks and radical innovation has largely developed along two isolated paths. On the one hand, a growing body of knowledge addresses the use of performance management systems in the context of networks (notably for production and incremental innovation). On the other hand, radical innovation scholars have shown how innovation initiatives that are more uncertain demand the use of new approaches (e.g., new project management routines or different evaluative tools for portfolios). Some scholars even suggest that traditional PM may suppress radical innovation. Our study takes a different approach. It aims to bridge radical innovation and network performance management through a systematic review of the literature. Here, we adopt a hybrid approach that combines bibliometrics with content analysis. Whereas the literature often separates the issues of network performance management and radical innovation, our contribution expands the theory of network management and radical innovation by developing a conceptual framework based on these concepts, thus combining them. We also offer suggestions for further research on this approach. Our framework suggests that overall, the performance management of radical innovation networks presents different features (e.g., recursive rather than linear) and constructs (e.g., openness and unintended performance) from those of innovation network management. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/caim.12348 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2327707129</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2327707129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3018-8e5aa249a799486138875da033c64148ad78a1d89a776f0e9baa52dc3bbaba033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD9PwzAQxS0EEqWw8AkssaEG7DiNHbZS8adSEQvM1sW5VC6JU-ykVQe-OylhYOKGO73T795Jj5BLzm54X7cGbH3DY5GoIzLiSSojlWb8mIxYloqIpxk7JWchrBljiYj5iHzdd7YqrFtRoLm3xQppju0O0dEN-rLxNTiDtO-wwhpdO6EeCmugota5ZgutbdyEgiv-aOp6i8Z_hDs6o2EfWqz7vaGVbdFD23mkHrcWd-fkpIQq4MXvHJP3x4e3-XO0fH1azGfLyAjGVaRwChAnGcgsS1TKhVJyWgATwqQJTxQUUgEvVA_ItGSY5QDTuDAizyE_YGNyNfhufPPZYWj1uum861_qWMRSMsnjrKeuB8r4JgSPpd54W4Pfa870IV59iFf_xNvDfIB3tsL9P6SezxYvw803JkR_GQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2327707129</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Building a bridge between performance management, radical innovation, and innovation networks: A systematic literature review</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos ; Facin, Ana Lúcia Figueiredo ; Hourneaux Junior, Flavio</creator><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos ; Facin, Ana Lúcia Figueiredo ; Hourneaux Junior, Flavio</creatorcontrib><description>Research on performance management (PM) of networks and radical innovation has largely developed along two isolated paths. On the one hand, a growing body of knowledge addresses the use of performance management systems in the context of networks (notably for production and incremental innovation). On the other hand, radical innovation scholars have shown how innovation initiatives that are more uncertain demand the use of new approaches (e.g., new project management routines or different evaluative tools for portfolios). Some scholars even suggest that traditional PM may suppress radical innovation. Our study takes a different approach. It aims to bridge radical innovation and network performance management through a systematic review of the literature. Here, we adopt a hybrid approach that combines bibliometrics with content analysis. Whereas the literature often separates the issues of network performance management and radical innovation, our contribution expands the theory of network management and radical innovation by developing a conceptual framework based on these concepts, thus combining them. We also offer suggestions for further research on this approach. Our framework suggests that overall, the performance management of radical innovation networks presents different features (e.g., recursive rather than linear) and constructs (e.g., openness and unintended performance) from those of innovation network management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-1690</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8691</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/caim.12348</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bibliometrics ; Content analysis ; Innovations ; Literature reviews ; Management systems ; Network management systems ; Networks ; Performance management ; Project management ; Radicalism</subject><ispartof>Creativity and innovation management, 2019-12, Vol.28 (4), p.536-549</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3018-8e5aa249a799486138875da033c64148ad78a1d89a776f0e9baa52dc3bbaba033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3018-8e5aa249a799486138875da033c64148ad78a1d89a776f0e9baa52dc3bbaba033</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3913-4770 ; 0000-0003-0379-4574 ; 0000-0002-0165-7843</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcaim.12348$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcaim.12348$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Facin, Ana Lúcia Figueiredo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hourneaux Junior, Flavio</creatorcontrib><title>Building a bridge between performance management, radical innovation, and innovation networks: A systematic literature review</title><title>Creativity and innovation management</title><description>Research on performance management (PM) of networks and radical innovation has largely developed along two isolated paths. On the one hand, a growing body of knowledge addresses the use of performance management systems in the context of networks (notably for production and incremental innovation). On the other hand, radical innovation scholars have shown how innovation initiatives that are more uncertain demand the use of new approaches (e.g., new project management routines or different evaluative tools for portfolios). Some scholars even suggest that traditional PM may suppress radical innovation. Our study takes a different approach. It aims to bridge radical innovation and network performance management through a systematic review of the literature. Here, we adopt a hybrid approach that combines bibliometrics with content analysis. Whereas the literature often separates the issues of network performance management and radical innovation, our contribution expands the theory of network management and radical innovation by developing a conceptual framework based on these concepts, thus combining them. We also offer suggestions for further research on this approach. Our framework suggests that overall, the performance management of radical innovation networks presents different features (e.g., recursive rather than linear) and constructs (e.g., openness and unintended performance) from those of innovation network management.</description><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Management systems</subject><subject>Network management systems</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Performance management</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Radicalism</subject><issn>0963-1690</issn><issn>1467-8691</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD9PwzAQxS0EEqWw8AkssaEG7DiNHbZS8adSEQvM1sW5VC6JU-ykVQe-OylhYOKGO73T795Jj5BLzm54X7cGbH3DY5GoIzLiSSojlWb8mIxYloqIpxk7JWchrBljiYj5iHzdd7YqrFtRoLm3xQppju0O0dEN-rLxNTiDtO-wwhpdO6EeCmugota5ZgutbdyEgiv-aOp6i8Z_hDs6o2EfWqz7vaGVbdFD23mkHrcWd-fkpIQq4MXvHJP3x4e3-XO0fH1azGfLyAjGVaRwChAnGcgsS1TKhVJyWgATwqQJTxQUUgEvVA_ItGSY5QDTuDAizyE_YGNyNfhufPPZYWj1uum861_qWMRSMsnjrKeuB8r4JgSPpd54W4Pfa870IV59iFf_xNvDfIB3tsL9P6SezxYvw803JkR_GQ</recordid><startdate>201912</startdate><enddate>201912</enddate><creator>Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos</creator><creator>Facin, Ana Lúcia Figueiredo</creator><creator>Hourneaux Junior, Flavio</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>F29</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3913-4770</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0379-4574</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0165-7843</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201912</creationdate><title>Building a bridge between performance management, radical innovation, and innovation networks: A systematic literature review</title><author>Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos ; Facin, Ana Lúcia Figueiredo ; Hourneaux Junior, Flavio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3018-8e5aa249a799486138875da033c64148ad78a1d89a776f0e9baa52dc3bbaba033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Management systems</topic><topic>Network management systems</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Performance management</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Radicalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Facin, Ana Lúcia Figueiredo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hourneaux Junior, Flavio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Design & Applied Arts Index (DAAI)</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Creativity and innovation management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos</au><au>Facin, Ana Lúcia Figueiredo</au><au>Hourneaux Junior, Flavio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Building a bridge between performance management, radical innovation, and innovation networks: A systematic literature review</atitle><jtitle>Creativity and innovation management</jtitle><date>2019-12</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>536</spage><epage>549</epage><pages>536-549</pages><issn>0963-1690</issn><eissn>1467-8691</eissn><abstract>Research on performance management (PM) of networks and radical innovation has largely developed along two isolated paths. On the one hand, a growing body of knowledge addresses the use of performance management systems in the context of networks (notably for production and incremental innovation). On the other hand, radical innovation scholars have shown how innovation initiatives that are more uncertain demand the use of new approaches (e.g., new project management routines or different evaluative tools for portfolios). Some scholars even suggest that traditional PM may suppress radical innovation. Our study takes a different approach. It aims to bridge radical innovation and network performance management through a systematic review of the literature. Here, we adopt a hybrid approach that combines bibliometrics with content analysis. Whereas the literature often separates the issues of network performance management and radical innovation, our contribution expands the theory of network management and radical innovation by developing a conceptual framework based on these concepts, thus combining them. We also offer suggestions for further research on this approach. Our framework suggests that overall, the performance management of radical innovation networks presents different features (e.g., recursive rather than linear) and constructs (e.g., openness and unintended performance) from those of innovation network management.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/caim.12348</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3913-4770</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0379-4574</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0165-7843</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0963-1690 |
ispartof | Creativity and innovation management, 2019-12, Vol.28 (4), p.536-549 |
issn | 0963-1690 1467-8691 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2327707129 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Bibliometrics Content analysis Innovations Literature reviews Management systems Network management systems Networks Performance management Project management Radicalism |
title | Building a bridge between performance management, radical innovation, and innovation networks: A systematic literature review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T04%3A47%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Building%20a%20bridge%20between%20performance%20management,%20radical%20innovation,%20and%20innovation%20networks:%20A%20systematic%20literature%20review&rft.jtitle=Creativity%20and%20innovation%20management&rft.au=Gomes,%20Leonardo%20Augusto%20de%20Vasconcelos&rft.date=2019-12&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=536&rft.epage=549&rft.pages=536-549&rft.issn=0963-1690&rft.eissn=1467-8691&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/caim.12348&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2327707129%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2327707129&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |