Roots, Riots, and Radical Change—A Road Less Travelled for Ecological Economics
In this paper, we put forward a new research agenda for ecological economics, based on three realisations. We then show how these can be connected through research and used to generate insights with the potential for application in broader, systemic change. The first realisation is that the core amb...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2019-04, Vol.11 (7), p.2001 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 2001 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Pirgmaier, Elke Steinberger, Julia |
description | In this paper, we put forward a new research agenda for ecological economics, based on three realisations. We then show how these can be connected through research and used to generate insights with the potential for application in broader, systemic change. The first realisation is that the core ambition of ecological economics, that of addressing the scale of human environmental resource use and associated impacts, often remains an aspirational goal, rather than being applied within research. In understanding intertwined environmental and social challenges, systemic approaches (including system dynamics) should be revitalised to address the full scope of what is possible or desirable. The second realisation is that the focus on biophysical and economic quantification and methods has been at the expense of a comprehensive social understanding of environmental impacts and barriers to change—including the role of power, social class, geographical location, historical change, and achieving human well-being. For instance, by fetishising growth as the core problem, attention is diverted away from underlying social drivers—monetary gains as profits, rent, or interest fuelled by capitalist competition and, ultimately, unequal power relations. The third realisation is that ecological economics situates itself with respect to mainstream (neoclassical) economics, but simultaneously adopts some of its mandate and blind spots, even in its more progressive camps. Pragmatic attempts to adopt mainstream concepts and tools often comfort, rather than challenge, the reproduction of the very power relations that stand in the way of sustainability transitions. We consider these three realisations as impediments for developing ecological economics as an emancipatory critical research paradigm and political project. We will not focus on or detail the failings of ecological economics, but state what we believe they are and reformulate them as research priorities. By describing and bringing these three elements together, we are able to outline an ambitious research agenda for ecological economics, one capable of catalysing real social change. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su11072001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2323910584</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2323910584</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2101-bc3bfd9d0e00c4254762b885645bd2ec6f04d73fecb347020d61c722193b483f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1Kw0AUhQdRsNRufIIBd2L03pnJ37KE-gMBMdR1mMxPTUkzdaYR3PkQPqFPYmwFPZtzFh_3cg4h5wjXnOdwEwZESBkAHpEJgxQjhBiO_-VTMgthDaM4xxyTCXmqnNuFK1q1e5O9ppXUrZIdLV5kvzJfH59zWjmpaWlCoEsv30zXGU2t83ShXOdWe3qMvdu0KpyREyu7YGa_PiXPt4tlcR-Vj3cPxbyMFEPAqFG8sTrXYACUYLFIE9ZkWZyIuNHMqMSC0Cm3RjVcpMBAJ6hSxjDnjci45VNycbi79e51MGFXr93g-_FlzTjj-dg3EyN1eaCUdyF4Y-utbzfSv9cI9c9q9d9q_Bs_KV1y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2323910584</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Roots, Riots, and Radical Change—A Road Less Travelled for Ecological Economics</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Pirgmaier, Elke ; Steinberger, Julia</creator><creatorcontrib>Pirgmaier, Elke ; Steinberger, Julia</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we put forward a new research agenda for ecological economics, based on three realisations. We then show how these can be connected through research and used to generate insights with the potential for application in broader, systemic change. The first realisation is that the core ambition of ecological economics, that of addressing the scale of human environmental resource use and associated impacts, often remains an aspirational goal, rather than being applied within research. In understanding intertwined environmental and social challenges, systemic approaches (including system dynamics) should be revitalised to address the full scope of what is possible or desirable. The second realisation is that the focus on biophysical and economic quantification and methods has been at the expense of a comprehensive social understanding of environmental impacts and barriers to change—including the role of power, social class, geographical location, historical change, and achieving human well-being. For instance, by fetishising growth as the core problem, attention is diverted away from underlying social drivers—monetary gains as profits, rent, or interest fuelled by capitalist competition and, ultimately, unequal power relations. The third realisation is that ecological economics situates itself with respect to mainstream (neoclassical) economics, but simultaneously adopts some of its mandate and blind spots, even in its more progressive camps. Pragmatic attempts to adopt mainstream concepts and tools often comfort, rather than challenge, the reproduction of the very power relations that stand in the way of sustainability transitions. We consider these three realisations as impediments for developing ecological economics as an emancipatory critical research paradigm and political project. We will not focus on or detail the failings of ecological economics, but state what we believe they are and reformulate them as research priorities. By describing and bringing these three elements together, we are able to outline an ambitious research agenda for ecological economics, one capable of catalysing real social change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su11072001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Activism ; Climate change ; Decision making ; Destruction ; Earth ; Ecological effects ; Ecological monitoring ; Economic conditions ; Economic development ; Economic growth ; Economics ; Environmental changes ; Environmental degradation ; Environmental justice ; Land pollution ; Land use ; Politics ; Research methodology ; Research methods ; Violence</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2019-04, Vol.11 (7), p.2001</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2101-bc3bfd9d0e00c4254762b885645bd2ec6f04d73fecb347020d61c722193b483f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2101-bc3bfd9d0e00c4254762b885645bd2ec6f04d73fecb347020d61c722193b483f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0174-1970</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pirgmaier, Elke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinberger, Julia</creatorcontrib><title>Roots, Riots, and Radical Change—A Road Less Travelled for Ecological Economics</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>In this paper, we put forward a new research agenda for ecological economics, based on three realisations. We then show how these can be connected through research and used to generate insights with the potential for application in broader, systemic change. The first realisation is that the core ambition of ecological economics, that of addressing the scale of human environmental resource use and associated impacts, often remains an aspirational goal, rather than being applied within research. In understanding intertwined environmental and social challenges, systemic approaches (including system dynamics) should be revitalised to address the full scope of what is possible or desirable. The second realisation is that the focus on biophysical and economic quantification and methods has been at the expense of a comprehensive social understanding of environmental impacts and barriers to change—including the role of power, social class, geographical location, historical change, and achieving human well-being. For instance, by fetishising growth as the core problem, attention is diverted away from underlying social drivers—monetary gains as profits, rent, or interest fuelled by capitalist competition and, ultimately, unequal power relations. The third realisation is that ecological economics situates itself with respect to mainstream (neoclassical) economics, but simultaneously adopts some of its mandate and blind spots, even in its more progressive camps. Pragmatic attempts to adopt mainstream concepts and tools often comfort, rather than challenge, the reproduction of the very power relations that stand in the way of sustainability transitions. We consider these three realisations as impediments for developing ecological economics as an emancipatory critical research paradigm and political project. We will not focus on or detail the failings of ecological economics, but state what we believe they are and reformulate them as research priorities. By describing and bringing these three elements together, we are able to outline an ambitious research agenda for ecological economics, one capable of catalysing real social change.</description><subject>Activism</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Destruction</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Environmental degradation</subject><subject>Environmental justice</subject><subject>Land pollution</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Violence</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkM1Kw0AUhQdRsNRufIIBd2L03pnJ37KE-gMBMdR1mMxPTUkzdaYR3PkQPqFPYmwFPZtzFh_3cg4h5wjXnOdwEwZESBkAHpEJgxQjhBiO_-VTMgthDaM4xxyTCXmqnNuFK1q1e5O9ppXUrZIdLV5kvzJfH59zWjmpaWlCoEsv30zXGU2t83ShXOdWe3qMvdu0KpyREyu7YGa_PiXPt4tlcR-Vj3cPxbyMFEPAqFG8sTrXYACUYLFIE9ZkWZyIuNHMqMSC0Cm3RjVcpMBAJ6hSxjDnjci45VNycbi79e51MGFXr93g-_FlzTjj-dg3EyN1eaCUdyF4Y-utbzfSv9cI9c9q9d9q_Bs_KV1y</recordid><startdate>20190404</startdate><enddate>20190404</enddate><creator>Pirgmaier, Elke</creator><creator>Steinberger, Julia</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0174-1970</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190404</creationdate><title>Roots, Riots, and Radical Change—A Road Less Travelled for Ecological Economics</title><author>Pirgmaier, Elke ; Steinberger, Julia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2101-bc3bfd9d0e00c4254762b885645bd2ec6f04d73fecb347020d61c722193b483f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Activism</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Destruction</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Environmental degradation</topic><topic>Environmental justice</topic><topic>Land pollution</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Violence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pirgmaier, Elke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinberger, Julia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pirgmaier, Elke</au><au>Steinberger, Julia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Roots, Riots, and Radical Change—A Road Less Travelled for Ecological Economics</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2019-04-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2001</spage><pages>2001-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>In this paper, we put forward a new research agenda for ecological economics, based on three realisations. We then show how these can be connected through research and used to generate insights with the potential for application in broader, systemic change. The first realisation is that the core ambition of ecological economics, that of addressing the scale of human environmental resource use and associated impacts, often remains an aspirational goal, rather than being applied within research. In understanding intertwined environmental and social challenges, systemic approaches (including system dynamics) should be revitalised to address the full scope of what is possible or desirable. The second realisation is that the focus on biophysical and economic quantification and methods has been at the expense of a comprehensive social understanding of environmental impacts and barriers to change—including the role of power, social class, geographical location, historical change, and achieving human well-being. For instance, by fetishising growth as the core problem, attention is diverted away from underlying social drivers—monetary gains as profits, rent, or interest fuelled by capitalist competition and, ultimately, unequal power relations. The third realisation is that ecological economics situates itself with respect to mainstream (neoclassical) economics, but simultaneously adopts some of its mandate and blind spots, even in its more progressive camps. Pragmatic attempts to adopt mainstream concepts and tools often comfort, rather than challenge, the reproduction of the very power relations that stand in the way of sustainability transitions. We consider these three realisations as impediments for developing ecological economics as an emancipatory critical research paradigm and political project. We will not focus on or detail the failings of ecological economics, but state what we believe they are and reformulate them as research priorities. By describing and bringing these three elements together, we are able to outline an ambitious research agenda for ecological economics, one capable of catalysing real social change.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su11072001</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0174-1970</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2019-04, Vol.11 (7), p.2001 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2323910584 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Activism Climate change Decision making Destruction Earth Ecological effects Ecological monitoring Economic conditions Economic development Economic growth Economics Environmental changes Environmental degradation Environmental justice Land pollution Land use Politics Research methodology Research methods Violence |
title | Roots, Riots, and Radical Change—A Road Less Travelled for Ecological Economics |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T09%3A10%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Roots,%20Riots,%20and%20Radical%20Change%E2%80%94A%20Road%20Less%20Travelled%20for%20Ecological%20Economics&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Pirgmaier,%20Elke&rft.date=2019-04-04&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2001&rft.pages=2001-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su11072001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2323910584%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2323910584&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |