Nonadherence in Tuberculosis Treatment: Predictors and Consequences in New York City
BACKGROUND: Poor adherence to antituberculosis treatment is the most important obstacle to tuberculosis control. PURPOSE: To identify and analyze predictors and consequences of nonadherence to antituberculosis treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of a citywide cohort of 184 patients...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of medicine 1997-02, Vol.102 (2), p.164-170 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | BACKGROUND: Poor adherence to antituberculosis treatment is the most important obstacle to tuberculosis control.
PURPOSE: To identify and analyze predictors and consequences of nonadherence to antituberculosis treatment.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of a citywide cohort of 184 patients with tuberculosis in New York City, newly diagnosed by culture in April 1991—before the strengthening of its control program—and followed up through 1994. Follow-up information was collected through the New York City tuberculosis registry. Nonadherence was defined as treatment default for at least 2 months.
RESULTS: Eighty-eight of the 184 (48%) patients were nonadherent. Greater nonadherence was noted among blacks (unadjusted relative risk [RR] 3.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 to 8.6, compared with whites), injection drug users (RR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.0), homeless (RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.8), alcoholics (RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.9), and HIV-infected patients (RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.9); also, census-derived estimates of household income were lower among nonadherent patients (
P = 0.018). In multivariate analysis, only injection drug use and homelessness predicted nonadherence, yet 46 (39%) of 117 patients who were neither homeless nor drug users were nonadherent. Nonadherent patients took longer to convert to negative culture (254 versus 64 days,
P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9343 1555-7162 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0002-9343(96)00402-0 |