Effects of different inhibitors such as malonic acid, Na₃PO₄ and HgCl₂ on uptake of different forms of antimony in rice plant
Background and aims Antimony is an analogue of arsenic (As), but its uptake mechanisms are not as well understood as As. Antimonite [Sb(III)] probably enters into plant roots via aquaporins but antimonate [Sb(V)] not through the phosphate [P(V)] uptake system as with arsenate [As(V)]. However, previ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plant and soil 2019-12, Vol.445 (1/2), p.259-271 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 271 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1/2 |
container_start_page | 259 |
container_title | Plant and soil |
container_volume | 445 |
creator | Feng, RenWei Lei, Lei Liu, BiXiu Chen, WenXiang Zhang, RuiRui Wang, LiZhen Li, YuanPing Su, JunMing Dai, JiaXin Wang, RenJie Lin, ZiTing Fekih, Ibtissem Ben Mazhar, Sohaib H. Rensing, Christopher |
description | Background and aims
Antimony is an analogue of arsenic (As), but its uptake mechanisms are not as well understood as As. Antimonite [Sb(III)] probably enters into plant roots via aquaporins but antimonate [Sb(V)] not through the phosphate [P(V)] uptake system as with arsenate [As(V)]. However, previous studies observed a dose−dependent interaction between As(V) and P(V) in some plants. This study was conducted mainly to identify that 1) whether the uptake of Sb(III) by plants will be via aquaporin channels; 2) whether the interaction effects between Sb(V) and P(V) might be dose−dependent; 3) whether the uptake of Sb(III) or Sb(V) is at the cost of energy.
Methods
Two hydroponic culture systems were set up using a rice plant (YeXiangYou No.3) to investigate the effects of different chemicals on the uptake of Sb in the rice plants subjected to Sb(III) and Sb(V). These chemicals included malonic acid (C
3
H
4
O
4
), Na
3
PO
4
[P(V)] and HgCl
2
.
Results
Sb was mainly sequestrated in the roots of the rice plants, suggesting a low transport capacity of Sb from roots to shoots. The plants took up Sb more easily under Sb(III) exposure than under Sb(V) exposure. 10 mg L
−1
Sb(III) increased the Sb concentration in the bleeding sap rather than the weight of the bleeding sap; but the situation reversed when rice plants were exposed to Sb(V), suggesting different transport mechanisms of Sb from roots to shoots between Sb(III) and Sb(V). The addition of C
3
H
4
O
4
generally reduced the Sb concentrations in the shoots and roots subjected to Sb(V), suggesting the uptake of Sb(V) to be energy dependent. The addition of Na
3
PO
4
also significantly reduced the concentrations of Sb in the shoots and roots when plants were exposed to Sb(V). Interestingly, the addition of HgCl
2
significantly reduced the concentrations of Sb in the shoots and roots when rice plants were exposed to both Sb(III) or Sb(V), possibly implying that uptake of Sb(III) might be via aquaporins and Cl
−
played a role in affecting the uptake of Sb(V).
Conclusions
The results of this study suggested that uptake of Sb(III) is via aquaporins, and Cl
−
as well as PO
4
3−
may compete with Sb(V) for uptake pathway. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11104-019-04296-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2323318150</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48704401</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48704401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-ba9987b7ef5148220c3fc1c2f5c89affa20874bd1189ca563a907c47aca847913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOGzEUhq2qlUhTXgCpkqVuO3CO7YnHyyqCgoSgC5DYWY5jg0Nip_ZkkW3ok-ZJMAwq6qarc9F_kT5CjhCOEUCeFEQE0QCqBgRTk4Z_ICNsJW9a4JOPZATAWQNS3R2Qz6Us4OXGyYg8nXrvbF9o8nQe6p5d7GmID2EW-pQLLRv7QE2hK7NMMVhqbJh_p1dmv3v6db3f_aEmzun5_XS53-1oinSz7s2j-zfOp7x6bTCxD6sUt7WA5mAdXS_r6wv55M2yuMO3OSa3Z6c30_Pm8vrnxfTHZWO5wL6ZGaU6OZPOtyg6xsByb9Ey39pOGe8Ng06K2RyxU9a0E24USCuksaYTUiEfk29D7jqn3xtXer1ImxxrpWaccY4dVlpjwgaVzamU7Lxe57AyeasR9AtsPcDWFbZ-ha15NfHBVKo43rv8Hv1f19fBtSiV9d8e0UkQApA_A2nAjl8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2323318150</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of different inhibitors such as malonic acid, Na₃PO₄ and HgCl₂ on uptake of different forms of antimony in rice plant</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Feng, RenWei ; Lei, Lei ; Liu, BiXiu ; Chen, WenXiang ; Zhang, RuiRui ; Wang, LiZhen ; Li, YuanPing ; Su, JunMing ; Dai, JiaXin ; Wang, RenJie ; Lin, ZiTing ; Fekih, Ibtissem Ben ; Mazhar, Sohaib H. ; Rensing, Christopher</creator><creatorcontrib>Feng, RenWei ; Lei, Lei ; Liu, BiXiu ; Chen, WenXiang ; Zhang, RuiRui ; Wang, LiZhen ; Li, YuanPing ; Su, JunMing ; Dai, JiaXin ; Wang, RenJie ; Lin, ZiTing ; Fekih, Ibtissem Ben ; Mazhar, Sohaib H. ; Rensing, Christopher</creatorcontrib><description>Background and aims
Antimony is an analogue of arsenic (As), but its uptake mechanisms are not as well understood as As. Antimonite [Sb(III)] probably enters into plant roots via aquaporins but antimonate [Sb(V)] not through the phosphate [P(V)] uptake system as with arsenate [As(V)]. However, previous studies observed a dose−dependent interaction between As(V) and P(V) in some plants. This study was conducted mainly to identify that 1) whether the uptake of Sb(III) by plants will be via aquaporin channels; 2) whether the interaction effects between Sb(V) and P(V) might be dose−dependent; 3) whether the uptake of Sb(III) or Sb(V) is at the cost of energy.
Methods
Two hydroponic culture systems were set up using a rice plant (YeXiangYou No.3) to investigate the effects of different chemicals on the uptake of Sb in the rice plants subjected to Sb(III) and Sb(V). These chemicals included malonic acid (C
3
H
4
O
4
), Na
3
PO
4
[P(V)] and HgCl
2
.
Results
Sb was mainly sequestrated in the roots of the rice plants, suggesting a low transport capacity of Sb from roots to shoots. The plants took up Sb more easily under Sb(III) exposure than under Sb(V) exposure. 10 mg L
−1
Sb(III) increased the Sb concentration in the bleeding sap rather than the weight of the bleeding sap; but the situation reversed when rice plants were exposed to Sb(V), suggesting different transport mechanisms of Sb from roots to shoots between Sb(III) and Sb(V). The addition of C
3
H
4
O
4
generally reduced the Sb concentrations in the shoots and roots subjected to Sb(V), suggesting the uptake of Sb(V) to be energy dependent. The addition of Na
3
PO
4
also significantly reduced the concentrations of Sb in the shoots and roots when plants were exposed to Sb(V). Interestingly, the addition of HgCl
2
significantly reduced the concentrations of Sb in the shoots and roots when rice plants were exposed to both Sb(III) or Sb(V), possibly implying that uptake of Sb(III) might be via aquaporins and Cl
−
played a role in affecting the uptake of Sb(V).
Conclusions
The results of this study suggested that uptake of Sb(III) is via aquaporins, and Cl
−
as well as PO
4
3−
may compete with Sb(V) for uptake pathway.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-079X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11104-019-04296-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Antimony ; Aquaporins ; Arsenates ; Arsenic ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Bleeding ; Ecology ; Exposure ; Hydroponics ; Life Sciences ; Mercuric chloride ; Mercury compounds ; Organic chemistry ; Plant Physiology ; Plant roots ; Plant Sciences ; REGULAR ARTICLE ; Rice ; Roots ; Shoots ; Sodium phosphate ; Soil Science & Conservation ; Stibnite ; Transport ; Trisodium phosphate</subject><ispartof>Plant and soil, 2019-12, Vol.445 (1/2), p.259-271</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019</rights><rights>Plant and Soil is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-ba9987b7ef5148220c3fc1c2f5c89affa20874bd1189ca563a907c47aca847913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-ba9987b7ef5148220c3fc1c2f5c89affa20874bd1189ca563a907c47aca847913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48704401$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48704401$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Feng, RenWei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, BiXiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, WenXiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, RuiRui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, LiZhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, YuanPing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, JunMing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dai, JiaXin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, RenJie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, ZiTing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fekih, Ibtissem Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazhar, Sohaib H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rensing, Christopher</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of different inhibitors such as malonic acid, Na₃PO₄ and HgCl₂ on uptake of different forms of antimony in rice plant</title><title>Plant and soil</title><addtitle>Plant Soil</addtitle><description>Background and aims
Antimony is an analogue of arsenic (As), but its uptake mechanisms are not as well understood as As. Antimonite [Sb(III)] probably enters into plant roots via aquaporins but antimonate [Sb(V)] not through the phosphate [P(V)] uptake system as with arsenate [As(V)]. However, previous studies observed a dose−dependent interaction between As(V) and P(V) in some plants. This study was conducted mainly to identify that 1) whether the uptake of Sb(III) by plants will be via aquaporin channels; 2) whether the interaction effects between Sb(V) and P(V) might be dose−dependent; 3) whether the uptake of Sb(III) or Sb(V) is at the cost of energy.
Methods
Two hydroponic culture systems were set up using a rice plant (YeXiangYou No.3) to investigate the effects of different chemicals on the uptake of Sb in the rice plants subjected to Sb(III) and Sb(V). These chemicals included malonic acid (C
3
H
4
O
4
), Na
3
PO
4
[P(V)] and HgCl
2
.
Results
Sb was mainly sequestrated in the roots of the rice plants, suggesting a low transport capacity of Sb from roots to shoots. The plants took up Sb more easily under Sb(III) exposure than under Sb(V) exposure. 10 mg L
−1
Sb(III) increased the Sb concentration in the bleeding sap rather than the weight of the bleeding sap; but the situation reversed when rice plants were exposed to Sb(V), suggesting different transport mechanisms of Sb from roots to shoots between Sb(III) and Sb(V). The addition of C
3
H
4
O
4
generally reduced the Sb concentrations in the shoots and roots subjected to Sb(V), suggesting the uptake of Sb(V) to be energy dependent. The addition of Na
3
PO
4
also significantly reduced the concentrations of Sb in the shoots and roots when plants were exposed to Sb(V). Interestingly, the addition of HgCl
2
significantly reduced the concentrations of Sb in the shoots and roots when rice plants were exposed to both Sb(III) or Sb(V), possibly implying that uptake of Sb(III) might be via aquaporins and Cl
−
played a role in affecting the uptake of Sb(V).
Conclusions
The results of this study suggested that uptake of Sb(III) is via aquaporins, and Cl
−
as well as PO
4
3−
may compete with Sb(V) for uptake pathway.</description><subject>Antimony</subject><subject>Aquaporins</subject><subject>Arsenates</subject><subject>Arsenic</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Bleeding</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Hydroponics</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mercuric chloride</subject><subject>Mercury compounds</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Plant roots</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>REGULAR ARTICLE</subject><subject>Rice</subject><subject>Roots</subject><subject>Shoots</subject><subject>Sodium phosphate</subject><subject>Soil Science & Conservation</subject><subject>Stibnite</subject><subject>Transport</subject><subject>Trisodium phosphate</subject><issn>0032-079X</issn><issn>1573-5036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOGzEUhq2qlUhTXgCpkqVuO3CO7YnHyyqCgoSgC5DYWY5jg0Nip_ZkkW3ok-ZJMAwq6qarc9F_kT5CjhCOEUCeFEQE0QCqBgRTk4Z_ICNsJW9a4JOPZATAWQNS3R2Qz6Us4OXGyYg8nXrvbF9o8nQe6p5d7GmID2EW-pQLLRv7QE2hK7NMMVhqbJh_p1dmv3v6db3f_aEmzun5_XS53-1oinSz7s2j-zfOp7x6bTCxD6sUt7WA5mAdXS_r6wv55M2yuMO3OSa3Z6c30_Pm8vrnxfTHZWO5wL6ZGaU6OZPOtyg6xsByb9Ey39pOGe8Ng06K2RyxU9a0E24USCuksaYTUiEfk29D7jqn3xtXer1ImxxrpWaccY4dVlpjwgaVzamU7Lxe57AyeasR9AtsPcDWFbZ-ha15NfHBVKo43rv8Hv1f19fBtSiV9d8e0UkQApA_A2nAjl8</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Feng, RenWei</creator><creator>Lei, Lei</creator><creator>Liu, BiXiu</creator><creator>Chen, WenXiang</creator><creator>Zhang, RuiRui</creator><creator>Wang, LiZhen</creator><creator>Li, YuanPing</creator><creator>Su, JunMing</creator><creator>Dai, JiaXin</creator><creator>Wang, RenJie</creator><creator>Lin, ZiTing</creator><creator>Fekih, Ibtissem Ben</creator><creator>Mazhar, Sohaib H.</creator><creator>Rensing, Christopher</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Effects of different inhibitors such as malonic acid, Na₃PO₄ and HgCl₂ on uptake of different forms of antimony in rice plant</title><author>Feng, RenWei ; Lei, Lei ; Liu, BiXiu ; Chen, WenXiang ; Zhang, RuiRui ; Wang, LiZhen ; Li, YuanPing ; Su, JunMing ; Dai, JiaXin ; Wang, RenJie ; Lin, ZiTing ; Fekih, Ibtissem Ben ; Mazhar, Sohaib H. ; Rensing, Christopher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-ba9987b7ef5148220c3fc1c2f5c89affa20874bd1189ca563a907c47aca847913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Antimony</topic><topic>Aquaporins</topic><topic>Arsenates</topic><topic>Arsenic</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Bleeding</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Hydroponics</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mercuric chloride</topic><topic>Mercury compounds</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Plant roots</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>REGULAR ARTICLE</topic><topic>Rice</topic><topic>Roots</topic><topic>Shoots</topic><topic>Sodium phosphate</topic><topic>Soil Science & Conservation</topic><topic>Stibnite</topic><topic>Transport</topic><topic>Trisodium phosphate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Feng, RenWei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, BiXiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, WenXiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, RuiRui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, LiZhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, YuanPing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, JunMing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dai, JiaXin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, RenJie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, ZiTing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fekih, Ibtissem Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazhar, Sohaib H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rensing, Christopher</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Feng, RenWei</au><au>Lei, Lei</au><au>Liu, BiXiu</au><au>Chen, WenXiang</au><au>Zhang, RuiRui</au><au>Wang, LiZhen</au><au>Li, YuanPing</au><au>Su, JunMing</au><au>Dai, JiaXin</au><au>Wang, RenJie</au><au>Lin, ZiTing</au><au>Fekih, Ibtissem Ben</au><au>Mazhar, Sohaib H.</au><au>Rensing, Christopher</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of different inhibitors such as malonic acid, Na₃PO₄ and HgCl₂ on uptake of different forms of antimony in rice plant</atitle><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle><stitle>Plant Soil</stitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>445</volume><issue>1/2</issue><spage>259</spage><epage>271</epage><pages>259-271</pages><issn>0032-079X</issn><eissn>1573-5036</eissn><abstract>Background and aims
Antimony is an analogue of arsenic (As), but its uptake mechanisms are not as well understood as As. Antimonite [Sb(III)] probably enters into plant roots via aquaporins but antimonate [Sb(V)] not through the phosphate [P(V)] uptake system as with arsenate [As(V)]. However, previous studies observed a dose−dependent interaction between As(V) and P(V) in some plants. This study was conducted mainly to identify that 1) whether the uptake of Sb(III) by plants will be via aquaporin channels; 2) whether the interaction effects between Sb(V) and P(V) might be dose−dependent; 3) whether the uptake of Sb(III) or Sb(V) is at the cost of energy.
Methods
Two hydroponic culture systems were set up using a rice plant (YeXiangYou No.3) to investigate the effects of different chemicals on the uptake of Sb in the rice plants subjected to Sb(III) and Sb(V). These chemicals included malonic acid (C
3
H
4
O
4
), Na
3
PO
4
[P(V)] and HgCl
2
.
Results
Sb was mainly sequestrated in the roots of the rice plants, suggesting a low transport capacity of Sb from roots to shoots. The plants took up Sb more easily under Sb(III) exposure than under Sb(V) exposure. 10 mg L
−1
Sb(III) increased the Sb concentration in the bleeding sap rather than the weight of the bleeding sap; but the situation reversed when rice plants were exposed to Sb(V), suggesting different transport mechanisms of Sb from roots to shoots between Sb(III) and Sb(V). The addition of C
3
H
4
O
4
generally reduced the Sb concentrations in the shoots and roots subjected to Sb(V), suggesting the uptake of Sb(V) to be energy dependent. The addition of Na
3
PO
4
also significantly reduced the concentrations of Sb in the shoots and roots when plants were exposed to Sb(V). Interestingly, the addition of HgCl
2
significantly reduced the concentrations of Sb in the shoots and roots when rice plants were exposed to both Sb(III) or Sb(V), possibly implying that uptake of Sb(III) might be via aquaporins and Cl
−
played a role in affecting the uptake of Sb(V).
Conclusions
The results of this study suggested that uptake of Sb(III) is via aquaporins, and Cl
−
as well as PO
4
3−
may compete with Sb(V) for uptake pathway.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s11104-019-04296-3</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-079X |
ispartof | Plant and soil, 2019-12, Vol.445 (1/2), p.259-271 |
issn | 0032-079X 1573-5036 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2323318150 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Antimony Aquaporins Arsenates Arsenic Biomedical and Life Sciences Bleeding Ecology Exposure Hydroponics Life Sciences Mercuric chloride Mercury compounds Organic chemistry Plant Physiology Plant roots Plant Sciences REGULAR ARTICLE Rice Roots Shoots Sodium phosphate Soil Science & Conservation Stibnite Transport Trisodium phosphate |
title | Effects of different inhibitors such as malonic acid, Na₃PO₄ and HgCl₂ on uptake of different forms of antimony in rice plant |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T23%3A14%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20different%20inhibitors%20such%20as%20malonic%20acid,%20Na%E2%82%83PO%E2%82%84%20and%20HgCl%E2%82%82%20on%20uptake%20of%20different%20forms%20of%20antimony%20in%20rice%20plant&rft.jtitle=Plant%20and%20soil&rft.au=Feng,%20RenWei&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=445&rft.issue=1/2&rft.spage=259&rft.epage=271&rft.pages=259-271&rft.issn=0032-079X&rft.eissn=1573-5036&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11104-019-04296-3&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48704401%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2323318150&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48704401&rfr_iscdi=true |