Subverting and Minding Boundaries: The Intellectual Work of Women
Using various methods and analytical angles, researchers consistently show that members of non-dominant groups, including women, experience academia as a hostile and marginalizing space. Such work is important, and yet, it is equally important that researchers approach the study of women's acad...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of higher education (Columbus) 2018-01, Vol.89 (5), p.677-701 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 701 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 677 |
container_title | The Journal of higher education (Columbus) |
container_volume | 89 |
creator | Gonzales, Leslie D. |
description | Using various methods and analytical angles, researchers consistently show that members of non-dominant groups, including women, experience academia as a hostile and marginalizing space. Such work is important, and yet, it is equally important that researchers approach the study of women's academic careers by elevating their intellectual labor. In this study, I take up two questions: (1) What are the origins of women's intellectual work and (2) How do women go about doing their intellectual work? My findings suggest that women tend to locate the origins of their work in the everyday rather than in formal educational sites, such as disciplinary contexts or classrooms. In terms of the doing of their intellectual work, I found that most women utilize subversive tactics, as they challenge disciplinary and professional boundaries that have historically governed the recognition and legitimation of knowledge within academe. However, drawing from critical race feminism, I also find some notable distinctions between Women of Color and White women, and suggest that future researchers attend more carefully to how power and privilege yields particular conditions and consequences among women. This paper offers important insights for peer reviewers (e.g., hiring, promotion, disciplinary award committees, and publication reviewers) as to the grounding(s) and distinctive contribution(s) of women's intellectual work. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00221546.2018.1434278 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2323056553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1188708</ericid><jstor_id>26772130</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26772130</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-55a2cc0bc289750a75543232bd641f1326bc39a0c04c248b54fcaa0c77c891603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwEyZV4tzhfLUZJ8Y0YGiIA0McozRNoaNLRtKC9u9pVZg44Ytt-Xlt60VohGGMQcAFACGYs2RMAIsxZpSRVBygAeZUxCxhcIgGHRN30DE6CWENbWDMB2j61GSfxtelfY2UzaOH0uZdfe0amytfmnAZrd5MtLC1qSqj60ZV0Yvz75Er2rwx9hQdFaoK5uwnD9HzzXw1u4uXj7eL2XQZaypIHXOuiNaQaSImKQeVcs4ooSTLE4YLTEmSaTpRoIFpwkTGWaFV26apFhOcAB2i837v1ruPxoRarl3jbXtStmso8IRz2lK8p7R3IXhTyK0vN8rvJAbZuSV_3ZKdW_LHrVY36nXGl3qvmd9jLEQKf-brUDu_B0iSpgTT7rurfl7awvmN-nK-ymWtdpXzhVdWl0HS_1_4BnkmgZg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2323056553</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Subverting and Minding Boundaries: The Intellectual Work of Women</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Gonzales, Leslie D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gonzales, Leslie D.</creatorcontrib><description>Using various methods and analytical angles, researchers consistently show that members of non-dominant groups, including women, experience academia as a hostile and marginalizing space. Such work is important, and yet, it is equally important that researchers approach the study of women's academic careers by elevating their intellectual labor. In this study, I take up two questions: (1) What are the origins of women's intellectual work and (2) How do women go about doing their intellectual work? My findings suggest that women tend to locate the origins of their work in the everyday rather than in formal educational sites, such as disciplinary contexts or classrooms. In terms of the doing of their intellectual work, I found that most women utilize subversive tactics, as they challenge disciplinary and professional boundaries that have historically governed the recognition and legitimation of knowledge within academe. However, drawing from critical race feminism, I also find some notable distinctions between Women of Color and White women, and suggest that future researchers attend more carefully to how power and privilege yields particular conditions and consequences among women. This paper offers important insights for peer reviewers (e.g., hiring, promotion, disciplinary award committees, and publication reviewers) as to the grounding(s) and distinctive contribution(s) of women's intellectual work.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1546</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4640</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2018.1434278</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Columbus: Routledge</publisher><subject>Boundary work ; College Faculty ; critical race feminism ; Critical Theory ; Disadvantaged ; Educational History ; epistemology ; faculty evaluation ; Faculty Promotion ; Faculty Publishing ; Females ; Feminism ; Gender Differences ; Higher Education ; Intellectual Disciplines ; intellectual work ; Interdisciplinary Approach ; knowledge production ; Minority Groups ; Power Structure ; Professional Recognition ; Race ; Researchers ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teacher Selection ; Whites ; Women ; women academics ; Women Faculty</subject><ispartof>The Journal of higher education (Columbus), 2018-01, Vol.89 (5), p.677-701</ispartof><rights>The Ohio State University</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-55a2cc0bc289750a75543232bd641f1326bc39a0c04c248b54fcaa0c77c891603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-55a2cc0bc289750a75543232bd641f1326bc39a0c04c248b54fcaa0c77c891603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26772130$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26772130$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,27929,27930,58022,58255</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1188708$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gonzales, Leslie D.</creatorcontrib><title>Subverting and Minding Boundaries: The Intellectual Work of Women</title><title>The Journal of higher education (Columbus)</title><description>Using various methods and analytical angles, researchers consistently show that members of non-dominant groups, including women, experience academia as a hostile and marginalizing space. Such work is important, and yet, it is equally important that researchers approach the study of women's academic careers by elevating their intellectual labor. In this study, I take up two questions: (1) What are the origins of women's intellectual work and (2) How do women go about doing their intellectual work? My findings suggest that women tend to locate the origins of their work in the everyday rather than in formal educational sites, such as disciplinary contexts or classrooms. In terms of the doing of their intellectual work, I found that most women utilize subversive tactics, as they challenge disciplinary and professional boundaries that have historically governed the recognition and legitimation of knowledge within academe. However, drawing from critical race feminism, I also find some notable distinctions between Women of Color and White women, and suggest that future researchers attend more carefully to how power and privilege yields particular conditions and consequences among women. This paper offers important insights for peer reviewers (e.g., hiring, promotion, disciplinary award committees, and publication reviewers) as to the grounding(s) and distinctive contribution(s) of women's intellectual work.</description><subject>Boundary work</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>critical race feminism</subject><subject>Critical Theory</subject><subject>Disadvantaged</subject><subject>Educational History</subject><subject>epistemology</subject><subject>faculty evaluation</subject><subject>Faculty Promotion</subject><subject>Faculty Publishing</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Intellectual Disciplines</subject><subject>intellectual work</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Approach</subject><subject>knowledge production</subject><subject>Minority Groups</subject><subject>Power Structure</subject><subject>Professional Recognition</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher Selection</subject><subject>Whites</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>women academics</subject><subject>Women Faculty</subject><issn>0022-1546</issn><issn>1538-4640</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwEyZV4tzhfLUZJ8Y0YGiIA0McozRNoaNLRtKC9u9pVZg44Ytt-Xlt60VohGGMQcAFACGYs2RMAIsxZpSRVBygAeZUxCxhcIgGHRN30DE6CWENbWDMB2j61GSfxtelfY2UzaOH0uZdfe0amytfmnAZrd5MtLC1qSqj60ZV0Yvz75Er2rwx9hQdFaoK5uwnD9HzzXw1u4uXj7eL2XQZaypIHXOuiNaQaSImKQeVcs4ooSTLE4YLTEmSaTpRoIFpwkTGWaFV26apFhOcAB2i837v1ruPxoRarl3jbXtStmso8IRz2lK8p7R3IXhTyK0vN8rvJAbZuSV_3ZKdW_LHrVY36nXGl3qvmd9jLEQKf-brUDu_B0iSpgTT7rurfl7awvmN-nK-ymWtdpXzhVdWl0HS_1_4BnkmgZg</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Gonzales, Leslie D.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis, Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Subverting and Minding Boundaries: The Intellectual Work of Women</title><author>Gonzales, Leslie D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-55a2cc0bc289750a75543232bd641f1326bc39a0c04c248b54fcaa0c77c891603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Boundary work</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>critical race feminism</topic><topic>Critical Theory</topic><topic>Disadvantaged</topic><topic>Educational History</topic><topic>epistemology</topic><topic>faculty evaluation</topic><topic>Faculty Promotion</topic><topic>Faculty Publishing</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Intellectual Disciplines</topic><topic>intellectual work</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Approach</topic><topic>knowledge production</topic><topic>Minority Groups</topic><topic>Power Structure</topic><topic>Professional Recognition</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher Selection</topic><topic>Whites</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>women academics</topic><topic>Women Faculty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gonzales, Leslie D.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of higher education (Columbus)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gonzales, Leslie D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1188708</ericid><atitle>Subverting and Minding Boundaries: The Intellectual Work of Women</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of higher education (Columbus)</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>677</spage><epage>701</epage><pages>677-701</pages><issn>0022-1546</issn><eissn>1538-4640</eissn><abstract>Using various methods and analytical angles, researchers consistently show that members of non-dominant groups, including women, experience academia as a hostile and marginalizing space. Such work is important, and yet, it is equally important that researchers approach the study of women's academic careers by elevating their intellectual labor. In this study, I take up two questions: (1) What are the origins of women's intellectual work and (2) How do women go about doing their intellectual work? My findings suggest that women tend to locate the origins of their work in the everyday rather than in formal educational sites, such as disciplinary contexts or classrooms. In terms of the doing of their intellectual work, I found that most women utilize subversive tactics, as they challenge disciplinary and professional boundaries that have historically governed the recognition and legitimation of knowledge within academe. However, drawing from critical race feminism, I also find some notable distinctions between Women of Color and White women, and suggest that future researchers attend more carefully to how power and privilege yields particular conditions and consequences among women. This paper offers important insights for peer reviewers (e.g., hiring, promotion, disciplinary award committees, and publication reviewers) as to the grounding(s) and distinctive contribution(s) of women's intellectual work.</abstract><cop>Columbus</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/00221546.2018.1434278</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1546 |
ispartof | The Journal of higher education (Columbus), 2018-01, Vol.89 (5), p.677-701 |
issn | 0022-1546 1538-4640 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2323056553 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | Boundary work College Faculty critical race feminism Critical Theory Disadvantaged Educational History epistemology faculty evaluation Faculty Promotion Faculty Publishing Females Feminism Gender Differences Higher Education Intellectual Disciplines intellectual work Interdisciplinary Approach knowledge production Minority Groups Power Structure Professional Recognition Race Researchers Teacher Attitudes Teacher Selection Whites Women women academics Women Faculty |
title | Subverting and Minding Boundaries: The Intellectual Work of Women |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T08%3A01%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Subverting%20and%20Minding%20Boundaries:%20The%20Intellectual%20Work%20of%20Women&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20higher%20education%20(Columbus)&rft.au=Gonzales,%20Leslie%20D.&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=677&rft.epage=701&rft.pages=677-701&rft.issn=0022-1546&rft.eissn=1538-4640&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00221546.2018.1434278&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26772130%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2323056553&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1188708&rft_jstor_id=26772130&rfr_iscdi=true |