Postoccupancy Evaluation in Buildings: Systematic Literature Review

AbstractThis paper develops a systematic literature review to identify publications that could serve as the basis for understanding how postoccupancy evaluations (POEs) are currently being conducted. The objective is to identify the criteria that are usually assessed, the evaluation methods used, th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of performance of constructed facilities 2020-02, Vol.34 (1)
Hauptverfasser: Sanchez Leitner, Drielle, Christine Sotsek, Nicolle, de Paula Lacerda Santos, Adriana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Journal of performance of constructed facilities
container_volume 34
creator Sanchez Leitner, Drielle
Christine Sotsek, Nicolle
de Paula Lacerda Santos, Adriana
description AbstractThis paper develops a systematic literature review to identify publications that could serve as the basis for understanding how postoccupancy evaluations (POEs) are currently being conducted. The objective is to identify the criteria that are usually assessed, the evaluation methods used, the time spent conducting the research, the types of buildings examined, and the professionals responsible for conducting the evaluations. The research was conducted using four electronic research sources covering journal and conference papers (English and Portuguese) published from 2013 to 2017. Fifty five papers that met the inclusion requirements were identified and examined according to the Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How (5W1H) tool logic, the quality tool that allows fast identification of the intrinsic elements of a project. More than half of the research used multiple assessment methods. The most used evaluation methods were questionnaires and on-site physical measurements. The most frequently evaluated criteria were lighting, internal temperature and thermal comfort, and acoustic comfort. All of the studies identified were developed by at least one researcher belonging to the academy and the time spent conducting the POEs varied according to the criteria evaluated and methods used. Finally, since there are multiple variables involved, there is no single solution for building evaluation.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001389
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2322634255</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2322634255</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a385t-6d22e28d3cfc00223250b1ba1c4c1195bc2e752f57572defd81aea6c9edd9df03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKv_YdGLHrbmo9lNeqtLq0JBsXoOaTIrKe1uTXZb-u_N0qonTwMz7_MOPAhdEzwgOCP3t-N5MbkrpgMihyzlHMsBxpgwIU9Q73d3inpYiDxlgopzdBHCMoZoLvMeKl7r0NTGtBtdmX0y2epVqxtXV4mrkofWrayrPsMome9DA-t4McnMNeB103pI3mDrYHeJzkq9CnB1nH30MZ28F0_p7OXxuRjPUs0Eb9LMUgpUWGZKE99TRjlekIUmZmgIkXxhKOScljznObVQWkE06MxIsFbaErM-ujn0bnz91UJo1LJufRVfqlhGMzaknMfU6JAyvg7BQ6k23q213yuCVSdNqU6aKqaqE6Q6QeooLcLZAdbBwF_9D_k_-A3OuXFI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2322634255</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Postoccupancy Evaluation in Buildings: Systematic Literature Review</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Sanchez Leitner, Drielle ; Christine Sotsek, Nicolle ; de Paula Lacerda Santos, Adriana</creator><creatorcontrib>Sanchez Leitner, Drielle ; Christine Sotsek, Nicolle ; de Paula Lacerda Santos, Adriana</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractThis paper develops a systematic literature review to identify publications that could serve as the basis for understanding how postoccupancy evaluations (POEs) are currently being conducted. The objective is to identify the criteria that are usually assessed, the evaluation methods used, the time spent conducting the research, the types of buildings examined, and the professionals responsible for conducting the evaluations. The research was conducted using four electronic research sources covering journal and conference papers (English and Portuguese) published from 2013 to 2017. Fifty five papers that met the inclusion requirements were identified and examined according to the Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How (5W1H) tool logic, the quality tool that allows fast identification of the intrinsic elements of a project. More than half of the research used multiple assessment methods. The most used evaluation methods were questionnaires and on-site physical measurements. The most frequently evaluated criteria were lighting, internal temperature and thermal comfort, and acoustic comfort. All of the studies identified were developed by at least one researcher belonging to the academy and the time spent conducting the POEs varied according to the criteria evaluated and methods used. Finally, since there are multiple variables involved, there is no single solution for building evaluation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-3828</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5509</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001389</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Buildings ; Criteria ; Evaluation ; Identification methods ; Literature reviews ; State-of-the-Art Review ; State-of-the-Art Reviews ; Systematic review ; Thermal comfort</subject><ispartof>Journal of performance of constructed facilities, 2020-02, Vol.34 (1)</ispartof><rights>2019 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a385t-6d22e28d3cfc00223250b1ba1c4c1195bc2e752f57572defd81aea6c9edd9df03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a385t-6d22e28d3cfc00223250b1ba1c4c1195bc2e752f57572defd81aea6c9edd9df03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3049-8132</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001389$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001389$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,75935,75943</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sanchez Leitner, Drielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christine Sotsek, Nicolle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Paula Lacerda Santos, Adriana</creatorcontrib><title>Postoccupancy Evaluation in Buildings: Systematic Literature Review</title><title>Journal of performance of constructed facilities</title><description>AbstractThis paper develops a systematic literature review to identify publications that could serve as the basis for understanding how postoccupancy evaluations (POEs) are currently being conducted. The objective is to identify the criteria that are usually assessed, the evaluation methods used, the time spent conducting the research, the types of buildings examined, and the professionals responsible for conducting the evaluations. The research was conducted using four electronic research sources covering journal and conference papers (English and Portuguese) published from 2013 to 2017. Fifty five papers that met the inclusion requirements were identified and examined according to the Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How (5W1H) tool logic, the quality tool that allows fast identification of the intrinsic elements of a project. More than half of the research used multiple assessment methods. The most used evaluation methods were questionnaires and on-site physical measurements. The most frequently evaluated criteria were lighting, internal temperature and thermal comfort, and acoustic comfort. All of the studies identified were developed by at least one researcher belonging to the academy and the time spent conducting the POEs varied according to the criteria evaluated and methods used. Finally, since there are multiple variables involved, there is no single solution for building evaluation.</description><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>State-of-the-Art Review</subject><subject>State-of-the-Art Reviews</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Thermal comfort</subject><issn>0887-3828</issn><issn>1943-5509</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKv_YdGLHrbmo9lNeqtLq0JBsXoOaTIrKe1uTXZb-u_N0qonTwMz7_MOPAhdEzwgOCP3t-N5MbkrpgMihyzlHMsBxpgwIU9Q73d3inpYiDxlgopzdBHCMoZoLvMeKl7r0NTGtBtdmX0y2epVqxtXV4mrkofWrayrPsMome9DA-t4McnMNeB103pI3mDrYHeJzkq9CnB1nH30MZ28F0_p7OXxuRjPUs0Eb9LMUgpUWGZKE99TRjlekIUmZmgIkXxhKOScljznObVQWkE06MxIsFbaErM-ujn0bnz91UJo1LJufRVfqlhGMzaknMfU6JAyvg7BQ6k23q213yuCVSdNqU6aKqaqE6Q6QeooLcLZAdbBwF_9D_k_-A3OuXFI</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Sanchez Leitner, Drielle</creator><creator>Christine Sotsek, Nicolle</creator><creator>de Paula Lacerda Santos, Adriana</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3049-8132</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Postoccupancy Evaluation in Buildings: Systematic Literature Review</title><author>Sanchez Leitner, Drielle ; Christine Sotsek, Nicolle ; de Paula Lacerda Santos, Adriana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a385t-6d22e28d3cfc00223250b1ba1c4c1195bc2e752f57572defd81aea6c9edd9df03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>State-of-the-Art Review</topic><topic>State-of-the-Art Reviews</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Thermal comfort</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sanchez Leitner, Drielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christine Sotsek, Nicolle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Paula Lacerda Santos, Adriana</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of performance of constructed facilities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sanchez Leitner, Drielle</au><au>Christine Sotsek, Nicolle</au><au>de Paula Lacerda Santos, Adriana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Postoccupancy Evaluation in Buildings: Systematic Literature Review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of performance of constructed facilities</jtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0887-3828</issn><eissn>1943-5509</eissn><abstract>AbstractThis paper develops a systematic literature review to identify publications that could serve as the basis for understanding how postoccupancy evaluations (POEs) are currently being conducted. The objective is to identify the criteria that are usually assessed, the evaluation methods used, the time spent conducting the research, the types of buildings examined, and the professionals responsible for conducting the evaluations. The research was conducted using four electronic research sources covering journal and conference papers (English and Portuguese) published from 2013 to 2017. Fifty five papers that met the inclusion requirements were identified and examined according to the Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How (5W1H) tool logic, the quality tool that allows fast identification of the intrinsic elements of a project. More than half of the research used multiple assessment methods. The most used evaluation methods were questionnaires and on-site physical measurements. The most frequently evaluated criteria were lighting, internal temperature and thermal comfort, and acoustic comfort. All of the studies identified were developed by at least one researcher belonging to the academy and the time spent conducting the POEs varied according to the criteria evaluated and methods used. Finally, since there are multiple variables involved, there is no single solution for building evaluation.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001389</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3049-8132</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0887-3828
ispartof Journal of performance of constructed facilities, 2020-02, Vol.34 (1)
issn 0887-3828
1943-5509
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2322634255
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014
subjects Buildings
Criteria
Evaluation
Identification methods
Literature reviews
State-of-the-Art Review
State-of-the-Art Reviews
Systematic review
Thermal comfort
title Postoccupancy Evaluation in Buildings: Systematic Literature Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T05%3A57%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Postoccupancy%20Evaluation%20in%20Buildings:%20Systematic%20Literature%20Review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20performance%20of%20constructed%20facilities&rft.au=Sanchez%20Leitner,%20Drielle&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0887-3828&rft.eissn=1943-5509&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001389&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2322634255%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2322634255&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true