Conscience, conscientious objections, and medicine
To inform the ongoing discussion of whether claims of conscientious objection allow medical professionals to refuse to perform tasks that would otherwise be their duty, this paper begins with a review of the philosophical literature that describes conscience as either a moral sense or the dictate of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Theoretical medicine and bioethics 2019-12, Vol.40 (6), p.487-506 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 506 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 487 |
container_title | Theoretical medicine and bioethics |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Rhodes, Rosamond |
description | To inform the ongoing discussion of whether claims of conscientious objection allow medical professionals to refuse to perform tasks that would otherwise be their duty, this paper begins with a review of the philosophical literature that describes conscience as either a moral sense or the dictate of reason. Even though authors have starkly different views on what conscience is, advocates of both approaches agree that conscience should be obeyed and that keeping promises is a conscience-given moral imperative. The paper then considers exemplars of conscientious objection—Henry David Thoreau, Mohandas Gandhi, and Martin Luther King Jr.—to identify the critical feature of conscientious objection as willingness to bear the burdens of one’s convictions. It concludes by showing that medical professionals who put their own interests before their patients’ welfare violate their previous commitments and misappropriate the title “conscientious objector” because they are unwilling to bear the burdens of their choices and instead impose burdens on their patients and colleagues. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11017-019-09513-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2322053479</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2322053479</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-89c513926299702545b635a380bcae4b78fe2ed8e947b7177f91e58340bf2e493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EoqXwAhxQJK417NpxbR9RVX6kSlzgbMXuBqWiSbGbA2-PSwrcOO1IOzNrf4xdItwggL5NiICaA1oOVqHk9oiNUWnJUQAcZy3NjOsS1YidpbQGyDEjTtlIorZaoBozMe_aFBpqA02LcNC7putT0fk1hSzbNC2qdlVsaNWEpqVzdlJX74kuDnPCXu8XL_NHvnx-eJrfLXmQWu24sSG_yYqZsFaDUKXyM6kqacCHikqvTU2CVoZsqb1GrWuLpIwswdeCSisn7Hro3cbuo6e0c-uuj20-6YQUApQs9d4lBleIXUqRareNzaaKnw7B7TG5AZPLmNw3JrcPXR2qe5-_9Rv54ZINcjCkvGrfKP7d_qf2C62QcHc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2322053479</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conscience, conscientious objections, and medicine</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Rhodes, Rosamond</creator><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Rosamond</creatorcontrib><description>To inform the ongoing discussion of whether claims of conscientious objection allow medical professionals to refuse to perform tasks that would otherwise be their duty, this paper begins with a review of the philosophical literature that describes conscience as either a moral sense or the dictate of reason. Even though authors have starkly different views on what conscience is, advocates of both approaches agree that conscience should be obeyed and that keeping promises is a conscience-given moral imperative. The paper then considers exemplars of conscientious objection—Henry David Thoreau, Mohandas Gandhi, and Martin Luther King Jr.—to identify the critical feature of conscientious objection as willingness to bear the burdens of one’s convictions. It concludes by showing that medical professionals who put their own interests before their patients’ welfare violate their previous commitments and misappropriate the title “conscientious objector” because they are unwilling to bear the burdens of their choices and instead impose burdens on their patients and colleagues.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1386-7415</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1200</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0980</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11017-019-09513-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31797215</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Conscientious objectors ; Education ; Ethics ; General Surgery ; History of Medicine ; Medical personnel ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Medicine ; Right to die ; Theory of Medicine/Bioethics</subject><ispartof>Theoretical medicine and bioethics, 2019-12, Vol.40 (6), p.487-506</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><rights>Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-89c513926299702545b635a380bcae4b78fe2ed8e947b7177f91e58340bf2e493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-89c513926299702545b635a380bcae4b78fe2ed8e947b7177f91e58340bf2e493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11017-019-09513-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11017-019-09513-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31797215$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Rosamond</creatorcontrib><title>Conscience, conscientious objections, and medicine</title><title>Theoretical medicine and bioethics</title><addtitle>Theor Med Bioeth</addtitle><addtitle>Theor Med Bioeth</addtitle><description>To inform the ongoing discussion of whether claims of conscientious objection allow medical professionals to refuse to perform tasks that would otherwise be their duty, this paper begins with a review of the philosophical literature that describes conscience as either a moral sense or the dictate of reason. Even though authors have starkly different views on what conscience is, advocates of both approaches agree that conscience should be obeyed and that keeping promises is a conscience-given moral imperative. The paper then considers exemplars of conscientious objection—Henry David Thoreau, Mohandas Gandhi, and Martin Luther King Jr.—to identify the critical feature of conscientious objection as willingness to bear the burdens of one’s convictions. It concludes by showing that medical professionals who put their own interests before their patients’ welfare violate their previous commitments and misappropriate the title “conscientious objector” because they are unwilling to bear the burdens of their choices and instead impose burdens on their patients and colleagues.</description><subject>Conscientious objectors</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>General Surgery</subject><subject>History of Medicine</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Medicine</subject><subject>Right to die</subject><subject>Theory of Medicine/Bioethics</subject><issn>1386-7415</issn><issn>1573-1200</issn><issn>1573-0980</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EoqXwAhxQJK417NpxbR9RVX6kSlzgbMXuBqWiSbGbA2-PSwrcOO1IOzNrf4xdItwggL5NiICaA1oOVqHk9oiNUWnJUQAcZy3NjOsS1YidpbQGyDEjTtlIorZaoBozMe_aFBpqA02LcNC7putT0fk1hSzbNC2qdlVsaNWEpqVzdlJX74kuDnPCXu8XL_NHvnx-eJrfLXmQWu24sSG_yYqZsFaDUKXyM6kqacCHikqvTU2CVoZsqb1GrWuLpIwswdeCSisn7Hro3cbuo6e0c-uuj20-6YQUApQs9d4lBleIXUqRareNzaaKnw7B7TG5AZPLmNw3JrcPXR2qe5-_9Rv54ZINcjCkvGrfKP7d_qf2C62QcHc</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Rhodes, Rosamond</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Conscience, conscientious objections, and medicine</title><author>Rhodes, Rosamond</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-89c513926299702545b635a380bcae4b78fe2ed8e947b7177f91e58340bf2e493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Conscientious objectors</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>General Surgery</topic><topic>History of Medicine</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Medicine</topic><topic>Right to die</topic><topic>Theory of Medicine/Bioethics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Rosamond</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Theoretical medicine and bioethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rhodes, Rosamond</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conscience, conscientious objections, and medicine</atitle><jtitle>Theoretical medicine and bioethics</jtitle><stitle>Theor Med Bioeth</stitle><addtitle>Theor Med Bioeth</addtitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>487</spage><epage>506</epage><pages>487-506</pages><issn>1386-7415</issn><eissn>1573-1200</eissn><eissn>1573-0980</eissn><abstract>To inform the ongoing discussion of whether claims of conscientious objection allow medical professionals to refuse to perform tasks that would otherwise be their duty, this paper begins with a review of the philosophical literature that describes conscience as either a moral sense or the dictate of reason. Even though authors have starkly different views on what conscience is, advocates of both approaches agree that conscience should be obeyed and that keeping promises is a conscience-given moral imperative. The paper then considers exemplars of conscientious objection—Henry David Thoreau, Mohandas Gandhi, and Martin Luther King Jr.—to identify the critical feature of conscientious objection as willingness to bear the burdens of one’s convictions. It concludes by showing that medical professionals who put their own interests before their patients’ welfare violate their previous commitments and misappropriate the title “conscientious objector” because they are unwilling to bear the burdens of their choices and instead impose burdens on their patients and colleagues.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>31797215</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11017-019-09513-9</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1386-7415 |
ispartof | Theoretical medicine and bioethics, 2019-12, Vol.40 (6), p.487-506 |
issn | 1386-7415 1573-1200 1573-0980 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2322053479 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Conscientious objectors Education Ethics General Surgery History of Medicine Medical personnel Philosophy Philosophy of Medicine Right to die Theory of Medicine/Bioethics |
title | Conscience, conscientious objections, and medicine |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T15%3A09%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conscience,%20conscientious%20objections,%20and%20medicine&rft.jtitle=Theoretical%20medicine%20and%20bioethics&rft.au=Rhodes,%20Rosamond&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=487&rft.epage=506&rft.pages=487-506&rft.issn=1386-7415&rft.eissn=1573-1200&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11017-019-09513-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2322053479%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2322053479&rft_id=info:pmid/31797215&rfr_iscdi=true |