Optimal demodulation-band selection for envelope-based diagnostics: A comparative study of traditional and novel tools

•Traditional band-selection methods focus on impulsiveness or cyclostationarity.•The two properties are often entangled in fault signals, giving misleading results.•The properties can be separated, and cyclostationarity appears most important.•Log-cycligram proposed to capture cyclostationarity sepa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Mechanical systems and signal processing 2019-12, Vol.134, p.106303, Article 106303
Hauptverfasser: Smith, Wade A., Borghesani, Pietro, Ni, Qing, Wang, Kesheng, Peng, Zhongxiao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 106303
container_title Mechanical systems and signal processing
container_volume 134
creator Smith, Wade A.
Borghesani, Pietro
Ni, Qing
Wang, Kesheng
Peng, Zhongxiao
description •Traditional band-selection methods focus on impulsiveness or cyclostationarity.•The two properties are often entangled in fault signals, giving misleading results.•The properties can be separated, and cyclostationarity appears most important.•Log-cycligram proposed to capture cyclostationarity separately from impulsiveness.•Performance of new method validated against existing tools on multiple datasets. The demodulation of machine signals is a key step for the diagnostics and prognostics of components such as rolling element bearings. Whereas diagnostic approaches could perform a cyclostationary analysis over the full spectral band (i.e. using cyclic-spectral maps), in order to extract time domain and statistical features for prognostics, a pre-processing filtering step is required to extract the often-weak fault-symptomatic signal components. A series of techniques derived from the original idea of the kurtogram have been proposed in previous studies for the selection of this optimal demodulation band. All of these methodologies have been designed to identify signal components with high impulsiveness (non-Gaussianity) or strong second-order cyclostationarity, both assumed to be typical characteristics of bearing fault signals. However, a recent series of theoretical works has shown how non-Gaussianity and non-stationarity (in its cyclic form), despite being clearly distinct properties, are practically entangled in bearing signals, and can be easily confused by indices such as kurtosis (implicitly assuming stationarity) or second-order cyclostationary (CS2) indicators (implicitly assuming Gaussianity). In addition, it has been shown that generalised Gaussian cyclostationary models are effective tools to describe and separate these two properties in bearing signals. Partial evidence seems to show that the cyclostationary property is dominant and more clearly indicative of a bearing fault, whereas impulsiveness is potentially misleading and not uniquely attributable to the bearing component of the signal. In this paper, we therefore propose a new statistically robust band selection tool which can capture cyclostationarity separately from non-Gaussianity. The tool, coined the log-cycligram (LC), is based on the strength of target cyclic frequency components in the spectrum of the log envelope (LES), and so potential fault frequencies must be known in advance. The effectiveness of the method is validated against the traditional kurtogram and a range of other
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106303
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2321881082</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0888327019305242</els_id><sourcerecordid>2321881082</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-d253d03412820bbaf623754201701b5acbcb3acf2107fed84256dc62c2142da53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1rxCAQhqW00O3HL-hF6DnbUfPhFnpYln7Bwl7asxg1xZDEVE1g_31Nt-eeBsd5H2YehO4IrAmQ8qFdH_sQxjUFskmdkgE7QysCmzIjlJTnaAWc84zRCi7RVQgtAGxyKFdoPozR9rLD2vROT52M1g1ZLQeNg-mMWp64cR6bYTadG036C0ZjbeXX4EK0KjziLVauH6VP4dngECd9xK7B0UttF0DCL8DBJQSOznXhBl00sgvm9q9eo8-X54_dW7Y_vL7vtvtM5TSPmaYF08ByQjmFupZNSVlV5OnMCkhdSFWrmknVUAJVYzTPaVFqVVJFSU61LNg1uj9xR---JxOiaN3k00JBUEYJ5wQ4TVPsNKW8C8GbRow-SfFHQUAsgkUrfgWLRbA4CU6pp1PKpANma7wIyppBGW19Eie0s__mfwA3JIb4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2321881082</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimal demodulation-band selection for envelope-based diagnostics: A comparative study of traditional and novel tools</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Smith, Wade A. ; Borghesani, Pietro ; Ni, Qing ; Wang, Kesheng ; Peng, Zhongxiao</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Wade A. ; Borghesani, Pietro ; Ni, Qing ; Wang, Kesheng ; Peng, Zhongxiao</creatorcontrib><description>•Traditional band-selection methods focus on impulsiveness or cyclostationarity.•The two properties are often entangled in fault signals, giving misleading results.•The properties can be separated, and cyclostationarity appears most important.•Log-cycligram proposed to capture cyclostationarity separately from impulsiveness.•Performance of new method validated against existing tools on multiple datasets. The demodulation of machine signals is a key step for the diagnostics and prognostics of components such as rolling element bearings. Whereas diagnostic approaches could perform a cyclostationary analysis over the full spectral band (i.e. using cyclic-spectral maps), in order to extract time domain and statistical features for prognostics, a pre-processing filtering step is required to extract the often-weak fault-symptomatic signal components. A series of techniques derived from the original idea of the kurtogram have been proposed in previous studies for the selection of this optimal demodulation band. All of these methodologies have been designed to identify signal components with high impulsiveness (non-Gaussianity) or strong second-order cyclostationarity, both assumed to be typical characteristics of bearing fault signals. However, a recent series of theoretical works has shown how non-Gaussianity and non-stationarity (in its cyclic form), despite being clearly distinct properties, are practically entangled in bearing signals, and can be easily confused by indices such as kurtosis (implicitly assuming stationarity) or second-order cyclostationary (CS2) indicators (implicitly assuming Gaussianity). In addition, it has been shown that generalised Gaussian cyclostationary models are effective tools to describe and separate these two properties in bearing signals. Partial evidence seems to show that the cyclostationary property is dominant and more clearly indicative of a bearing fault, whereas impulsiveness is potentially misleading and not uniquely attributable to the bearing component of the signal. In this paper, we therefore propose a new statistically robust band selection tool which can capture cyclostationarity separately from non-Gaussianity. The tool, coined the log-cycligram (LC), is based on the strength of target cyclic frequency components in the spectrum of the log envelope (LES), and so potential fault frequencies must be known in advance. The effectiveness of the method is validated against the traditional kurtogram and a range of other existing techniques on both numerical and experimental datasets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-3270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-1216</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106303</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bearing diagnostics ; Comparative studies ; Cyclostationary analysis ; Demodulation ; Demodulation band ; Diagnostic systems ; Envelope analysis ; Feature extraction ; Kurtogram ; Kurtosis ; Robustness (mathematics) ; Roller bearings ; Signal processing</subject><ispartof>Mechanical systems and signal processing, 2019-12, Vol.134, p.106303, Article 106303</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Dec 1, 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-d253d03412820bbaf623754201701b5acbcb3acf2107fed84256dc62c2142da53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-d253d03412820bbaf623754201701b5acbcb3acf2107fed84256dc62c2142da53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888327019305242$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Wade A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borghesani, Pietro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ni, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Kesheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Zhongxiao</creatorcontrib><title>Optimal demodulation-band selection for envelope-based diagnostics: A comparative study of traditional and novel tools</title><title>Mechanical systems and signal processing</title><description>•Traditional band-selection methods focus on impulsiveness or cyclostationarity.•The two properties are often entangled in fault signals, giving misleading results.•The properties can be separated, and cyclostationarity appears most important.•Log-cycligram proposed to capture cyclostationarity separately from impulsiveness.•Performance of new method validated against existing tools on multiple datasets. The demodulation of machine signals is a key step for the diagnostics and prognostics of components such as rolling element bearings. Whereas diagnostic approaches could perform a cyclostationary analysis over the full spectral band (i.e. using cyclic-spectral maps), in order to extract time domain and statistical features for prognostics, a pre-processing filtering step is required to extract the often-weak fault-symptomatic signal components. A series of techniques derived from the original idea of the kurtogram have been proposed in previous studies for the selection of this optimal demodulation band. All of these methodologies have been designed to identify signal components with high impulsiveness (non-Gaussianity) or strong second-order cyclostationarity, both assumed to be typical characteristics of bearing fault signals. However, a recent series of theoretical works has shown how non-Gaussianity and non-stationarity (in its cyclic form), despite being clearly distinct properties, are practically entangled in bearing signals, and can be easily confused by indices such as kurtosis (implicitly assuming stationarity) or second-order cyclostationary (CS2) indicators (implicitly assuming Gaussianity). In addition, it has been shown that generalised Gaussian cyclostationary models are effective tools to describe and separate these two properties in bearing signals. Partial evidence seems to show that the cyclostationary property is dominant and more clearly indicative of a bearing fault, whereas impulsiveness is potentially misleading and not uniquely attributable to the bearing component of the signal. In this paper, we therefore propose a new statistically robust band selection tool which can capture cyclostationarity separately from non-Gaussianity. The tool, coined the log-cycligram (LC), is based on the strength of target cyclic frequency components in the spectrum of the log envelope (LES), and so potential fault frequencies must be known in advance. The effectiveness of the method is validated against the traditional kurtogram and a range of other existing techniques on both numerical and experimental datasets.</description><subject>Bearing diagnostics</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Cyclostationary analysis</subject><subject>Demodulation</subject><subject>Demodulation band</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Envelope analysis</subject><subject>Feature extraction</subject><subject>Kurtogram</subject><subject>Kurtosis</subject><subject>Robustness (mathematics)</subject><subject>Roller bearings</subject><subject>Signal processing</subject><issn>0888-3270</issn><issn>1096-1216</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1rxCAQhqW00O3HL-hF6DnbUfPhFnpYln7Bwl7asxg1xZDEVE1g_31Nt-eeBsd5H2YehO4IrAmQ8qFdH_sQxjUFskmdkgE7QysCmzIjlJTnaAWc84zRCi7RVQgtAGxyKFdoPozR9rLD2vROT52M1g1ZLQeNg-mMWp64cR6bYTadG036C0ZjbeXX4EK0KjziLVauH6VP4dngECd9xK7B0UttF0DCL8DBJQSOznXhBl00sgvm9q9eo8-X54_dW7Y_vL7vtvtM5TSPmaYF08ByQjmFupZNSVlV5OnMCkhdSFWrmknVUAJVYzTPaVFqVVJFSU61LNg1uj9xR---JxOiaN3k00JBUEYJ5wQ4TVPsNKW8C8GbRow-SfFHQUAsgkUrfgWLRbA4CU6pp1PKpANma7wIyppBGW19Eie0s__mfwA3JIb4</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Smith, Wade A.</creator><creator>Borghesani, Pietro</creator><creator>Ni, Qing</creator><creator>Wang, Kesheng</creator><creator>Peng, Zhongxiao</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Optimal demodulation-band selection for envelope-based diagnostics: A comparative study of traditional and novel tools</title><author>Smith, Wade A. ; Borghesani, Pietro ; Ni, Qing ; Wang, Kesheng ; Peng, Zhongxiao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-d253d03412820bbaf623754201701b5acbcb3acf2107fed84256dc62c2142da53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bearing diagnostics</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Cyclostationary analysis</topic><topic>Demodulation</topic><topic>Demodulation band</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Envelope analysis</topic><topic>Feature extraction</topic><topic>Kurtogram</topic><topic>Kurtosis</topic><topic>Robustness (mathematics)</topic><topic>Roller bearings</topic><topic>Signal processing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Wade A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borghesani, Pietro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ni, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Kesheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Zhongxiao</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Mechanical systems and signal processing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Wade A.</au><au>Borghesani, Pietro</au><au>Ni, Qing</au><au>Wang, Kesheng</au><au>Peng, Zhongxiao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimal demodulation-band selection for envelope-based diagnostics: A comparative study of traditional and novel tools</atitle><jtitle>Mechanical systems and signal processing</jtitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>134</volume><spage>106303</spage><pages>106303-</pages><artnum>106303</artnum><issn>0888-3270</issn><eissn>1096-1216</eissn><abstract>•Traditional band-selection methods focus on impulsiveness or cyclostationarity.•The two properties are often entangled in fault signals, giving misleading results.•The properties can be separated, and cyclostationarity appears most important.•Log-cycligram proposed to capture cyclostationarity separately from impulsiveness.•Performance of new method validated against existing tools on multiple datasets. The demodulation of machine signals is a key step for the diagnostics and prognostics of components such as rolling element bearings. Whereas diagnostic approaches could perform a cyclostationary analysis over the full spectral band (i.e. using cyclic-spectral maps), in order to extract time domain and statistical features for prognostics, a pre-processing filtering step is required to extract the often-weak fault-symptomatic signal components. A series of techniques derived from the original idea of the kurtogram have been proposed in previous studies for the selection of this optimal demodulation band. All of these methodologies have been designed to identify signal components with high impulsiveness (non-Gaussianity) or strong second-order cyclostationarity, both assumed to be typical characteristics of bearing fault signals. However, a recent series of theoretical works has shown how non-Gaussianity and non-stationarity (in its cyclic form), despite being clearly distinct properties, are practically entangled in bearing signals, and can be easily confused by indices such as kurtosis (implicitly assuming stationarity) or second-order cyclostationary (CS2) indicators (implicitly assuming Gaussianity). In addition, it has been shown that generalised Gaussian cyclostationary models are effective tools to describe and separate these two properties in bearing signals. Partial evidence seems to show that the cyclostationary property is dominant and more clearly indicative of a bearing fault, whereas impulsiveness is potentially misleading and not uniquely attributable to the bearing component of the signal. In this paper, we therefore propose a new statistically robust band selection tool which can capture cyclostationarity separately from non-Gaussianity. The tool, coined the log-cycligram (LC), is based on the strength of target cyclic frequency components in the spectrum of the log envelope (LES), and so potential fault frequencies must be known in advance. The effectiveness of the method is validated against the traditional kurtogram and a range of other existing techniques on both numerical and experimental datasets.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106303</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0888-3270
ispartof Mechanical systems and signal processing, 2019-12, Vol.134, p.106303, Article 106303
issn 0888-3270
1096-1216
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2321881082
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Bearing diagnostics
Comparative studies
Cyclostationary analysis
Demodulation
Demodulation band
Diagnostic systems
Envelope analysis
Feature extraction
Kurtogram
Kurtosis
Robustness (mathematics)
Roller bearings
Signal processing
title Optimal demodulation-band selection for envelope-based diagnostics: A comparative study of traditional and novel tools
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T05%3A06%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimal%20demodulation-band%20selection%20for%20envelope-based%20diagnostics:%20A%20comparative%20study%20of%20traditional%20and%20novel%20tools&rft.jtitle=Mechanical%20systems%20and%20signal%20processing&rft.au=Smith,%20Wade%20A.&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=134&rft.spage=106303&rft.pages=106303-&rft.artnum=106303&rft.issn=0888-3270&rft.eissn=1096-1216&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106303&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2321881082%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2321881082&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0888327019305242&rfr_iscdi=true