The Soviet Legacy in Russian Foreign Policy

After the Soviet Union broke apart in late December 1991 and the Russian Federation emerged as an independent country, Russian political leaders had to confront a wide range of foreign policy issues leftover from the Soviet regime. The series of agreements codifying the dis-solution of the Soviet Un...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Political science quarterly 2019-12, Vol.134 (4), p.585-609
1. Verfasser:	Kramer, Mark
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Codification Foreign policy Policy analysis Political leadership
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	609
container_issue	4
container_start_page	585
container_title	Political science quarterly
container_volume	134
creator	Kramer, Mark
description	After the Soviet Union broke apart in late December 1991 and the Russian Federation emerged as an independent country, Russian political leaders had to confront a wide range of foreign policy issues leftover from the Soviet regime. The series of agreements codifying the dis-solution of the Soviet Union, which led to the formation of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and broad international recognition of 15 new states by the end of 1991, designated Russia as the “legal successor state” to the USSR, a status that, for many Russian leaders (both then and now), has blurred Soviet and Russian interests. As the oﬃcial successor state, Russia was given sole possession of the vast Soviet nuclear arsenal and was awarded the USSR’s permanent seat on the United...
doi_str_mv	10.1002/polq.12988
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2321331168</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2321331168</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2608-a90bd9cbf74164175bc9cbb86643c70b958233bf6cc55f2156e25252f1731943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQQIMoWFcv_oKCN6VrJmnS9CiLq0JhV-3BW2hjumapTTfZKv33Zq1nZw7DwJsPHkKXgOeAMbntbbubA8mFOEIRMCoS4OztGEUYU5JQyNkpOvN-i0NkQCJ0U37o-NV-Gb2PC72p1BibLn4ZvDdVFy-t02bTxWvbGjWeo5Omar2--KszVC7vy8VjUqwenhZ3RaIIxyKpcly_56pushR4ChmrVehqwXlKVYbrnAlCad1wpRhrCDCuCQvZQBYeTOkMXU1re2d3g_Z7ubWD68JFSSgBSgG4CNT1RClnvXe6kb0zn5UbJWB5cCEPLuSviwDDBH-bVo__kHK9Kp6nmR8luV7n</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2321331168</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Soviet Legacy in Russian Foreign Policy</title><source>Columbia International Affairs Online Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Kramer, Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Mark</creatorcontrib><description>After the Soviet Union broke apart in late December 1991 and the Russian Federation emerged as an independent country, Russian political leaders had to confront a wide range of foreign policy issues leftover from the Soviet regime. The series of agreements codifying the dis-solution of the Soviet Union, which led to the formation of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and broad international recognition of 15 new states by the end of 1991, designated Russia as the “legal successor state” to the USSR, a status that, for many Russian leaders (both then and now), has blurred Soviet and Russian interests. As the oﬃcial successor state, Russia was given sole possession of the vast Soviet nuclear arsenal and was awarded the USSR’s permanent seat on the United...</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-3195</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-165X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/polq.12988</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Codification ; Foreign policy ; Policy analysis ; Political leadership</subject><ispartof>Political science quarterly, 2019-12, Vol.134 (4), p.585-609</ispartof><rights>2019 Academy of Political Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpolq.12988$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpolq.12988$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Mark</creatorcontrib><title>The Soviet Legacy in Russian Foreign Policy</title><title>Political science quarterly</title><description>After the Soviet Union broke apart in late December 1991 and the Russian Federation emerged as an independent country, Russian political leaders had to confront a wide range of foreign policy issues leftover from the Soviet regime. The series of agreements codifying the dis-solution of the Soviet Union, which led to the formation of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and broad international recognition of 15 new states by the end of 1991, designated Russia as the “legal successor state” to the USSR, a status that, for many Russian leaders (both then and now), has blurred Soviet and Russian interests. As the oﬃcial successor state, Russia was given sole possession of the vast Soviet nuclear arsenal and was awarded the USSR’s permanent seat on the United...</description><subject>Codification</subject><subject>Foreign policy</subject><subject>Policy analysis</subject><subject>Political leadership</subject><issn>0032-3195</issn><issn>1538-165X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQQIMoWFcv_oKCN6VrJmnS9CiLq0JhV-3BW2hjumapTTfZKv33Zq1nZw7DwJsPHkKXgOeAMbntbbubA8mFOEIRMCoS4OztGEUYU5JQyNkpOvN-i0NkQCJ0U37o-NV-Gb2PC72p1BibLn4ZvDdVFy-t02bTxWvbGjWeo5Omar2--KszVC7vy8VjUqwenhZ3RaIIxyKpcly_56pushR4ChmrVehqwXlKVYbrnAlCad1wpRhrCDCuCQvZQBYeTOkMXU1re2d3g_Z7ubWD68JFSSgBSgG4CNT1RClnvXe6kb0zn5UbJWB5cCEPLuSviwDDBH-bVo__kHK9Kp6nmR8luV7n</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Kramer, Mark</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>The Soviet Legacy in Russian Foreign Policy</title><author>Kramer, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2608-a90bd9cbf74164175bc9cbb86643c70b958233bf6cc55f2156e25252f1731943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Codification</topic><topic>Foreign policy</topic><topic>Policy analysis</topic><topic>Political leadership</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Political science quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kramer, Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Soviet Legacy in Russian Foreign Policy</atitle><jtitle>Political science quarterly</jtitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>585</spage><epage>609</epage><pages>585-609</pages><issn>0032-3195</issn><eissn>1538-165X</eissn><abstract>After the Soviet Union broke apart in late December 1991 and the Russian Federation emerged as an independent country, Russian political leaders had to confront a wide range of foreign policy issues leftover from the Soviet regime. The series of agreements codifying the dis-solution of the Soviet Union, which led to the formation of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and broad international recognition of 15 new states by the end of 1991, designated Russia as the “legal successor state” to the USSR, a status that, for many Russian leaders (both then and now), has blurred Soviet and Russian interests. As the oﬃcial successor state, Russia was given sole possession of the vast Soviet nuclear arsenal and was awarded the USSR’s permanent seat on the United...</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1002/polq.12988</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0032-3195
ispartof	Political science quarterly, 2019-12, Vol.134 (4), p.585-609
issn	0032-3195 1538-165X
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_journals_2321331168
source	Columbia International Affairs Online Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Access via Wiley Online Library; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects	Codification Foreign policy Policy analysis Political leadership
title	The Soviet Legacy in Russian Foreign Policy
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T20%3A41%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Soviet%20Legacy%20in%20Russian%20Foreign%20Policy&rft.jtitle=Political%20science%20quarterly&rft.au=Kramer,%20Mark&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=585&rft.epage=609&rft.pages=585-609&rft.issn=0032-3195&rft.eissn=1538-165X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/polq.12988&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2321331168%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2321331168&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true