Investigating the attainment of open government data objectives: is there a mismatch between objectives and results?

The objectives of open government data initiatives range from enhancing transparency and accountability to increasing innovation and participation. However, there is a lack of knowledge of the extent to which the objectives of open government data initiatives are achieved. This article investigates...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International review of administrative sciences 2019-12, Vol.85 (4), p.645-672
Hauptverfasser: Zuiderwijk, Anneke, Shinde, Rhythima, Janssen, Marijn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 672
container_issue 4
container_start_page 645
container_title International review of administrative sciences
container_volume 85
creator Zuiderwijk, Anneke
Shinde, Rhythima
Janssen, Marijn
description The objectives of open government data initiatives range from enhancing transparency and accountability to increasing innovation and participation. However, there is a lack of knowledge of the extent to which the objectives of open government data initiatives are achieved. This article investigates the relationship between the objectives of open government data initiatives and the benefits delivered. A total of 168 survey responses concerning 156 open government data initiatives at different government levels worldwide suggest that operational and technical benefits are the benefits most often delivered, followed by economic benefits and, finally, societal benefits. Surprisingly, our study suggests that whether an open government data initiative delivers a benefit (e.g. increased openness, trust or innovation) is not significantly affected by having an objective related to the delivery of that benefit. The objectives of state- and national-level open government data initiatives are more often achieved than those of local- and regional-level open government data initiatives. Points for practitioners Key implications for professionals working in public management and administration are: attaining open government data objectives is easier said than done; the benefits delivered are most often operational and technical benefits, followed by economic benefits and, finally, societal benefits; the benefits are often in areas other than those of the open government data initiative’s objectives, suggesting a mismatch between the objectives and their attainment; state- and national-level open government data initiatives achieve their objectives more often than local- and regional-level open government data initiatives; and initiatives might mimic each other instead of aiming at delivering the benefits.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0020852317739115
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2320893654</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0020852317739115</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2320893654</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-70ffcc6282d66c7d96de09f9105571b9406b846c7b8772d8c6941ba074865ea83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3jwHPq0k2X-tFpPhRKHjR85LNZrcp3aQmacX_3iwrFARPM8x7vxnmAXCN0S3GQtwhRJBkpMx9WWHMTsAMU44LQQg_BbNRLkb9HFzEuEEIU4nlDKSlO5iYbK-SdT1MawNVSsq6wbgEfQf9zjjY-4MJ06hVSUHfbIxONpP30MaRCpmDg42DSnoNG5O-TOaOPqhcC4OJ-22KD5fgrFPbaK5-6xx8PD-9L16L1dvLcvG4KnTJcCoE6jqtOZGk5VyLtuKtQVVXYcSYwE1FEW8kzUojhSCt1LyiuFFIUMmZUbKcg5tp7y74z31-s974fXD5ZE3KHFdVckazC00uHXyMwXT1LthBhe8ao3rMtv6bbUaKCYmqN8el__p_ADE9eZY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2320893654</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigating the attainment of open government data objectives: is there a mismatch between objectives and results?</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Zuiderwijk, Anneke ; Shinde, Rhythima ; Janssen, Marijn</creator><creatorcontrib>Zuiderwijk, Anneke ; Shinde, Rhythima ; Janssen, Marijn</creatorcontrib><description>The objectives of open government data initiatives range from enhancing transparency and accountability to increasing innovation and participation. However, there is a lack of knowledge of the extent to which the objectives of open government data initiatives are achieved. This article investigates the relationship between the objectives of open government data initiatives and the benefits delivered. A total of 168 survey responses concerning 156 open government data initiatives at different government levels worldwide suggest that operational and technical benefits are the benefits most often delivered, followed by economic benefits and, finally, societal benefits. Surprisingly, our study suggests that whether an open government data initiative delivers a benefit (e.g. increased openness, trust or innovation) is not significantly affected by having an objective related to the delivery of that benefit. The objectives of state- and national-level open government data initiatives are more often achieved than those of local- and regional-level open government data initiatives. Points for practitioners Key implications for professionals working in public management and administration are: attaining open government data objectives is easier said than done; the benefits delivered are most often operational and technical benefits, followed by economic benefits and, finally, societal benefits; the benefits are often in areas other than those of the open government data initiative’s objectives, suggesting a mismatch between the objectives and their attainment; state- and national-level open government data initiatives achieve their objectives more often than local- and regional-level open government data initiatives; and initiatives might mimic each other instead of aiming at delivering the benefits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-8523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0020852317739115</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Attainment ; Data ; Innovations ; Objectives ; Open meeting laws ; Openness ; Participation ; Responses ; Transparency</subject><ispartof>International review of administrative sciences, 2019-12, Vol.85 (4), p.645-672</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-70ffcc6282d66c7d96de09f9105571b9406b846c7b8772d8c6941ba074865ea83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-70ffcc6282d66c7d96de09f9105571b9406b846c7b8772d8c6941ba074865ea83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0020852317739115$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020852317739115$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zuiderwijk, Anneke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinde, Rhythima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Marijn</creatorcontrib><title>Investigating the attainment of open government data objectives: is there a mismatch between objectives and results?</title><title>International review of administrative sciences</title><description>The objectives of open government data initiatives range from enhancing transparency and accountability to increasing innovation and participation. However, there is a lack of knowledge of the extent to which the objectives of open government data initiatives are achieved. This article investigates the relationship between the objectives of open government data initiatives and the benefits delivered. A total of 168 survey responses concerning 156 open government data initiatives at different government levels worldwide suggest that operational and technical benefits are the benefits most often delivered, followed by economic benefits and, finally, societal benefits. Surprisingly, our study suggests that whether an open government data initiative delivers a benefit (e.g. increased openness, trust or innovation) is not significantly affected by having an objective related to the delivery of that benefit. The objectives of state- and national-level open government data initiatives are more often achieved than those of local- and regional-level open government data initiatives. Points for practitioners Key implications for professionals working in public management and administration are: attaining open government data objectives is easier said than done; the benefits delivered are most often operational and technical benefits, followed by economic benefits and, finally, societal benefits; the benefits are often in areas other than those of the open government data initiative’s objectives, suggesting a mismatch between the objectives and their attainment; state- and national-level open government data initiatives achieve their objectives more often than local- and regional-level open government data initiatives; and initiatives might mimic each other instead of aiming at delivering the benefits.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Attainment</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Open meeting laws</subject><subject>Openness</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Responses</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><issn>0020-8523</issn><issn>1461-7226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3jwHPq0k2X-tFpPhRKHjR85LNZrcp3aQmacX_3iwrFARPM8x7vxnmAXCN0S3GQtwhRJBkpMx9WWHMTsAMU44LQQg_BbNRLkb9HFzEuEEIU4nlDKSlO5iYbK-SdT1MawNVSsq6wbgEfQf9zjjY-4MJ06hVSUHfbIxONpP30MaRCpmDg42DSnoNG5O-TOaOPqhcC4OJ-22KD5fgrFPbaK5-6xx8PD-9L16L1dvLcvG4KnTJcCoE6jqtOZGk5VyLtuKtQVVXYcSYwE1FEW8kzUojhSCt1LyiuFFIUMmZUbKcg5tp7y74z31-s974fXD5ZE3KHFdVckazC00uHXyMwXT1LthBhe8ao3rMtv6bbUaKCYmqN8el__p_ADE9eZY</recordid><startdate>201912</startdate><enddate>201912</enddate><creator>Zuiderwijk, Anneke</creator><creator>Shinde, Rhythima</creator><creator>Janssen, Marijn</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201912</creationdate><title>Investigating the attainment of open government data objectives: is there a mismatch between objectives and results?</title><author>Zuiderwijk, Anneke ; Shinde, Rhythima ; Janssen, Marijn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-70ffcc6282d66c7d96de09f9105571b9406b846c7b8772d8c6941ba074865ea83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Attainment</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Open meeting laws</topic><topic>Openness</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Responses</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zuiderwijk, Anneke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinde, Rhythima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Marijn</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International review of administrative sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zuiderwijk, Anneke</au><au>Shinde, Rhythima</au><au>Janssen, Marijn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigating the attainment of open government data objectives: is there a mismatch between objectives and results?</atitle><jtitle>International review of administrative sciences</jtitle><date>2019-12</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>645</spage><epage>672</epage><pages>645-672</pages><issn>0020-8523</issn><eissn>1461-7226</eissn><abstract>The objectives of open government data initiatives range from enhancing transparency and accountability to increasing innovation and participation. However, there is a lack of knowledge of the extent to which the objectives of open government data initiatives are achieved. This article investigates the relationship between the objectives of open government data initiatives and the benefits delivered. A total of 168 survey responses concerning 156 open government data initiatives at different government levels worldwide suggest that operational and technical benefits are the benefits most often delivered, followed by economic benefits and, finally, societal benefits. Surprisingly, our study suggests that whether an open government data initiative delivers a benefit (e.g. increased openness, trust or innovation) is not significantly affected by having an objective related to the delivery of that benefit. The objectives of state- and national-level open government data initiatives are more often achieved than those of local- and regional-level open government data initiatives. Points for practitioners Key implications for professionals working in public management and administration are: attaining open government data objectives is easier said than done; the benefits delivered are most often operational and technical benefits, followed by economic benefits and, finally, societal benefits; the benefits are often in areas other than those of the open government data initiative’s objectives, suggesting a mismatch between the objectives and their attainment; state- and national-level open government data initiatives achieve their objectives more often than local- and regional-level open government data initiatives; and initiatives might mimic each other instead of aiming at delivering the benefits.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0020852317739115</doi><tpages>28</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-8523
ispartof International review of administrative sciences, 2019-12, Vol.85 (4), p.645-672
issn 0020-8523
1461-7226
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2320893654
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Accountability
Attainment
Data
Innovations
Objectives
Open meeting laws
Openness
Participation
Responses
Transparency
title Investigating the attainment of open government data objectives: is there a mismatch between objectives and results?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T17%3A31%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigating%20the%20attainment%20of%20open%20government%20data%20objectives:%20is%20there%20a%20mismatch%20between%20objectives%20and%20results?&rft.jtitle=International%20review%20of%20administrative%20sciences&rft.au=Zuiderwijk,%20Anneke&rft.date=2019-12&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=645&rft.epage=672&rft.pages=645-672&rft.issn=0020-8523&rft.eissn=1461-7226&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0020852317739115&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2320893654%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2320893654&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0020852317739115&rfr_iscdi=true