For sale: caveat emptor
THE system of land registration was, according to Lord Wilberforce in Williams&Glyn's Bank v. Boland [1981] A.C. 487, 503, “designed to free the purchaser from the hazards of notice–real or constructive–which, in the case of unregistered land, involved him in enquiries, often quite elaborat...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Cambridge law journal 1999-11, Vol.58 (3), p.461-499 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 499 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 461 |
| container_title | Cambridge law journal |
| container_volume | 58 |
| creator | Tee, Louise |
| description | THE system of land registration was, according to Lord Wilberforce in Williams&Glyn's Bank v. Boland [1981] A.C. 487, 503, “designed to free the purchaser from the hazards of notice–real or constructive–which, in the case of unregistered land, involved him in enquiries, often quite elaborate, failing which he might be bound by equities”. The hapless purchaser of land may well consider the remedy just as hazardous as the complaint. Certainly, in the light of Ferrishurst Ltd. v. Wallcite Ltd. [1999] 2 W.L.R. 667, no obituary can yet be written for elaborate enquiries. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0008197399293014 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_231982752</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0008197399293014</cupid><jstor_id>4508593</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4508593</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2308-643485eab684ed4800893ed006de2cd08ac30e22f980fe577b4098b15e18656e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j81LAzEQxYMoWKtnETwU76uT78SblLaKFfGLHkN2d1ZaW7cmW9H_3pQt9SCehuH33sx7hJxQOKdA9cUTABhqNbeWWQ5U7JAOFcpmjHK7SzprnK35PjmIcZZWbY3tkONhHXrRz_GyV_hP9E0PF8umDodkr_LziEeb2SUvw8Fz_zob349u-lfjrGA8XVSCCyPR58oILIVJXyzHEkCVyIoSjC84IGOVNVCh1DoXYE1OJVKjpELeJWft3WWoP1YYGzerV-E9vXSMU2uYliyJaCsqQh1jwMotw3Thw7ej4Nb13Z_6yXPaemYx1dkahAQjLU84a_E0Nvi1xT68OaW5lk6NHtztnWJ8Mnl0Mun5JoJf5GFavuJv0P9D_ACwcnDu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>231982752</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>For sale: caveat emptor</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Tee, Louise</creator><creatorcontrib>Tee, Louise</creatorcontrib><description>THE system of land registration was, according to Lord Wilberforce in Williams&Glyn's Bank v. Boland [1981] A.C. 487, 503, “designed to free the purchaser from the hazards of notice–real or constructive–which, in the case of unregistered land, involved him in enquiries, often quite elaborate, failing which he might be bound by equities”. The hapless purchaser of land may well consider the remedy just as hazardous as the complaint. Certainly, in the light of Ferrishurst Ltd. v. Wallcite Ltd. [1999] 2 W.L.R. 667, no obituary can yet be written for elaborate enquiries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-1973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-2139</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0008197399293014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Appellate courts ; CASE AND COMMENT ; Court decisions ; Equity ; Land ; Legislation ; Litigation ; Purchasing ; Registration</subject><ispartof>Cambridge law journal, 1999-11, Vol.58 (3), p.461-499</ispartof><rights>The Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors, 1999</rights><rights>Copyright 1999 The Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press, Publishing Division Nov 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4508593$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0008197399293014/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,799,27901,27902,55603,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tee, Louise</creatorcontrib><title>For sale: caveat emptor</title><title>Cambridge law journal</title><addtitle>C.L.J</addtitle><description>THE system of land registration was, according to Lord Wilberforce in Williams&Glyn's Bank v. Boland [1981] A.C. 487, 503, “designed to free the purchaser from the hazards of notice–real or constructive–which, in the case of unregistered land, involved him in enquiries, often quite elaborate, failing which he might be bound by equities”. The hapless purchaser of land may well consider the remedy just as hazardous as the complaint. Certainly, in the light of Ferrishurst Ltd. v. Wallcite Ltd. [1999] 2 W.L.R. 667, no obituary can yet be written for elaborate enquiries.</description><subject>Appellate courts</subject><subject>CASE AND COMMENT</subject><subject>Court decisions</subject><subject>Equity</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Purchasing</subject><subject>Registration</subject><issn>0008-1973</issn><issn>1469-2139</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j81LAzEQxYMoWKtnETwU76uT78SblLaKFfGLHkN2d1ZaW7cmW9H_3pQt9SCehuH33sx7hJxQOKdA9cUTABhqNbeWWQ5U7JAOFcpmjHK7SzprnK35PjmIcZZWbY3tkONhHXrRz_GyV_hP9E0PF8umDodkr_LziEeb2SUvw8Fz_zob349u-lfjrGA8XVSCCyPR58oILIVJXyzHEkCVyIoSjC84IGOVNVCh1DoXYE1OJVKjpELeJWft3WWoP1YYGzerV-E9vXSMU2uYliyJaCsqQh1jwMotw3Thw7ej4Nb13Z_6yXPaemYx1dkahAQjLU84a_E0Nvi1xT68OaW5lk6NHtztnWJ8Mnl0Mun5JoJf5GFavuJv0P9D_ACwcnDu</recordid><startdate>19991101</startdate><enddate>19991101</enddate><creator>Tee, Louise</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991101</creationdate><title>For sale: caveat emptor</title><author>Tee, Louise</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2308-643485eab684ed4800893ed006de2cd08ac30e22f980fe577b4098b15e18656e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Appellate courts</topic><topic>CASE AND COMMENT</topic><topic>Court decisions</topic><topic>Equity</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Purchasing</topic><topic>Registration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tee, Louise</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Cambridge law journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tee, Louise</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>For sale: caveat emptor</atitle><jtitle>Cambridge law journal</jtitle><addtitle>C.L.J</addtitle><date>1999-11-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>461</spage><epage>499</epage><pages>461-499</pages><issn>0008-1973</issn><eissn>1469-2139</eissn><abstract>THE system of land registration was, according to Lord Wilberforce in Williams&Glyn's Bank v. Boland [1981] A.C. 487, 503, “designed to free the purchaser from the hazards of notice–real or constructive–which, in the case of unregistered land, involved him in enquiries, often quite elaborate, failing which he might be bound by equities”. The hapless purchaser of land may well consider the remedy just as hazardous as the complaint. Certainly, in the light of Ferrishurst Ltd. v. Wallcite Ltd. [1999] 2 W.L.R. 667, no obituary can yet be written for elaborate enquiries.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0008197399293014</doi><tpages>39</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0008-1973 |
| ispartof | Cambridge law journal, 1999-11, Vol.58 (3), p.461-499 |
| issn | 0008-1973 1469-2139 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_231982752 |
| source | Cambridge University Press Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; JSTOR |
| subjects | Appellate courts CASE AND COMMENT Court decisions Equity Land Legislation Litigation Purchasing Registration |
| title | For sale: caveat emptor |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T22%3A40%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=For%20sale:%20caveat%20emptor&rft.jtitle=Cambridge%20law%20journal&rft.au=Tee,%20Louise&rft.date=1999-11-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=461&rft.epage=499&rft.pages=461-499&rft.issn=0008-1973&rft.eissn=1469-2139&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0008197399293014&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4508593%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=231982752&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0008197399293014&rft_jstor_id=4508593&rfr_iscdi=true |