The “Subtext of Everything”: High School Science Teachers’ Views of Emotions and Their Related Teaching Practices

Since most emotional regulation research is about teachers regulating their own emotions, this study sought to examine how teachers view emotions and respond to their students’ emotions. Drawing from an interactional view of emotions and emotion regulation, five science teachers were interviewed for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of science, mathematics and technology education mathematics and technology education, 2019-12, Vol.19 (4), p.430-445
1. Verfasser: Hufnagel, Elizabeth
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 445
container_issue 4
container_start_page 430
container_title Canadian journal of science, mathematics and technology education
container_volume 19
creator Hufnagel, Elizabeth
description Since most emotional regulation research is about teachers regulating their own emotions, this study sought to examine how teachers view emotions and respond to their students’ emotions. Drawing from an interactional view of emotions and emotion regulation, five science teachers were interviewed for 60–75 minutes about the emotions experienced by their students, themselves, and scientists. They were also prompted to talk about how they respond to their students’ emotions. Findings from the study include that the teachers limited their views of students’ emotions along a positive/negative binary with a focus on academic emotions. These views were in contrast to their conceptions of their own emotions and those of scientists. In addition, the teachers described three teaching practices by which they implicitly and explicitly attempted to avoid student frustration: expressing their own excitement, downplaying students’ expressions of frustration, and utilizing group work. To a lesser degree, the teachers shared how they acknowledged students’ emotions in the classroom. It is concluded that the teachers’ views of emotions were aligned with their practices to minimize student frustration since they viewed that emotion as an impediment to learning.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s42330-019-00059-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2319255337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1235663</ericid><sourcerecordid>2319255337</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-8be3862ba88bc54d3ae93f908ca4f777e57711277bfda033b5690a7feb3620973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhQdRsFZfQBACrkfzM5lM3EmpfwiKrW5DJr3TSWlnajK1dtfXEPTl-iRGR3Tn6lw453wXThQdEnxCMBanPqGM4RgTGWOMuYz5VtQhMqFxgjnZDnciaZwSnu5Ge95PMKaCUt6JlsMS0Gb9PljkDbw2qC5Q_wXcqiltNd6sP87QlR2XaGDKup4GsVAZQEPQpgTnN-s39GRh6b97s7qxdeWRrkYoYK1DDzDVDYzafACie6dNYw34_Win0FMPBz_ajR4v-sPeVXx7d3ndO7-NDUtIE2c5sCyluc6y3PBkxDRIVkicGZ0UQgjgQhBChciLkcaM5TyVWIsCcpZSLAXrRsctd-7q5wX4Rk3qhavCS0UZkZRzxr5StE0ZV3vvoFBzZ2farRTB6mtg1Q6swsDqe2DFQ-moLYGz5rfQvyGU8TRlwWet74NXjcH9vf6H-glU1IoC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2319255337</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The “Subtext of Everything”: High School Science Teachers’ Views of Emotions and Their Related Teaching Practices</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Hufnagel, Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Hufnagel, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>Since most emotional regulation research is about teachers regulating their own emotions, this study sought to examine how teachers view emotions and respond to their students’ emotions. Drawing from an interactional view of emotions and emotion regulation, five science teachers were interviewed for 60–75 minutes about the emotions experienced by their students, themselves, and scientists. They were also prompted to talk about how they respond to their students’ emotions. Findings from the study include that the teachers limited their views of students’ emotions along a positive/negative binary with a focus on academic emotions. These views were in contrast to their conceptions of their own emotions and those of scientists. In addition, the teachers described three teaching practices by which they implicitly and explicitly attempted to avoid student frustration: expressing their own excitement, downplaying students’ expressions of frustration, and utilizing group work. To a lesser degree, the teachers shared how they acknowledged students’ emotions in the classroom. It is concluded that the teachers’ views of emotions were aligned with their practices to minimize student frustration since they viewed that emotion as an impediment to learning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1492-6156</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-4051</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s42330-019-00059-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Education ; Educational Practices ; Emotions ; Engineering/Technology Education ; Frustration ; High School Teachers ; Mathematics Education ; Psychological Patterns ; Science Education ; Science Instruction ; Science Teachers ; Scientists ; Secondary School Science ; Secondary school students ; Secondary school teachers ; Students ; Studies ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teacher Student Relationship ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of science, mathematics and technology education, 2019-12, Vol.19 (4), p.430-445</ispartof><rights>Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE) 2019</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-8be3862ba88bc54d3ae93f908ca4f777e57711277bfda033b5690a7feb3620973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-8be3862ba88bc54d3ae93f908ca4f777e57711277bfda033b5690a7feb3620973</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2866-4901</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42330-019-00059-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42330-019-00059-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1235663$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hufnagel, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>The “Subtext of Everything”: High School Science Teachers’ Views of Emotions and Their Related Teaching Practices</title><title>Canadian journal of science, mathematics and technology education</title><addtitle>Can. J. Sci. Math. Techn. Educ</addtitle><description>Since most emotional regulation research is about teachers regulating their own emotions, this study sought to examine how teachers view emotions and respond to their students’ emotions. Drawing from an interactional view of emotions and emotion regulation, five science teachers were interviewed for 60–75 minutes about the emotions experienced by their students, themselves, and scientists. They were also prompted to talk about how they respond to their students’ emotions. Findings from the study include that the teachers limited their views of students’ emotions along a positive/negative binary with a focus on academic emotions. These views were in contrast to their conceptions of their own emotions and those of scientists. In addition, the teachers described three teaching practices by which they implicitly and explicitly attempted to avoid student frustration: expressing their own excitement, downplaying students’ expressions of frustration, and utilizing group work. To a lesser degree, the teachers shared how they acknowledged students’ emotions in the classroom. It is concluded that the teachers’ views of emotions were aligned with their practices to minimize student frustration since they viewed that emotion as an impediment to learning.</description><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Engineering/Technology Education</subject><subject>Frustration</subject><subject>High School Teachers</subject><subject>Mathematics Education</subject><subject>Psychological Patterns</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Science Teachers</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Secondary School Science</subject><subject>Secondary school students</subject><subject>Secondary school teachers</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher Student Relationship</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><issn>1492-6156</issn><issn>1942-4051</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhQdRsFZfQBACrkfzM5lM3EmpfwiKrW5DJr3TSWlnajK1dtfXEPTl-iRGR3Tn6lw453wXThQdEnxCMBanPqGM4RgTGWOMuYz5VtQhMqFxgjnZDnciaZwSnu5Ge95PMKaCUt6JlsMS0Gb9PljkDbw2qC5Q_wXcqiltNd6sP87QlR2XaGDKup4GsVAZQEPQpgTnN-s39GRh6b97s7qxdeWRrkYoYK1DDzDVDYzafACie6dNYw34_Win0FMPBz_ajR4v-sPeVXx7d3ndO7-NDUtIE2c5sCyluc6y3PBkxDRIVkicGZ0UQgjgQhBChciLkcaM5TyVWIsCcpZSLAXrRsctd-7q5wX4Rk3qhavCS0UZkZRzxr5StE0ZV3vvoFBzZ2farRTB6mtg1Q6swsDqe2DFQ-moLYGz5rfQvyGU8TRlwWet74NXjcH9vf6H-glU1IoC</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Hufnagel, Elizabeth</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2866-4901</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>The “Subtext of Everything”: High School Science Teachers’ Views of Emotions and Their Related Teaching Practices</title><author>Hufnagel, Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-8be3862ba88bc54d3ae93f908ca4f777e57711277bfda033b5690a7feb3620973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Engineering/Technology Education</topic><topic>Frustration</topic><topic>High School Teachers</topic><topic>Mathematics Education</topic><topic>Psychological Patterns</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Science Teachers</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Secondary School Science</topic><topic>Secondary school students</topic><topic>Secondary school teachers</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher Student Relationship</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hufnagel, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of science, mathematics and technology education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hufnagel, Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1235663</ericid><atitle>The “Subtext of Everything”: High School Science Teachers’ Views of Emotions and Their Related Teaching Practices</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of science, mathematics and technology education</jtitle><stitle>Can. J. Sci. Math. Techn. Educ</stitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>430</spage><epage>445</epage><pages>430-445</pages><issn>1492-6156</issn><eissn>1942-4051</eissn><abstract>Since most emotional regulation research is about teachers regulating their own emotions, this study sought to examine how teachers view emotions and respond to their students’ emotions. Drawing from an interactional view of emotions and emotion regulation, five science teachers were interviewed for 60–75 minutes about the emotions experienced by their students, themselves, and scientists. They were also prompted to talk about how they respond to their students’ emotions. Findings from the study include that the teachers limited their views of students’ emotions along a positive/negative binary with a focus on academic emotions. These views were in contrast to their conceptions of their own emotions and those of scientists. In addition, the teachers described three teaching practices by which they implicitly and explicitly attempted to avoid student frustration: expressing their own excitement, downplaying students’ expressions of frustration, and utilizing group work. To a lesser degree, the teachers shared how they acknowledged students’ emotions in the classroom. It is concluded that the teachers’ views of emotions were aligned with their practices to minimize student frustration since they viewed that emotion as an impediment to learning.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s42330-019-00059-5</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2866-4901</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1492-6156
ispartof Canadian journal of science, mathematics and technology education, 2019-12, Vol.19 (4), p.430-445
issn 1492-6156
1942-4051
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2319255337
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Education
Educational Practices
Emotions
Engineering/Technology Education
Frustration
High School Teachers
Mathematics Education
Psychological Patterns
Science Education
Science Instruction
Science Teachers
Scientists
Secondary School Science
Secondary school students
Secondary school teachers
Students
Studies
Teacher Attitudes
Teacher Student Relationship
Teachers
Teaching
Teaching Methods
title The “Subtext of Everything”: High School Science Teachers’ Views of Emotions and Their Related Teaching Practices
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T15%3A17%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20%E2%80%9CSubtext%20of%20Everything%E2%80%9D:%20High%20School%20Science%20Teachers%E2%80%99%20Views%20of%20Emotions%20and%20Their%20Related%20Teaching%20Practices&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20science,%20mathematics%20and%20technology%20education&rft.au=Hufnagel,%20Elizabeth&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=430&rft.epage=445&rft.pages=430-445&rft.issn=1492-6156&rft.eissn=1942-4051&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s42330-019-00059-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2319255337%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2319255337&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1235663&rfr_iscdi=true