Ethics and Fairness in Assessing Learning Outcomes in Higher Education

Fairness is one of the most important quality criteria of assessments and a necessary condition for valid test score interpretations. In this paper, we describe findings related to an assessment of N  = 7664 beginning business and economics students at 46 universities across Germany using a domain-s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Higher education policy 2019-12, Vol.32 (4), p.537-556
Hauptverfasser: Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Schlax, J., Jitomirski, J., Happ, R., Kühling-Thees, C., Brückner, S., Pant, H. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 556
container_issue 4
container_start_page 537
container_title Higher education policy
container_volume 32
creator Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O.
Schlax, J.
Jitomirski, J.
Happ, R.
Kühling-Thees, C.
Brückner, S.
Pant, H. A.
description Fairness is one of the most important quality criteria of assessments and a necessary condition for valid test score interpretations. In this paper, we describe findings related to an assessment of N  = 7664 beginning business and economics students at 46 universities across Germany using a domain-specific higher education entry test. From the perspective of test fairness as defined by the internationally established validation standards outlined by AERA et al. (Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, AERA, Washington, DC, 2014 ), we identify which students had particular difficulty completing the test, taking into account gender- and language-related influence factors in the assessment of their test performance. Our results highlight the particular challenges in admissions testing in higher education. One of these challenges is finding a suitable way to address the disadvantages experienced by various groups of students to guarantee fairness and ethical integrity when developing and administering tests. Current migration developments and the overall internationalization of higher education have led to an increasing heterogeneity of student bodies. These challenges are therefore of particular relevance for education policy and practice when it comes to ensuring fairness when assessing learning outcomes for all student groups. This also applies in the context of commonly used standardized assessments and established examination practices in higher education.
doi_str_mv 10.1057/s41307-019-00149-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2318359254</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2318359254</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-106c820bc900a1f13df1986f93ef73a2ff9d2fe03bc74bb6aeff0122ce620a073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwNOC5-hMsv9yLKW1QqEXPYdsNmlTbLYmu1C_vWlX8OZpHsx7b4YfIY8IzwhF9RJz5FBRQEEBMBf0dEUmWOVAeV3yazIBUTBaV5zfkrsY9wBQ8VJMyHLR75yOmfJttlQueBNj5nw2izEp57fZ2qjgz2Iz9Lo7mMt65bY7E7JFO2jVu87fkxurPqN5-J1T8rFcvM9XdL15fZvP1lRzFD1FKHXNoNECQKFF3loUdWkFN7biilkrWmYN8EZXedOUylgLyJg2JQOVXp6Sp7H3GLqvwcRe7rsh-HRSMo41LwQr8uRio0uHLsZgrDwGd1DhWyLIMy858pKJl7zwkqcU4mMoJrPfmvBX_U_qBwJJbfs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2318359254</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ethics and Fairness in Assessing Learning Outcomes in Higher Education</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O. ; Schlax, J. ; Jitomirski, J. ; Happ, R. ; Kühling-Thees, C. ; Brückner, S. ; Pant, H. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O. ; Schlax, J. ; Jitomirski, J. ; Happ, R. ; Kühling-Thees, C. ; Brückner, S. ; Pant, H. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Fairness is one of the most important quality criteria of assessments and a necessary condition for valid test score interpretations. In this paper, we describe findings related to an assessment of N  = 7664 beginning business and economics students at 46 universities across Germany using a domain-specific higher education entry test. From the perspective of test fairness as defined by the internationally established validation standards outlined by AERA et al. (Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, AERA, Washington, DC, 2014 ), we identify which students had particular difficulty completing the test, taking into account gender- and language-related influence factors in the assessment of their test performance. Our results highlight the particular challenges in admissions testing in higher education. One of these challenges is finding a suitable way to address the disadvantages experienced by various groups of students to guarantee fairness and ethical integrity when developing and administering tests. Current migration developments and the overall internationalization of higher education have led to an increasing heterogeneity of student bodies. These challenges are therefore of particular relevance for education policy and practice when it comes to ensuring fairness when assessing learning outcomes for all student groups. This also applies in the context of commonly used standardized assessments and established examination practices in higher education.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-8733</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1740-3863</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1057/s41307-019-00149-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Palgrave Macmillan UK</publisher><subject>Admissions policies ; Business students ; College students ; Criteria ; Education ; Education Policy ; Educational Policy ; Educational Policy and Politics ; Ethics ; Fairness ; Globalization ; Heterogeneity ; Higher Education ; Learning ; Migration ; Morality ; Original Article ; Psychological Testing ; Students ; Test Interpretation ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Higher education policy, 2019-12, Vol.32 (4), p.537-556</ispartof><rights>International Association of Universities 2019</rights><rights>Copyright Palgrave Macmillan Dec 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-106c820bc900a1f13df1986f93ef73a2ff9d2fe03bc74bb6aeff0122ce620a073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-106c820bc900a1f13df1986f93ef73a2ff9d2fe03bc74bb6aeff0122ce620a073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/s41307-019-00149-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41307-019-00149-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27871,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlax, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jitomirski, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Happ, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kühling-Thees, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brückner, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pant, H. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Ethics and Fairness in Assessing Learning Outcomes in Higher Education</title><title>Higher education policy</title><addtitle>High Educ Policy</addtitle><description>Fairness is one of the most important quality criteria of assessments and a necessary condition for valid test score interpretations. In this paper, we describe findings related to an assessment of N  = 7664 beginning business and economics students at 46 universities across Germany using a domain-specific higher education entry test. From the perspective of test fairness as defined by the internationally established validation standards outlined by AERA et al. (Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, AERA, Washington, DC, 2014 ), we identify which students had particular difficulty completing the test, taking into account gender- and language-related influence factors in the assessment of their test performance. Our results highlight the particular challenges in admissions testing in higher education. One of these challenges is finding a suitable way to address the disadvantages experienced by various groups of students to guarantee fairness and ethical integrity when developing and administering tests. Current migration developments and the overall internationalization of higher education have led to an increasing heterogeneity of student bodies. These challenges are therefore of particular relevance for education policy and practice when it comes to ensuring fairness when assessing learning outcomes for all student groups. This also applies in the context of commonly used standardized assessments and established examination practices in higher education.</description><subject>Admissions policies</subject><subject>Business students</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education Policy</subject><subject>Educational Policy</subject><subject>Educational Policy and Politics</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Fairness</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Psychological Testing</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Test Interpretation</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0952-8733</issn><issn>1740-3863</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwNOC5-hMsv9yLKW1QqEXPYdsNmlTbLYmu1C_vWlX8OZpHsx7b4YfIY8IzwhF9RJz5FBRQEEBMBf0dEUmWOVAeV3yazIBUTBaV5zfkrsY9wBQ8VJMyHLR75yOmfJttlQueBNj5nw2izEp57fZ2qjgz2Iz9Lo7mMt65bY7E7JFO2jVu87fkxurPqN5-J1T8rFcvM9XdL15fZvP1lRzFD1FKHXNoNECQKFF3loUdWkFN7biilkrWmYN8EZXedOUylgLyJg2JQOVXp6Sp7H3GLqvwcRe7rsh-HRSMo41LwQr8uRio0uHLsZgrDwGd1DhWyLIMy858pKJl7zwkqcU4mMoJrPfmvBX_U_qBwJJbfs</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O.</creator><creator>Schlax, J.</creator><creator>Jitomirski, J.</creator><creator>Happ, R.</creator><creator>Kühling-Thees, C.</creator><creator>Brückner, S.</creator><creator>Pant, H. A.</creator><general>Palgrave Macmillan UK</general><general>Palgrave Macmillan</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Ethics and Fairness in Assessing Learning Outcomes in Higher Education</title><author>Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O. ; Schlax, J. ; Jitomirski, J. ; Happ, R. ; Kühling-Thees, C. ; Brückner, S. ; Pant, H. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-106c820bc900a1f13df1986f93ef73a2ff9d2fe03bc74bb6aeff0122ce620a073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Admissions policies</topic><topic>Business students</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education Policy</topic><topic>Educational Policy</topic><topic>Educational Policy and Politics</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Fairness</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Psychological Testing</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Test Interpretation</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlax, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jitomirski, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Happ, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kühling-Thees, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brückner, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pant, H. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Higher education policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O.</au><au>Schlax, J.</au><au>Jitomirski, J.</au><au>Happ, R.</au><au>Kühling-Thees, C.</au><au>Brückner, S.</au><au>Pant, H. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ethics and Fairness in Assessing Learning Outcomes in Higher Education</atitle><jtitle>Higher education policy</jtitle><stitle>High Educ Policy</stitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>537</spage><epage>556</epage><pages>537-556</pages><issn>0952-8733</issn><eissn>1740-3863</eissn><abstract>Fairness is one of the most important quality criteria of assessments and a necessary condition for valid test score interpretations. In this paper, we describe findings related to an assessment of N  = 7664 beginning business and economics students at 46 universities across Germany using a domain-specific higher education entry test. From the perspective of test fairness as defined by the internationally established validation standards outlined by AERA et al. (Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, AERA, Washington, DC, 2014 ), we identify which students had particular difficulty completing the test, taking into account gender- and language-related influence factors in the assessment of their test performance. Our results highlight the particular challenges in admissions testing in higher education. One of these challenges is finding a suitable way to address the disadvantages experienced by various groups of students to guarantee fairness and ethical integrity when developing and administering tests. Current migration developments and the overall internationalization of higher education have led to an increasing heterogeneity of student bodies. These challenges are therefore of particular relevance for education policy and practice when it comes to ensuring fairness when assessing learning outcomes for all student groups. This also applies in the context of commonly used standardized assessments and established examination practices in higher education.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Palgrave Macmillan UK</pub><doi>10.1057/s41307-019-00149-x</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0952-8733
ispartof Higher education policy, 2019-12, Vol.32 (4), p.537-556
issn 0952-8733
1740-3863
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2318359254
source PAIS Index; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Admissions policies
Business students
College students
Criteria
Education
Education Policy
Educational Policy
Educational Policy and Politics
Ethics
Fairness
Globalization
Heterogeneity
Higher Education
Learning
Migration
Morality
Original Article
Psychological Testing
Students
Test Interpretation
Validity
title Ethics and Fairness in Assessing Learning Outcomes in Higher Education
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T08%3A06%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ethics%20and%20Fairness%20in%20Assessing%20Learning%20Outcomes%20in%20Higher%20Education&rft.jtitle=Higher%20education%20policy&rft.au=Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia,%20O.&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=537&rft.epage=556&rft.pages=537-556&rft.issn=0952-8733&rft.eissn=1740-3863&rft_id=info:doi/10.1057/s41307-019-00149-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2318359254%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2318359254&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true