Bond indenture provisions and the risk of corporate debt
This paper examines the effect of alternative bond indenture provisions on the allocation of risk among the firm's claimants. The approach taken here differs from that of earlier studies in that risk allocation is examined while the firm's leverage (in market value terms) is held constant....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of financial economics 1982-12, Vol.10 (4), p.375-406 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 406 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 375 |
container_title | Journal of financial economics |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Ho, Thomas S.Y. Singer, Ronald F. |
description | This paper examines the effect of alternative bond indenture provisions on the allocation of risk among the firm's claimants. The approach taken here differs from that of earlier studies in that risk allocation is examined while the firm's leverage (in market value terms) is held constant. In this context, four indenture provisions are examined: (1) the time to maturity, (2) the promised payment schedule, (3) financing restrictions and (4) priority rules. It is concluded that risk is transferred from stockholders to bondholders as the time to maturity and promised payment increase appropriately. Furthermore substitution of longer-term debt for an equal amount of shorter-term debt also increases the risk to bondholders while decreasing the risk to stockholders. The analysis shows that a coupon bond can be represented by a unique discount bond with the same risk and value. This permits the characterization of the effective maturity of a risky debt issue, a concept analogous to the stochastic duration of a default-free coupon bond. These results are shown to be independent of the means used to finance the debt issue. Finally, it is concluded that the relative risk associated with different bonds issued by the same firm cannot be determined by the structure of priority rules alone. It is also necessary to consider the timing of the promised payments compared to that of the other debt issues in the firm's capital structure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0304-405X(82)90017-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_231724247</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0304405X82900174</els_id><sourcerecordid>1164170</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-dbc52eb8a1c48b5998ea46971369e64a3402751368b336fd3b88a92fdd04f1e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LxDAUDKLguvoPPBS96KGarzbJRVDxE8GLB28hTV7ZrG5Tk-6C_97UijcNDHl5b2byGIQOCT4jmNTnmGFecly9nkh6qjAmouRbaEakUCUVgm-j2S9lF-2ltMT5iErNkLwKnSt856Ab1hGKPoaNTz50qTB5MCygiD69FaEtbIh9iGaAwkEz7KOd1rwnOPi55-jl9ubl-r58er57uL58Km2F5VC6xlYUGmmI5bKplJJgeK0EYbWCmhvGMRVVfsmGsbp1rJHSKNo6h3lLgM3R0WSbF_tYQxr0Mqxjl3_UlBFBOeUik47_IhGqKsVqIkYWn1g2hpQitLqPfmXipyZYjznqMSQ9hqQl1d85ap5lj5MsQg_2VwMAy9Z3ubPRzGQHZj7HQmUpMz6DZ_QZTFTZtNaLYZXNLiYzyJFtPESdrIfOgvMR7KBd8P9v8wVP3JDG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1295936177</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bond indenture provisions and the risk of corporate debt</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Ho, Thomas S.Y. ; Singer, Ronald F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ho, Thomas S.Y. ; Singer, Ronald F.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines the effect of alternative bond indenture provisions on the allocation of risk among the firm's claimants. The approach taken here differs from that of earlier studies in that risk allocation is examined while the firm's leverage (in market value terms) is held constant. In this context, four indenture provisions are examined: (1) the time to maturity, (2) the promised payment schedule, (3) financing restrictions and (4) priority rules. It is concluded that risk is transferred from stockholders to bondholders as the time to maturity and promised payment increase appropriately. Furthermore substitution of longer-term debt for an equal amount of shorter-term debt also increases the risk to bondholders while decreasing the risk to stockholders. The analysis shows that a coupon bond can be represented by a unique discount bond with the same risk and value. This permits the characterization of the effective maturity of a risky debt issue, a concept analogous to the stochastic duration of a default-free coupon bond. These results are shown to be independent of the means used to finance the debt issue. Finally, it is concluded that the relative risk associated with different bonds issued by the same firm cannot be determined by the structure of priority rules alone. It is also necessary to consider the timing of the promised payments compared to that of the other debt issues in the firm's capital structure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-405X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2774</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(82)90017-4</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JFECDT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Bonds ; Capital structure ; Corporate debt ; Debt financing ; Economic theory ; Leverage ; Mathematical models ; Maturity ; Provisions ; Risk ; Stockholders</subject><ispartof>Journal of financial economics, 1982-12, Vol.10 (4), p.375-406</ispartof><rights>1982</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Dec 1982</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-dbc52eb8a1c48b5998ea46971369e64a3402751368b336fd3b88a92fdd04f1e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(82)90017-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,4009,27871,27926,27927,45997</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejfinec/v_3a10_3ay_3a1982_3ai_3a4_3ap_3a375-406.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ho, Thomas S.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Ronald F.</creatorcontrib><title>Bond indenture provisions and the risk of corporate debt</title><title>Journal of financial economics</title><description>This paper examines the effect of alternative bond indenture provisions on the allocation of risk among the firm's claimants. The approach taken here differs from that of earlier studies in that risk allocation is examined while the firm's leverage (in market value terms) is held constant. In this context, four indenture provisions are examined: (1) the time to maturity, (2) the promised payment schedule, (3) financing restrictions and (4) priority rules. It is concluded that risk is transferred from stockholders to bondholders as the time to maturity and promised payment increase appropriately. Furthermore substitution of longer-term debt for an equal amount of shorter-term debt also increases the risk to bondholders while decreasing the risk to stockholders. The analysis shows that a coupon bond can be represented by a unique discount bond with the same risk and value. This permits the characterization of the effective maturity of a risky debt issue, a concept analogous to the stochastic duration of a default-free coupon bond. These results are shown to be independent of the means used to finance the debt issue. Finally, it is concluded that the relative risk associated with different bonds issued by the same firm cannot be determined by the structure of priority rules alone. It is also necessary to consider the timing of the promised payments compared to that of the other debt issues in the firm's capital structure.</description><subject>Bonds</subject><subject>Capital structure</subject><subject>Corporate debt</subject><subject>Debt financing</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Leverage</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Maturity</subject><subject>Provisions</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Stockholders</subject><issn>0304-405X</issn><issn>1879-2774</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UE1LxDAUDKLguvoPPBS96KGarzbJRVDxE8GLB28hTV7ZrG5Tk-6C_97UijcNDHl5b2byGIQOCT4jmNTnmGFecly9nkh6qjAmouRbaEakUCUVgm-j2S9lF-2ltMT5iErNkLwKnSt856Ab1hGKPoaNTz50qTB5MCygiD69FaEtbIh9iGaAwkEz7KOd1rwnOPi55-jl9ubl-r58er57uL58Km2F5VC6xlYUGmmI5bKplJJgeK0EYbWCmhvGMRVVfsmGsbp1rJHSKNo6h3lLgM3R0WSbF_tYQxr0Mqxjl3_UlBFBOeUik47_IhGqKsVqIkYWn1g2hpQitLqPfmXipyZYjznqMSQ9hqQl1d85ap5lj5MsQg_2VwMAy9Z3ubPRzGQHZj7HQmUpMz6DZ_QZTFTZtNaLYZXNLiYzyJFtPESdrIfOgvMR7KBd8P9v8wVP3JDG</recordid><startdate>19821201</startdate><enddate>19821201</enddate><creator>Ho, Thomas S.Y.</creator><creator>Singer, Ronald F.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>North-Holland in collaboration with the Graduate School of Management, University of Rochester</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19821201</creationdate><title>Bond indenture provisions and the risk of corporate debt</title><author>Ho, Thomas S.Y. ; Singer, Ronald F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-dbc52eb8a1c48b5998ea46971369e64a3402751368b336fd3b88a92fdd04f1e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><topic>Bonds</topic><topic>Capital structure</topic><topic>Corporate debt</topic><topic>Debt financing</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Leverage</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Maturity</topic><topic>Provisions</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Stockholders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ho, Thomas S.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Ronald F.</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of financial economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ho, Thomas S.Y.</au><au>Singer, Ronald F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bond indenture provisions and the risk of corporate debt</atitle><jtitle>Journal of financial economics</jtitle><date>1982-12-01</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>375</spage><epage>406</epage><pages>375-406</pages><issn>0304-405X</issn><eissn>1879-2774</eissn><coden>JFECDT</coden><abstract>This paper examines the effect of alternative bond indenture provisions on the allocation of risk among the firm's claimants. The approach taken here differs from that of earlier studies in that risk allocation is examined while the firm's leverage (in market value terms) is held constant. In this context, four indenture provisions are examined: (1) the time to maturity, (2) the promised payment schedule, (3) financing restrictions and (4) priority rules. It is concluded that risk is transferred from stockholders to bondholders as the time to maturity and promised payment increase appropriately. Furthermore substitution of longer-term debt for an equal amount of shorter-term debt also increases the risk to bondholders while decreasing the risk to stockholders. The analysis shows that a coupon bond can be represented by a unique discount bond with the same risk and value. This permits the characterization of the effective maturity of a risky debt issue, a concept analogous to the stochastic duration of a default-free coupon bond. These results are shown to be independent of the means used to finance the debt issue. Finally, it is concluded that the relative risk associated with different bonds issued by the same firm cannot be determined by the structure of priority rules alone. It is also necessary to consider the timing of the promised payments compared to that of the other debt issues in the firm's capital structure.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/0304-405X(82)90017-4</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0304-405X |
ispartof | Journal of financial economics, 1982-12, Vol.10 (4), p.375-406 |
issn | 0304-405X 1879-2774 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_231724247 |
source | RePEc; Periodicals Index Online; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Bonds Capital structure Corporate debt Debt financing Economic theory Leverage Mathematical models Maturity Provisions Risk Stockholders |
title | Bond indenture provisions and the risk of corporate debt |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T00%3A51%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bond%20indenture%20provisions%20and%20the%20risk%20of%20corporate%20debt&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20financial%20economics&rft.au=Ho,%20Thomas%20S.Y.&rft.date=1982-12-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=375&rft.epage=406&rft.pages=375-406&rft.issn=0304-405X&rft.eissn=1879-2774&rft.coden=JFECDT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0304-405X(82)90017-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1164170%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1295936177&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0304405X82900174&rfr_iscdi=true |