Structure‐Coupled 3‐D Imaging of Magnetotelluric and Wide‐Angle Seismic Reflection/Refraction Data With Interfaces
Magnetotelluric (MT) and wide‐angle seismic reflection/refraction surveys play a fundamental role in understanding the crustal rheology and lithospheric structure of the Earth. In recent years, the integration of the two methods in order to improve the robustness of the inversion has started to gain...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Earth and Space Science Open Archive ESSOAr 2019-10, Vol.124 (10), p.10309-10330 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 10330 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 10309 |
container_title | Earth and Space Science Open Archive ESSOAr |
container_volume | 124 |
creator | Peng, Miao Tan, Handong Moorkamp, Max |
description | Magnetotelluric (MT) and wide‐angle seismic reflection/refraction surveys play a fundamental role in understanding the crustal rheology and lithospheric structure of the Earth. In recent years, the integration of the two methods in order to improve the robustness of the inversion has started to gain attention. We present a new approach for joint 3‐D inversion of MT and wide‐angle seismic reflection/refraction data to accurately determine crustal structures and Moho depth. Based on H‐κ stacking of teleseismic receiver functions, we estimate an initial reference Moho. This is used as input for the subsequent MT/seismic joint inversion, where the Moho interface is updated and crustal structures are added to the model. During the joint inversion process, structural similarity is facilitated through the cross‐gradient constraint. Synthetic model tests show an improvement of the inversion results over separate inversions. In particular, the tests based on two geologically realistic models demonstrate that the crustal structure and even the trade‐off between velocity and Moho interface can be sufficiently resolved by combined MT and seismic data sets when using the estimates from analysis of receiver functions. These results show that the new method can provide useful constraints on crustal structures including their geophysical properties and discontinuities.
Key Points
A new coupled algorithm is developed for 3‐D imaging of magnetotelluric and wide‐angle seismic reflection/refraction data
Two strategies are presented to mitigate the problem of accurately determining crustal structures and Moho interface simultaneously
The inclusion of teleseismic receiver functions is proved to be effective in the new algorithm |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2019JB018194 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2317082234</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2317082234</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3962-ccaa5b35b62d1149c110d42125e66b3e224e554b98c96736a45e8e7f200ea47e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1OwzAMgCsEEhPsxgNE4spYnL82RzZgbBpC2kAcqyx1R1HXjjQV7MYj8Iw8CRlDiBO--JP92T44ik6AngNlus8o6MmAQgJa7EUdBkr3NJdq_5eBH0bdpnmmIZJQAtGJ3ubetda3Dj_fP4Z1uy4xIzzwJRmvzLKolqTOya1ZVuhrj2XZusISU2Xksci2MxfVskQyx6JZhcYM8xKtL-qqH9CZbySXxpvg-ycyrjy63FhsjqOD3JQNdn_yUfRwfXU_vOlN70bj4cW0Z7hWrGetMXLB5UKxDEBoC0AzwYBJVGrBkTGBUoqFTqxWMVdGSEwwzhmlaESM_Cg63e1du_qlxcanz3XrqnAyZUKCAA2K_WtxiGnCGBfBOttZ1tVN4zBP165YGbdJgabbJ6R_nxB0vtNfixI3_7rpZDQbSB4Lxr8AkaOJmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2451419162</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Structure‐Coupled 3‐D Imaging of Magnetotelluric and Wide‐Angle Seismic Reflection/Refraction Data With Interfaces</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Peng, Miao ; Tan, Handong ; Moorkamp, Max</creator><creatorcontrib>Peng, Miao ; Tan, Handong ; Moorkamp, Max</creatorcontrib><description>Magnetotelluric (MT) and wide‐angle seismic reflection/refraction surveys play a fundamental role in understanding the crustal rheology and lithospheric structure of the Earth. In recent years, the integration of the two methods in order to improve the robustness of the inversion has started to gain attention. We present a new approach for joint 3‐D inversion of MT and wide‐angle seismic reflection/refraction data to accurately determine crustal structures and Moho depth. Based on H‐κ stacking of teleseismic receiver functions, we estimate an initial reference Moho. This is used as input for the subsequent MT/seismic joint inversion, where the Moho interface is updated and crustal structures are added to the model. During the joint inversion process, structural similarity is facilitated through the cross‐gradient constraint. Synthetic model tests show an improvement of the inversion results over separate inversions. In particular, the tests based on two geologically realistic models demonstrate that the crustal structure and even the trade‐off between velocity and Moho interface can be sufficiently resolved by combined MT and seismic data sets when using the estimates from analysis of receiver functions. These results show that the new method can provide useful constraints on crustal structures including their geophysical properties and discontinuities.
Key Points
A new coupled algorithm is developed for 3‐D imaging of magnetotelluric and wide‐angle seismic reflection/refraction data
Two strategies are presented to mitigate the problem of accurately determining crustal structures and Moho interface simultaneously
The inclusion of teleseismic receiver functions is proved to be effective in the new algorithm</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2019JB018194</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Angle of reflection ; Constraint modelling ; cross gradient ; Crustal structure ; Earth ; Earth crust ; Geophysics ; Imaging techniques ; Interfaces ; Inversion ; Inversions ; joint inversion ; magnetotelluric ; Model testing ; Moho ; Namche Barwa ; Reflection ; Refraction ; Rheological properties ; Rheology ; Seismic activity ; Seismic data ; Seismic surveys ; Seismological data ; Structures ; Surveys ; wide‐angle seismic reflection/refraction</subject><ispartof>Earth and Space Science Open Archive ESSOAr, 2019-10, Vol.124 (10), p.10309-10330</ispartof><rights>2019. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>2019. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3962-ccaa5b35b62d1149c110d42125e66b3e224e554b98c96736a45e8e7f200ea47e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3962-ccaa5b35b62d1149c110d42125e66b3e224e554b98c96736a45e8e7f200ea47e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2282-9229 ; 0000-0002-7879-1346 ; 0000-0002-7680-1483</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2019JB018194$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2019JB018194$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27903,27904,45553,45554,46387,46811</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peng, Miao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Handong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moorkamp, Max</creatorcontrib><title>Structure‐Coupled 3‐D Imaging of Magnetotelluric and Wide‐Angle Seismic Reflection/Refraction Data With Interfaces</title><title>Earth and Space Science Open Archive ESSOAr</title><description>Magnetotelluric (MT) and wide‐angle seismic reflection/refraction surveys play a fundamental role in understanding the crustal rheology and lithospheric structure of the Earth. In recent years, the integration of the two methods in order to improve the robustness of the inversion has started to gain attention. We present a new approach for joint 3‐D inversion of MT and wide‐angle seismic reflection/refraction data to accurately determine crustal structures and Moho depth. Based on H‐κ stacking of teleseismic receiver functions, we estimate an initial reference Moho. This is used as input for the subsequent MT/seismic joint inversion, where the Moho interface is updated and crustal structures are added to the model. During the joint inversion process, structural similarity is facilitated through the cross‐gradient constraint. Synthetic model tests show an improvement of the inversion results over separate inversions. In particular, the tests based on two geologically realistic models demonstrate that the crustal structure and even the trade‐off between velocity and Moho interface can be sufficiently resolved by combined MT and seismic data sets when using the estimates from analysis of receiver functions. These results show that the new method can provide useful constraints on crustal structures including their geophysical properties and discontinuities.
Key Points
A new coupled algorithm is developed for 3‐D imaging of magnetotelluric and wide‐angle seismic reflection/refraction data
Two strategies are presented to mitigate the problem of accurately determining crustal structures and Moho interface simultaneously
The inclusion of teleseismic receiver functions is proved to be effective in the new algorithm</description><subject>Angle of reflection</subject><subject>Constraint modelling</subject><subject>cross gradient</subject><subject>Crustal structure</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Earth crust</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Imaging techniques</subject><subject>Interfaces</subject><subject>Inversion</subject><subject>Inversions</subject><subject>joint inversion</subject><subject>magnetotelluric</subject><subject>Model testing</subject><subject>Moho</subject><subject>Namche Barwa</subject><subject>Reflection</subject><subject>Refraction</subject><subject>Rheological properties</subject><subject>Rheology</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic data</subject><subject>Seismic surveys</subject><subject>Seismological data</subject><subject>Structures</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>wide‐angle seismic reflection/refraction</subject><issn>2169-9313</issn><issn>2169-9356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>PQCXX</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1OwzAMgCsEEhPsxgNE4spYnL82RzZgbBpC2kAcqyx1R1HXjjQV7MYj8Iw8CRlDiBO--JP92T44ik6AngNlus8o6MmAQgJa7EUdBkr3NJdq_5eBH0bdpnmmIZJQAtGJ3ubetda3Dj_fP4Z1uy4xIzzwJRmvzLKolqTOya1ZVuhrj2XZusISU2Xksci2MxfVskQyx6JZhcYM8xKtL-qqH9CZbySXxpvg-ycyrjy63FhsjqOD3JQNdn_yUfRwfXU_vOlN70bj4cW0Z7hWrGetMXLB5UKxDEBoC0AzwYBJVGrBkTGBUoqFTqxWMVdGSEwwzhmlaESM_Cg63e1du_qlxcanz3XrqnAyZUKCAA2K_WtxiGnCGBfBOttZ1tVN4zBP165YGbdJgabbJ6R_nxB0vtNfixI3_7rpZDQbSB4Lxr8AkaOJmQ</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Peng, Miao</creator><creator>Tan, Handong</creator><creator>Moorkamp, Max</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>AAFGM</scope><scope>ABQRF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>ADZZV</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AFLLJ</scope><scope>AFOKG</scope><scope>AGAJT</scope><scope>AQTIP</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQCXX</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>SQOEQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2282-9229</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7879-1346</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7680-1483</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Structure‐Coupled 3‐D Imaging of Magnetotelluric and Wide‐Angle Seismic Reflection/Refraction Data With Interfaces</title><author>Peng, Miao ; Tan, Handong ; Moorkamp, Max</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3962-ccaa5b35b62d1149c110d42125e66b3e224e554b98c96736a45e8e7f200ea47e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Angle of reflection</topic><topic>Constraint modelling</topic><topic>cross gradient</topic><topic>Crustal structure</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Earth crust</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Imaging techniques</topic><topic>Interfaces</topic><topic>Inversion</topic><topic>Inversions</topic><topic>joint inversion</topic><topic>magnetotelluric</topic><topic>Model testing</topic><topic>Moho</topic><topic>Namche Barwa</topic><topic>Reflection</topic><topic>Refraction</topic><topic>Rheological properties</topic><topic>Rheology</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic data</topic><topic>Seismic surveys</topic><topic>Seismological data</topic><topic>Structures</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>wide‐angle seismic reflection/refraction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peng, Miao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Handong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moorkamp, Max</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Earth and Space Science Open Archive ESSOAr</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peng, Miao</au><au>Tan, Handong</au><au>Moorkamp, Max</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Structure‐Coupled 3‐D Imaging of Magnetotelluric and Wide‐Angle Seismic Reflection/Refraction Data With Interfaces</atitle><jtitle>Earth and Space Science Open Archive ESSOAr</jtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>10309</spage><epage>10330</epage><pages>10309-10330</pages><issn>2169-9313</issn><eissn>2169-9356</eissn><abstract>Magnetotelluric (MT) and wide‐angle seismic reflection/refraction surveys play a fundamental role in understanding the crustal rheology and lithospheric structure of the Earth. In recent years, the integration of the two methods in order to improve the robustness of the inversion has started to gain attention. We present a new approach for joint 3‐D inversion of MT and wide‐angle seismic reflection/refraction data to accurately determine crustal structures and Moho depth. Based on H‐κ stacking of teleseismic receiver functions, we estimate an initial reference Moho. This is used as input for the subsequent MT/seismic joint inversion, where the Moho interface is updated and crustal structures are added to the model. During the joint inversion process, structural similarity is facilitated through the cross‐gradient constraint. Synthetic model tests show an improvement of the inversion results over separate inversions. In particular, the tests based on two geologically realistic models demonstrate that the crustal structure and even the trade‐off between velocity and Moho interface can be sufficiently resolved by combined MT and seismic data sets when using the estimates from analysis of receiver functions. These results show that the new method can provide useful constraints on crustal structures including their geophysical properties and discontinuities.
Key Points
A new coupled algorithm is developed for 3‐D imaging of magnetotelluric and wide‐angle seismic reflection/refraction data
Two strategies are presented to mitigate the problem of accurately determining crustal structures and Moho interface simultaneously
The inclusion of teleseismic receiver functions is proved to be effective in the new algorithm</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2019JB018194</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2282-9229</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7879-1346</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7680-1483</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-9313 |
ispartof | Earth and Space Science Open Archive ESSOAr, 2019-10, Vol.124 (10), p.10309-10330 |
issn | 2169-9313 2169-9356 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2317082234 |
source | Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Angle of reflection Constraint modelling cross gradient Crustal structure Earth Earth crust Geophysics Imaging techniques Interfaces Inversion Inversions joint inversion magnetotelluric Model testing Moho Namche Barwa Reflection Refraction Rheological properties Rheology Seismic activity Seismic data Seismic surveys Seismological data Structures Surveys wide‐angle seismic reflection/refraction |
title | Structure‐Coupled 3‐D Imaging of Magnetotelluric and Wide‐Angle Seismic Reflection/Refraction Data With Interfaces |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T03%3A39%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Structure%E2%80%90Coupled%203%E2%80%90D%20Imaging%20of%20Magnetotelluric%20and%20Wide%E2%80%90Angle%20Seismic%20Reflection/Refraction%20Data%20With%20Interfaces&rft.jtitle=Earth%20and%20Space%20Science%20Open%20Archive%20ESSOAr&rft.au=Peng,%20Miao&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=10309&rft.epage=10330&rft.pages=10309-10330&rft.issn=2169-9313&rft.eissn=2169-9356&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2019JB018194&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2317082234%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2451419162&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |