In vitro evaluation of the effects of Ultrasound Tongue Scraper on bacteria and biofilm formation

Aim Oral malodor is a common condition caused by some Gram‐negative oral bacteria, among which are the 3 red complex bacteria (RCB). The present study investigated the effectiveness of the Ultrasound Tongue Scraper (UTS) to disrupt the structural morphology of the bacteria and their biofilm. Methods...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry 2019-11, Vol.10 (4), p.e12471-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Amaechi, Bennett T., Abdul Azees, Parveez Ahamed, Menon, Suchitra, Kasundra, Hariyali
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 4
container_start_page e12471
container_title Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry
container_volume 10
creator Amaechi, Bennett T.
Abdul Azees, Parveez Ahamed
Menon, Suchitra
Kasundra, Hariyali
description Aim Oral malodor is a common condition caused by some Gram‐negative oral bacteria, among which are the 3 red complex bacteria (RCB). The present study investigated the effectiveness of the Ultrasound Tongue Scraper (UTS) to disrupt the structural morphology of the bacteria and their biofilm. Methods While developing over 72 hours, multispecies biofilms of RCB (Porphromonas gingivalis, Tryponema denticola, Tannerella forsythia) were treated every 24 hours with 1.6‐MHz ultrasound waves generated with UTS. An untreated group served as controls. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to determine the biofilm thickness, biomass and live : dead cell ratio at each time point (24, 48 and 72 hours). Biofilm morphology and bacteria ultrastructure were viewed using scanning/transmission electron microscopy, respectively. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests. Results At each time point, the 3 variables were significantly lower in treated samples than the untreated. Significant biofilm disruption was observed in treated samples at each time period while the untreated had intact biofilm morphology. Cells in treated samples showed disrupted cell wall, cytoplasmic material, huge vacuoles and heterogeneity in electron density, while these cell organelles remained intact in untreated samples. Conclusion The UTS has an inhibitory effect on RCB and could be useful for oral malodor management.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jicd.12471
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2316718123</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2316718123</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-63a357b1160980d03093328eea10b1ba2f52cb087923ebbf794794d649057df23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMottRe_AES8CZszST7kT1K_aoUPNieQ7Kb6Jbtpia7lf57027t0WFgEubhGXgRugYygVD3q6ooJ0DjDM7QkJIYIkhpen56Ax-gsfcrEopxnqb8Eg0YJDEkkAyRnDV4W7XOYr2VdSfbyjbYGtx-aayN0UXr999l3TrpbdeUeGGbz07jj8LJjXY44EoWrXaVxDKsVWVNVa-xsW59sF2hCyNrr8fHOULL56fF9DWav7_Mpg_zqGBJBlHKZJgKICU5JyVhJGeMcq0lEAVKUpPQQhGe5ZRppUyWx6HLNM5JkpWGshG67b0bZ7877Vuxsp1rwklBGaQZcKAsUHc9VTjrvdNGbFy1lm4ngIh9oGIfqDgEGuCbo7JTa12e0L_4AgA98FPVevePSrzNpo-99Bdlk37K</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2316718123</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vitro evaluation of the effects of Ultrasound Tongue Scraper on bacteria and biofilm formation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Amaechi, Bennett T. ; Abdul Azees, Parveez Ahamed ; Menon, Suchitra ; Kasundra, Hariyali</creator><creatorcontrib>Amaechi, Bennett T. ; Abdul Azees, Parveez Ahamed ; Menon, Suchitra ; Kasundra, Hariyali</creatorcontrib><description>Aim Oral malodor is a common condition caused by some Gram‐negative oral bacteria, among which are the 3 red complex bacteria (RCB). The present study investigated the effectiveness of the Ultrasound Tongue Scraper (UTS) to disrupt the structural morphology of the bacteria and their biofilm. Methods While developing over 72 hours, multispecies biofilms of RCB (Porphromonas gingivalis, Tryponema denticola, Tannerella forsythia) were treated every 24 hours with 1.6‐MHz ultrasound waves generated with UTS. An untreated group served as controls. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to determine the biofilm thickness, biomass and live : dead cell ratio at each time point (24, 48 and 72 hours). Biofilm morphology and bacteria ultrastructure were viewed using scanning/transmission electron microscopy, respectively. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests. Results At each time point, the 3 variables were significantly lower in treated samples than the untreated. Significant biofilm disruption was observed in treated samples at each time period while the untreated had intact biofilm morphology. Cells in treated samples showed disrupted cell wall, cytoplasmic material, huge vacuoles and heterogeneity in electron density, while these cell organelles remained intact in untreated samples. Conclusion The UTS has an inhibitory effect on RCB and could be useful for oral malodor management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2041-1618</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-1626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jicd.12471</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31541515</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; biofilm ; Biofilms ; Cell walls ; Confocal microscopy ; Cytology ; microscopic analysis ; Microscopy ; Microscopy, Confocal ; Morphology ; Off odor ; oral malodor ; Organelles ; red complex bacteria ; Tannerella forsythia ; Tongue ; Transmission electron microscopy ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasound ; Ultrasound Tongue Scraper ; Ultrastructure ; Vacuoles</subject><ispartof>Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry, 2019-11, Vol.10 (4), p.e12471-n/a</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-63a357b1160980d03093328eea10b1ba2f52cb087923ebbf794794d649057df23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-63a357b1160980d03093328eea10b1ba2f52cb087923ebbf794794d649057df23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1123-1416</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjicd.12471$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjicd.12471$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31541515$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amaechi, Bennett T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdul Azees, Parveez Ahamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menon, Suchitra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasundra, Hariyali</creatorcontrib><title>In vitro evaluation of the effects of Ultrasound Tongue Scraper on bacteria and biofilm formation</title><title>Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry</title><addtitle>J Investig Clin Dent</addtitle><description>Aim Oral malodor is a common condition caused by some Gram‐negative oral bacteria, among which are the 3 red complex bacteria (RCB). The present study investigated the effectiveness of the Ultrasound Tongue Scraper (UTS) to disrupt the structural morphology of the bacteria and their biofilm. Methods While developing over 72 hours, multispecies biofilms of RCB (Porphromonas gingivalis, Tryponema denticola, Tannerella forsythia) were treated every 24 hours with 1.6‐MHz ultrasound waves generated with UTS. An untreated group served as controls. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to determine the biofilm thickness, biomass and live : dead cell ratio at each time point (24, 48 and 72 hours). Biofilm morphology and bacteria ultrastructure were viewed using scanning/transmission electron microscopy, respectively. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests. Results At each time point, the 3 variables were significantly lower in treated samples than the untreated. Significant biofilm disruption was observed in treated samples at each time period while the untreated had intact biofilm morphology. Cells in treated samples showed disrupted cell wall, cytoplasmic material, huge vacuoles and heterogeneity in electron density, while these cell organelles remained intact in untreated samples. Conclusion The UTS has an inhibitory effect on RCB and could be useful for oral malodor management.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>biofilm</subject><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Cell walls</subject><subject>Confocal microscopy</subject><subject>Cytology</subject><subject>microscopic analysis</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Microscopy, Confocal</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Off odor</subject><subject>oral malodor</subject><subject>Organelles</subject><subject>red complex bacteria</subject><subject>Tannerella forsythia</subject><subject>Tongue</subject><subject>Transmission electron microscopy</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Ultrasound Tongue Scraper</subject><subject>Ultrastructure</subject><subject>Vacuoles</subject><issn>2041-1618</issn><issn>2041-1626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMottRe_AES8CZszST7kT1K_aoUPNieQ7Kb6Jbtpia7lf57027t0WFgEubhGXgRugYygVD3q6ooJ0DjDM7QkJIYIkhpen56Ax-gsfcrEopxnqb8Eg0YJDEkkAyRnDV4W7XOYr2VdSfbyjbYGtx-aayN0UXr999l3TrpbdeUeGGbz07jj8LJjXY44EoWrXaVxDKsVWVNVa-xsW59sF2hCyNrr8fHOULL56fF9DWav7_Mpg_zqGBJBlHKZJgKICU5JyVhJGeMcq0lEAVKUpPQQhGe5ZRppUyWx6HLNM5JkpWGshG67b0bZ7877Vuxsp1rwklBGaQZcKAsUHc9VTjrvdNGbFy1lm4ngIh9oGIfqDgEGuCbo7JTa12e0L_4AgA98FPVevePSrzNpo-99Bdlk37K</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Amaechi, Bennett T.</creator><creator>Abdul Azees, Parveez Ahamed</creator><creator>Menon, Suchitra</creator><creator>Kasundra, Hariyali</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1123-1416</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>In vitro evaluation of the effects of Ultrasound Tongue Scraper on bacteria and biofilm formation</title><author>Amaechi, Bennett T. ; Abdul Azees, Parveez Ahamed ; Menon, Suchitra ; Kasundra, Hariyali</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-63a357b1160980d03093328eea10b1ba2f52cb087923ebbf794794d649057df23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>biofilm</topic><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Cell walls</topic><topic>Confocal microscopy</topic><topic>Cytology</topic><topic>microscopic analysis</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Microscopy, Confocal</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Off odor</topic><topic>oral malodor</topic><topic>Organelles</topic><topic>red complex bacteria</topic><topic>Tannerella forsythia</topic><topic>Tongue</topic><topic>Transmission electron microscopy</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Ultrasound Tongue Scraper</topic><topic>Ultrastructure</topic><topic>Vacuoles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amaechi, Bennett T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdul Azees, Parveez Ahamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menon, Suchitra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasundra, Hariyali</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amaechi, Bennett T.</au><au>Abdul Azees, Parveez Ahamed</au><au>Menon, Suchitra</au><au>Kasundra, Hariyali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vitro evaluation of the effects of Ultrasound Tongue Scraper on bacteria and biofilm formation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Investig Clin Dent</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e12471</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e12471-n/a</pages><issn>2041-1618</issn><eissn>2041-1626</eissn><abstract>Aim Oral malodor is a common condition caused by some Gram‐negative oral bacteria, among which are the 3 red complex bacteria (RCB). The present study investigated the effectiveness of the Ultrasound Tongue Scraper (UTS) to disrupt the structural morphology of the bacteria and their biofilm. Methods While developing over 72 hours, multispecies biofilms of RCB (Porphromonas gingivalis, Tryponema denticola, Tannerella forsythia) were treated every 24 hours with 1.6‐MHz ultrasound waves generated with UTS. An untreated group served as controls. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to determine the biofilm thickness, biomass and live : dead cell ratio at each time point (24, 48 and 72 hours). Biofilm morphology and bacteria ultrastructure were viewed using scanning/transmission electron microscopy, respectively. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests. Results At each time point, the 3 variables were significantly lower in treated samples than the untreated. Significant biofilm disruption was observed in treated samples at each time period while the untreated had intact biofilm morphology. Cells in treated samples showed disrupted cell wall, cytoplasmic material, huge vacuoles and heterogeneity in electron density, while these cell organelles remained intact in untreated samples. Conclusion The UTS has an inhibitory effect on RCB and could be useful for oral malodor management.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31541515</pmid><doi>10.1111/jicd.12471</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1123-1416</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2041-1618
ispartof Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry, 2019-11, Vol.10 (4), p.e12471-n/a
issn 2041-1618
2041-1626
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2316718123
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Bacteria
biofilm
Biofilms
Cell walls
Confocal microscopy
Cytology
microscopic analysis
Microscopy
Microscopy, Confocal
Morphology
Off odor
oral malodor
Organelles
red complex bacteria
Tannerella forsythia
Tongue
Transmission electron microscopy
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasound
Ultrasound Tongue Scraper
Ultrastructure
Vacuoles
title In vitro evaluation of the effects of Ultrasound Tongue Scraper on bacteria and biofilm formation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T06%3A14%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vitro%20evaluation%20of%20the%20effects%20of%20Ultrasound%20Tongue%20Scraper%20on%20bacteria%20and%20biofilm%20formation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20investigative%20and%20clinical%20dentistry&rft.au=Amaechi,%20Bennett%20T.&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e12471&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e12471-n/a&rft.issn=2041-1618&rft.eissn=2041-1626&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jicd.12471&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2316718123%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2316718123&rft_id=info:pmid/31541515&rfr_iscdi=true