In vitro evaluation of the effects of Ultrasound Tongue Scraper on bacteria and biofilm formation
Aim Oral malodor is a common condition caused by some Gram‐negative oral bacteria, among which are the 3 red complex bacteria (RCB). The present study investigated the effectiveness of the Ultrasound Tongue Scraper (UTS) to disrupt the structural morphology of the bacteria and their biofilm. Methods...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry 2019-11, Vol.10 (4), p.e12471-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e12471 |
container_title | Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Amaechi, Bennett T. Abdul Azees, Parveez Ahamed Menon, Suchitra Kasundra, Hariyali |
description | Aim
Oral malodor is a common condition caused by some Gram‐negative oral bacteria, among which are the 3 red complex bacteria (RCB). The present study investigated the effectiveness of the Ultrasound Tongue Scraper (UTS) to disrupt the structural morphology of the bacteria and their biofilm.
Methods
While developing over 72 hours, multispecies biofilms of RCB (Porphromonas gingivalis, Tryponema denticola, Tannerella forsythia) were treated every 24 hours with 1.6‐MHz ultrasound waves generated with UTS. An untreated group served as controls. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to determine the biofilm thickness, biomass and live : dead cell ratio at each time point (24, 48 and 72 hours). Biofilm morphology and bacteria ultrastructure were viewed using scanning/transmission electron microscopy, respectively. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests.
Results
At each time point, the 3 variables were significantly lower in treated samples than the untreated. Significant biofilm disruption was observed in treated samples at each time period while the untreated had intact biofilm morphology. Cells in treated samples showed disrupted cell wall, cytoplasmic material, huge vacuoles and heterogeneity in electron density, while these cell organelles remained intact in untreated samples.
Conclusion
The UTS has an inhibitory effect on RCB and could be useful for oral malodor management. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jicd.12471 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2316718123</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2316718123</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-63a357b1160980d03093328eea10b1ba2f52cb087923ebbf794794d649057df23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMottRe_AES8CZszST7kT1K_aoUPNieQ7Kb6Jbtpia7lf57027t0WFgEubhGXgRugYygVD3q6ooJ0DjDM7QkJIYIkhpen56Ax-gsfcrEopxnqb8Eg0YJDEkkAyRnDV4W7XOYr2VdSfbyjbYGtx-aayN0UXr999l3TrpbdeUeGGbz07jj8LJjXY44EoWrXaVxDKsVWVNVa-xsW59sF2hCyNrr8fHOULL56fF9DWav7_Mpg_zqGBJBlHKZJgKICU5JyVhJGeMcq0lEAVKUpPQQhGe5ZRppUyWx6HLNM5JkpWGshG67b0bZ7877Vuxsp1rwklBGaQZcKAsUHc9VTjrvdNGbFy1lm4ngIh9oGIfqDgEGuCbo7JTa12e0L_4AgA98FPVevePSrzNpo-99Bdlk37K</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2316718123</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vitro evaluation of the effects of Ultrasound Tongue Scraper on bacteria and biofilm formation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Amaechi, Bennett T. ; Abdul Azees, Parveez Ahamed ; Menon, Suchitra ; Kasundra, Hariyali</creator><creatorcontrib>Amaechi, Bennett T. ; Abdul Azees, Parveez Ahamed ; Menon, Suchitra ; Kasundra, Hariyali</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
Oral malodor is a common condition caused by some Gram‐negative oral bacteria, among which are the 3 red complex bacteria (RCB). The present study investigated the effectiveness of the Ultrasound Tongue Scraper (UTS) to disrupt the structural morphology of the bacteria and their biofilm.
Methods
While developing over 72 hours, multispecies biofilms of RCB (Porphromonas gingivalis, Tryponema denticola, Tannerella forsythia) were treated every 24 hours with 1.6‐MHz ultrasound waves generated with UTS. An untreated group served as controls. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to determine the biofilm thickness, biomass and live : dead cell ratio at each time point (24, 48 and 72 hours). Biofilm morphology and bacteria ultrastructure were viewed using scanning/transmission electron microscopy, respectively. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests.
Results
At each time point, the 3 variables were significantly lower in treated samples than the untreated. Significant biofilm disruption was observed in treated samples at each time period while the untreated had intact biofilm morphology. Cells in treated samples showed disrupted cell wall, cytoplasmic material, huge vacuoles and heterogeneity in electron density, while these cell organelles remained intact in untreated samples.
Conclusion
The UTS has an inhibitory effect on RCB and could be useful for oral malodor management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2041-1618</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-1626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jicd.12471</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31541515</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; biofilm ; Biofilms ; Cell walls ; Confocal microscopy ; Cytology ; microscopic analysis ; Microscopy ; Microscopy, Confocal ; Morphology ; Off odor ; oral malodor ; Organelles ; red complex bacteria ; Tannerella forsythia ; Tongue ; Transmission electron microscopy ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasound ; Ultrasound Tongue Scraper ; Ultrastructure ; Vacuoles</subject><ispartof>Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry, 2019-11, Vol.10 (4), p.e12471-n/a</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-63a357b1160980d03093328eea10b1ba2f52cb087923ebbf794794d649057df23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-63a357b1160980d03093328eea10b1ba2f52cb087923ebbf794794d649057df23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1123-1416</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjicd.12471$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjicd.12471$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31541515$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amaechi, Bennett T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdul Azees, Parveez Ahamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menon, Suchitra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasundra, Hariyali</creatorcontrib><title>In vitro evaluation of the effects of Ultrasound Tongue Scraper on bacteria and biofilm formation</title><title>Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry</title><addtitle>J Investig Clin Dent</addtitle><description>Aim
Oral malodor is a common condition caused by some Gram‐negative oral bacteria, among which are the 3 red complex bacteria (RCB). The present study investigated the effectiveness of the Ultrasound Tongue Scraper (UTS) to disrupt the structural morphology of the bacteria and their biofilm.
Methods
While developing over 72 hours, multispecies biofilms of RCB (Porphromonas gingivalis, Tryponema denticola, Tannerella forsythia) were treated every 24 hours with 1.6‐MHz ultrasound waves generated with UTS. An untreated group served as controls. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to determine the biofilm thickness, biomass and live : dead cell ratio at each time point (24, 48 and 72 hours). Biofilm morphology and bacteria ultrastructure were viewed using scanning/transmission electron microscopy, respectively. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests.
Results
At each time point, the 3 variables were significantly lower in treated samples than the untreated. Significant biofilm disruption was observed in treated samples at each time period while the untreated had intact biofilm morphology. Cells in treated samples showed disrupted cell wall, cytoplasmic material, huge vacuoles and heterogeneity in electron density, while these cell organelles remained intact in untreated samples.
Conclusion
The UTS has an inhibitory effect on RCB and could be useful for oral malodor management.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>biofilm</subject><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Cell walls</subject><subject>Confocal microscopy</subject><subject>Cytology</subject><subject>microscopic analysis</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Microscopy, Confocal</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Off odor</subject><subject>oral malodor</subject><subject>Organelles</subject><subject>red complex bacteria</subject><subject>Tannerella forsythia</subject><subject>Tongue</subject><subject>Transmission electron microscopy</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Ultrasound Tongue Scraper</subject><subject>Ultrastructure</subject><subject>Vacuoles</subject><issn>2041-1618</issn><issn>2041-1626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMottRe_AES8CZszST7kT1K_aoUPNieQ7Kb6Jbtpia7lf57027t0WFgEubhGXgRugYygVD3q6ooJ0DjDM7QkJIYIkhpen56Ax-gsfcrEopxnqb8Eg0YJDEkkAyRnDV4W7XOYr2VdSfbyjbYGtx-aayN0UXr999l3TrpbdeUeGGbz07jj8LJjXY44EoWrXaVxDKsVWVNVa-xsW59sF2hCyNrr8fHOULL56fF9DWav7_Mpg_zqGBJBlHKZJgKICU5JyVhJGeMcq0lEAVKUpPQQhGe5ZRppUyWx6HLNM5JkpWGshG67b0bZ7877Vuxsp1rwklBGaQZcKAsUHc9VTjrvdNGbFy1lm4ngIh9oGIfqDgEGuCbo7JTa12e0L_4AgA98FPVevePSrzNpo-99Bdlk37K</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Amaechi, Bennett T.</creator><creator>Abdul Azees, Parveez Ahamed</creator><creator>Menon, Suchitra</creator><creator>Kasundra, Hariyali</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1123-1416</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>In vitro evaluation of the effects of Ultrasound Tongue Scraper on bacteria and biofilm formation</title><author>Amaechi, Bennett T. ; Abdul Azees, Parveez Ahamed ; Menon, Suchitra ; Kasundra, Hariyali</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-63a357b1160980d03093328eea10b1ba2f52cb087923ebbf794794d649057df23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>biofilm</topic><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Cell walls</topic><topic>Confocal microscopy</topic><topic>Cytology</topic><topic>microscopic analysis</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Microscopy, Confocal</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Off odor</topic><topic>oral malodor</topic><topic>Organelles</topic><topic>red complex bacteria</topic><topic>Tannerella forsythia</topic><topic>Tongue</topic><topic>Transmission electron microscopy</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Ultrasound Tongue Scraper</topic><topic>Ultrastructure</topic><topic>Vacuoles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amaechi, Bennett T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdul Azees, Parveez Ahamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menon, Suchitra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasundra, Hariyali</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amaechi, Bennett T.</au><au>Abdul Azees, Parveez Ahamed</au><au>Menon, Suchitra</au><au>Kasundra, Hariyali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vitro evaluation of the effects of Ultrasound Tongue Scraper on bacteria and biofilm formation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Investig Clin Dent</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e12471</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e12471-n/a</pages><issn>2041-1618</issn><eissn>2041-1626</eissn><abstract>Aim
Oral malodor is a common condition caused by some Gram‐negative oral bacteria, among which are the 3 red complex bacteria (RCB). The present study investigated the effectiveness of the Ultrasound Tongue Scraper (UTS) to disrupt the structural morphology of the bacteria and their biofilm.
Methods
While developing over 72 hours, multispecies biofilms of RCB (Porphromonas gingivalis, Tryponema denticola, Tannerella forsythia) were treated every 24 hours with 1.6‐MHz ultrasound waves generated with UTS. An untreated group served as controls. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to determine the biofilm thickness, biomass and live : dead cell ratio at each time point (24, 48 and 72 hours). Biofilm morphology and bacteria ultrastructure were viewed using scanning/transmission electron microscopy, respectively. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests.
Results
At each time point, the 3 variables were significantly lower in treated samples than the untreated. Significant biofilm disruption was observed in treated samples at each time period while the untreated had intact biofilm morphology. Cells in treated samples showed disrupted cell wall, cytoplasmic material, huge vacuoles and heterogeneity in electron density, while these cell organelles remained intact in untreated samples.
Conclusion
The UTS has an inhibitory effect on RCB and could be useful for oral malodor management.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31541515</pmid><doi>10.1111/jicd.12471</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1123-1416</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2041-1618 |
ispartof | Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry, 2019-11, Vol.10 (4), p.e12471-n/a |
issn | 2041-1618 2041-1626 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2316718123 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Bacteria biofilm Biofilms Cell walls Confocal microscopy Cytology microscopic analysis Microscopy Microscopy, Confocal Morphology Off odor oral malodor Organelles red complex bacteria Tannerella forsythia Tongue Transmission electron microscopy Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasound Ultrasound Tongue Scraper Ultrastructure Vacuoles |
title | In vitro evaluation of the effects of Ultrasound Tongue Scraper on bacteria and biofilm formation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T06%3A14%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vitro%20evaluation%20of%20the%20effects%20of%20Ultrasound%20Tongue%20Scraper%20on%20bacteria%20and%20biofilm%20formation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20investigative%20and%20clinical%20dentistry&rft.au=Amaechi,%20Bennett%20T.&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e12471&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e12471-n/a&rft.issn=2041-1618&rft.eissn=2041-1626&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jicd.12471&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2316718123%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2316718123&rft_id=info:pmid/31541515&rfr_iscdi=true |