An evaluation of the primary South African standard and guideline for the provision of water for firefighting

In South Africa, as is mostly the norm globally, national legislation and guidelines specify that potable water distribution networks maintain the capacity to provide specified quantities of water for firefighting. This paper addresses the question: is the South African standard and guideline pertai...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water S. A. 2019-10, Vol.45 (4), p.691-699
Hauptverfasser: Mac Bean, C.B., Ilemobade, A.A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 699
container_issue 4
container_start_page 691
container_title Water S. A.
container_volume 45
creator Mac Bean, C.B.
Ilemobade, A.A.
description In South Africa, as is mostly the norm globally, national legislation and guidelines specify that potable water distribution networks maintain the capacity to provide specified quantities of water for firefighting. This paper addresses the question: is the South African standard and guideline pertaining to fire-flow provision appropriate for firefighting and do these ensure the most efficient balance between providing sufficient fire protection and promoting sustainable water use? In answering this question, this study: (i) reviewed national and international design standards and guidelines; and (ii) captured and analysed 10 years of billable fire incident reports representing 3 859 fire events within the City of Johannesburg. Highlights from the study include: inconsistencies in categories when comparing the SANS 10090 and The Red Book fire tables and violations (in The Red Book) of stipulated Minimum Fire Flows; over the 10 year period, 75% of fire incidents within the City of Johannesburg were extinguished using less than 6.6 kL of water – less than the capacity (6.9 kL) of the City’s conventional pumping tanker during the period; 99.9% of fire incidents within the City were quenched using an average fire flow rate of less than 1 200 L/min, which is the minimum hydrant flow rate for the lowest fire risk category in SANS 10090; and peak fire occurrence did not correspond with typical peak residential water use. Recommendations are proffered in respect of the above.
doi_str_mv 10.17159/wsa/2019.v45.i4.7551
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2316378632</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A625795808</galeid><sabinet_id>https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-19bc7b73ad</sabinet_id><sourcerecordid>A625795808</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-4265a9b6ce9a2f878e3a0f4b461e1c4331b175cb1cba147d6b5377edcb764e8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkU1r3DAQhkVpodu0P6Eg6NmOZH3Zp7IsaZsQ6KHNWYxkaa3glbeSvKH_PtrsosOAZt75eB-EvlLSUkXFcPuS4bYjdGhPXLSBt0oI-g5taE9lowZB3qMNYapvuGL9R_Qp52dCOsb4sEGHbcTuBPMKJSwRLx6XyeFjCgdI__GfZS0T3voULEScC8QR0ohrwPs1jG4O0WG_pKtoOYV87fICxaW3lA_J-bCfSoj7z-iDhzm7L9d4g55-3P3d_Woef_-8320fGyvYUBreSQGDkdYN0Ple9Y4B8dxwSR21nDFqqBLWUGuAcjVKI5hSbrRGSe56YDfo26Vv3enf6nLRz8uaYh2pO0Zl9UKyrla1l6o9zE6H6JeSwNY3ukOwS6xr1_-t7EQ1sSd9FYiLwKYl53qWvhqlKdFvKHRFoc8odEWhA9dnFFX3_aLLYKpjRWdwx9XoqZRj1tM466laWmedc5SIjui7h52mg7HKKAYjewUipJXK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2316378632</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An evaluation of the primary South African standard and guideline for the provision of water for firefighting</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>African Journals Online (Open Access)</source><source>Sabinet African Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Mac Bean, C.B. ; Ilemobade, A.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mac Bean, C.B. ; Ilemobade, A.A.</creatorcontrib><description>In South Africa, as is mostly the norm globally, national legislation and guidelines specify that potable water distribution networks maintain the capacity to provide specified quantities of water for firefighting. This paper addresses the question: is the South African standard and guideline pertaining to fire-flow provision appropriate for firefighting and do these ensure the most efficient balance between providing sufficient fire protection and promoting sustainable water use? In answering this question, this study: (i) reviewed national and international design standards and guidelines; and (ii) captured and analysed 10 years of billable fire incident reports representing 3 859 fire events within the City of Johannesburg. Highlights from the study include: inconsistencies in categories when comparing the SANS 10090 and The Red Book fire tables and violations (in The Red Book) of stipulated Minimum Fire Flows; over the 10 year period, 75% of fire incidents within the City of Johannesburg were extinguished using less than 6.6 kL of water – less than the capacity (6.9 kL) of the City’s conventional pumping tanker during the period; 99.9% of fire incidents within the City were quenched using an average fire flow rate of less than 1 200 L/min, which is the minimum hydrant flow rate for the lowest fire risk category in SANS 10090; and peak fire occurrence did not correspond with typical peak residential water use. Recommendations are proffered in respect of the above.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-4738</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1816-7950</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1816-7950</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17159/wsa/2019.v45.i4.7551</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Gezina: Water Research Commission (WRC)</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Construction ; Design standards ; Distribution management ; Drinking water ; Fire fighting ; Fire prevention ; Fire protection ; Firefighting ; Firefighting water standard and guideline ; Fires ; Flow rates ; Flow velocity ; Guidelines ; Land settlement ; Legislation ; Questions ; South Africa ; Sustainable use ; Tables ; Tankers ; Water ; Water distribution ; Water engineering ; Water shortages ; Water supply ; Water use</subject><ispartof>Water S. A., 2019-10, Vol.45 (4), p.691-699</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Water Research Commission</rights><rights>2019. This work is published under NOCC (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-4265a9b6ce9a2f878e3a0f4b461e1c4331b175cb1cba147d6b5377edcb764e8a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925,39242</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mac Bean, C.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilemobade, A.A.</creatorcontrib><title>An evaluation of the primary South African standard and guideline for the provision of water for firefighting</title><title>Water S. A.</title><description>In South Africa, as is mostly the norm globally, national legislation and guidelines specify that potable water distribution networks maintain the capacity to provide specified quantities of water for firefighting. This paper addresses the question: is the South African standard and guideline pertaining to fire-flow provision appropriate for firefighting and do these ensure the most efficient balance between providing sufficient fire protection and promoting sustainable water use? In answering this question, this study: (i) reviewed national and international design standards and guidelines; and (ii) captured and analysed 10 years of billable fire incident reports representing 3 859 fire events within the City of Johannesburg. Highlights from the study include: inconsistencies in categories when comparing the SANS 10090 and The Red Book fire tables and violations (in The Red Book) of stipulated Minimum Fire Flows; over the 10 year period, 75% of fire incidents within the City of Johannesburg were extinguished using less than 6.6 kL of water – less than the capacity (6.9 kL) of the City’s conventional pumping tanker during the period; 99.9% of fire incidents within the City were quenched using an average fire flow rate of less than 1 200 L/min, which is the minimum hydrant flow rate for the lowest fire risk category in SANS 10090; and peak fire occurrence did not correspond with typical peak residential water use. Recommendations are proffered in respect of the above.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Design standards</subject><subject>Distribution management</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Fire fighting</subject><subject>Fire prevention</subject><subject>Fire protection</subject><subject>Firefighting</subject><subject>Firefighting water standard and guideline</subject><subject>Fires</subject><subject>Flow rates</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Land settlement</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Questions</subject><subject>South Africa</subject><subject>Sustainable use</subject><subject>Tables</subject><subject>Tankers</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water distribution</subject><subject>Water engineering</subject><subject>Water shortages</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><subject>Water use</subject><issn>0378-4738</issn><issn>1816-7950</issn><issn>1816-7950</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JRA</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotkU1r3DAQhkVpodu0P6Eg6NmOZH3Zp7IsaZsQ6KHNWYxkaa3glbeSvKH_PtrsosOAZt75eB-EvlLSUkXFcPuS4bYjdGhPXLSBt0oI-g5taE9lowZB3qMNYapvuGL9R_Qp52dCOsb4sEGHbcTuBPMKJSwRLx6XyeFjCgdI__GfZS0T3voULEScC8QR0ohrwPs1jG4O0WG_pKtoOYV87fICxaW3lA_J-bCfSoj7z-iDhzm7L9d4g55-3P3d_Woef_-8320fGyvYUBreSQGDkdYN0Ple9Y4B8dxwSR21nDFqqBLWUGuAcjVKI5hSbrRGSe56YDfo26Vv3enf6nLRz8uaYh2pO0Zl9UKyrla1l6o9zE6H6JeSwNY3ukOwS6xr1_-t7EQ1sSd9FYiLwKYl53qWvhqlKdFvKHRFoc8odEWhA9dnFFX3_aLLYKpjRWdwx9XoqZRj1tM466laWmedc5SIjui7h52mg7HKKAYjewUipJXK</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Mac Bean, C.B.</creator><creator>Ilemobade, A.A.</creator><general>Water Research Commission (WRC)</general><general>Water Research Commission</general><scope>AEIZH</scope><scope>JRA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>An evaluation of the primary South African standard and guideline for the provision of water for firefighting</title><author>Mac Bean, C.B. ; Ilemobade, A.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-4265a9b6ce9a2f878e3a0f4b461e1c4331b175cb1cba147d6b5377edcb764e8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Design standards</topic><topic>Distribution management</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Fire fighting</topic><topic>Fire prevention</topic><topic>Fire protection</topic><topic>Firefighting</topic><topic>Firefighting water standard and guideline</topic><topic>Fires</topic><topic>Flow rates</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Land settlement</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Questions</topic><topic>South Africa</topic><topic>Sustainable use</topic><topic>Tables</topic><topic>Tankers</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water distribution</topic><topic>Water engineering</topic><topic>Water shortages</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><topic>Water use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mac Bean, C.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilemobade, A.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Sabinet:Open Access</collection><collection>Sabinet African Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East &amp; Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water S. A.</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mac Bean, C.B.</au><au>Ilemobade, A.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An evaluation of the primary South African standard and guideline for the provision of water for firefighting</atitle><jtitle>Water S. A.</jtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>691</spage><epage>699</epage><pages>691-699</pages><issn>0378-4738</issn><issn>1816-7950</issn><eissn>1816-7950</eissn><abstract>In South Africa, as is mostly the norm globally, national legislation and guidelines specify that potable water distribution networks maintain the capacity to provide specified quantities of water for firefighting. This paper addresses the question: is the South African standard and guideline pertaining to fire-flow provision appropriate for firefighting and do these ensure the most efficient balance between providing sufficient fire protection and promoting sustainable water use? In answering this question, this study: (i) reviewed national and international design standards and guidelines; and (ii) captured and analysed 10 years of billable fire incident reports representing 3 859 fire events within the City of Johannesburg. Highlights from the study include: inconsistencies in categories when comparing the SANS 10090 and The Red Book fire tables and violations (in The Red Book) of stipulated Minimum Fire Flows; over the 10 year period, 75% of fire incidents within the City of Johannesburg were extinguished using less than 6.6 kL of water – less than the capacity (6.9 kL) of the City’s conventional pumping tanker during the period; 99.9% of fire incidents within the City were quenched using an average fire flow rate of less than 1 200 L/min, which is the minimum hydrant flow rate for the lowest fire risk category in SANS 10090; and peak fire occurrence did not correspond with typical peak residential water use. Recommendations are proffered in respect of the above.</abstract><cop>Gezina</cop><pub>Water Research Commission (WRC)</pub><doi>10.17159/wsa/2019.v45.i4.7551</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-4738
ispartof Water S. A., 2019-10, Vol.45 (4), p.691-699
issn 0378-4738
1816-7950
1816-7950
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2316378632
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; African Journals Online (Open Access); Sabinet African Journals Open Access Collection; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Analysis
Construction
Design standards
Distribution management
Drinking water
Fire fighting
Fire prevention
Fire protection
Firefighting
Firefighting water standard and guideline
Fires
Flow rates
Flow velocity
Guidelines
Land settlement
Legislation
Questions
South Africa
Sustainable use
Tables
Tankers
Water
Water distribution
Water engineering
Water shortages
Water supply
Water use
title An evaluation of the primary South African standard and guideline for the provision of water for firefighting
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T08%3A17%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20evaluation%20of%20the%20primary%20South%20African%20standard%20and%20guideline%20for%20the%20provision%20of%20water%20for%20firefighting&rft.jtitle=Water%20S.%20A.&rft.au=Mac%20Bean,%20C.B.&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=691&rft.epage=699&rft.pages=691-699&rft.issn=0378-4738&rft.eissn=1816-7950&rft_id=info:doi/10.17159/wsa/2019.v45.i4.7551&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA625795808%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2316378632&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A625795808&rft_sabinet_id=https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-19bc7b73ad&rfr_iscdi=true