Fatigue crack closure: A myth or a misconception?

In this paper, we have extended our previous study on fatigue crack closure to examine the phenomenon of crack opening displacement (COD) and its impact on the crack tip fields in both 2D and 3D specimen geometries using full‐field experimental measurements and integrated finite element modelling. D...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fatigue & fracture of engineering materials & structures 2019-12, Vol.42 (12), p.2747-2763
Hauptverfasser: Tong, Jie, Alshammrei, Shaher, Lin, Bing, Wigger, Tim, Marrow, Thomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2763
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2747
container_title Fatigue & fracture of engineering materials & structures
container_volume 42
creator Tong, Jie
Alshammrei, Shaher
Lin, Bing
Wigger, Tim
Marrow, Thomas
description In this paper, we have extended our previous study on fatigue crack closure to examine the phenomenon of crack opening displacement (COD) and its impact on the crack tip fields in both 2D and 3D specimen geometries using full‐field experimental measurements and integrated finite element modelling. Digital image correlation (DIC) and digital volume correlation (DVC) were used to measure the near‐tip material responses on the surfaces (DIC) and the interior (DVC) of the specimens. Materials with elastic‐plastic and large plastic characteristics were chosen for the study, where plasticity‐induced premature contact between the crack flanks is known to occur. Displacement maps around the cracks were obtained using DIC and DVC at selected load increments and were introduced as boundary conditions into the finite element (FE) models to obtain the “effective” crack driving force in terms of J‐integral, and the results were compared with those “nominal” from the standard FE analysis. Both visual observation and compliance curves were used to determine the “crack opening” levels; whilst the impacts of the crack opening on the crack driving force J and the normal strains ahead of the crack tip were evaluated in 2D and 3D. The results from the study indicate that, crack closure, although clearly identifiable in the compliance curves, does not appear to impact on global crack driving force, such as J‐integral, or strains ahead of the crack tip; hence, it may well be a misconception.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ffe.13112
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2314468407</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2314468407</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3982-a86c3f4b6acc5dbcef7f0d5517a31ebaa7b43e519d1f5ccd98e1fc092ccd36733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A8sMTGk9cVfCQuqUANIlVhAYrOciw0pbV3sRKj_nkBYueVueO59pYeQS2AzGGbuvZsBB8iPyASEYlmuSnlMJoWWKtOyeD0lZymtGQMlOJ8QqGzXvvWOYrT4QXETUh_dDV3Q7aF7pyFSS7dtwrBDt-_asLs9JyfebpK7-NtT8lItn-8estXT_ePdYpUhL4s8s4VC7kWtLKJsanRee9ZICdpycLW1uhbcSSgb8BKxKQsHHlmZDzdXmvMpuRpz9zF89i51Zh36uBsqTc5BCFUIpgfqeqQwhpSi82Yf262NBwPM_BgxgxHza2Rg5yP71W7c4X_QVNVy_PgGv1NhYg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2314468407</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fatigue crack closure: A myth or a misconception?</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Tong, Jie ; Alshammrei, Shaher ; Lin, Bing ; Wigger, Tim ; Marrow, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Tong, Jie ; Alshammrei, Shaher ; Lin, Bing ; Wigger, Tim ; Marrow, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we have extended our previous study on fatigue crack closure to examine the phenomenon of crack opening displacement (COD) and its impact on the crack tip fields in both 2D and 3D specimen geometries using full‐field experimental measurements and integrated finite element modelling. Digital image correlation (DIC) and digital volume correlation (DVC) were used to measure the near‐tip material responses on the surfaces (DIC) and the interior (DVC) of the specimens. Materials with elastic‐plastic and large plastic characteristics were chosen for the study, where plasticity‐induced premature contact between the crack flanks is known to occur. Displacement maps around the cracks were obtained using DIC and DVC at selected load increments and were introduced as boundary conditions into the finite element (FE) models to obtain the “effective” crack driving force in terms of J‐integral, and the results were compared with those “nominal” from the standard FE analysis. Both visual observation and compliance curves were used to determine the “crack opening” levels; whilst the impacts of the crack opening on the crack driving force J and the normal strains ahead of the crack tip were evaluated in 2D and 3D. The results from the study indicate that, crack closure, although clearly identifiable in the compliance curves, does not appear to impact on global crack driving force, such as J‐integral, or strains ahead of the crack tip; hence, it may well be a misconception.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8756-758X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2695</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ffe.13112</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Boundary conditions ; Correlation analysis ; Crack closure ; Crack opening displacement ; Crack propagation ; Crack tips ; DIC ; Digital imaging ; DVC ; fatigue crack ; Fatigue cracks ; Fatigue failure ; Finite element method ; Integrals ; J‐integral ; Mathematical models ; Modulus of elasticity ; strain ; Visual observation</subject><ispartof>Fatigue &amp; fracture of engineering materials &amp; structures, 2019-12, Vol.42 (12), p.2747-2763</ispartof><rights>2019 Wiley Publishing Ltd.</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3982-a86c3f4b6acc5dbcef7f0d5517a31ebaa7b43e519d1f5ccd98e1fc092ccd36733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3982-a86c3f4b6acc5dbcef7f0d5517a31ebaa7b43e519d1f5ccd98e1fc092ccd36733</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6120-9826 ; 0000-0003-1038-6691</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fffe.13112$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fffe.13112$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tong, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alshammrei, Shaher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Bing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wigger, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marrow, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Fatigue crack closure: A myth or a misconception?</title><title>Fatigue &amp; fracture of engineering materials &amp; structures</title><description>In this paper, we have extended our previous study on fatigue crack closure to examine the phenomenon of crack opening displacement (COD) and its impact on the crack tip fields in both 2D and 3D specimen geometries using full‐field experimental measurements and integrated finite element modelling. Digital image correlation (DIC) and digital volume correlation (DVC) were used to measure the near‐tip material responses on the surfaces (DIC) and the interior (DVC) of the specimens. Materials with elastic‐plastic and large plastic characteristics were chosen for the study, where plasticity‐induced premature contact between the crack flanks is known to occur. Displacement maps around the cracks were obtained using DIC and DVC at selected load increments and were introduced as boundary conditions into the finite element (FE) models to obtain the “effective” crack driving force in terms of J‐integral, and the results were compared with those “nominal” from the standard FE analysis. Both visual observation and compliance curves were used to determine the “crack opening” levels; whilst the impacts of the crack opening on the crack driving force J and the normal strains ahead of the crack tip were evaluated in 2D and 3D. The results from the study indicate that, crack closure, although clearly identifiable in the compliance curves, does not appear to impact on global crack driving force, such as J‐integral, or strains ahead of the crack tip; hence, it may well be a misconception.</description><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Crack closure</subject><subject>Crack opening displacement</subject><subject>Crack propagation</subject><subject>Crack tips</subject><subject>DIC</subject><subject>Digital imaging</subject><subject>DVC</subject><subject>fatigue crack</subject><subject>Fatigue cracks</subject><subject>Fatigue failure</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Integrals</subject><subject>J‐integral</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Modulus of elasticity</subject><subject>strain</subject><subject>Visual observation</subject><issn>8756-758X</issn><issn>1460-2695</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A8sMTGk9cVfCQuqUANIlVhAYrOciw0pbV3sRKj_nkBYueVueO59pYeQS2AzGGbuvZsBB8iPyASEYlmuSnlMJoWWKtOyeD0lZymtGQMlOJ8QqGzXvvWOYrT4QXETUh_dDV3Q7aF7pyFSS7dtwrBDt-_asLs9JyfebpK7-NtT8lItn-8estXT_ePdYpUhL4s8s4VC7kWtLKJsanRee9ZICdpycLW1uhbcSSgb8BKxKQsHHlmZDzdXmvMpuRpz9zF89i51Zh36uBsqTc5BCFUIpgfqeqQwhpSi82Yf262NBwPM_BgxgxHza2Rg5yP71W7c4X_QVNVy_PgGv1NhYg</recordid><startdate>201912</startdate><enddate>201912</enddate><creator>Tong, Jie</creator><creator>Alshammrei, Shaher</creator><creator>Lin, Bing</creator><creator>Wigger, Tim</creator><creator>Marrow, Thomas</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6120-9826</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1038-6691</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201912</creationdate><title>Fatigue crack closure: A myth or a misconception?</title><author>Tong, Jie ; Alshammrei, Shaher ; Lin, Bing ; Wigger, Tim ; Marrow, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3982-a86c3f4b6acc5dbcef7f0d5517a31ebaa7b43e519d1f5ccd98e1fc092ccd36733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Crack closure</topic><topic>Crack opening displacement</topic><topic>Crack propagation</topic><topic>Crack tips</topic><topic>DIC</topic><topic>Digital imaging</topic><topic>DVC</topic><topic>fatigue crack</topic><topic>Fatigue cracks</topic><topic>Fatigue failure</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Integrals</topic><topic>J‐integral</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Modulus of elasticity</topic><topic>strain</topic><topic>Visual observation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tong, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alshammrei, Shaher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Bing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wigger, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marrow, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Fatigue &amp; fracture of engineering materials &amp; structures</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tong, Jie</au><au>Alshammrei, Shaher</au><au>Lin, Bing</au><au>Wigger, Tim</au><au>Marrow, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fatigue crack closure: A myth or a misconception?</atitle><jtitle>Fatigue &amp; fracture of engineering materials &amp; structures</jtitle><date>2019-12</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2747</spage><epage>2763</epage><pages>2747-2763</pages><issn>8756-758X</issn><eissn>1460-2695</eissn><abstract>In this paper, we have extended our previous study on fatigue crack closure to examine the phenomenon of crack opening displacement (COD) and its impact on the crack tip fields in both 2D and 3D specimen geometries using full‐field experimental measurements and integrated finite element modelling. Digital image correlation (DIC) and digital volume correlation (DVC) were used to measure the near‐tip material responses on the surfaces (DIC) and the interior (DVC) of the specimens. Materials with elastic‐plastic and large plastic characteristics were chosen for the study, where plasticity‐induced premature contact between the crack flanks is known to occur. Displacement maps around the cracks were obtained using DIC and DVC at selected load increments and were introduced as boundary conditions into the finite element (FE) models to obtain the “effective” crack driving force in terms of J‐integral, and the results were compared with those “nominal” from the standard FE analysis. Both visual observation and compliance curves were used to determine the “crack opening” levels; whilst the impacts of the crack opening on the crack driving force J and the normal strains ahead of the crack tip were evaluated in 2D and 3D. The results from the study indicate that, crack closure, although clearly identifiable in the compliance curves, does not appear to impact on global crack driving force, such as J‐integral, or strains ahead of the crack tip; hence, it may well be a misconception.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/ffe.13112</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6120-9826</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1038-6691</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 8756-758X
ispartof Fatigue & fracture of engineering materials & structures, 2019-12, Vol.42 (12), p.2747-2763
issn 8756-758X
1460-2695
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2314468407
source Wiley Journals
subjects Boundary conditions
Correlation analysis
Crack closure
Crack opening displacement
Crack propagation
Crack tips
DIC
Digital imaging
DVC
fatigue crack
Fatigue cracks
Fatigue failure
Finite element method
Integrals
J‐integral
Mathematical models
Modulus of elasticity
strain
Visual observation
title Fatigue crack closure: A myth or a misconception?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T05%3A27%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fatigue%20crack%20closure:%20A%20myth%20or%20a%20misconception?&rft.jtitle=Fatigue%20&%20fracture%20of%20engineering%20materials%20&%20structures&rft.au=Tong,%20Jie&rft.date=2019-12&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2747&rft.epage=2763&rft.pages=2747-2763&rft.issn=8756-758X&rft.eissn=1460-2695&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ffe.13112&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2314468407%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2314468407&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true