Fatigue crack closure: A myth or a misconception?
In this paper, we have extended our previous study on fatigue crack closure to examine the phenomenon of crack opening displacement (COD) and its impact on the crack tip fields in both 2D and 3D specimen geometries using full‐field experimental measurements and integrated finite element modelling. D...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fatigue & fracture of engineering materials & structures 2019-12, Vol.42 (12), p.2747-2763 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2763 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2747 |
container_title | Fatigue & fracture of engineering materials & structures |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Tong, Jie Alshammrei, Shaher Lin, Bing Wigger, Tim Marrow, Thomas |
description | In this paper, we have extended our previous study on fatigue crack closure to examine the phenomenon of crack opening displacement (COD) and its impact on the crack tip fields in both 2D and 3D specimen geometries using full‐field experimental measurements and integrated finite element modelling. Digital image correlation (DIC) and digital volume correlation (DVC) were used to measure the near‐tip material responses on the surfaces (DIC) and the interior (DVC) of the specimens. Materials with elastic‐plastic and large plastic characteristics were chosen for the study, where plasticity‐induced premature contact between the crack flanks is known to occur. Displacement maps around the cracks were obtained using DIC and DVC at selected load increments and were introduced as boundary conditions into the finite element (FE) models to obtain the “effective” crack driving force in terms of J‐integral, and the results were compared with those “nominal” from the standard FE analysis. Both visual observation and compliance curves were used to determine the “crack opening” levels; whilst the impacts of the crack opening on the crack driving force J and the normal strains ahead of the crack tip were evaluated in 2D and 3D. The results from the study indicate that, crack closure, although clearly identifiable in the compliance curves, does not appear to impact on global crack driving force, such as J‐integral, or strains ahead of the crack tip; hence, it may well be a misconception. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ffe.13112 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2314468407</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2314468407</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3982-a86c3f4b6acc5dbcef7f0d5517a31ebaa7b43e519d1f5ccd98e1fc092ccd36733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A8sMTGk9cVfCQuqUANIlVhAYrOciw0pbV3sRKj_nkBYueVueO59pYeQS2AzGGbuvZsBB8iPyASEYlmuSnlMJoWWKtOyeD0lZymtGQMlOJ8QqGzXvvWOYrT4QXETUh_dDV3Q7aF7pyFSS7dtwrBDt-_asLs9JyfebpK7-NtT8lItn-8estXT_ePdYpUhL4s8s4VC7kWtLKJsanRee9ZICdpycLW1uhbcSSgb8BKxKQsHHlmZDzdXmvMpuRpz9zF89i51Zh36uBsqTc5BCFUIpgfqeqQwhpSi82Yf262NBwPM_BgxgxHza2Rg5yP71W7c4X_QVNVy_PgGv1NhYg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2314468407</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fatigue crack closure: A myth or a misconception?</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Tong, Jie ; Alshammrei, Shaher ; Lin, Bing ; Wigger, Tim ; Marrow, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Tong, Jie ; Alshammrei, Shaher ; Lin, Bing ; Wigger, Tim ; Marrow, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we have extended our previous study on fatigue crack closure to examine the phenomenon of crack opening displacement (COD) and its impact on the crack tip fields in both 2D and 3D specimen geometries using full‐field experimental measurements and integrated finite element modelling. Digital image correlation (DIC) and digital volume correlation (DVC) were used to measure the near‐tip material responses on the surfaces (DIC) and the interior (DVC) of the specimens. Materials with elastic‐plastic and large plastic characteristics were chosen for the study, where plasticity‐induced premature contact between the crack flanks is known to occur. Displacement maps around the cracks were obtained using DIC and DVC at selected load increments and were introduced as boundary conditions into the finite element (FE) models to obtain the “effective” crack driving force in terms of J‐integral, and the results were compared with those “nominal” from the standard FE analysis. Both visual observation and compliance curves were used to determine the “crack opening” levels; whilst the impacts of the crack opening on the crack driving force J and the normal strains ahead of the crack tip were evaluated in 2D and 3D. The results from the study indicate that, crack closure, although clearly identifiable in the compliance curves, does not appear to impact on global crack driving force, such as J‐integral, or strains ahead of the crack tip; hence, it may well be a misconception.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8756-758X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2695</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ffe.13112</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Boundary conditions ; Correlation analysis ; Crack closure ; Crack opening displacement ; Crack propagation ; Crack tips ; DIC ; Digital imaging ; DVC ; fatigue crack ; Fatigue cracks ; Fatigue failure ; Finite element method ; Integrals ; J‐integral ; Mathematical models ; Modulus of elasticity ; strain ; Visual observation</subject><ispartof>Fatigue & fracture of engineering materials & structures, 2019-12, Vol.42 (12), p.2747-2763</ispartof><rights>2019 Wiley Publishing Ltd.</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3982-a86c3f4b6acc5dbcef7f0d5517a31ebaa7b43e519d1f5ccd98e1fc092ccd36733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3982-a86c3f4b6acc5dbcef7f0d5517a31ebaa7b43e519d1f5ccd98e1fc092ccd36733</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6120-9826 ; 0000-0003-1038-6691</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fffe.13112$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fffe.13112$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tong, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alshammrei, Shaher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Bing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wigger, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marrow, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Fatigue crack closure: A myth or a misconception?</title><title>Fatigue & fracture of engineering materials & structures</title><description>In this paper, we have extended our previous study on fatigue crack closure to examine the phenomenon of crack opening displacement (COD) and its impact on the crack tip fields in both 2D and 3D specimen geometries using full‐field experimental measurements and integrated finite element modelling. Digital image correlation (DIC) and digital volume correlation (DVC) were used to measure the near‐tip material responses on the surfaces (DIC) and the interior (DVC) of the specimens. Materials with elastic‐plastic and large plastic characteristics were chosen for the study, where plasticity‐induced premature contact between the crack flanks is known to occur. Displacement maps around the cracks were obtained using DIC and DVC at selected load increments and were introduced as boundary conditions into the finite element (FE) models to obtain the “effective” crack driving force in terms of J‐integral, and the results were compared with those “nominal” from the standard FE analysis. Both visual observation and compliance curves were used to determine the “crack opening” levels; whilst the impacts of the crack opening on the crack driving force J and the normal strains ahead of the crack tip were evaluated in 2D and 3D. The results from the study indicate that, crack closure, although clearly identifiable in the compliance curves, does not appear to impact on global crack driving force, such as J‐integral, or strains ahead of the crack tip; hence, it may well be a misconception.</description><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Crack closure</subject><subject>Crack opening displacement</subject><subject>Crack propagation</subject><subject>Crack tips</subject><subject>DIC</subject><subject>Digital imaging</subject><subject>DVC</subject><subject>fatigue crack</subject><subject>Fatigue cracks</subject><subject>Fatigue failure</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Integrals</subject><subject>J‐integral</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Modulus of elasticity</subject><subject>strain</subject><subject>Visual observation</subject><issn>8756-758X</issn><issn>1460-2695</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A8sMTGk9cVfCQuqUANIlVhAYrOciw0pbV3sRKj_nkBYueVueO59pYeQS2AzGGbuvZsBB8iPyASEYlmuSnlMJoWWKtOyeD0lZymtGQMlOJ8QqGzXvvWOYrT4QXETUh_dDV3Q7aF7pyFSS7dtwrBDt-_asLs9JyfebpK7-NtT8lItn-8estXT_ePdYpUhL4s8s4VC7kWtLKJsanRee9ZICdpycLW1uhbcSSgb8BKxKQsHHlmZDzdXmvMpuRpz9zF89i51Zh36uBsqTc5BCFUIpgfqeqQwhpSi82Yf262NBwPM_BgxgxHza2Rg5yP71W7c4X_QVNVy_PgGv1NhYg</recordid><startdate>201912</startdate><enddate>201912</enddate><creator>Tong, Jie</creator><creator>Alshammrei, Shaher</creator><creator>Lin, Bing</creator><creator>Wigger, Tim</creator><creator>Marrow, Thomas</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6120-9826</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1038-6691</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201912</creationdate><title>Fatigue crack closure: A myth or a misconception?</title><author>Tong, Jie ; Alshammrei, Shaher ; Lin, Bing ; Wigger, Tim ; Marrow, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3982-a86c3f4b6acc5dbcef7f0d5517a31ebaa7b43e519d1f5ccd98e1fc092ccd36733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Crack closure</topic><topic>Crack opening displacement</topic><topic>Crack propagation</topic><topic>Crack tips</topic><topic>DIC</topic><topic>Digital imaging</topic><topic>DVC</topic><topic>fatigue crack</topic><topic>Fatigue cracks</topic><topic>Fatigue failure</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Integrals</topic><topic>J‐integral</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Modulus of elasticity</topic><topic>strain</topic><topic>Visual observation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tong, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alshammrei, Shaher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Bing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wigger, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marrow, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Fatigue & fracture of engineering materials & structures</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tong, Jie</au><au>Alshammrei, Shaher</au><au>Lin, Bing</au><au>Wigger, Tim</au><au>Marrow, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fatigue crack closure: A myth or a misconception?</atitle><jtitle>Fatigue & fracture of engineering materials & structures</jtitle><date>2019-12</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2747</spage><epage>2763</epage><pages>2747-2763</pages><issn>8756-758X</issn><eissn>1460-2695</eissn><abstract>In this paper, we have extended our previous study on fatigue crack closure to examine the phenomenon of crack opening displacement (COD) and its impact on the crack tip fields in both 2D and 3D specimen geometries using full‐field experimental measurements and integrated finite element modelling. Digital image correlation (DIC) and digital volume correlation (DVC) were used to measure the near‐tip material responses on the surfaces (DIC) and the interior (DVC) of the specimens. Materials with elastic‐plastic and large plastic characteristics were chosen for the study, where plasticity‐induced premature contact between the crack flanks is known to occur. Displacement maps around the cracks were obtained using DIC and DVC at selected load increments and were introduced as boundary conditions into the finite element (FE) models to obtain the “effective” crack driving force in terms of J‐integral, and the results were compared with those “nominal” from the standard FE analysis. Both visual observation and compliance curves were used to determine the “crack opening” levels; whilst the impacts of the crack opening on the crack driving force J and the normal strains ahead of the crack tip were evaluated in 2D and 3D. The results from the study indicate that, crack closure, although clearly identifiable in the compliance curves, does not appear to impact on global crack driving force, such as J‐integral, or strains ahead of the crack tip; hence, it may well be a misconception.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/ffe.13112</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6120-9826</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1038-6691</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 8756-758X |
ispartof | Fatigue & fracture of engineering materials & structures, 2019-12, Vol.42 (12), p.2747-2763 |
issn | 8756-758X 1460-2695 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2314468407 |
source | Wiley Journals |
subjects | Boundary conditions Correlation analysis Crack closure Crack opening displacement Crack propagation Crack tips DIC Digital imaging DVC fatigue crack Fatigue cracks Fatigue failure Finite element method Integrals J‐integral Mathematical models Modulus of elasticity strain Visual observation |
title | Fatigue crack closure: A myth or a misconception? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T05%3A27%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fatigue%20crack%20closure:%20A%20myth%20or%20a%20misconception?&rft.jtitle=Fatigue%20&%20fracture%20of%20engineering%20materials%20&%20structures&rft.au=Tong,%20Jie&rft.date=2019-12&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2747&rft.epage=2763&rft.pages=2747-2763&rft.issn=8756-758X&rft.eissn=1460-2695&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ffe.13112&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2314468407%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2314468407&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |