Returns to scale and asset prices
The q‐theory of investment is proposed to explain firm growth effects, where previous papers identify a negative effect of firm growth, including asset growth, real investment and net share issuance, on future stock returns. This paper uses returns to scale from the production function to test the d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of business finance & accounting 2019-10, Vol.46 (9-10), p.1299-1318 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1318 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9-10 |
container_start_page | 1299 |
container_title | Journal of business finance & accounting |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Chen, Hung‐Kun Chan, Konan Wang, Yanzhi |
description | The q‐theory of investment is proposed to explain firm growth effects, where previous papers identify a negative effect of firm growth, including asset growth, real investment and net share issuance, on future stock returns. This paper uses returns to scale from the production function to test the dynamic q‐theory, which predicts that the firm growth effect is theoretically weaker for firms with decreasing returns to scale (DRS) than for non‐DRS firms. Our empirical results generally support the prediction of dynamic q‐theory. However, we find that the dynamic q‐theory explains little of the value, momentum and ROE effects from the standpoint of returns to scale. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jbfa.12408 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2314126255</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2314126255</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3348-18c02f511f9ef6ef3024e3ebd99428f55ffbee7e3187701e8ccdb4fa2115e7023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsXf8GKN2FrJt97rMX6QUEQBW8hm51Al7Vbky3Sf2_qenYuc3nemZeHkEugM8hz29bBzYAJao7IBIQypaykPiYTyqkqlVEfp-QspZZSykDpCbl6xWEXN6kY-iJ512HhNk3hUsKh2Ma1x3ROToLrEl787Sl5X96_LR7L1cvD02K-Kj3nwpRgPGVBAoQKg8LAKRPIsW6qSjATpAyhRtTIwWhNAY33TS2CYwASNWV8Sq7Hu9vYf-0wDbbtc7P80jIOAphiUmbqZqR87FOKGGxu-eni3gK1BwX2oMD-KsgwjPD3usP9P6R9vlvOx8wP16ZcLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2314126255</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Returns to scale and asset prices</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Chen, Hung‐Kun ; Chan, Konan ; Wang, Yanzhi</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hung‐Kun ; Chan, Konan ; Wang, Yanzhi</creatorcontrib><description>The q‐theory of investment is proposed to explain firm growth effects, where previous papers identify a negative effect of firm growth, including asset growth, real investment and net share issuance, on future stock returns. This paper uses returns to scale from the production function to test the dynamic q‐theory, which predicts that the firm growth effect is theoretically weaker for firms with decreasing returns to scale (DRS) than for non‐DRS firms. Our empirical results generally support the prediction of dynamic q‐theory. However, we find that the dynamic q‐theory explains little of the value, momentum and ROE effects from the standpoint of returns to scale.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-686X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-5957</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jbfa.12408</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>asset growth ; Assets ; Economic models ; G12 ; G14 ; investment ; Investments ; net share issuance ; Prices ; q‐theory ; returns to scale</subject><ispartof>Journal of business finance & accounting, 2019-10, Vol.46 (9-10), p.1299-1318</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3348-18c02f511f9ef6ef3024e3ebd99428f55ffbee7e3187701e8ccdb4fa2115e7023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3348-18c02f511f9ef6ef3024e3ebd99428f55ffbee7e3187701e8ccdb4fa2115e7023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjbfa.12408$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjbfa.12408$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hung‐Kun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Konan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yanzhi</creatorcontrib><title>Returns to scale and asset prices</title><title>Journal of business finance & accounting</title><description>The q‐theory of investment is proposed to explain firm growth effects, where previous papers identify a negative effect of firm growth, including asset growth, real investment and net share issuance, on future stock returns. This paper uses returns to scale from the production function to test the dynamic q‐theory, which predicts that the firm growth effect is theoretically weaker for firms with decreasing returns to scale (DRS) than for non‐DRS firms. Our empirical results generally support the prediction of dynamic q‐theory. However, we find that the dynamic q‐theory explains little of the value, momentum and ROE effects from the standpoint of returns to scale.</description><subject>asset growth</subject><subject>Assets</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>G12</subject><subject>G14</subject><subject>investment</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>net share issuance</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>q‐theory</subject><subject>returns to scale</subject><issn>0306-686X</issn><issn>1468-5957</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsXf8GKN2FrJt97rMX6QUEQBW8hm51Al7Vbky3Sf2_qenYuc3nemZeHkEugM8hz29bBzYAJao7IBIQypaykPiYTyqkqlVEfp-QspZZSykDpCbl6xWEXN6kY-iJ512HhNk3hUsKh2Ma1x3ROToLrEl787Sl5X96_LR7L1cvD02K-Kj3nwpRgPGVBAoQKg8LAKRPIsW6qSjATpAyhRtTIwWhNAY33TS2CYwASNWV8Sq7Hu9vYf-0wDbbtc7P80jIOAphiUmbqZqR87FOKGGxu-eni3gK1BwX2oMD-KsgwjPD3usP9P6R9vlvOx8wP16ZcLg</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Chen, Hung‐Kun</creator><creator>Chan, Konan</creator><creator>Wang, Yanzhi</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Returns to scale and asset prices</title><author>Chen, Hung‐Kun ; Chan, Konan ; Wang, Yanzhi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3348-18c02f511f9ef6ef3024e3ebd99428f55ffbee7e3187701e8ccdb4fa2115e7023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>asset growth</topic><topic>Assets</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>G12</topic><topic>G14</topic><topic>investment</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>net share issuance</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>q‐theory</topic><topic>returns to scale</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hung‐Kun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Konan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yanzhi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of business finance & accounting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Hung‐Kun</au><au>Chan, Konan</au><au>Wang, Yanzhi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Returns to scale and asset prices</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business finance & accounting</jtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>9-10</issue><spage>1299</spage><epage>1318</epage><pages>1299-1318</pages><issn>0306-686X</issn><eissn>1468-5957</eissn><abstract>The q‐theory of investment is proposed to explain firm growth effects, where previous papers identify a negative effect of firm growth, including asset growth, real investment and net share issuance, on future stock returns. This paper uses returns to scale from the production function to test the dynamic q‐theory, which predicts that the firm growth effect is theoretically weaker for firms with decreasing returns to scale (DRS) than for non‐DRS firms. Our empirical results generally support the prediction of dynamic q‐theory. However, we find that the dynamic q‐theory explains little of the value, momentum and ROE effects from the standpoint of returns to scale.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/jbfa.12408</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0306-686X |
ispartof | Journal of business finance & accounting, 2019-10, Vol.46 (9-10), p.1299-1318 |
issn | 0306-686X 1468-5957 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2314126255 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | asset growth Assets Economic models G12 G14 investment Investments net share issuance Prices q‐theory returns to scale |
title | Returns to scale and asset prices |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T11%3A31%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Returns%20to%20scale%20and%20asset%20prices&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20finance%20&%20accounting&rft.au=Chen,%20Hung%E2%80%90Kun&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=9-10&rft.spage=1299&rft.epage=1318&rft.pages=1299-1318&rft.issn=0306-686X&rft.eissn=1468-5957&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jbfa.12408&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2314126255%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2314126255&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |