Genesis of ore‐bearing volcanic rocks in the Derbur lead–zinc mining area of the Erguna Massif, western slope of the Great Xing'an Range, NE China: Geochemistry, Sr–Nd–Pb isotopes, and zircon U–Pb geochronology

The Derbur lead–zinc deposit is located in the Derbugan metallogenic belt in the north‐western portion of the Mesozoic Hailaer‐Genhe volcanic basin in the northern Great Xing'an Range. This deposit occurs in the Middle Jurassic intermediate–mafic volcanic rocks of the Tamulangou Formation and i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geological journal (Chichester, England) England), 2019-11, Vol.54 (6), p.3891-3908
Hauptverfasser: Xu, Zhi‐Tao, Sun, Jing‐Gui, Liang, Xiao‐Long, Sun, Fan‐Ting, Ming, Zhu, Liu, Chen, He, Yun‐Peng, Lei, Feng‐Zhi, Yang, Q.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3908
container_issue 6
container_start_page 3891
container_title Geological journal (Chichester, England)
container_volume 54
creator Xu, Zhi‐Tao
Sun, Jing‐Gui
Liang, Xiao‐Long
Sun, Fan‐Ting
Ming, Zhu
Liu, Chen
He, Yun‐Peng
Lei, Feng‐Zhi
Yang, Q.
description The Derbur lead–zinc deposit is located in the Derbugan metallogenic belt in the north‐western portion of the Mesozoic Hailaer‐Genhe volcanic basin in the northern Great Xing'an Range. This deposit occurs in the Middle Jurassic intermediate–mafic volcanic rocks of the Tamulangou Formation and is spatially and temporally associated with acidic pyroclastic rocks. The host rocks are bedded trachyandesite and rhyolitic lithic‐crystal tuffs, and basaltic‐andesitic aplite veins are associated with the ore body. Because the deposit is a hypabyssal low‐temperature hydrothermal Pb–Zn deposit associated with volcanism, to determine the precise petrogenesis of the volcanic rocks, this study analysed the zircon U–Pb ages of the trachyandesite and rhyolitic lithic‐crystal tuffs, the Sr–Nd–Pb isotopic geochemistry of the trachyandesite and basaltic‐andesitic aplite, and the whole‐rock geochemistry of all three rock types. The results showed that the trachyandesite and basaltic‐andesitic aplite belong to the shoshonitic series and have similar whole‐rock and isotopic geochemical characteristics, including enrichments in large‐ion lithophile elements and light rare earth elements and depletions in high‐field‐strength elements. They also have low initial 87Sr/86Sr values of 0.705007–0.705240 and εNd(t) values of +0.6 to +1.7, with model ages (TDM) of 699–883 Ma. The ratios of 206Pb/204Pb, 207Pb/204Pb, and 208Pb/204Pb vary from 18.438 to 18.476, 15.570 to 15.577, and 38.254 to 38.320, respectively, with μ values of 9.40–9.41. In contrast, the rhyolitic lithic‐crystal tuffs are characterized by high SiO2 contents (73.44–79.48 wt.%); low Al2O3 (11.36–12.53 wt.%), TiO2 (0.14–0.18 wt.%), and K2O + Na2O (3.48–3.89 wt.%, Na2O ≤ K2O) contents; and low Mg# values (0.17–0.41), indicating that they belong to the calc–alkaline series. Additionally, they have relatively low REE contents and strong Sr depletions. LA‐ICP‐MS zircon U–Pb dating of the trachyandesite and rhyolitic lithic‐crystal tuffs indicates that their ages are 167.0 ± 2.0 Ma and 164.8 ± 1.6 Ma, respectively. We conclude that the trachyandesite and the basaltic‐andesitic aplite were derived from the partial melting of lower crustal material assimilated by a depleted lithospheric mantle that was subsequently metasomatized by subducted slab‐derived fluids. The rhyolitic lithic‐crystal tuffs likely originated from the partial melting of accreted lower crust. In summary, because the acidic volcanism was accompanied by increa
doi_str_mv 10.1002/gj.3349
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2313897228</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2313897228</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3129-a53ab63fff1f64d2ca18133fa2f289e01ac64a3ae35a63efc4a7eb7fa6a855533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10c-O0zAQBnALgURZEK8wEoc90C7-k6QJN1RKAC0LAlbiFk3cceqS2sVOWXVP-whIvB6nfRIcCkdOtuTffJ-sYeyx4GeCc_ms25wplVV32ETwqpoJrrK7bML5XKZ7zu-zBzFuOBeCZ2LCftXkKNoI3oAPdHvzoyUM1nXw3fcandUQvP4awToY1gQvKbT7AD3h6vbm57V1GrbWjR4D4ZgyqmXo9g7hHcZozRSuKA4UHMTe7-ifqZMf4EsaPUUHH9F1NIWLJSzW1uFzqMnrNW1tHMJhCp9CarsYKz-0YKMfUlCcAroVXNugvYPL41s3jgXvfO-7w0N2z2Af6dHf84Rdvlp-Xryenb-v3yxenM9QCVnNMFfYFsoYI0yRraRGUQqlDEojy4q4QF1kqJBUjoUiozOcUzs3WGCZ57lSJ-zJMXcX_Ld9-myz8fvgUmUjlVBlNZeyTOr0qHTwMQYyzS7YLYZDI3gzrq7pNs24uiSfHuWV7enwP9bUb__o38SeoJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2313897228</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genesis of ore‐bearing volcanic rocks in the Derbur lead–zinc mining area of the Erguna Massif, western slope of the Great Xing'an Range, NE China: Geochemistry, Sr–Nd–Pb isotopes, and zircon U–Pb geochronology</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Xu, Zhi‐Tao ; Sun, Jing‐Gui ; Liang, Xiao‐Long ; Sun, Fan‐Ting ; Ming, Zhu ; Liu, Chen ; He, Yun‐Peng ; Lei, Feng‐Zhi ; Yang, Q.</creator><creatorcontrib>Xu, Zhi‐Tao ; Sun, Jing‐Gui ; Liang, Xiao‐Long ; Sun, Fan‐Ting ; Ming, Zhu ; Liu, Chen ; He, Yun‐Peng ; Lei, Feng‐Zhi ; Yang, Q.</creatorcontrib><description>The Derbur lead–zinc deposit is located in the Derbugan metallogenic belt in the north‐western portion of the Mesozoic Hailaer‐Genhe volcanic basin in the northern Great Xing'an Range. This deposit occurs in the Middle Jurassic intermediate–mafic volcanic rocks of the Tamulangou Formation and is spatially and temporally associated with acidic pyroclastic rocks. The host rocks are bedded trachyandesite and rhyolitic lithic‐crystal tuffs, and basaltic‐andesitic aplite veins are associated with the ore body. Because the deposit is a hypabyssal low‐temperature hydrothermal Pb–Zn deposit associated with volcanism, to determine the precise petrogenesis of the volcanic rocks, this study analysed the zircon U–Pb ages of the trachyandesite and rhyolitic lithic‐crystal tuffs, the Sr–Nd–Pb isotopic geochemistry of the trachyandesite and basaltic‐andesitic aplite, and the whole‐rock geochemistry of all three rock types. The results showed that the trachyandesite and basaltic‐andesitic aplite belong to the shoshonitic series and have similar whole‐rock and isotopic geochemical characteristics, including enrichments in large‐ion lithophile elements and light rare earth elements and depletions in high‐field‐strength elements. They also have low initial 87Sr/86Sr values of 0.705007–0.705240 and εNd(t) values of +0.6 to +1.7, with model ages (TDM) of 699–883 Ma. The ratios of 206Pb/204Pb, 207Pb/204Pb, and 208Pb/204Pb vary from 18.438 to 18.476, 15.570 to 15.577, and 38.254 to 38.320, respectively, with μ values of 9.40–9.41. In contrast, the rhyolitic lithic‐crystal tuffs are characterized by high SiO2 contents (73.44–79.48 wt.%); low Al2O3 (11.36–12.53 wt.%), TiO2 (0.14–0.18 wt.%), and K2O + Na2O (3.48–3.89 wt.%, Na2O ≤ K2O) contents; and low Mg# values (0.17–0.41), indicating that they belong to the calc–alkaline series. Additionally, they have relatively low REE contents and strong Sr depletions. LA‐ICP‐MS zircon U–Pb dating of the trachyandesite and rhyolitic lithic‐crystal tuffs indicates that their ages are 167.0 ± 2.0 Ma and 164.8 ± 1.6 Ma, respectively. We conclude that the trachyandesite and the basaltic‐andesitic aplite were derived from the partial melting of lower crustal material assimilated by a depleted lithospheric mantle that was subsequently metasomatized by subducted slab‐derived fluids. The rhyolitic lithic‐crystal tuffs likely originated from the partial melting of accreted lower crust. In summary, because the acidic volcanism was accompanied by increasingly felsic volcanism, bimodal volcanic rocks were produced. Among volcanogenic deposits, bimodal volcanic rocks are the most favourable ore‐hosting rocks, and ore‐forming materials were contributed by the magmatic system. These processes created conditions conducive to the formation of large‐scale Ag, Pb, and Zn mineralization in this area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0072-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1034</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/gj.3349</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Liverpool: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aluminum oxide ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Crystals ; Depletion ; Derbur ; Earth ; Erguna Massif ; Fluids ; Geochemistry ; Geochronology ; Geochronometry ; Great Xing'an Range ; Isotopes ; Jurassic ; Lead ; Lead isotopes ; Lithic ; Magma ; Massifs ; Melting ; Mesozoic ; Mineralization ; Petrogenesis ; Radiometric dating ; Rare earth elements ; Ratios ; Rocks ; Silica ; Silicon dioxide ; Sr–Nd–Pb isotopes ; Strontium 87 ; Strontium isotopes ; Titanium dioxide ; Volcanic activity ; Volcanic rocks ; Volcanism ; Volcanogenic deposits ; Zinc ; Zircon ; zircon U–Pb dating</subject><ispartof>Geological journal (Chichester, England), 2019-11, Vol.54 (6), p.3891-3908</ispartof><rights>2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3129-a53ab63fff1f64d2ca18133fa2f289e01ac64a3ae35a63efc4a7eb7fa6a855533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3129-a53ab63fff1f64d2ca18133fa2f289e01ac64a3ae35a63efc4a7eb7fa6a855533</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9954-087X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fgj.3349$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fgj.3349$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xu, Zhi‐Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Jing‐Gui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Xiao‐Long</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Fan‐Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ming, Zhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Yun‐Peng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Feng‐Zhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Q.</creatorcontrib><title>Genesis of ore‐bearing volcanic rocks in the Derbur lead–zinc mining area of the Erguna Massif, western slope of the Great Xing'an Range, NE China: Geochemistry, Sr–Nd–Pb isotopes, and zircon U–Pb geochronology</title><title>Geological journal (Chichester, England)</title><description>The Derbur lead–zinc deposit is located in the Derbugan metallogenic belt in the north‐western portion of the Mesozoic Hailaer‐Genhe volcanic basin in the northern Great Xing'an Range. This deposit occurs in the Middle Jurassic intermediate–mafic volcanic rocks of the Tamulangou Formation and is spatially and temporally associated with acidic pyroclastic rocks. The host rocks are bedded trachyandesite and rhyolitic lithic‐crystal tuffs, and basaltic‐andesitic aplite veins are associated with the ore body. Because the deposit is a hypabyssal low‐temperature hydrothermal Pb–Zn deposit associated with volcanism, to determine the precise petrogenesis of the volcanic rocks, this study analysed the zircon U–Pb ages of the trachyandesite and rhyolitic lithic‐crystal tuffs, the Sr–Nd–Pb isotopic geochemistry of the trachyandesite and basaltic‐andesitic aplite, and the whole‐rock geochemistry of all three rock types. The results showed that the trachyandesite and basaltic‐andesitic aplite belong to the shoshonitic series and have similar whole‐rock and isotopic geochemical characteristics, including enrichments in large‐ion lithophile elements and light rare earth elements and depletions in high‐field‐strength elements. They also have low initial 87Sr/86Sr values of 0.705007–0.705240 and εNd(t) values of +0.6 to +1.7, with model ages (TDM) of 699–883 Ma. The ratios of 206Pb/204Pb, 207Pb/204Pb, and 208Pb/204Pb vary from 18.438 to 18.476, 15.570 to 15.577, and 38.254 to 38.320, respectively, with μ values of 9.40–9.41. In contrast, the rhyolitic lithic‐crystal tuffs are characterized by high SiO2 contents (73.44–79.48 wt.%); low Al2O3 (11.36–12.53 wt.%), TiO2 (0.14–0.18 wt.%), and K2O + Na2O (3.48–3.89 wt.%, Na2O ≤ K2O) contents; and low Mg# values (0.17–0.41), indicating that they belong to the calc–alkaline series. Additionally, they have relatively low REE contents and strong Sr depletions. LA‐ICP‐MS zircon U–Pb dating of the trachyandesite and rhyolitic lithic‐crystal tuffs indicates that their ages are 167.0 ± 2.0 Ma and 164.8 ± 1.6 Ma, respectively. We conclude that the trachyandesite and the basaltic‐andesitic aplite were derived from the partial melting of lower crustal material assimilated by a depleted lithospheric mantle that was subsequently metasomatized by subducted slab‐derived fluids. The rhyolitic lithic‐crystal tuffs likely originated from the partial melting of accreted lower crust. In summary, because the acidic volcanism was accompanied by increasingly felsic volcanism, bimodal volcanic rocks were produced. Among volcanogenic deposits, bimodal volcanic rocks are the most favourable ore‐hosting rocks, and ore‐forming materials were contributed by the magmatic system. These processes created conditions conducive to the formation of large‐scale Ag, Pb, and Zn mineralization in this area.</description><subject>Aluminum oxide</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Crystals</subject><subject>Depletion</subject><subject>Derbur</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Erguna Massif</subject><subject>Fluids</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Geochronology</subject><subject>Geochronometry</subject><subject>Great Xing'an Range</subject><subject>Isotopes</subject><subject>Jurassic</subject><subject>Lead</subject><subject>Lead isotopes</subject><subject>Lithic</subject><subject>Magma</subject><subject>Massifs</subject><subject>Melting</subject><subject>Mesozoic</subject><subject>Mineralization</subject><subject>Petrogenesis</subject><subject>Radiometric dating</subject><subject>Rare earth elements</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Silica</subject><subject>Silicon dioxide</subject><subject>Sr–Nd–Pb isotopes</subject><subject>Strontium 87</subject><subject>Strontium isotopes</subject><subject>Titanium dioxide</subject><subject>Volcanic activity</subject><subject>Volcanic rocks</subject><subject>Volcanism</subject><subject>Volcanogenic deposits</subject><subject>Zinc</subject><subject>Zircon</subject><subject>zircon U–Pb dating</subject><issn>0072-1050</issn><issn>1099-1034</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10c-O0zAQBnALgURZEK8wEoc90C7-k6QJN1RKAC0LAlbiFk3cceqS2sVOWXVP-whIvB6nfRIcCkdOtuTffJ-sYeyx4GeCc_ms25wplVV32ETwqpoJrrK7bML5XKZ7zu-zBzFuOBeCZ2LCftXkKNoI3oAPdHvzoyUM1nXw3fcandUQvP4awToY1gQvKbT7AD3h6vbm57V1GrbWjR4D4ZgyqmXo9g7hHcZozRSuKA4UHMTe7-ifqZMf4EsaPUUHH9F1NIWLJSzW1uFzqMnrNW1tHMJhCp9CarsYKz-0YKMfUlCcAroVXNugvYPL41s3jgXvfO-7w0N2z2Af6dHf84Rdvlp-Xryenb-v3yxenM9QCVnNMFfYFsoYI0yRraRGUQqlDEojy4q4QF1kqJBUjoUiozOcUzs3WGCZ57lSJ-zJMXcX_Ld9-myz8fvgUmUjlVBlNZeyTOr0qHTwMQYyzS7YLYZDI3gzrq7pNs24uiSfHuWV7enwP9bUb__o38SeoJw</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Xu, Zhi‐Tao</creator><creator>Sun, Jing‐Gui</creator><creator>Liang, Xiao‐Long</creator><creator>Sun, Fan‐Ting</creator><creator>Ming, Zhu</creator><creator>Liu, Chen</creator><creator>He, Yun‐Peng</creator><creator>Lei, Feng‐Zhi</creator><creator>Yang, Q.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9954-087X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Genesis of ore‐bearing volcanic rocks in the Derbur lead–zinc mining area of the Erguna Massif, western slope of the Great Xing'an Range, NE China: Geochemistry, Sr–Nd–Pb isotopes, and zircon U–Pb geochronology</title><author>Xu, Zhi‐Tao ; Sun, Jing‐Gui ; Liang, Xiao‐Long ; Sun, Fan‐Ting ; Ming, Zhu ; Liu, Chen ; He, Yun‐Peng ; Lei, Feng‐Zhi ; Yang, Q.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3129-a53ab63fff1f64d2ca18133fa2f289e01ac64a3ae35a63efc4a7eb7fa6a855533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aluminum oxide</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Crystals</topic><topic>Depletion</topic><topic>Derbur</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Erguna Massif</topic><topic>Fluids</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Geochronology</topic><topic>Geochronometry</topic><topic>Great Xing'an Range</topic><topic>Isotopes</topic><topic>Jurassic</topic><topic>Lead</topic><topic>Lead isotopes</topic><topic>Lithic</topic><topic>Magma</topic><topic>Massifs</topic><topic>Melting</topic><topic>Mesozoic</topic><topic>Mineralization</topic><topic>Petrogenesis</topic><topic>Radiometric dating</topic><topic>Rare earth elements</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Silica</topic><topic>Silicon dioxide</topic><topic>Sr–Nd–Pb isotopes</topic><topic>Strontium 87</topic><topic>Strontium isotopes</topic><topic>Titanium dioxide</topic><topic>Volcanic activity</topic><topic>Volcanic rocks</topic><topic>Volcanism</topic><topic>Volcanogenic deposits</topic><topic>Zinc</topic><topic>Zircon</topic><topic>zircon U–Pb dating</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xu, Zhi‐Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Jing‐Gui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Xiao‐Long</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Fan‐Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ming, Zhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Yun‐Peng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Feng‐Zhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Q.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Geological journal (Chichester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xu, Zhi‐Tao</au><au>Sun, Jing‐Gui</au><au>Liang, Xiao‐Long</au><au>Sun, Fan‐Ting</au><au>Ming, Zhu</au><au>Liu, Chen</au><au>He, Yun‐Peng</au><au>Lei, Feng‐Zhi</au><au>Yang, Q.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genesis of ore‐bearing volcanic rocks in the Derbur lead–zinc mining area of the Erguna Massif, western slope of the Great Xing'an Range, NE China: Geochemistry, Sr–Nd–Pb isotopes, and zircon U–Pb geochronology</atitle><jtitle>Geological journal (Chichester, England)</jtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>3891</spage><epage>3908</epage><pages>3891-3908</pages><issn>0072-1050</issn><eissn>1099-1034</eissn><abstract>The Derbur lead–zinc deposit is located in the Derbugan metallogenic belt in the north‐western portion of the Mesozoic Hailaer‐Genhe volcanic basin in the northern Great Xing'an Range. This deposit occurs in the Middle Jurassic intermediate–mafic volcanic rocks of the Tamulangou Formation and is spatially and temporally associated with acidic pyroclastic rocks. The host rocks are bedded trachyandesite and rhyolitic lithic‐crystal tuffs, and basaltic‐andesitic aplite veins are associated with the ore body. Because the deposit is a hypabyssal low‐temperature hydrothermal Pb–Zn deposit associated with volcanism, to determine the precise petrogenesis of the volcanic rocks, this study analysed the zircon U–Pb ages of the trachyandesite and rhyolitic lithic‐crystal tuffs, the Sr–Nd–Pb isotopic geochemistry of the trachyandesite and basaltic‐andesitic aplite, and the whole‐rock geochemistry of all three rock types. The results showed that the trachyandesite and basaltic‐andesitic aplite belong to the shoshonitic series and have similar whole‐rock and isotopic geochemical characteristics, including enrichments in large‐ion lithophile elements and light rare earth elements and depletions in high‐field‐strength elements. They also have low initial 87Sr/86Sr values of 0.705007–0.705240 and εNd(t) values of +0.6 to +1.7, with model ages (TDM) of 699–883 Ma. The ratios of 206Pb/204Pb, 207Pb/204Pb, and 208Pb/204Pb vary from 18.438 to 18.476, 15.570 to 15.577, and 38.254 to 38.320, respectively, with μ values of 9.40–9.41. In contrast, the rhyolitic lithic‐crystal tuffs are characterized by high SiO2 contents (73.44–79.48 wt.%); low Al2O3 (11.36–12.53 wt.%), TiO2 (0.14–0.18 wt.%), and K2O + Na2O (3.48–3.89 wt.%, Na2O ≤ K2O) contents; and low Mg# values (0.17–0.41), indicating that they belong to the calc–alkaline series. Additionally, they have relatively low REE contents and strong Sr depletions. LA‐ICP‐MS zircon U–Pb dating of the trachyandesite and rhyolitic lithic‐crystal tuffs indicates that their ages are 167.0 ± 2.0 Ma and 164.8 ± 1.6 Ma, respectively. We conclude that the trachyandesite and the basaltic‐andesitic aplite were derived from the partial melting of lower crustal material assimilated by a depleted lithospheric mantle that was subsequently metasomatized by subducted slab‐derived fluids. The rhyolitic lithic‐crystal tuffs likely originated from the partial melting of accreted lower crust. In summary, because the acidic volcanism was accompanied by increasingly felsic volcanism, bimodal volcanic rocks were produced. Among volcanogenic deposits, bimodal volcanic rocks are the most favourable ore‐hosting rocks, and ore‐forming materials were contributed by the magmatic system. These processes created conditions conducive to the formation of large‐scale Ag, Pb, and Zn mineralization in this area.</abstract><cop>Liverpool</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/gj.3349</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9954-087X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0072-1050
ispartof Geological journal (Chichester, England), 2019-11, Vol.54 (6), p.3891-3908
issn 0072-1050
1099-1034
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2313897228
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aluminum oxide
Computational fluid dynamics
Crystals
Depletion
Derbur
Earth
Erguna Massif
Fluids
Geochemistry
Geochronology
Geochronometry
Great Xing'an Range
Isotopes
Jurassic
Lead
Lead isotopes
Lithic
Magma
Massifs
Melting
Mesozoic
Mineralization
Petrogenesis
Radiometric dating
Rare earth elements
Ratios
Rocks
Silica
Silicon dioxide
Sr–Nd–Pb isotopes
Strontium 87
Strontium isotopes
Titanium dioxide
Volcanic activity
Volcanic rocks
Volcanism
Volcanogenic deposits
Zinc
Zircon
zircon U–Pb dating
title Genesis of ore‐bearing volcanic rocks in the Derbur lead–zinc mining area of the Erguna Massif, western slope of the Great Xing'an Range, NE China: Geochemistry, Sr–Nd–Pb isotopes, and zircon U–Pb geochronology
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T08%3A33%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genesis%20of%20ore%E2%80%90bearing%20volcanic%20rocks%20in%20the%20Derbur%20lead%E2%80%93zinc%20mining%20area%20of%20the%20Erguna%20Massif,%20western%20slope%20of%20the%20Great%20Xing'an%20Range,%20NE%20China:%20Geochemistry,%20Sr%E2%80%93Nd%E2%80%93Pb%20isotopes,%20and%20zircon%20U%E2%80%93Pb%20geochronology&rft.jtitle=Geological%20journal%20(Chichester,%20England)&rft.au=Xu,%20Zhi%E2%80%90Tao&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=3891&rft.epage=3908&rft.pages=3891-3908&rft.issn=0072-1050&rft.eissn=1099-1034&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/gj.3349&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2313897228%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2313897228&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true