National development through global production networks? The case of Dongguan, China

The wide-ranging implications of globalised production networks (GPNs) for national varieties of capitalism are only now beginning to be broached by political economists and human geographers. As production processes increasingly striate national political territories, an area in need of further res...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Political geography 2019-08, Vol.73, p.48-59
1. Verfasser: Rolf, Steven
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 59
container_issue
container_start_page 48
container_title Political geography
container_volume 73
creator Rolf, Steven
description The wide-ranging implications of globalised production networks (GPNs) for national varieties of capitalism are only now beginning to be broached by political economists and human geographers. As production processes increasingly striate national political territories, an area in need of further research is the impact of GPNs on developing economies’ state architectures — which have historically utilised state-owned or state-directed industries in pursuit of national development projects. The advent of GPNs radically altered the possibilities for such strategies by apparently undermining the ability of developing states to develop national champions — large, vertically integrated firms either nationally owned if not subject to great levels of state control. Does the preponderance of transnational production networks, SMEs, foreign direct investment, and export processing zones entail an end to the significance of national states and politics for development trajectories? Experience suggests otherwise, and a literature is beginning to theorise various forms by which statehood, sovereignty and politics continue to shape GPN-organised manufacturing. The reciprocal interactivity of networks and institutions remains in need of further research, however. This article probes these questions with reference to a detailed case study of the developmental experience of Dongguan city in China between 1978 and 2008. In this period, Dongguan (a major export manufacturing hub on the southern coast) came to the forefront of China's national strategy of export-led industrialisation — but simultaneously crystallised the rise of fragmented production. The city's industrialisation was governed by this contradictory dynamic – on the one hand, GPN-integration transformed its social and political order, while subsequent interventions by the provincial and national states aimed to envelop the city in the institutional framework of China's political economy.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.05.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2312229242</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0962629818300489</els_id><sourcerecordid>2312229242</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-b6bb7ecc3b316272eb5d8ef04d0b44903dba4d5f5be194c65cf1eff0df1290773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwDzhY4krC2nk1FxAqT6mCSzlbsb1OE9K42EkR_x5X4cxl97Azo52PkEsGMQOW37TxznY12pgDK2PIYoD8iMzYokiiDMr8mMzC5FHOy8UpOfO-BYASCpiR9Vs1NLavOqpxj53dbbEf6LBxdqw3tO6sDKeds3pUBx3tcfi27tPf0fUGqao8Umvog-3reqz6a7rcNH11Tk5M1Xm8-Ntz8vH0uF6-RKv359fl_SpSSZIOkcylLFCpRCYs5wVHmekFGkg1yDQtIdGySnVmMomsTFWeKcPQGNCG8fB9kczJ1ZQbHvwa0Q-itaMLZbzgCeOclzzlQZVOKuWs9w6N2LlmW7kfwUAc-IlWTPzEgZ-ATAR-wXY72TA02DfohFcN9gp141ANQtvm_4BfNU58Ew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2312229242</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>National development through global production networks? The case of Dongguan, China</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Rolf, Steven</creator><creatorcontrib>Rolf, Steven</creatorcontrib><description>The wide-ranging implications of globalised production networks (GPNs) for national varieties of capitalism are only now beginning to be broached by political economists and human geographers. As production processes increasingly striate national political territories, an area in need of further research is the impact of GPNs on developing economies’ state architectures — which have historically utilised state-owned or state-directed industries in pursuit of national development projects. The advent of GPNs radically altered the possibilities for such strategies by apparently undermining the ability of developing states to develop national champions — large, vertically integrated firms either nationally owned if not subject to great levels of state control. Does the preponderance of transnational production networks, SMEs, foreign direct investment, and export processing zones entail an end to the significance of national states and politics for development trajectories? Experience suggests otherwise, and a literature is beginning to theorise various forms by which statehood, sovereignty and politics continue to shape GPN-organised manufacturing. The reciprocal interactivity of networks and institutions remains in need of further research, however. This article probes these questions with reference to a detailed case study of the developmental experience of Dongguan city in China between 1978 and 2008. In this period, Dongguan (a major export manufacturing hub on the southern coast) came to the forefront of China's national strategy of export-led industrialisation — but simultaneously crystallised the rise of fragmented production. The city's industrialisation was governed by this contradictory dynamic – on the one hand, GPN-integration transformed its social and political order, while subsequent interventions by the provincial and national states aimed to envelop the city in the institutional framework of China's political economy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-6298</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5096</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.05.006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Capitalism ; Case studies ; Cities ; Developing countries ; Development programs ; Economic development ; Economists ; Export processing zones ; Foreign investment ; Geographers ; Industrialization ; LDCs ; Manufacturing ; Multinational corporations ; National development ; Networks ; Political economists ; Political economy ; Politics ; Production ; Radicalism ; Sovereignty ; Statehood ; Transnationalism</subject><ispartof>Political geography, 2019-08, Vol.73, p.48-59</ispartof><rights>2019</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Aug 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-b6bb7ecc3b316272eb5d8ef04d0b44903dba4d5f5be194c65cf1eff0df1290773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-b6bb7ecc3b316272eb5d8ef04d0b44903dba4d5f5be194c65cf1eff0df1290773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629818300489$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27843,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rolf, Steven</creatorcontrib><title>National development through global production networks? The case of Dongguan, China</title><title>Political geography</title><description>The wide-ranging implications of globalised production networks (GPNs) for national varieties of capitalism are only now beginning to be broached by political economists and human geographers. As production processes increasingly striate national political territories, an area in need of further research is the impact of GPNs on developing economies’ state architectures — which have historically utilised state-owned or state-directed industries in pursuit of national development projects. The advent of GPNs radically altered the possibilities for such strategies by apparently undermining the ability of developing states to develop national champions — large, vertically integrated firms either nationally owned if not subject to great levels of state control. Does the preponderance of transnational production networks, SMEs, foreign direct investment, and export processing zones entail an end to the significance of national states and politics for development trajectories? Experience suggests otherwise, and a literature is beginning to theorise various forms by which statehood, sovereignty and politics continue to shape GPN-organised manufacturing. The reciprocal interactivity of networks and institutions remains in need of further research, however. This article probes these questions with reference to a detailed case study of the developmental experience of Dongguan city in China between 1978 and 2008. In this period, Dongguan (a major export manufacturing hub on the southern coast) came to the forefront of China's national strategy of export-led industrialisation — but simultaneously crystallised the rise of fragmented production. The city's industrialisation was governed by this contradictory dynamic – on the one hand, GPN-integration transformed its social and political order, while subsequent interventions by the provincial and national states aimed to envelop the city in the institutional framework of China's political economy.</description><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Development programs</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economists</subject><subject>Export processing zones</subject><subject>Foreign investment</subject><subject>Geographers</subject><subject>Industrialization</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Multinational corporations</subject><subject>National development</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Political economists</subject><subject>Political economy</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Production</subject><subject>Radicalism</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><subject>Statehood</subject><subject>Transnationalism</subject><issn>0962-6298</issn><issn>1873-5096</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwDzhY4krC2nk1FxAqT6mCSzlbsb1OE9K42EkR_x5X4cxl97Azo52PkEsGMQOW37TxznY12pgDK2PIYoD8iMzYokiiDMr8mMzC5FHOy8UpOfO-BYASCpiR9Vs1NLavOqpxj53dbbEf6LBxdqw3tO6sDKeds3pUBx3tcfi27tPf0fUGqao8Umvog-3reqz6a7rcNH11Tk5M1Xm8-Ntz8vH0uF6-RKv359fl_SpSSZIOkcylLFCpRCYs5wVHmekFGkg1yDQtIdGySnVmMomsTFWeKcPQGNCG8fB9kczJ1ZQbHvwa0Q-itaMLZbzgCeOclzzlQZVOKuWs9w6N2LlmW7kfwUAc-IlWTPzEgZ-ATAR-wXY72TA02DfohFcN9gp141ANQtvm_4BfNU58Ew</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Rolf, Steven</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>National development through global production networks? The case of Dongguan, China</title><author>Rolf, Steven</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-b6bb7ecc3b316272eb5d8ef04d0b44903dba4d5f5be194c65cf1eff0df1290773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Development programs</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economists</topic><topic>Export processing zones</topic><topic>Foreign investment</topic><topic>Geographers</topic><topic>Industrialization</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Multinational corporations</topic><topic>National development</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Political economists</topic><topic>Political economy</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Production</topic><topic>Radicalism</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><topic>Statehood</topic><topic>Transnationalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rolf, Steven</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Political geography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rolf, Steven</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>National development through global production networks? The case of Dongguan, China</atitle><jtitle>Political geography</jtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>73</volume><spage>48</spage><epage>59</epage><pages>48-59</pages><issn>0962-6298</issn><eissn>1873-5096</eissn><abstract>The wide-ranging implications of globalised production networks (GPNs) for national varieties of capitalism are only now beginning to be broached by political economists and human geographers. As production processes increasingly striate national political territories, an area in need of further research is the impact of GPNs on developing economies’ state architectures — which have historically utilised state-owned or state-directed industries in pursuit of national development projects. The advent of GPNs radically altered the possibilities for such strategies by apparently undermining the ability of developing states to develop national champions — large, vertically integrated firms either nationally owned if not subject to great levels of state control. Does the preponderance of transnational production networks, SMEs, foreign direct investment, and export processing zones entail an end to the significance of national states and politics for development trajectories? Experience suggests otherwise, and a literature is beginning to theorise various forms by which statehood, sovereignty and politics continue to shape GPN-organised manufacturing. The reciprocal interactivity of networks and institutions remains in need of further research, however. This article probes these questions with reference to a detailed case study of the developmental experience of Dongguan city in China between 1978 and 2008. In this period, Dongguan (a major export manufacturing hub on the southern coast) came to the forefront of China's national strategy of export-led industrialisation — but simultaneously crystallised the rise of fragmented production. The city's industrialisation was governed by this contradictory dynamic – on the one hand, GPN-integration transformed its social and political order, while subsequent interventions by the provincial and national states aimed to envelop the city in the institutional framework of China's political economy.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.05.006</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-6298
ispartof Political geography, 2019-08, Vol.73, p.48-59
issn 0962-6298
1873-5096
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2312229242
source PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Capitalism
Case studies
Cities
Developing countries
Development programs
Economic development
Economists
Export processing zones
Foreign investment
Geographers
Industrialization
LDCs
Manufacturing
Multinational corporations
National development
Networks
Political economists
Political economy
Politics
Production
Radicalism
Sovereignty
Statehood
Transnationalism
title National development through global production networks? The case of Dongguan, China
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T00%3A09%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=National%20development%20through%20global%20production%20networks?%20The%20case%20of%20Dongguan,%20China&rft.jtitle=Political%20geography&rft.au=Rolf,%20Steven&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=73&rft.spage=48&rft.epage=59&rft.pages=48-59&rft.issn=0962-6298&rft.eissn=1873-5096&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.05.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2312229242%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2312229242&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0962629818300489&rfr_iscdi=true