The Law and Social Norms of Pay Secrecy

According to conventional wisdom, we live in a confessional age where one's sexual practices and mental health history are common water-cooler and dinner conversation subjects. Yet conventional wisdom also tells us that people do not want to discuss their finances. "Money talk" is the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Berkeley journal of employment and labor law 2005-01, Vol.26 (1), p.41-63
1. Verfasser: Edwards, Matthew A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 63
container_issue 1
container_start_page 41
container_title Berkeley journal of employment and labor law
container_volume 26
creator Edwards, Matthew A.
description According to conventional wisdom, we live in a confessional age where one's sexual practices and mental health history are common water-cooler and dinner conversation subjects. Yet conventional wisdom also tells us that people do not want to discuss their finances. "Money talk" is the last conversational taboo. The American workplace is one arena in which the money-talk taboo has important implications, and in a recent article, Professors Leonard Bierman and Rafael Gely (2004) explore this realm by applying social norms theory to the issue of workplace pay secrecy. This reply essay expands on Bierman's and Gely's themes and explains why further investigation into the relationship between law, social norms, and pay secrecy is required. In particular, the paper argues that discussions of the law and norms of pay secrecy would be enriched by the development of a normative theory of pay secrecy - a theory that specifically identifies the contexts in which pay secrecy is socially beneficial, and sets forth the metric by which social welfare is being measured in evaluating pay secrecy regimes.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_231209929</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24052186</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24052186</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j499-55fadba01de0af3b8d782d4ed058998806dbc883cc4663ad044a7c2d1350385b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjc1KAzEYRYMoOLY-ghDcuBrIf74spfgHgxY6--GbJIMd2qYmLTJv70A9m7s53HNFKiEt1BxAXJOKM2Nra4y5JXeljGwGwFXkqf2OtMFfiodAN8lvcUc_U94Xmga6xoluos_RT0tyM-CuxPv_XZD29aVdvdfN19vH6rmpR-VcrfWAoUfGQ2Q4yB6CBRFUDEyDcwDMhN4DSO-VMRIDUwqtF4FLzSToXi7I4-X2mNPPOZZTN6ZzPszFTkgumHPCzdLDRRrLKeXumLd7zFMnFNOCg5F_Cx9Evg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>231209929</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Law and Social Norms of Pay Secrecy</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Edwards, Matthew A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Matthew A.</creatorcontrib><description>According to conventional wisdom, we live in a confessional age where one's sexual practices and mental health history are common water-cooler and dinner conversation subjects. Yet conventional wisdom also tells us that people do not want to discuss their finances. "Money talk" is the last conversational taboo. The American workplace is one arena in which the money-talk taboo has important implications, and in a recent article, Professors Leonard Bierman and Rafael Gely (2004) explore this realm by applying social norms theory to the issue of workplace pay secrecy. This reply essay expands on Bierman's and Gely's themes and explains why further investigation into the relationship between law, social norms, and pay secrecy is required. In particular, the paper argues that discussions of the law and norms of pay secrecy would be enriched by the development of a normative theory of pay secrecy - a theory that specifically identifies the contexts in which pay secrecy is socially beneficial, and sets forth the metric by which social welfare is being measured in evaluating pay secrecy regimes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1067-7666</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2378-1882</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berkeley: BOALT HALL SCHOOL OF LAW UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA</publisher><subject>Employee compensation ; Employment ; Interpersonal communication ; Labor ; Normativity ; Right of privacy ; Rule of law ; Salary ; Social interaction ; Social law ; Social norms ; Theory ; Wages ; Wages &amp; salaries ; Work environment ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>Berkeley journal of employment and labor law, 2005-01, Vol.26 (1), p.41-63</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 The Regents of the University of California</rights><rights>Copyright University of California Press 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24052186$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24052186$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Matthew A.</creatorcontrib><title>The Law and Social Norms of Pay Secrecy</title><title>Berkeley journal of employment and labor law</title><description>According to conventional wisdom, we live in a confessional age where one's sexual practices and mental health history are common water-cooler and dinner conversation subjects. Yet conventional wisdom also tells us that people do not want to discuss their finances. "Money talk" is the last conversational taboo. The American workplace is one arena in which the money-talk taboo has important implications, and in a recent article, Professors Leonard Bierman and Rafael Gely (2004) explore this realm by applying social norms theory to the issue of workplace pay secrecy. This reply essay expands on Bierman's and Gely's themes and explains why further investigation into the relationship between law, social norms, and pay secrecy is required. In particular, the paper argues that discussions of the law and norms of pay secrecy would be enriched by the development of a normative theory of pay secrecy - a theory that specifically identifies the contexts in which pay secrecy is socially beneficial, and sets forth the metric by which social welfare is being measured in evaluating pay secrecy regimes.</description><subject>Employee compensation</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Interpersonal communication</subject><subject>Labor</subject><subject>Normativity</subject><subject>Right of privacy</subject><subject>Rule of law</subject><subject>Salary</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social law</subject><subject>Social norms</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Wages</subject><subject>Wages &amp; salaries</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>1067-7666</issn><issn>2378-1882</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNotjc1KAzEYRYMoOLY-ghDcuBrIf74spfgHgxY6--GbJIMd2qYmLTJv70A9m7s53HNFKiEt1BxAXJOKM2Nra4y5JXeljGwGwFXkqf2OtMFfiodAN8lvcUc_U94Xmga6xoluos_RT0tyM-CuxPv_XZD29aVdvdfN19vH6rmpR-VcrfWAoUfGQ2Q4yB6CBRFUDEyDcwDMhN4DSO-VMRIDUwqtF4FLzSToXi7I4-X2mNPPOZZTN6ZzPszFTkgumHPCzdLDRRrLKeXumLd7zFMnFNOCg5F_Cx9Evg</recordid><startdate>20050101</startdate><enddate>20050101</enddate><creator>Edwards, Matthew A.</creator><general>BOALT HALL SCHOOL OF LAW UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA</general><general>University of California - Berkeley, School of Law</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20050101</creationdate><title>The Law and Social Norms of Pay Secrecy</title><author>Edwards, Matthew A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j499-55fadba01de0af3b8d782d4ed058998806dbc883cc4663ad044a7c2d1350385b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Employee compensation</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Interpersonal communication</topic><topic>Labor</topic><topic>Normativity</topic><topic>Right of privacy</topic><topic>Rule of law</topic><topic>Salary</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social law</topic><topic>Social norms</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Wages</topic><topic>Wages &amp; salaries</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Matthew A.</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Berkeley journal of employment and labor law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Edwards, Matthew A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Law and Social Norms of Pay Secrecy</atitle><jtitle>Berkeley journal of employment and labor law</jtitle><date>2005-01-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>41</spage><epage>63</epage><pages>41-63</pages><issn>1067-7666</issn><eissn>2378-1882</eissn><abstract>According to conventional wisdom, we live in a confessional age where one's sexual practices and mental health history are common water-cooler and dinner conversation subjects. Yet conventional wisdom also tells us that people do not want to discuss their finances. "Money talk" is the last conversational taboo. The American workplace is one arena in which the money-talk taboo has important implications, and in a recent article, Professors Leonard Bierman and Rafael Gely (2004) explore this realm by applying social norms theory to the issue of workplace pay secrecy. This reply essay expands on Bierman's and Gely's themes and explains why further investigation into the relationship between law, social norms, and pay secrecy is required. In particular, the paper argues that discussions of the law and norms of pay secrecy would be enriched by the development of a normative theory of pay secrecy - a theory that specifically identifies the contexts in which pay secrecy is socially beneficial, and sets forth the metric by which social welfare is being measured in evaluating pay secrecy regimes.</abstract><cop>Berkeley</cop><pub>BOALT HALL SCHOOL OF LAW UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA</pub><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1067-7666
ispartof Berkeley journal of employment and labor law, 2005-01, Vol.26 (1), p.41-63
issn 1067-7666
2378-1882
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_231209929
source Jstor Complete Legacy; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Business Source Complete
subjects Employee compensation
Employment
Interpersonal communication
Labor
Normativity
Right of privacy
Rule of law
Salary
Social interaction
Social law
Social norms
Theory
Wages
Wages & salaries
Work environment
Workplaces
title The Law and Social Norms of Pay Secrecy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T19%3A37%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Law%20and%20Social%20Norms%20of%20Pay%20Secrecy&rft.jtitle=Berkeley%20journal%20of%20employment%20and%20labor%20law&rft.au=Edwards,%20Matthew%20A.&rft.date=2005-01-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=41&rft.epage=63&rft.pages=41-63&rft.issn=1067-7666&rft.eissn=2378-1882&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24052186%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=231209929&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24052186&rfr_iscdi=true