Disloyalty! Does Jefferson Standard Stalk Still?

In Endicott Interconnect Technologies, Inc. v. NLRB, 453 F.3d 532 (D.C. Cir. 2006), the District of Columbia Circuit breathed fresh life into the Supreme Court's 1953 decision in Jefferson Standard Broadcasting. The Court rejected the decision of the National Labor Relations Board to hold that...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Berkeley journal of employment and labor law 2007-07, Vol.28 (2), p.541-568
1. Verfasser: Finkin, Matthew W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In Endicott Interconnect Technologies, Inc. v. NLRB, 453 F.3d 532 (D.C. Cir. 2006), the District of Columbia Circuit breathed fresh life into the Supreme Court's 1953 decision in Jefferson Standard Broadcasting. The Court rejected the decision of the National Labor Relations Board to hold that public criticism of an employer's product or the quality of its management is so disloyal as to be cause to dismiss the employee irrespective of the context of the utterance. The Labor Board extended this in Five Star Transportation, Inc., 349 NLRB No. 8 (2007). This Article argues that the legal and ideological underpinnings of Jefferson Standard have become thoroughly eroded over the ensuing half century; that, at best, disloyalty is worthless as a guide to decision; at worst, it chills speech of social value, and ought to be abandoned.
ISSN:1067-7666
2378-1882