Experimental and numerical investigation of performance of an ethanol-gasoline dual-injection engine

Experiments and simulations were performed to investigate the effect of ethanol direct injection plus gasoline port injection (EDI + GPI) on engine performance. Gasoline direct injection plus GPI (GDI + GPI) was also tested as a reference to EDI + GPI. The experimental results showed that volumetric...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy (Oxford) 2019-11, Vol.186, p.115835, Article 115835
Hauptverfasser: Zhuang, Yuan, Zhu, Guodong, Gong, Zhen, Wang, Chenfang, Huang, Yuhan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 115835
container_title Energy (Oxford)
container_volume 186
creator Zhuang, Yuan
Zhu, Guodong
Gong, Zhen
Wang, Chenfang
Huang, Yuhan
description Experiments and simulations were performed to investigate the effect of ethanol direct injection plus gasoline port injection (EDI + GPI) on engine performance. Gasoline direct injection plus GPI (GDI + GPI) was also tested as a reference to EDI + GPI. The experimental results showed that volumetric efficiency increased with the raise of direct injection ratio in both EDI + GPI and GDI + GPI conditions. The volumetric efficiency and IMEP of EDI + GPI were greater than that of GDI + GPI, due to the stronger charge cooling effect of EDI. Combustion process was improved by EDI when ethanol energy ratio (EER) was less than 42%, however further increase of EER led to the deterioration of combustion process. Simulation results showed that ethanol's high laminar flame speed played a dominate role to the improvement of combustion process. Although EDI negatively affected the equivalence ratio around spark plug, this disadvantage was offset by the high laminar flame speed of ethanol, resulting in shorter initial and major combustion durations. Simulation results also found that combustion process was deteriorated when EER was greater than 42%, which was mainly due to over-cooling and poor mixing of EDI. Regarding emissions, NO decreased while CO and HC increased with the raise of both EDI and GDI ratios. •EDI + GPI showed higher volumetric efficiency and IMEP than GDI + GPI did.•EDI + GPI led to lower in-cylinder temperature and shorter combustion duration.•Ethanol's high laminar flame speed was the main contributor to short combustion duration.•HC and CO of EDI + GPI first decreased and then increased with the raise of ethanol ratio.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.165
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2310648106</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360544219315075</els_id><sourcerecordid>2310648106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-e5371ea223f9fd2556f0aa5b961acb90dbe501421dc86ccd0938a7773c9608973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwBywisU4YJ7Edb5BQVR5SJTawtlx7UhyldnGSiv49LmXNZkYzunceh5BbCgUFyu-7Aj3GzaEogcoCREE5OyMz2ogq56Jh52QGFYec1XV5Sa6GoQMA1kg5I3b5vcPotuhH3Wfa28xP29QwqXJ-j8PoNnp0wWehzZKyDXGrvcFjqX2G46f2oc83egi985jZSfe58x2aXxP6Tepek4tW9wPe_OU5-Xhavi9e8tXb8-vicZWbmsoxR1YJirosq1a2tmSMt6A1W0tOtVlLsGtkQOuSWtNwYyzIqtFCiMpIDo0U1ZzcnebuYvia0u2qC1P0aaUqKwq8blJIqvqkMjEMQ8RW7RIAHQ-KgjryVJ068VRHngqESjyT7eFkw_TB3mFUg3GYUFgX07fKBvf_gB-kQYID</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2310648106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experimental and numerical investigation of performance of an ethanol-gasoline dual-injection engine</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zhuang, Yuan ; Zhu, Guodong ; Gong, Zhen ; Wang, Chenfang ; Huang, Yuhan</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhuang, Yuan ; Zhu, Guodong ; Gong, Zhen ; Wang, Chenfang ; Huang, Yuhan</creatorcontrib><description>Experiments and simulations were performed to investigate the effect of ethanol direct injection plus gasoline port injection (EDI + GPI) on engine performance. Gasoline direct injection plus GPI (GDI + GPI) was also tested as a reference to EDI + GPI. The experimental results showed that volumetric efficiency increased with the raise of direct injection ratio in both EDI + GPI and GDI + GPI conditions. The volumetric efficiency and IMEP of EDI + GPI were greater than that of GDI + GPI, due to the stronger charge cooling effect of EDI. Combustion process was improved by EDI when ethanol energy ratio (EER) was less than 42%, however further increase of EER led to the deterioration of combustion process. Simulation results showed that ethanol's high laminar flame speed played a dominate role to the improvement of combustion process. Although EDI negatively affected the equivalence ratio around spark plug, this disadvantage was offset by the high laminar flame speed of ethanol, resulting in shorter initial and major combustion durations. Simulation results also found that combustion process was deteriorated when EER was greater than 42%, which was mainly due to over-cooling and poor mixing of EDI. Regarding emissions, NO decreased while CO and HC increased with the raise of both EDI and GDI ratios. •EDI + GPI showed higher volumetric efficiency and IMEP than GDI + GPI did.•EDI + GPI led to lower in-cylinder temperature and shorter combustion duration.•Ethanol's high laminar flame speed was the main contributor to short combustion duration.•HC and CO of EDI + GPI first decreased and then increased with the raise of ethanol ratio.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-5442</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6785</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.165</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Combustion ; Computer simulation ; Cooling ; Cooling effects ; Direct injection ; Dual injection ; Equivalence ratio ; Ethanol ; Flame speed ; Flames ; Gasoline ; Injection ; Port fuel injection ; Spark plugs ; Volumetric efficiency</subject><ispartof>Energy (Oxford), 2019-11, Vol.186, p.115835, Article 115835</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Nov 1, 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-e5371ea223f9fd2556f0aa5b961acb90dbe501421dc86ccd0938a7773c9608973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-e5371ea223f9fd2556f0aa5b961acb90dbe501421dc86ccd0938a7773c9608973</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9800-8788 ; 0000-0003-0202-4498</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219315075$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhuang, Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Guodong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Zhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chenfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yuhan</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental and numerical investigation of performance of an ethanol-gasoline dual-injection engine</title><title>Energy (Oxford)</title><description>Experiments and simulations were performed to investigate the effect of ethanol direct injection plus gasoline port injection (EDI + GPI) on engine performance. Gasoline direct injection plus GPI (GDI + GPI) was also tested as a reference to EDI + GPI. The experimental results showed that volumetric efficiency increased with the raise of direct injection ratio in both EDI + GPI and GDI + GPI conditions. The volumetric efficiency and IMEP of EDI + GPI were greater than that of GDI + GPI, due to the stronger charge cooling effect of EDI. Combustion process was improved by EDI when ethanol energy ratio (EER) was less than 42%, however further increase of EER led to the deterioration of combustion process. Simulation results showed that ethanol's high laminar flame speed played a dominate role to the improvement of combustion process. Although EDI negatively affected the equivalence ratio around spark plug, this disadvantage was offset by the high laminar flame speed of ethanol, resulting in shorter initial and major combustion durations. Simulation results also found that combustion process was deteriorated when EER was greater than 42%, which was mainly due to over-cooling and poor mixing of EDI. Regarding emissions, NO decreased while CO and HC increased with the raise of both EDI and GDI ratios. •EDI + GPI showed higher volumetric efficiency and IMEP than GDI + GPI did.•EDI + GPI led to lower in-cylinder temperature and shorter combustion duration.•Ethanol's high laminar flame speed was the main contributor to short combustion duration.•HC and CO of EDI + GPI first decreased and then increased with the raise of ethanol ratio.</description><subject>Combustion</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Cooling</subject><subject>Cooling effects</subject><subject>Direct injection</subject><subject>Dual injection</subject><subject>Equivalence ratio</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Flame speed</subject><subject>Flames</subject><subject>Gasoline</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>Port fuel injection</subject><subject>Spark plugs</subject><subject>Volumetric efficiency</subject><issn>0360-5442</issn><issn>1873-6785</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwBywisU4YJ7Edb5BQVR5SJTawtlx7UhyldnGSiv49LmXNZkYzunceh5BbCgUFyu-7Aj3GzaEogcoCREE5OyMz2ogq56Jh52QGFYec1XV5Sa6GoQMA1kg5I3b5vcPotuhH3Wfa28xP29QwqXJ-j8PoNnp0wWehzZKyDXGrvcFjqX2G46f2oc83egi985jZSfe58x2aXxP6Tepek4tW9wPe_OU5-Xhavi9e8tXb8-vicZWbmsoxR1YJirosq1a2tmSMt6A1W0tOtVlLsGtkQOuSWtNwYyzIqtFCiMpIDo0U1ZzcnebuYvia0u2qC1P0aaUqKwq8blJIqvqkMjEMQ8RW7RIAHQ-KgjryVJ068VRHngqESjyT7eFkw_TB3mFUg3GYUFgX07fKBvf_gB-kQYID</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Zhuang, Yuan</creator><creator>Zhu, Guodong</creator><creator>Gong, Zhen</creator><creator>Wang, Chenfang</creator><creator>Huang, Yuhan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9800-8788</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0202-4498</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Experimental and numerical investigation of performance of an ethanol-gasoline dual-injection engine</title><author>Zhuang, Yuan ; Zhu, Guodong ; Gong, Zhen ; Wang, Chenfang ; Huang, Yuhan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-e5371ea223f9fd2556f0aa5b961acb90dbe501421dc86ccd0938a7773c9608973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Combustion</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Cooling</topic><topic>Cooling effects</topic><topic>Direct injection</topic><topic>Dual injection</topic><topic>Equivalence ratio</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Flame speed</topic><topic>Flames</topic><topic>Gasoline</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>Port fuel injection</topic><topic>Spark plugs</topic><topic>Volumetric efficiency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhuang, Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Guodong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Zhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chenfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yuhan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhuang, Yuan</au><au>Zhu, Guodong</au><au>Gong, Zhen</au><au>Wang, Chenfang</au><au>Huang, Yuhan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experimental and numerical investigation of performance of an ethanol-gasoline dual-injection engine</atitle><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>186</volume><spage>115835</spage><pages>115835-</pages><artnum>115835</artnum><issn>0360-5442</issn><eissn>1873-6785</eissn><abstract>Experiments and simulations were performed to investigate the effect of ethanol direct injection plus gasoline port injection (EDI + GPI) on engine performance. Gasoline direct injection plus GPI (GDI + GPI) was also tested as a reference to EDI + GPI. The experimental results showed that volumetric efficiency increased with the raise of direct injection ratio in both EDI + GPI and GDI + GPI conditions. The volumetric efficiency and IMEP of EDI + GPI were greater than that of GDI + GPI, due to the stronger charge cooling effect of EDI. Combustion process was improved by EDI when ethanol energy ratio (EER) was less than 42%, however further increase of EER led to the deterioration of combustion process. Simulation results showed that ethanol's high laminar flame speed played a dominate role to the improvement of combustion process. Although EDI negatively affected the equivalence ratio around spark plug, this disadvantage was offset by the high laminar flame speed of ethanol, resulting in shorter initial and major combustion durations. Simulation results also found that combustion process was deteriorated when EER was greater than 42%, which was mainly due to over-cooling and poor mixing of EDI. Regarding emissions, NO decreased while CO and HC increased with the raise of both EDI and GDI ratios. •EDI + GPI showed higher volumetric efficiency and IMEP than GDI + GPI did.•EDI + GPI led to lower in-cylinder temperature and shorter combustion duration.•Ethanol's high laminar flame speed was the main contributor to short combustion duration.•HC and CO of EDI + GPI first decreased and then increased with the raise of ethanol ratio.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.165</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9800-8788</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0202-4498</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-5442
ispartof Energy (Oxford), 2019-11, Vol.186, p.115835, Article 115835
issn 0360-5442
1873-6785
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2310648106
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Combustion
Computer simulation
Cooling
Cooling effects
Direct injection
Dual injection
Equivalence ratio
Ethanol
Flame speed
Flames
Gasoline
Injection
Port fuel injection
Spark plugs
Volumetric efficiency
title Experimental and numerical investigation of performance of an ethanol-gasoline dual-injection engine
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T07%3A12%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experimental%20and%20numerical%20investigation%20of%20performance%20of%20an%20ethanol-gasoline%20dual-injection%20engine&rft.jtitle=Energy%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Zhuang,%20Yuan&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=186&rft.spage=115835&rft.pages=115835-&rft.artnum=115835&rft.issn=0360-5442&rft.eissn=1873-6785&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.165&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2310648106%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2310648106&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0360544219315075&rfr_iscdi=true