Experimental and numerical investigation of performance of an ethanol-gasoline dual-injection engine
Experiments and simulations were performed to investigate the effect of ethanol direct injection plus gasoline port injection (EDI + GPI) on engine performance. Gasoline direct injection plus GPI (GDI + GPI) was also tested as a reference to EDI + GPI. The experimental results showed that volumetric...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy (Oxford) 2019-11, Vol.186, p.115835, Article 115835 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 115835 |
container_title | Energy (Oxford) |
container_volume | 186 |
creator | Zhuang, Yuan Zhu, Guodong Gong, Zhen Wang, Chenfang Huang, Yuhan |
description | Experiments and simulations were performed to investigate the effect of ethanol direct injection plus gasoline port injection (EDI + GPI) on engine performance. Gasoline direct injection plus GPI (GDI + GPI) was also tested as a reference to EDI + GPI. The experimental results showed that volumetric efficiency increased with the raise of direct injection ratio in both EDI + GPI and GDI + GPI conditions. The volumetric efficiency and IMEP of EDI + GPI were greater than that of GDI + GPI, due to the stronger charge cooling effect of EDI. Combustion process was improved by EDI when ethanol energy ratio (EER) was less than 42%, however further increase of EER led to the deterioration of combustion process. Simulation results showed that ethanol's high laminar flame speed played a dominate role to the improvement of combustion process. Although EDI negatively affected the equivalence ratio around spark plug, this disadvantage was offset by the high laminar flame speed of ethanol, resulting in shorter initial and major combustion durations. Simulation results also found that combustion process was deteriorated when EER was greater than 42%, which was mainly due to over-cooling and poor mixing of EDI. Regarding emissions, NO decreased while CO and HC increased with the raise of both EDI and GDI ratios.
•EDI + GPI showed higher volumetric efficiency and IMEP than GDI + GPI did.•EDI + GPI led to lower in-cylinder temperature and shorter combustion duration.•Ethanol's high laminar flame speed was the main contributor to short combustion duration.•HC and CO of EDI + GPI first decreased and then increased with the raise of ethanol ratio. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.165 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2310648106</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360544219315075</els_id><sourcerecordid>2310648106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-e5371ea223f9fd2556f0aa5b961acb90dbe501421dc86ccd0938a7773c9608973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwBywisU4YJ7Edb5BQVR5SJTawtlx7UhyldnGSiv49LmXNZkYzunceh5BbCgUFyu-7Aj3GzaEogcoCREE5OyMz2ogq56Jh52QGFYec1XV5Sa6GoQMA1kg5I3b5vcPotuhH3Wfa28xP29QwqXJ-j8PoNnp0wWehzZKyDXGrvcFjqX2G46f2oc83egi985jZSfe58x2aXxP6Tepek4tW9wPe_OU5-Xhavi9e8tXb8-vicZWbmsoxR1YJirosq1a2tmSMt6A1W0tOtVlLsGtkQOuSWtNwYyzIqtFCiMpIDo0U1ZzcnebuYvia0u2qC1P0aaUqKwq8blJIqvqkMjEMQ8RW7RIAHQ-KgjryVJ068VRHngqESjyT7eFkw_TB3mFUg3GYUFgX07fKBvf_gB-kQYID</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2310648106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experimental and numerical investigation of performance of an ethanol-gasoline dual-injection engine</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zhuang, Yuan ; Zhu, Guodong ; Gong, Zhen ; Wang, Chenfang ; Huang, Yuhan</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhuang, Yuan ; Zhu, Guodong ; Gong, Zhen ; Wang, Chenfang ; Huang, Yuhan</creatorcontrib><description>Experiments and simulations were performed to investigate the effect of ethanol direct injection plus gasoline port injection (EDI + GPI) on engine performance. Gasoline direct injection plus GPI (GDI + GPI) was also tested as a reference to EDI + GPI. The experimental results showed that volumetric efficiency increased with the raise of direct injection ratio in both EDI + GPI and GDI + GPI conditions. The volumetric efficiency and IMEP of EDI + GPI were greater than that of GDI + GPI, due to the stronger charge cooling effect of EDI. Combustion process was improved by EDI when ethanol energy ratio (EER) was less than 42%, however further increase of EER led to the deterioration of combustion process. Simulation results showed that ethanol's high laminar flame speed played a dominate role to the improvement of combustion process. Although EDI negatively affected the equivalence ratio around spark plug, this disadvantage was offset by the high laminar flame speed of ethanol, resulting in shorter initial and major combustion durations. Simulation results also found that combustion process was deteriorated when EER was greater than 42%, which was mainly due to over-cooling and poor mixing of EDI. Regarding emissions, NO decreased while CO and HC increased with the raise of both EDI and GDI ratios.
•EDI + GPI showed higher volumetric efficiency and IMEP than GDI + GPI did.•EDI + GPI led to lower in-cylinder temperature and shorter combustion duration.•Ethanol's high laminar flame speed was the main contributor to short combustion duration.•HC and CO of EDI + GPI first decreased and then increased with the raise of ethanol ratio.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-5442</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6785</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.165</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Combustion ; Computer simulation ; Cooling ; Cooling effects ; Direct injection ; Dual injection ; Equivalence ratio ; Ethanol ; Flame speed ; Flames ; Gasoline ; Injection ; Port fuel injection ; Spark plugs ; Volumetric efficiency</subject><ispartof>Energy (Oxford), 2019-11, Vol.186, p.115835, Article 115835</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Nov 1, 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-e5371ea223f9fd2556f0aa5b961acb90dbe501421dc86ccd0938a7773c9608973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-e5371ea223f9fd2556f0aa5b961acb90dbe501421dc86ccd0938a7773c9608973</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9800-8788 ; 0000-0003-0202-4498</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219315075$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhuang, Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Guodong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Zhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chenfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yuhan</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental and numerical investigation of performance of an ethanol-gasoline dual-injection engine</title><title>Energy (Oxford)</title><description>Experiments and simulations were performed to investigate the effect of ethanol direct injection plus gasoline port injection (EDI + GPI) on engine performance. Gasoline direct injection plus GPI (GDI + GPI) was also tested as a reference to EDI + GPI. The experimental results showed that volumetric efficiency increased with the raise of direct injection ratio in both EDI + GPI and GDI + GPI conditions. The volumetric efficiency and IMEP of EDI + GPI were greater than that of GDI + GPI, due to the stronger charge cooling effect of EDI. Combustion process was improved by EDI when ethanol energy ratio (EER) was less than 42%, however further increase of EER led to the deterioration of combustion process. Simulation results showed that ethanol's high laminar flame speed played a dominate role to the improvement of combustion process. Although EDI negatively affected the equivalence ratio around spark plug, this disadvantage was offset by the high laminar flame speed of ethanol, resulting in shorter initial and major combustion durations. Simulation results also found that combustion process was deteriorated when EER was greater than 42%, which was mainly due to over-cooling and poor mixing of EDI. Regarding emissions, NO decreased while CO and HC increased with the raise of both EDI and GDI ratios.
•EDI + GPI showed higher volumetric efficiency and IMEP than GDI + GPI did.•EDI + GPI led to lower in-cylinder temperature and shorter combustion duration.•Ethanol's high laminar flame speed was the main contributor to short combustion duration.•HC and CO of EDI + GPI first decreased and then increased with the raise of ethanol ratio.</description><subject>Combustion</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Cooling</subject><subject>Cooling effects</subject><subject>Direct injection</subject><subject>Dual injection</subject><subject>Equivalence ratio</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Flame speed</subject><subject>Flames</subject><subject>Gasoline</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>Port fuel injection</subject><subject>Spark plugs</subject><subject>Volumetric efficiency</subject><issn>0360-5442</issn><issn>1873-6785</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwBywisU4YJ7Edb5BQVR5SJTawtlx7UhyldnGSiv49LmXNZkYzunceh5BbCgUFyu-7Aj3GzaEogcoCREE5OyMz2ogq56Jh52QGFYec1XV5Sa6GoQMA1kg5I3b5vcPotuhH3Wfa28xP29QwqXJ-j8PoNnp0wWehzZKyDXGrvcFjqX2G46f2oc83egi985jZSfe58x2aXxP6Tepek4tW9wPe_OU5-Xhavi9e8tXb8-vicZWbmsoxR1YJirosq1a2tmSMt6A1W0tOtVlLsGtkQOuSWtNwYyzIqtFCiMpIDo0U1ZzcnebuYvia0u2qC1P0aaUqKwq8blJIqvqkMjEMQ8RW7RIAHQ-KgjryVJ068VRHngqESjyT7eFkw_TB3mFUg3GYUFgX07fKBvf_gB-kQYID</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Zhuang, Yuan</creator><creator>Zhu, Guodong</creator><creator>Gong, Zhen</creator><creator>Wang, Chenfang</creator><creator>Huang, Yuhan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9800-8788</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0202-4498</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Experimental and numerical investigation of performance of an ethanol-gasoline dual-injection engine</title><author>Zhuang, Yuan ; Zhu, Guodong ; Gong, Zhen ; Wang, Chenfang ; Huang, Yuhan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-e5371ea223f9fd2556f0aa5b961acb90dbe501421dc86ccd0938a7773c9608973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Combustion</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Cooling</topic><topic>Cooling effects</topic><topic>Direct injection</topic><topic>Dual injection</topic><topic>Equivalence ratio</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Flame speed</topic><topic>Flames</topic><topic>Gasoline</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>Port fuel injection</topic><topic>Spark plugs</topic><topic>Volumetric efficiency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhuang, Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Guodong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Zhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chenfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yuhan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhuang, Yuan</au><au>Zhu, Guodong</au><au>Gong, Zhen</au><au>Wang, Chenfang</au><au>Huang, Yuhan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experimental and numerical investigation of performance of an ethanol-gasoline dual-injection engine</atitle><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>186</volume><spage>115835</spage><pages>115835-</pages><artnum>115835</artnum><issn>0360-5442</issn><eissn>1873-6785</eissn><abstract>Experiments and simulations were performed to investigate the effect of ethanol direct injection plus gasoline port injection (EDI + GPI) on engine performance. Gasoline direct injection plus GPI (GDI + GPI) was also tested as a reference to EDI + GPI. The experimental results showed that volumetric efficiency increased with the raise of direct injection ratio in both EDI + GPI and GDI + GPI conditions. The volumetric efficiency and IMEP of EDI + GPI were greater than that of GDI + GPI, due to the stronger charge cooling effect of EDI. Combustion process was improved by EDI when ethanol energy ratio (EER) was less than 42%, however further increase of EER led to the deterioration of combustion process. Simulation results showed that ethanol's high laminar flame speed played a dominate role to the improvement of combustion process. Although EDI negatively affected the equivalence ratio around spark plug, this disadvantage was offset by the high laminar flame speed of ethanol, resulting in shorter initial and major combustion durations. Simulation results also found that combustion process was deteriorated when EER was greater than 42%, which was mainly due to over-cooling and poor mixing of EDI. Regarding emissions, NO decreased while CO and HC increased with the raise of both EDI and GDI ratios.
•EDI + GPI showed higher volumetric efficiency and IMEP than GDI + GPI did.•EDI + GPI led to lower in-cylinder temperature and shorter combustion duration.•Ethanol's high laminar flame speed was the main contributor to short combustion duration.•HC and CO of EDI + GPI first decreased and then increased with the raise of ethanol ratio.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.165</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9800-8788</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0202-4498</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-5442 |
ispartof | Energy (Oxford), 2019-11, Vol.186, p.115835, Article 115835 |
issn | 0360-5442 1873-6785 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2310648106 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Combustion Computer simulation Cooling Cooling effects Direct injection Dual injection Equivalence ratio Ethanol Flame speed Flames Gasoline Injection Port fuel injection Spark plugs Volumetric efficiency |
title | Experimental and numerical investigation of performance of an ethanol-gasoline dual-injection engine |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T07%3A12%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experimental%20and%20numerical%20investigation%20of%20performance%20of%20an%20ethanol-gasoline%20dual-injection%20engine&rft.jtitle=Energy%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Zhuang,%20Yuan&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=186&rft.spage=115835&rft.pages=115835-&rft.artnum=115835&rft.issn=0360-5442&rft.eissn=1873-6785&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.165&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2310648106%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2310648106&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0360544219315075&rfr_iscdi=true |