Effect of micro-shot peening, conventional shot peening and their combination on fatigue property of EA4T axle steel

In this study, EA4T axle steel specimens were subjected to three shot peening treatments: conventional shot peening (CSP), micro-shot peening (MSP) and their combination, i.e. dual shot peening (DSP). The residual stress, surface roughness, morphology, microhardness, were used to characterize the af...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of materials processing technology 2020-01, Vol.275, p.116320, Article 116320
Hauptverfasser: Li, Xing, Zhang, Jiwang, Yang, Bing, Zhang, Jinxin, Wu, Mingze, Lu, Liantao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 116320
container_title Journal of materials processing technology
container_volume 275
creator Li, Xing
Zhang, Jiwang
Yang, Bing
Zhang, Jinxin
Wu, Mingze
Lu, Liantao
description In this study, EA4T axle steel specimens were subjected to three shot peening treatments: conventional shot peening (CSP), micro-shot peening (MSP) and their combination, i.e. dual shot peening (DSP). The residual stress, surface roughness, morphology, microhardness, were used to characterize the affected surface layer. The results indicated that MSP achieved maximum surface compressive residual stress (SCRS), minimum surface roughness, high surface microhardness. Moreover, compared to CSP, DSP improved the SCRS and microhardness while reducing surface roughness. However, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations indicated the presence of intensive defects of the DSP-treated specimens, which hindered the fatigue strength of the specimens. Fatigue tests were conducted to evaluate the effect of different treatments on fatigue life, the median S-N curve demonstrated that the fatigue limit at 107 cycles was improved by 24, 32, and 27% for the CSP, MSP, and DSP specimens, respectively. Furthermore, SEM observation was conducted to analyze the fracture mechanisms, the results indicated that the failure of all specimens originated at the surface and the fracture mechanisms were not changed by the shot peening treatments. The SCRS during the cyclic loading have also been analyzed. Moreover, the factors influencing fatigue limit improvement were discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116320
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2310285201</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0924013619302924</els_id><sourcerecordid>2310285201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-7a0a3e4c2aecf12fea74a68a5c46fd123c9555a35765697cb70facd81b029cf63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFtLAzEQhYMoWKv_IeCru-aym-w-1lIvUPClPoc0O2mzbHdrkhb7781SQd-EgRmYM4c5H0KYkpwSKh7bvN3puPdDBJMzQuucUsEZuUATWkmeFVIWl2hCalZkhHJxjW5CaAmhklTVBMWFtWAiHizeOeOHLGyHiPcAves3D9gM_RH66IZed_jvCuu-wXELzifNbu16PYpwKpumzQFwemkPPp5G68WsWGH91QEOEaC7RVdWdwHufvoUfTwvVvPXbPn-8jafLTPDCxEzqYnmUBimwVjKLGhZaFHp0hTCNpRxU5dlqXkpRSlqadaSWG2aiq4Jq40VfIruz77pl88DhKja4eBTlKAYp4RVZQKWVNVZleKH4MGqvXc77U-KEjUyVq36ZaxGxurMOJ0-nU8hpTg68CoYB72BxvlEVTWD-9_kG208i_0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2310285201</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of micro-shot peening, conventional shot peening and their combination on fatigue property of EA4T axle steel</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Li, Xing ; Zhang, Jiwang ; Yang, Bing ; Zhang, Jinxin ; Wu, Mingze ; Lu, Liantao</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Xing ; Zhang, Jiwang ; Yang, Bing ; Zhang, Jinxin ; Wu, Mingze ; Lu, Liantao</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, EA4T axle steel specimens were subjected to three shot peening treatments: conventional shot peening (CSP), micro-shot peening (MSP) and their combination, i.e. dual shot peening (DSP). The residual stress, surface roughness, morphology, microhardness, were used to characterize the affected surface layer. The results indicated that MSP achieved maximum surface compressive residual stress (SCRS), minimum surface roughness, high surface microhardness. Moreover, compared to CSP, DSP improved the SCRS and microhardness while reducing surface roughness. However, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations indicated the presence of intensive defects of the DSP-treated specimens, which hindered the fatigue strength of the specimens. Fatigue tests were conducted to evaluate the effect of different treatments on fatigue life, the median S-N curve demonstrated that the fatigue limit at 107 cycles was improved by 24, 32, and 27% for the CSP, MSP, and DSP specimens, respectively. Furthermore, SEM observation was conducted to analyze the fracture mechanisms, the results indicated that the failure of all specimens originated at the surface and the fracture mechanisms were not changed by the shot peening treatments. The SCRS during the cyclic loading have also been analyzed. Moreover, the factors influencing fatigue limit improvement were discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0924-0136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4774</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116320</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aluminum ; Compressive properties ; Cyclic loads ; EA4T axle steel ; Failure analysis ; Fatigue life ; Fatigue limit ; Fatigue strength ; Fatigue tests ; Fracture mechanics ; Low alloy steels ; Microhardness ; Morphology ; Residual stress ; S N diagrams ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Shafts (machine elements) ; Shot peening ; Stress relaxation ; Surface layers ; Surface roughness</subject><ispartof>Journal of materials processing technology, 2020-01, Vol.275, p.116320, Article 116320</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jan 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-7a0a3e4c2aecf12fea74a68a5c46fd123c9555a35765697cb70facd81b029cf63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-7a0a3e4c2aecf12fea74a68a5c46fd123c9555a35765697cb70facd81b029cf63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924013619302924$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Xing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jiwang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Bing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jinxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Mingze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Liantao</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of micro-shot peening, conventional shot peening and their combination on fatigue property of EA4T axle steel</title><title>Journal of materials processing technology</title><description>In this study, EA4T axle steel specimens were subjected to three shot peening treatments: conventional shot peening (CSP), micro-shot peening (MSP) and their combination, i.e. dual shot peening (DSP). The residual stress, surface roughness, morphology, microhardness, were used to characterize the affected surface layer. The results indicated that MSP achieved maximum surface compressive residual stress (SCRS), minimum surface roughness, high surface microhardness. Moreover, compared to CSP, DSP improved the SCRS and microhardness while reducing surface roughness. However, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations indicated the presence of intensive defects of the DSP-treated specimens, which hindered the fatigue strength of the specimens. Fatigue tests were conducted to evaluate the effect of different treatments on fatigue life, the median S-N curve demonstrated that the fatigue limit at 107 cycles was improved by 24, 32, and 27% for the CSP, MSP, and DSP specimens, respectively. Furthermore, SEM observation was conducted to analyze the fracture mechanisms, the results indicated that the failure of all specimens originated at the surface and the fracture mechanisms were not changed by the shot peening treatments. The SCRS during the cyclic loading have also been analyzed. Moreover, the factors influencing fatigue limit improvement were discussed.</description><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Compressive properties</subject><subject>Cyclic loads</subject><subject>EA4T axle steel</subject><subject>Failure analysis</subject><subject>Fatigue life</subject><subject>Fatigue limit</subject><subject>Fatigue strength</subject><subject>Fatigue tests</subject><subject>Fracture mechanics</subject><subject>Low alloy steels</subject><subject>Microhardness</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Residual stress</subject><subject>S N diagrams</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Shafts (machine elements)</subject><subject>Shot peening</subject><subject>Stress relaxation</subject><subject>Surface layers</subject><subject>Surface roughness</subject><issn>0924-0136</issn><issn>1873-4774</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkFtLAzEQhYMoWKv_IeCru-aym-w-1lIvUPClPoc0O2mzbHdrkhb7781SQd-EgRmYM4c5H0KYkpwSKh7bvN3puPdDBJMzQuucUsEZuUATWkmeFVIWl2hCalZkhHJxjW5CaAmhklTVBMWFtWAiHizeOeOHLGyHiPcAves3D9gM_RH66IZed_jvCuu-wXELzifNbu16PYpwKpumzQFwemkPPp5G68WsWGH91QEOEaC7RVdWdwHufvoUfTwvVvPXbPn-8jafLTPDCxEzqYnmUBimwVjKLGhZaFHp0hTCNpRxU5dlqXkpRSlqadaSWG2aiq4Jq40VfIruz77pl88DhKja4eBTlKAYp4RVZQKWVNVZleKH4MGqvXc77U-KEjUyVq36ZaxGxurMOJ0-nU8hpTg68CoYB72BxvlEVTWD-9_kG208i_0</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Li, Xing</creator><creator>Zhang, Jiwang</creator><creator>Yang, Bing</creator><creator>Zhang, Jinxin</creator><creator>Wu, Mingze</creator><creator>Lu, Liantao</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Effect of micro-shot peening, conventional shot peening and their combination on fatigue property of EA4T axle steel</title><author>Li, Xing ; Zhang, Jiwang ; Yang, Bing ; Zhang, Jinxin ; Wu, Mingze ; Lu, Liantao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-7a0a3e4c2aecf12fea74a68a5c46fd123c9555a35765697cb70facd81b029cf63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Compressive properties</topic><topic>Cyclic loads</topic><topic>EA4T axle steel</topic><topic>Failure analysis</topic><topic>Fatigue life</topic><topic>Fatigue limit</topic><topic>Fatigue strength</topic><topic>Fatigue tests</topic><topic>Fracture mechanics</topic><topic>Low alloy steels</topic><topic>Microhardness</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Residual stress</topic><topic>S N diagrams</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Shafts (machine elements)</topic><topic>Shot peening</topic><topic>Stress relaxation</topic><topic>Surface layers</topic><topic>Surface roughness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Xing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jiwang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Bing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jinxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Mingze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Liantao</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of materials processing technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Xing</au><au>Zhang, Jiwang</au><au>Yang, Bing</au><au>Zhang, Jinxin</au><au>Wu, Mingze</au><au>Lu, Liantao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of micro-shot peening, conventional shot peening and their combination on fatigue property of EA4T axle steel</atitle><jtitle>Journal of materials processing technology</jtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>275</volume><spage>116320</spage><pages>116320-</pages><artnum>116320</artnum><issn>0924-0136</issn><eissn>1873-4774</eissn><abstract>In this study, EA4T axle steel specimens were subjected to three shot peening treatments: conventional shot peening (CSP), micro-shot peening (MSP) and their combination, i.e. dual shot peening (DSP). The residual stress, surface roughness, morphology, microhardness, were used to characterize the affected surface layer. The results indicated that MSP achieved maximum surface compressive residual stress (SCRS), minimum surface roughness, high surface microhardness. Moreover, compared to CSP, DSP improved the SCRS and microhardness while reducing surface roughness. However, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations indicated the presence of intensive defects of the DSP-treated specimens, which hindered the fatigue strength of the specimens. Fatigue tests were conducted to evaluate the effect of different treatments on fatigue life, the median S-N curve demonstrated that the fatigue limit at 107 cycles was improved by 24, 32, and 27% for the CSP, MSP, and DSP specimens, respectively. Furthermore, SEM observation was conducted to analyze the fracture mechanisms, the results indicated that the failure of all specimens originated at the surface and the fracture mechanisms were not changed by the shot peening treatments. The SCRS during the cyclic loading have also been analyzed. Moreover, the factors influencing fatigue limit improvement were discussed.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116320</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0924-0136
ispartof Journal of materials processing technology, 2020-01, Vol.275, p.116320, Article 116320
issn 0924-0136
1873-4774
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2310285201
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aluminum
Compressive properties
Cyclic loads
EA4T axle steel
Failure analysis
Fatigue life
Fatigue limit
Fatigue strength
Fatigue tests
Fracture mechanics
Low alloy steels
Microhardness
Morphology
Residual stress
S N diagrams
Scanning electron microscopy
Shafts (machine elements)
Shot peening
Stress relaxation
Surface layers
Surface roughness
title Effect of micro-shot peening, conventional shot peening and their combination on fatigue property of EA4T axle steel
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T11%3A51%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20micro-shot%20peening,%20conventional%20shot%20peening%20and%20their%20combination%20on%20fatigue%20property%20of%20EA4T%20axle%20steel&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20materials%20processing%20technology&rft.au=Li,%20Xing&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=275&rft.spage=116320&rft.pages=116320-&rft.artnum=116320&rft.issn=0924-0136&rft.eissn=1873-4774&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116320&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2310285201%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2310285201&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0924013619302924&rfr_iscdi=true