comparison of soil food webs beneath C₃- and C₄-dominated grasslands

Soil food webs influence organic matter mineralization and plant nutrient availability, but the potential for plants to capitalize on these processes by altering soil food webs has received little attention. We compared soil food webs beneath C₃- and C₄-grass plantings by measuring bacterial and fun...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biology and fertility of soils 2008-10, Vol.45 (1), p.73-81
Hauptverfasser: Dornbush, Mathew, Cambardella, Cynthia, Ingham, Elaine, Raich, James
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 81
container_issue 1
container_start_page 73
container_title Biology and fertility of soils
container_volume 45
creator Dornbush, Mathew
Cambardella, Cynthia
Ingham, Elaine
Raich, James
description Soil food webs influence organic matter mineralization and plant nutrient availability, but the potential for plants to capitalize on these processes by altering soil food webs has received little attention. We compared soil food webs beneath C₃- and C₄-grass plantings by measuring bacterial and fungal biomass and protozoan and nematode abundance repeatedly over 2 years. We tested published expectations that C₃ detritus and root chemistry (low lignin/N) favor bacterial-based food webs and root-feeding nematodes, whereas C₄ detritus (high lignin/N) and greater production favor fungal decomposers and predatory nematodes. We also hypothesized that seasonal differences in plant growth between the two grassland types would generate season-specific differences in soil food webs. In contrast to our expectations, bacterial biomass and ciliate abundance were greater beneath C₄ grasses, and we found no differences in fungi, amoebae, flagellates, or nematodes. Soil food webs varied significantly among sample dates, but differences were unrelated to aboveground plant growth. Our findings, in combination with previous work, suggest that preexisting soil properties moderate the effect of plant inputs on soil food webs. We hypothesize that high levels of soil organic matter provide a stable environment and energy source for soil organisms and thus buffer soil food webs from short-term dynamics of plant communities.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00374-008-0312-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_231009573</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1896949671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1844-743a43df85da84f348404c043577dc1ecba89e92d98d5bcdfe4cd01a6dc38cc23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsP4MrgPnpymSazlKJWKLjQrkMmlzqlndRkirhVn9QnMWUEd67OgfN__4EPoXMKVxRAXmcALgUBUAQ4ZUQcoBEVnBGQqj5EI6BSESYn7Bid5LwCoJWi9QjNbNxsTWpz7HAMOMd2jUOMDr_5JuPGd970L3j6_fFJsOncfvsiLm7azvTe4WUyOa_LIZ-io2DW2Z_9zjFa3N0-T2dk_nj_ML2ZE0uVEEQKbgR3QVXOKBG4UAKEBcErKZ2l3jZG1b5mrlauaqwLXlgH1Eyc5cpaxsfocujdpvi687nXq7hLXXmpGS8q6kryEqJDyKaYc_JBb1O7MeldU9B7X3rwpYsvvfelRWHYwOSS7ZY-_RX_B10MUDBRm2XxqBdPDCgvfoXiE8l_ALe1d20</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>231009573</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>comparison of soil food webs beneath C₃- and C₄-dominated grasslands</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Dornbush, Mathew ; Cambardella, Cynthia ; Ingham, Elaine ; Raich, James</creator><creatorcontrib>Dornbush, Mathew ; Cambardella, Cynthia ; Ingham, Elaine ; Raich, James</creatorcontrib><description>Soil food webs influence organic matter mineralization and plant nutrient availability, but the potential for plants to capitalize on these processes by altering soil food webs has received little attention. We compared soil food webs beneath C₃- and C₄-grass plantings by measuring bacterial and fungal biomass and protozoan and nematode abundance repeatedly over 2 years. We tested published expectations that C₃ detritus and root chemistry (low lignin/N) favor bacterial-based food webs and root-feeding nematodes, whereas C₄ detritus (high lignin/N) and greater production favor fungal decomposers and predatory nematodes. We also hypothesized that seasonal differences in plant growth between the two grassland types would generate season-specific differences in soil food webs. In contrast to our expectations, bacterial biomass and ciliate abundance were greater beneath C₄ grasses, and we found no differences in fungi, amoebae, flagellates, or nematodes. Soil food webs varied significantly among sample dates, but differences were unrelated to aboveground plant growth. Our findings, in combination with previous work, suggest that preexisting soil properties moderate the effect of plant inputs on soil food webs. We hypothesize that high levels of soil organic matter provide a stable environment and energy source for soil organisms and thus buffer soil food webs from short-term dynamics of plant communities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0178-2762</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0789</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00374-008-0312-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Bacteria ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Detritus ; Food chains ; Food webs ; Fungi ; Grasses ; Grasslands ; Life Sciences ; Mineralization ; Nematoda ; Nematodes ; Nutrient availability ; Organic matter ; Original Paper ; Plant biology ; Plant communities ; Plant growth ; Protozoa ; Soil organic matter ; Soil properties ; Soil Science &amp; Conservation ; Soils</subject><ispartof>Biology and fertility of soils, 2008-10, Vol.45 (1), p.73-81</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1844-743a43df85da84f348404c043577dc1ecba89e92d98d5bcdfe4cd01a6dc38cc23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1844-743a43df85da84f348404c043577dc1ecba89e92d98d5bcdfe4cd01a6dc38cc23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00374-008-0312-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00374-008-0312-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dornbush, Mathew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cambardella, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingham, Elaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raich, James</creatorcontrib><title>comparison of soil food webs beneath C₃- and C₄-dominated grasslands</title><title>Biology and fertility of soils</title><addtitle>Biol Fertil Soils</addtitle><description>Soil food webs influence organic matter mineralization and plant nutrient availability, but the potential for plants to capitalize on these processes by altering soil food webs has received little attention. We compared soil food webs beneath C₃- and C₄-grass plantings by measuring bacterial and fungal biomass and protozoan and nematode abundance repeatedly over 2 years. We tested published expectations that C₃ detritus and root chemistry (low lignin/N) favor bacterial-based food webs and root-feeding nematodes, whereas C₄ detritus (high lignin/N) and greater production favor fungal decomposers and predatory nematodes. We also hypothesized that seasonal differences in plant growth between the two grassland types would generate season-specific differences in soil food webs. In contrast to our expectations, bacterial biomass and ciliate abundance were greater beneath C₄ grasses, and we found no differences in fungi, amoebae, flagellates, or nematodes. Soil food webs varied significantly among sample dates, but differences were unrelated to aboveground plant growth. Our findings, in combination with previous work, suggest that preexisting soil properties moderate the effect of plant inputs on soil food webs. We hypothesize that high levels of soil organic matter provide a stable environment and energy source for soil organisms and thus buffer soil food webs from short-term dynamics of plant communities.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Detritus</subject><subject>Food chains</subject><subject>Food webs</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mineralization</subject><subject>Nematoda</subject><subject>Nematodes</subject><subject>Nutrient availability</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plant biology</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Protozoa</subject><subject>Soil organic matter</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><subject>Soils</subject><issn>0178-2762</issn><issn>1432-0789</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsP4MrgPnpymSazlKJWKLjQrkMmlzqlndRkirhVn9QnMWUEd67OgfN__4EPoXMKVxRAXmcALgUBUAQ4ZUQcoBEVnBGQqj5EI6BSESYn7Bid5LwCoJWi9QjNbNxsTWpz7HAMOMd2jUOMDr_5JuPGd970L3j6_fFJsOncfvsiLm7azvTe4WUyOa_LIZ-io2DW2Z_9zjFa3N0-T2dk_nj_ML2ZE0uVEEQKbgR3QVXOKBG4UAKEBcErKZ2l3jZG1b5mrlauaqwLXlgH1Eyc5cpaxsfocujdpvi687nXq7hLXXmpGS8q6kryEqJDyKaYc_JBb1O7MeldU9B7X3rwpYsvvfelRWHYwOSS7ZY-_RX_B10MUDBRm2XxqBdPDCgvfoXiE8l_ALe1d20</recordid><startdate>20081001</startdate><enddate>20081001</enddate><creator>Dornbush, Mathew</creator><creator>Cambardella, Cynthia</creator><creator>Ingham, Elaine</creator><creator>Raich, James</creator><general>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081001</creationdate><title>comparison of soil food webs beneath C₃- and C₄-dominated grasslands</title><author>Dornbush, Mathew ; Cambardella, Cynthia ; Ingham, Elaine ; Raich, James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1844-743a43df85da84f348404c043577dc1ecba89e92d98d5bcdfe4cd01a6dc38cc23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Detritus</topic><topic>Food chains</topic><topic>Food webs</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mineralization</topic><topic>Nematoda</topic><topic>Nematodes</topic><topic>Nutrient availability</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plant biology</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Protozoa</topic><topic>Soil organic matter</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</topic><topic>Soils</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dornbush, Mathew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cambardella, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingham, Elaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raich, James</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Biology and fertility of soils</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dornbush, Mathew</au><au>Cambardella, Cynthia</au><au>Ingham, Elaine</au><au>Raich, James</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>comparison of soil food webs beneath C₃- and C₄-dominated grasslands</atitle><jtitle>Biology and fertility of soils</jtitle><stitle>Biol Fertil Soils</stitle><date>2008-10-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>73</spage><epage>81</epage><pages>73-81</pages><issn>0178-2762</issn><eissn>1432-0789</eissn><abstract>Soil food webs influence organic matter mineralization and plant nutrient availability, but the potential for plants to capitalize on these processes by altering soil food webs has received little attention. We compared soil food webs beneath C₃- and C₄-grass plantings by measuring bacterial and fungal biomass and protozoan and nematode abundance repeatedly over 2 years. We tested published expectations that C₃ detritus and root chemistry (low lignin/N) favor bacterial-based food webs and root-feeding nematodes, whereas C₄ detritus (high lignin/N) and greater production favor fungal decomposers and predatory nematodes. We also hypothesized that seasonal differences in plant growth between the two grassland types would generate season-specific differences in soil food webs. In contrast to our expectations, bacterial biomass and ciliate abundance were greater beneath C₄ grasses, and we found no differences in fungi, amoebae, flagellates, or nematodes. Soil food webs varied significantly among sample dates, but differences were unrelated to aboveground plant growth. Our findings, in combination with previous work, suggest that preexisting soil properties moderate the effect of plant inputs on soil food webs. We hypothesize that high levels of soil organic matter provide a stable environment and energy source for soil organisms and thus buffer soil food webs from short-term dynamics of plant communities.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s00374-008-0312-4</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0178-2762
ispartof Biology and fertility of soils, 2008-10, Vol.45 (1), p.73-81
issn 0178-2762
1432-0789
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_231009573
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Agriculture
Bacteria
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Detritus
Food chains
Food webs
Fungi
Grasses
Grasslands
Life Sciences
Mineralization
Nematoda
Nematodes
Nutrient availability
Organic matter
Original Paper
Plant biology
Plant communities
Plant growth
Protozoa
Soil organic matter
Soil properties
Soil Science & Conservation
Soils
title comparison of soil food webs beneath C₃- and C₄-dominated grasslands
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T12%3A13%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=comparison%20of%20soil%20food%20webs%20beneath%20C%E2%82%83-%20and%20C%E2%82%84-dominated%20grasslands&rft.jtitle=Biology%20and%20fertility%20of%20soils&rft.au=Dornbush,%20Mathew&rft.date=2008-10-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=73&rft.epage=81&rft.pages=73-81&rft.issn=0178-2762&rft.eissn=1432-0789&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00374-008-0312-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1896949671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=231009573&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true