Comparison of effects of dietary‐specific fatty acids on growth and lipid metabolism in Nile tilapia
The dominant fatty acids (FAs) in oils are often used to explain different nutritional effects of dietary oils in fish. However, the amounts of dominant FAs among oils are different, and the nutritional roles of these important FAs in fish have not been precisely compared at similar levels in feedin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Aquaculture nutrition 2019-08, Vol.25 (4), p.862-872 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 872 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 862 |
container_title | Aquaculture nutrition |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Liu, Yan Wen, Jia‐Jing Ning, Li‐Jun Jiao, Jian‐Gang Qiao, Fang Chen, Li‐Qiao Zhang, Mei‐Ling Du, Zhen‐Yu |
description | The dominant fatty acids (FAs) in oils are often used to explain different nutritional effects of dietary oils in fish. However, the amounts of dominant FAs among oils are different, and the nutritional roles of these important FAs in fish have not been precisely compared at similar levels in feeding trials. In the present study, different amounts of palmitic acid were added to safflower oil (SO), olive oil (OO) and fish oil (FO) to obtain comparable amounts (about 550 g/kg of total FAs) of 18:2n‐6, 18:1n‐9 and 20:5n‐3 + 22:6n‐3 and subsequently fed to Nile tilapia (11.1 ± 0.01 g) for 8 weeks. The results showed similar growth among groups but FO group obtained lower fat deposition, serum ALT and AST activities, compared to OO. Lipogenesis‐related gene expressions were higher in OO group than FO group in liver, muscle and adipose tissue, but there were only few differences in these genes between SO and FO groups. Lipid catabolism genes in FO group were higher than OO and SO groups in adipose tissue, but not in muscle, and the significantly higher expressions of CPT1b and PPARα were only observed in liver. Overall, dietary 18:2n‐6, 20:5n‐3 and 22:6n‐3 were beneficial to normal growth and lipid metabolism, whereas high amount of 18:1n‐9 induced lipid deposition and liver damage in Nile tilapia. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/anu.12906 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2309665752</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2309665752</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3326-4792049a641651d2050ae2d157eafcd6cdf7a9ccb8e171e0a05d4d5d965d72563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1OwzAUhS0EEqUw8AaWmBjS2k5s12NVQUGqykJny_UPuEriYKequvEIPCNPgktYucs9w3fu1TkA3GI0wXmmqt1PMBGInYERLhktCBL0_KRpWVDOy0twldIOIUxmnI6AW4SmU9Gn0MLgoHXO6j6dpPG2V_H4_fmVOqu98xo61fdHqLQ3mWjhWwyH_h2q1sDad97AJju2ofapgb6Fa19b2PtadV5dgwun6mRv_vYYbB4fXhdPxepl-byYrwpdloQVFRcEVUKxCjOKDUEUKUsMptwqpw3TxnEltN7OLObYIoWoqQw1glHDCWXlGNwNd7sYPvY29XIX9rHNLyUpkWCMckoydT9QOoaUonWyi77JYSVG8lSjzDXK3xozOx3YQ45z_B-U8_VmcPwAtQx1ZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2309665752</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of effects of dietary‐specific fatty acids on growth and lipid metabolism in Nile tilapia</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Liu, Yan ; Wen, Jia‐Jing ; Ning, Li‐Jun ; Jiao, Jian‐Gang ; Qiao, Fang ; Chen, Li‐Qiao ; Zhang, Mei‐Ling ; Du, Zhen‐Yu</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yan ; Wen, Jia‐Jing ; Ning, Li‐Jun ; Jiao, Jian‐Gang ; Qiao, Fang ; Chen, Li‐Qiao ; Zhang, Mei‐Ling ; Du, Zhen‐Yu</creatorcontrib><description>The dominant fatty acids (FAs) in oils are often used to explain different nutritional effects of dietary oils in fish. However, the amounts of dominant FAs among oils are different, and the nutritional roles of these important FAs in fish have not been precisely compared at similar levels in feeding trials. In the present study, different amounts of palmitic acid were added to safflower oil (SO), olive oil (OO) and fish oil (FO) to obtain comparable amounts (about 550 g/kg of total FAs) of 18:2n‐6, 18:1n‐9 and 20:5n‐3 + 22:6n‐3 and subsequently fed to Nile tilapia (11.1 ± 0.01 g) for 8 weeks. The results showed similar growth among groups but FO group obtained lower fat deposition, serum ALT and AST activities, compared to OO. Lipogenesis‐related gene expressions were higher in OO group than FO group in liver, muscle and adipose tissue, but there were only few differences in these genes between SO and FO groups. Lipid catabolism genes in FO group were higher than OO and SO groups in adipose tissue, but not in muscle, and the significantly higher expressions of CPT1b and PPARα were only observed in liver. Overall, dietary 18:2n‐6, 20:5n‐3 and 22:6n‐3 were beneficial to normal growth and lipid metabolism, whereas high amount of 18:1n‐9 induced lipid deposition and liver damage in Nile tilapia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1353-5773</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2095</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/anu.12906</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>Adipose tissue ; Catabolism ; dietary oil ; fatty acid composition ; Fatty acids ; Fish ; Fish oils ; Freshwater fishes ; Gene expression ; Growth ; growth performance ; lipid metabolism ; Lipids ; Liver ; Metabolism ; nile tilapia ; Oil ; Oils & fats ; Olive oil ; Oreochromis niloticus ; Safflower oil ; Serum ; Tilapia ; very long chain unsaturated fatty acid</subject><ispartof>Aquaculture nutrition, 2019-08, Vol.25 (4), p.862-872</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3326-4792049a641651d2050ae2d157eafcd6cdf7a9ccb8e171e0a05d4d5d965d72563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3326-4792049a641651d2050ae2d157eafcd6cdf7a9ccb8e171e0a05d4d5d965d72563</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6581-5313 ; 0000-0003-0138-7828</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fanu.12906$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fanu.12906$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27928,27929,45578,45579</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Jia‐Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ning, Li‐Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiao, Jian‐Gang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Li‐Qiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Mei‐Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Zhen‐Yu</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of effects of dietary‐specific fatty acids on growth and lipid metabolism in Nile tilapia</title><title>Aquaculture nutrition</title><description>The dominant fatty acids (FAs) in oils are often used to explain different nutritional effects of dietary oils in fish. However, the amounts of dominant FAs among oils are different, and the nutritional roles of these important FAs in fish have not been precisely compared at similar levels in feeding trials. In the present study, different amounts of palmitic acid were added to safflower oil (SO), olive oil (OO) and fish oil (FO) to obtain comparable amounts (about 550 g/kg of total FAs) of 18:2n‐6, 18:1n‐9 and 20:5n‐3 + 22:6n‐3 and subsequently fed to Nile tilapia (11.1 ± 0.01 g) for 8 weeks. The results showed similar growth among groups but FO group obtained lower fat deposition, serum ALT and AST activities, compared to OO. Lipogenesis‐related gene expressions were higher in OO group than FO group in liver, muscle and adipose tissue, but there were only few differences in these genes between SO and FO groups. Lipid catabolism genes in FO group were higher than OO and SO groups in adipose tissue, but not in muscle, and the significantly higher expressions of CPT1b and PPARα were only observed in liver. Overall, dietary 18:2n‐6, 20:5n‐3 and 22:6n‐3 were beneficial to normal growth and lipid metabolism, whereas high amount of 18:1n‐9 induced lipid deposition and liver damage in Nile tilapia.</description><subject>Adipose tissue</subject><subject>Catabolism</subject><subject>dietary oil</subject><subject>fatty acid composition</subject><subject>Fatty acids</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish oils</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>growth performance</subject><subject>lipid metabolism</subject><subject>Lipids</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>nile tilapia</subject><subject>Oil</subject><subject>Oils & fats</subject><subject>Olive oil</subject><subject>Oreochromis niloticus</subject><subject>Safflower oil</subject><subject>Serum</subject><subject>Tilapia</subject><subject>very long chain unsaturated fatty acid</subject><issn>1353-5773</issn><issn>1365-2095</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kL1OwzAUhS0EEqUw8AaWmBjS2k5s12NVQUGqykJny_UPuEriYKequvEIPCNPgktYucs9w3fu1TkA3GI0wXmmqt1PMBGInYERLhktCBL0_KRpWVDOy0twldIOIUxmnI6AW4SmU9Gn0MLgoHXO6j6dpPG2V_H4_fmVOqu98xo61fdHqLQ3mWjhWwyH_h2q1sDad97AJju2ofapgb6Fa19b2PtadV5dgwun6mRv_vYYbB4fXhdPxepl-byYrwpdloQVFRcEVUKxCjOKDUEUKUsMptwqpw3TxnEltN7OLObYIoWoqQw1glHDCWXlGNwNd7sYPvY29XIX9rHNLyUpkWCMckoydT9QOoaUonWyi77JYSVG8lSjzDXK3xozOx3YQ45z_B-U8_VmcPwAtQx1ZA</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Liu, Yan</creator><creator>Wen, Jia‐Jing</creator><creator>Ning, Li‐Jun</creator><creator>Jiao, Jian‐Gang</creator><creator>Qiao, Fang</creator><creator>Chen, Li‐Qiao</creator><creator>Zhang, Mei‐Ling</creator><creator>Du, Zhen‐Yu</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6581-5313</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0138-7828</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>Comparison of effects of dietary‐specific fatty acids on growth and lipid metabolism in Nile tilapia</title><author>Liu, Yan ; Wen, Jia‐Jing ; Ning, Li‐Jun ; Jiao, Jian‐Gang ; Qiao, Fang ; Chen, Li‐Qiao ; Zhang, Mei‐Ling ; Du, Zhen‐Yu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3326-4792049a641651d2050ae2d157eafcd6cdf7a9ccb8e171e0a05d4d5d965d72563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adipose tissue</topic><topic>Catabolism</topic><topic>dietary oil</topic><topic>fatty acid composition</topic><topic>Fatty acids</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish oils</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>growth performance</topic><topic>lipid metabolism</topic><topic>Lipids</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>nile tilapia</topic><topic>Oil</topic><topic>Oils & fats</topic><topic>Olive oil</topic><topic>Oreochromis niloticus</topic><topic>Safflower oil</topic><topic>Serum</topic><topic>Tilapia</topic><topic>very long chain unsaturated fatty acid</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Jia‐Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ning, Li‐Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiao, Jian‐Gang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Li‐Qiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Mei‐Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Zhen‐Yu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Aquaculture nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Yan</au><au>Wen, Jia‐Jing</au><au>Ning, Li‐Jun</au><au>Jiao, Jian‐Gang</au><au>Qiao, Fang</au><au>Chen, Li‐Qiao</au><au>Zhang, Mei‐Ling</au><au>Du, Zhen‐Yu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of effects of dietary‐specific fatty acids on growth and lipid metabolism in Nile tilapia</atitle><jtitle>Aquaculture nutrition</jtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>862</spage><epage>872</epage><pages>862-872</pages><issn>1353-5773</issn><eissn>1365-2095</eissn><abstract>The dominant fatty acids (FAs) in oils are often used to explain different nutritional effects of dietary oils in fish. However, the amounts of dominant FAs among oils are different, and the nutritional roles of these important FAs in fish have not been precisely compared at similar levels in feeding trials. In the present study, different amounts of palmitic acid were added to safflower oil (SO), olive oil (OO) and fish oil (FO) to obtain comparable amounts (about 550 g/kg of total FAs) of 18:2n‐6, 18:1n‐9 and 20:5n‐3 + 22:6n‐3 and subsequently fed to Nile tilapia (11.1 ± 0.01 g) for 8 weeks. The results showed similar growth among groups but FO group obtained lower fat deposition, serum ALT and AST activities, compared to OO. Lipogenesis‐related gene expressions were higher in OO group than FO group in liver, muscle and adipose tissue, but there were only few differences in these genes between SO and FO groups. Lipid catabolism genes in FO group were higher than OO and SO groups in adipose tissue, but not in muscle, and the significantly higher expressions of CPT1b and PPARα were only observed in liver. Overall, dietary 18:2n‐6, 20:5n‐3 and 22:6n‐3 were beneficial to normal growth and lipid metabolism, whereas high amount of 18:1n‐9 induced lipid deposition and liver damage in Nile tilapia.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><doi>10.1111/anu.12906</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6581-5313</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0138-7828</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1353-5773 |
ispartof | Aquaculture nutrition, 2019-08, Vol.25 (4), p.862-872 |
issn | 1353-5773 1365-2095 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2309665752 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Adipose tissue Catabolism dietary oil fatty acid composition Fatty acids Fish Fish oils Freshwater fishes Gene expression Growth growth performance lipid metabolism Lipids Liver Metabolism nile tilapia Oil Oils & fats Olive oil Oreochromis niloticus Safflower oil Serum Tilapia very long chain unsaturated fatty acid |
title | Comparison of effects of dietary‐specific fatty acids on growth and lipid metabolism in Nile tilapia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T13%3A27%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20effects%20of%20dietary%E2%80%90specific%20fatty%20acids%20on%20growth%20and%20lipid%20metabolism%20in%20Nile%20tilapia&rft.jtitle=Aquaculture%20nutrition&rft.au=Liu,%20Yan&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=862&rft.epage=872&rft.pages=862-872&rft.issn=1353-5773&rft.eissn=1365-2095&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/anu.12906&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2309665752%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2309665752&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |