Comparison of effects of dietary‐specific fatty acids on growth and lipid metabolism in Nile tilapia

The dominant fatty acids (FAs) in oils are often used to explain different nutritional effects of dietary oils in fish. However, the amounts of dominant FAs among oils are different, and the nutritional roles of these important FAs in fish have not been precisely compared at similar levels in feedin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aquaculture nutrition 2019-08, Vol.25 (4), p.862-872
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Yan, Wen, Jia‐Jing, Ning, Li‐Jun, Jiao, Jian‐Gang, Qiao, Fang, Chen, Li‐Qiao, Zhang, Mei‐Ling, Du, Zhen‐Yu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 872
container_issue 4
container_start_page 862
container_title Aquaculture nutrition
container_volume 25
creator Liu, Yan
Wen, Jia‐Jing
Ning, Li‐Jun
Jiao, Jian‐Gang
Qiao, Fang
Chen, Li‐Qiao
Zhang, Mei‐Ling
Du, Zhen‐Yu
description The dominant fatty acids (FAs) in oils are often used to explain different nutritional effects of dietary oils in fish. However, the amounts of dominant FAs among oils are different, and the nutritional roles of these important FAs in fish have not been precisely compared at similar levels in feeding trials. In the present study, different amounts of palmitic acid were added to safflower oil (SO), olive oil (OO) and fish oil (FO) to obtain comparable amounts (about 550 g/kg of total FAs) of 18:2n‐6, 18:1n‐9 and 20:5n‐3 + 22:6n‐3 and subsequently fed to Nile tilapia (11.1 ± 0.01 g) for 8 weeks. The results showed similar growth among groups but FO group obtained lower fat deposition, serum ALT and AST activities, compared to OO. Lipogenesis‐related gene expressions were higher in OO group than FO group in liver, muscle and adipose tissue, but there were only few differences in these genes between SO and FO groups. Lipid catabolism genes in FO group were higher than OO and SO groups in adipose tissue, but not in muscle, and the significantly higher expressions of CPT1b and PPARα were only observed in liver. Overall, dietary 18:2n‐6, 20:5n‐3 and 22:6n‐3 were beneficial to normal growth and lipid metabolism, whereas high amount of 18:1n‐9 induced lipid deposition and liver damage in Nile tilapia.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/anu.12906
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2309665752</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2309665752</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3326-4792049a641651d2050ae2d157eafcd6cdf7a9ccb8e171e0a05d4d5d965d72563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1OwzAUhS0EEqUw8AaWmBjS2k5s12NVQUGqykJny_UPuEriYKequvEIPCNPgktYucs9w3fu1TkA3GI0wXmmqt1PMBGInYERLhktCBL0_KRpWVDOy0twldIOIUxmnI6AW4SmU9Gn0MLgoHXO6j6dpPG2V_H4_fmVOqu98xo61fdHqLQ3mWjhWwyH_h2q1sDad97AJju2ofapgb6Fa19b2PtadV5dgwun6mRv_vYYbB4fXhdPxepl-byYrwpdloQVFRcEVUKxCjOKDUEUKUsMptwqpw3TxnEltN7OLObYIoWoqQw1glHDCWXlGNwNd7sYPvY29XIX9rHNLyUpkWCMckoydT9QOoaUonWyi77JYSVG8lSjzDXK3xozOx3YQ45z_B-U8_VmcPwAtQx1ZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2309665752</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of effects of dietary‐specific fatty acids on growth and lipid metabolism in Nile tilapia</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Liu, Yan ; Wen, Jia‐Jing ; Ning, Li‐Jun ; Jiao, Jian‐Gang ; Qiao, Fang ; Chen, Li‐Qiao ; Zhang, Mei‐Ling ; Du, Zhen‐Yu</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yan ; Wen, Jia‐Jing ; Ning, Li‐Jun ; Jiao, Jian‐Gang ; Qiao, Fang ; Chen, Li‐Qiao ; Zhang, Mei‐Ling ; Du, Zhen‐Yu</creatorcontrib><description>The dominant fatty acids (FAs) in oils are often used to explain different nutritional effects of dietary oils in fish. However, the amounts of dominant FAs among oils are different, and the nutritional roles of these important FAs in fish have not been precisely compared at similar levels in feeding trials. In the present study, different amounts of palmitic acid were added to safflower oil (SO), olive oil (OO) and fish oil (FO) to obtain comparable amounts (about 550 g/kg of total FAs) of 18:2n‐6, 18:1n‐9 and 20:5n‐3 + 22:6n‐3 and subsequently fed to Nile tilapia (11.1 ± 0.01 g) for 8 weeks. The results showed similar growth among groups but FO group obtained lower fat deposition, serum ALT and AST activities, compared to OO. Lipogenesis‐related gene expressions were higher in OO group than FO group in liver, muscle and adipose tissue, but there were only few differences in these genes between SO and FO groups. Lipid catabolism genes in FO group were higher than OO and SO groups in adipose tissue, but not in muscle, and the significantly higher expressions of CPT1b and PPARα were only observed in liver. Overall, dietary 18:2n‐6, 20:5n‐3 and 22:6n‐3 were beneficial to normal growth and lipid metabolism, whereas high amount of 18:1n‐9 induced lipid deposition and liver damage in Nile tilapia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1353-5773</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2095</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/anu.12906</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>Adipose tissue ; Catabolism ; dietary oil ; fatty acid composition ; Fatty acids ; Fish ; Fish oils ; Freshwater fishes ; Gene expression ; Growth ; growth performance ; lipid metabolism ; Lipids ; Liver ; Metabolism ; nile tilapia ; Oil ; Oils &amp; fats ; Olive oil ; Oreochromis niloticus ; Safflower oil ; Serum ; Tilapia ; very long chain unsaturated fatty acid</subject><ispartof>Aquaculture nutrition, 2019-08, Vol.25 (4), p.862-872</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3326-4792049a641651d2050ae2d157eafcd6cdf7a9ccb8e171e0a05d4d5d965d72563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3326-4792049a641651d2050ae2d157eafcd6cdf7a9ccb8e171e0a05d4d5d965d72563</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6581-5313 ; 0000-0003-0138-7828</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fanu.12906$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fanu.12906$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27928,27929,45578,45579</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Jia‐Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ning, Li‐Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiao, Jian‐Gang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Li‐Qiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Mei‐Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Zhen‐Yu</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of effects of dietary‐specific fatty acids on growth and lipid metabolism in Nile tilapia</title><title>Aquaculture nutrition</title><description>The dominant fatty acids (FAs) in oils are often used to explain different nutritional effects of dietary oils in fish. However, the amounts of dominant FAs among oils are different, and the nutritional roles of these important FAs in fish have not been precisely compared at similar levels in feeding trials. In the present study, different amounts of palmitic acid were added to safflower oil (SO), olive oil (OO) and fish oil (FO) to obtain comparable amounts (about 550 g/kg of total FAs) of 18:2n‐6, 18:1n‐9 and 20:5n‐3 + 22:6n‐3 and subsequently fed to Nile tilapia (11.1 ± 0.01 g) for 8 weeks. The results showed similar growth among groups but FO group obtained lower fat deposition, serum ALT and AST activities, compared to OO. Lipogenesis‐related gene expressions were higher in OO group than FO group in liver, muscle and adipose tissue, but there were only few differences in these genes between SO and FO groups. Lipid catabolism genes in FO group were higher than OO and SO groups in adipose tissue, but not in muscle, and the significantly higher expressions of CPT1b and PPARα were only observed in liver. Overall, dietary 18:2n‐6, 20:5n‐3 and 22:6n‐3 were beneficial to normal growth and lipid metabolism, whereas high amount of 18:1n‐9 induced lipid deposition and liver damage in Nile tilapia.</description><subject>Adipose tissue</subject><subject>Catabolism</subject><subject>dietary oil</subject><subject>fatty acid composition</subject><subject>Fatty acids</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish oils</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>growth performance</subject><subject>lipid metabolism</subject><subject>Lipids</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>nile tilapia</subject><subject>Oil</subject><subject>Oils &amp; fats</subject><subject>Olive oil</subject><subject>Oreochromis niloticus</subject><subject>Safflower oil</subject><subject>Serum</subject><subject>Tilapia</subject><subject>very long chain unsaturated fatty acid</subject><issn>1353-5773</issn><issn>1365-2095</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kL1OwzAUhS0EEqUw8AaWmBjS2k5s12NVQUGqykJny_UPuEriYKequvEIPCNPgktYucs9w3fu1TkA3GI0wXmmqt1PMBGInYERLhktCBL0_KRpWVDOy0twldIOIUxmnI6AW4SmU9Gn0MLgoHXO6j6dpPG2V_H4_fmVOqu98xo61fdHqLQ3mWjhWwyH_h2q1sDad97AJju2ofapgb6Fa19b2PtadV5dgwun6mRv_vYYbB4fXhdPxepl-byYrwpdloQVFRcEVUKxCjOKDUEUKUsMptwqpw3TxnEltN7OLObYIoWoqQw1glHDCWXlGNwNd7sYPvY29XIX9rHNLyUpkWCMckoydT9QOoaUonWyi77JYSVG8lSjzDXK3xozOx3YQ45z_B-U8_VmcPwAtQx1ZA</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Liu, Yan</creator><creator>Wen, Jia‐Jing</creator><creator>Ning, Li‐Jun</creator><creator>Jiao, Jian‐Gang</creator><creator>Qiao, Fang</creator><creator>Chen, Li‐Qiao</creator><creator>Zhang, Mei‐Ling</creator><creator>Du, Zhen‐Yu</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6581-5313</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0138-7828</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>Comparison of effects of dietary‐specific fatty acids on growth and lipid metabolism in Nile tilapia</title><author>Liu, Yan ; Wen, Jia‐Jing ; Ning, Li‐Jun ; Jiao, Jian‐Gang ; Qiao, Fang ; Chen, Li‐Qiao ; Zhang, Mei‐Ling ; Du, Zhen‐Yu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3326-4792049a641651d2050ae2d157eafcd6cdf7a9ccb8e171e0a05d4d5d965d72563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adipose tissue</topic><topic>Catabolism</topic><topic>dietary oil</topic><topic>fatty acid composition</topic><topic>Fatty acids</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish oils</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>growth performance</topic><topic>lipid metabolism</topic><topic>Lipids</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>nile tilapia</topic><topic>Oil</topic><topic>Oils &amp; fats</topic><topic>Olive oil</topic><topic>Oreochromis niloticus</topic><topic>Safflower oil</topic><topic>Serum</topic><topic>Tilapia</topic><topic>very long chain unsaturated fatty acid</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Jia‐Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ning, Li‐Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiao, Jian‐Gang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Li‐Qiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Mei‐Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Zhen‐Yu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Aquaculture nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Yan</au><au>Wen, Jia‐Jing</au><au>Ning, Li‐Jun</au><au>Jiao, Jian‐Gang</au><au>Qiao, Fang</au><au>Chen, Li‐Qiao</au><au>Zhang, Mei‐Ling</au><au>Du, Zhen‐Yu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of effects of dietary‐specific fatty acids on growth and lipid metabolism in Nile tilapia</atitle><jtitle>Aquaculture nutrition</jtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>862</spage><epage>872</epage><pages>862-872</pages><issn>1353-5773</issn><eissn>1365-2095</eissn><abstract>The dominant fatty acids (FAs) in oils are often used to explain different nutritional effects of dietary oils in fish. However, the amounts of dominant FAs among oils are different, and the nutritional roles of these important FAs in fish have not been precisely compared at similar levels in feeding trials. In the present study, different amounts of palmitic acid were added to safflower oil (SO), olive oil (OO) and fish oil (FO) to obtain comparable amounts (about 550 g/kg of total FAs) of 18:2n‐6, 18:1n‐9 and 20:5n‐3 + 22:6n‐3 and subsequently fed to Nile tilapia (11.1 ± 0.01 g) for 8 weeks. The results showed similar growth among groups but FO group obtained lower fat deposition, serum ALT and AST activities, compared to OO. Lipogenesis‐related gene expressions were higher in OO group than FO group in liver, muscle and adipose tissue, but there were only few differences in these genes between SO and FO groups. Lipid catabolism genes in FO group were higher than OO and SO groups in adipose tissue, but not in muscle, and the significantly higher expressions of CPT1b and PPARα were only observed in liver. Overall, dietary 18:2n‐6, 20:5n‐3 and 22:6n‐3 were beneficial to normal growth and lipid metabolism, whereas high amount of 18:1n‐9 induced lipid deposition and liver damage in Nile tilapia.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><doi>10.1111/anu.12906</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6581-5313</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0138-7828</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1353-5773
ispartof Aquaculture nutrition, 2019-08, Vol.25 (4), p.862-872
issn 1353-5773
1365-2095
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2309665752
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Adipose tissue
Catabolism
dietary oil
fatty acid composition
Fatty acids
Fish
Fish oils
Freshwater fishes
Gene expression
Growth
growth performance
lipid metabolism
Lipids
Liver
Metabolism
nile tilapia
Oil
Oils & fats
Olive oil
Oreochromis niloticus
Safflower oil
Serum
Tilapia
very long chain unsaturated fatty acid
title Comparison of effects of dietary‐specific fatty acids on growth and lipid metabolism in Nile tilapia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T13%3A27%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20effects%20of%20dietary%E2%80%90specific%20fatty%20acids%20on%20growth%20and%20lipid%20metabolism%20in%20Nile%20tilapia&rft.jtitle=Aquaculture%20nutrition&rft.au=Liu,%20Yan&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=862&rft.epage=872&rft.pages=862-872&rft.issn=1353-5773&rft.eissn=1365-2095&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/anu.12906&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2309665752%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2309665752&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true