Specificity, strength, and evolution of pretransplant donor‐specific HLA antibodies determine outcome after kidney transplantation

In this cohort study (N = 924), we investigated the evolution and clinical significance of pretransplant donor‐specific HLA antibodies (preDSA), detected in the single‐antigen beads assay but complement‐dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch‐negative. Donor specificity of the preDSA (N = 107) was determi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of transplantation 2019-11, Vol.19 (11), p.3100-3113
Hauptverfasser: Senev, Aleksandar, Lerut, Evelyne, Van Sandt, Vicky, Coemans, Maarten, Callemeyn, Jasper, Sprangers, Ben, Kuypers, Dirk, Emonds, Marie‐Paule, Naesens, Maarten
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3113
container_issue 11
container_start_page 3100
container_title American journal of transplantation
container_volume 19
creator Senev, Aleksandar
Lerut, Evelyne
Van Sandt, Vicky
Coemans, Maarten
Callemeyn, Jasper
Sprangers, Ben
Kuypers, Dirk
Emonds, Marie‐Paule
Naesens, Maarten
description In this cohort study (N = 924), we investigated the evolution and clinical significance of pretransplant donor‐specific HLA antibodies (preDSA), detected in the single‐antigen beads assay but complement‐dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch‐negative. Donor specificity of the preDSA (N = 107) was determined by high‐resolution genotyping of donor‐recipient pairs. We found that in 52% of the patients with preDSA, preDSA spontaneously resolved within the first 3 months posttransplant. PreDSA that persisted posttransplant had higher pretransplant median fluorescence intensity values and more specificity against DQ. Patients with both resolved and persistent DSA had a high incidence of histological picture of antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMRh; 54% and 59% respectively). Patients with preDSA that persisted posttransplant had worse 10‐year graft survival compared to resolved DSA and preDSA‐negative patients. Compared to cases without preDSA, Cox modeling revealed an increased risk of graft failure only in the patients with persistent DSA, in the presence (hazard ratio [HR] = 8.3) but also in the absence (HR = 4.3) of ABMRh. In contrast, no increased risk of graft failure was seen in patients with resolved DSA. We conclude that persistence of preDSA posttransplant has a negative impact on graft survival, beyond ABMRh. Even in the absence of antibody‐targeting therapy, low median fluorescence intensity DSA and non‐DQ preDSA often disappear early posttransplantation and are not deleterious for graft outcome. In this large cohort study of 924 single kidney recipients, Senev et al investigate the evolution of pretransplant HLA‐DSA determined by high‐resolution HLA genotyping of the transplant pair and conclude that even in the absence of antibody‐targeting therapy, low‐MFI DSA and non‐DQ pretransplant DSA often disappear early posttransplant and are not deleterious for graft outcome.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ajt.15414
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2309502722</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2309502722</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-68ccfc0dd7bfcbd734a13db21e0e68a375f9323af47e3ad1accecd0fba60f95c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLlOAzEQhi0EgnAUvACyRIWUw8deKaMICCgSBVCvvPYYHBJ7sb2gdBQ8AM_Ik7AhASqmmdHom2-kH6FjSvq0rYGYxT5NE5psoQ7NCOllNOHbvzNP99B-CDNCaM4Ktov2OCUZS4asg95va5BGG2nisotD9GAf4mMXC6swvLh5E42z2Glce4he2FDPhY1YOev859tH2FzjyXTU3kRTOWUgYAUR_MJYwK6J0i0AC91u8JNRFpb4zyRW_kO0o8U8wNGmH6D7i_O78aQ3vbm8Go-mPcmLIullhZRaEqXySstK5TwRlKuKUSCQFYLnqR5yxoVOcuBCUSElSEV0JTKih6nkB-h07a29e24gxHLmGm_blyXjZJgSljPWUmdrSnoXggdd1t4shF-WlJSrvMs27_I775Y92RibagHql_wJuAUGa-DVzGH5v6kcXd-tlV-8Jo8F</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2309502722</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Specificity, strength, and evolution of pretransplant donor‐specific HLA antibodies determine outcome after kidney transplantation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Senev, Aleksandar ; Lerut, Evelyne ; Van Sandt, Vicky ; Coemans, Maarten ; Callemeyn, Jasper ; Sprangers, Ben ; Kuypers, Dirk ; Emonds, Marie‐Paule ; Naesens, Maarten</creator><creatorcontrib>Senev, Aleksandar ; Lerut, Evelyne ; Van Sandt, Vicky ; Coemans, Maarten ; Callemeyn, Jasper ; Sprangers, Ben ; Kuypers, Dirk ; Emonds, Marie‐Paule ; Naesens, Maarten</creatorcontrib><description>In this cohort study (N = 924), we investigated the evolution and clinical significance of pretransplant donor‐specific HLA antibodies (preDSA), detected in the single‐antigen beads assay but complement‐dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch‐negative. Donor specificity of the preDSA (N = 107) was determined by high‐resolution genotyping of donor‐recipient pairs. We found that in 52% of the patients with preDSA, preDSA spontaneously resolved within the first 3 months posttransplant. PreDSA that persisted posttransplant had higher pretransplant median fluorescence intensity values and more specificity against DQ. Patients with both resolved and persistent DSA had a high incidence of histological picture of antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMRh; 54% and 59% respectively). Patients with preDSA that persisted posttransplant had worse 10‐year graft survival compared to resolved DSA and preDSA‐negative patients. Compared to cases without preDSA, Cox modeling revealed an increased risk of graft failure only in the patients with persistent DSA, in the presence (hazard ratio [HR] = 8.3) but also in the absence (HR = 4.3) of ABMRh. In contrast, no increased risk of graft failure was seen in patients with resolved DSA. We conclude that persistence of preDSA posttransplant has a negative impact on graft survival, beyond ABMRh. Even in the absence of antibody‐targeting therapy, low median fluorescence intensity DSA and non‐DQ preDSA often disappear early posttransplantation and are not deleterious for graft outcome. In this large cohort study of 924 single kidney recipients, Senev et al investigate the evolution of pretransplant HLA‐DSA determined by high‐resolution HLA genotyping of the transplant pair and conclude that even in the absence of antibody‐targeting therapy, low‐MFI DSA and non‐DQ pretransplant DSA often disappear early posttransplant and are not deleterious for graft outcome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1600-6135</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-6143</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15414</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31062492</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>alloantibody ; Antibodies ; antibody‐mediated (ABMR) ; clinical research/practice ; Cohort Studies ; Cytotoxicity ; deceased ; donors and donation ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Genotyping ; Graft rejection ; Graft Rejection - etiology ; Graft Rejection - mortality ; Graft Rejection - pathology ; Graft Survival ; Grafts ; health services and outcomes research ; histocompatibility ; Histocompatibility antigen HLA ; Histocompatibility testing ; HLA Antigens - immunology ; Humans ; Isoantibodies - adverse effects ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - surgery ; Kidney transplantation ; Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects ; kidney transplantation/nephrology ; Kidney transplants ; major histocompatibility complex (MHC) ; Male ; Middle Aged ; organ procurement and allocation ; Prognosis ; rejection ; risk assessment/risk stratification ; Risk Factors ; ROC Curve ; Survival ; Tissue Donors - supply &amp; distribution</subject><ispartof>American journal of transplantation, 2019-11, Vol.19 (11), p.3100-3113</ispartof><rights>2019 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons</rights><rights>2019 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-68ccfc0dd7bfcbd734a13db21e0e68a375f9323af47e3ad1accecd0fba60f95c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-68ccfc0dd7bfcbd734a13db21e0e68a375f9323af47e3ad1accecd0fba60f95c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9748-4069 ; 0000-0003-3937-7190 ; 0000-0002-2653-8656 ; 0000-0002-6196-4669 ; 0000-0002-5625-0792 ; 0000-0003-1314-9675 ; 0000-0001-5546-9680 ; 0000-0001-8442-3673 ; 0000-0003-2235-9842</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fajt.15414$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fajt.15414$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31062492$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Senev, Aleksandar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerut, Evelyne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Sandt, Vicky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coemans, Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callemeyn, Jasper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sprangers, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuypers, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emonds, Marie‐Paule</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naesens, Maarten</creatorcontrib><title>Specificity, strength, and evolution of pretransplant donor‐specific HLA antibodies determine outcome after kidney transplantation</title><title>American journal of transplantation</title><addtitle>Am J Transplant</addtitle><description>In this cohort study (N = 924), we investigated the evolution and clinical significance of pretransplant donor‐specific HLA antibodies (preDSA), detected in the single‐antigen beads assay but complement‐dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch‐negative. Donor specificity of the preDSA (N = 107) was determined by high‐resolution genotyping of donor‐recipient pairs. We found that in 52% of the patients with preDSA, preDSA spontaneously resolved within the first 3 months posttransplant. PreDSA that persisted posttransplant had higher pretransplant median fluorescence intensity values and more specificity against DQ. Patients with both resolved and persistent DSA had a high incidence of histological picture of antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMRh; 54% and 59% respectively). Patients with preDSA that persisted posttransplant had worse 10‐year graft survival compared to resolved DSA and preDSA‐negative patients. Compared to cases without preDSA, Cox modeling revealed an increased risk of graft failure only in the patients with persistent DSA, in the presence (hazard ratio [HR] = 8.3) but also in the absence (HR = 4.3) of ABMRh. In contrast, no increased risk of graft failure was seen in patients with resolved DSA. We conclude that persistence of preDSA posttransplant has a negative impact on graft survival, beyond ABMRh. Even in the absence of antibody‐targeting therapy, low median fluorescence intensity DSA and non‐DQ preDSA often disappear early posttransplantation and are not deleterious for graft outcome. In this large cohort study of 924 single kidney recipients, Senev et al investigate the evolution of pretransplant HLA‐DSA determined by high‐resolution HLA genotyping of the transplant pair and conclude that even in the absence of antibody‐targeting therapy, low‐MFI DSA and non‐DQ pretransplant DSA often disappear early posttransplant and are not deleterious for graft outcome.</description><subject>alloantibody</subject><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>antibody‐mediated (ABMR)</subject><subject>clinical research/practice</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Cytotoxicity</subject><subject>deceased</subject><subject>donors and donation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Genotyping</subject><subject>Graft rejection</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - etiology</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - mortality</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - pathology</subject><subject>Graft Survival</subject><subject>Grafts</subject><subject>health services and outcomes research</subject><subject>histocompatibility</subject><subject>Histocompatibility antigen HLA</subject><subject>Histocompatibility testing</subject><subject>HLA Antigens - immunology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Isoantibodies - adverse effects</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - surgery</subject><subject>Kidney transplantation</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>kidney transplantation/nephrology</subject><subject>Kidney transplants</subject><subject>major histocompatibility complex (MHC)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>organ procurement and allocation</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>rejection</subject><subject>risk assessment/risk stratification</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tissue Donors - supply &amp; distribution</subject><issn>1600-6135</issn><issn>1600-6143</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kLlOAzEQhi0EgnAUvACyRIWUw8deKaMICCgSBVCvvPYYHBJ7sb2gdBQ8AM_Ik7AhASqmmdHom2-kH6FjSvq0rYGYxT5NE5psoQ7NCOllNOHbvzNP99B-CDNCaM4Ktov2OCUZS4asg95va5BGG2nisotD9GAf4mMXC6swvLh5E42z2Glce4he2FDPhY1YOev859tH2FzjyXTU3kRTOWUgYAUR_MJYwK6J0i0AC91u8JNRFpb4zyRW_kO0o8U8wNGmH6D7i_O78aQ3vbm8Go-mPcmLIullhZRaEqXySstK5TwRlKuKUSCQFYLnqR5yxoVOcuBCUSElSEV0JTKih6nkB-h07a29e24gxHLmGm_blyXjZJgSljPWUmdrSnoXggdd1t4shF-WlJSrvMs27_I775Y92RibagHql_wJuAUGa-DVzGH5v6kcXd-tlV-8Jo8F</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Senev, Aleksandar</creator><creator>Lerut, Evelyne</creator><creator>Van Sandt, Vicky</creator><creator>Coemans, Maarten</creator><creator>Callemeyn, Jasper</creator><creator>Sprangers, Ben</creator><creator>Kuypers, Dirk</creator><creator>Emonds, Marie‐Paule</creator><creator>Naesens, Maarten</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9748-4069</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3937-7190</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2653-8656</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6196-4669</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5625-0792</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1314-9675</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5546-9680</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8442-3673</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2235-9842</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Specificity, strength, and evolution of pretransplant donor‐specific HLA antibodies determine outcome after kidney transplantation</title><author>Senev, Aleksandar ; Lerut, Evelyne ; Van Sandt, Vicky ; Coemans, Maarten ; Callemeyn, Jasper ; Sprangers, Ben ; Kuypers, Dirk ; Emonds, Marie‐Paule ; Naesens, Maarten</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-68ccfc0dd7bfcbd734a13db21e0e68a375f9323af47e3ad1accecd0fba60f95c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>alloantibody</topic><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>antibody‐mediated (ABMR)</topic><topic>clinical research/practice</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Cytotoxicity</topic><topic>deceased</topic><topic>donors and donation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Genotyping</topic><topic>Graft rejection</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - etiology</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - mortality</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - pathology</topic><topic>Graft Survival</topic><topic>Grafts</topic><topic>health services and outcomes research</topic><topic>histocompatibility</topic><topic>Histocompatibility antigen HLA</topic><topic>Histocompatibility testing</topic><topic>HLA Antigens - immunology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Isoantibodies - adverse effects</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - surgery</topic><topic>Kidney transplantation</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>kidney transplantation/nephrology</topic><topic>Kidney transplants</topic><topic>major histocompatibility complex (MHC)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>organ procurement and allocation</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>rejection</topic><topic>risk assessment/risk stratification</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tissue Donors - supply &amp; distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Senev, Aleksandar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerut, Evelyne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Sandt, Vicky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coemans, Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callemeyn, Jasper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sprangers, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuypers, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emonds, Marie‐Paule</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naesens, Maarten</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>American journal of transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Senev, Aleksandar</au><au>Lerut, Evelyne</au><au>Van Sandt, Vicky</au><au>Coemans, Maarten</au><au>Callemeyn, Jasper</au><au>Sprangers, Ben</au><au>Kuypers, Dirk</au><au>Emonds, Marie‐Paule</au><au>Naesens, Maarten</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Specificity, strength, and evolution of pretransplant donor‐specific HLA antibodies determine outcome after kidney transplantation</atitle><jtitle>American journal of transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Transplant</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3100</spage><epage>3113</epage><pages>3100-3113</pages><issn>1600-6135</issn><eissn>1600-6143</eissn><abstract>In this cohort study (N = 924), we investigated the evolution and clinical significance of pretransplant donor‐specific HLA antibodies (preDSA), detected in the single‐antigen beads assay but complement‐dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch‐negative. Donor specificity of the preDSA (N = 107) was determined by high‐resolution genotyping of donor‐recipient pairs. We found that in 52% of the patients with preDSA, preDSA spontaneously resolved within the first 3 months posttransplant. PreDSA that persisted posttransplant had higher pretransplant median fluorescence intensity values and more specificity against DQ. Patients with both resolved and persistent DSA had a high incidence of histological picture of antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMRh; 54% and 59% respectively). Patients with preDSA that persisted posttransplant had worse 10‐year graft survival compared to resolved DSA and preDSA‐negative patients. Compared to cases without preDSA, Cox modeling revealed an increased risk of graft failure only in the patients with persistent DSA, in the presence (hazard ratio [HR] = 8.3) but also in the absence (HR = 4.3) of ABMRh. In contrast, no increased risk of graft failure was seen in patients with resolved DSA. We conclude that persistence of preDSA posttransplant has a negative impact on graft survival, beyond ABMRh. Even in the absence of antibody‐targeting therapy, low median fluorescence intensity DSA and non‐DQ preDSA often disappear early posttransplantation and are not deleterious for graft outcome. In this large cohort study of 924 single kidney recipients, Senev et al investigate the evolution of pretransplant HLA‐DSA determined by high‐resolution HLA genotyping of the transplant pair and conclude that even in the absence of antibody‐targeting therapy, low‐MFI DSA and non‐DQ pretransplant DSA often disappear early posttransplant and are not deleterious for graft outcome.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><pmid>31062492</pmid><doi>10.1111/ajt.15414</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9748-4069</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3937-7190</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2653-8656</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6196-4669</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5625-0792</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1314-9675</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5546-9680</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8442-3673</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2235-9842</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1600-6135
ispartof American journal of transplantation, 2019-11, Vol.19 (11), p.3100-3113
issn 1600-6135
1600-6143
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2309502722
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects alloantibody
Antibodies
antibody‐mediated (ABMR)
clinical research/practice
Cohort Studies
Cytotoxicity
deceased
donors and donation
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Genotyping
Graft rejection
Graft Rejection - etiology
Graft Rejection - mortality
Graft Rejection - pathology
Graft Survival
Grafts
health services and outcomes research
histocompatibility
Histocompatibility antigen HLA
Histocompatibility testing
HLA Antigens - immunology
Humans
Isoantibodies - adverse effects
Kidney Failure, Chronic - surgery
Kidney transplantation
Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects
kidney transplantation/nephrology
Kidney transplants
major histocompatibility complex (MHC)
Male
Middle Aged
organ procurement and allocation
Prognosis
rejection
risk assessment/risk stratification
Risk Factors
ROC Curve
Survival
Tissue Donors - supply & distribution
title Specificity, strength, and evolution of pretransplant donor‐specific HLA antibodies determine outcome after kidney transplantation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T01%3A38%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Specificity,%20strength,%20and%20evolution%20of%20pretransplant%20donor%E2%80%90specific%20HLA%20antibodies%20determine%20outcome%20after%20kidney%20transplantation&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20transplantation&rft.au=Senev,%20Aleksandar&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3100&rft.epage=3113&rft.pages=3100-3113&rft.issn=1600-6135&rft.eissn=1600-6143&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ajt.15414&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2309502722%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2309502722&rft_id=info:pmid/31062492&rfr_iscdi=true