Specificity, strength, and evolution of pretransplant donor‐specific HLA antibodies determine outcome after kidney transplantation
In this cohort study (N = 924), we investigated the evolution and clinical significance of pretransplant donor‐specific HLA antibodies (preDSA), detected in the single‐antigen beads assay but complement‐dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch‐negative. Donor specificity of the preDSA (N = 107) was determi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of transplantation 2019-11, Vol.19 (11), p.3100-3113 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3113 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 3100 |
container_title | American journal of transplantation |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Senev, Aleksandar Lerut, Evelyne Van Sandt, Vicky Coemans, Maarten Callemeyn, Jasper Sprangers, Ben Kuypers, Dirk Emonds, Marie‐Paule Naesens, Maarten |
description | In this cohort study (N = 924), we investigated the evolution and clinical significance of pretransplant donor‐specific HLA antibodies (preDSA), detected in the single‐antigen beads assay but complement‐dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch‐negative. Donor specificity of the preDSA (N = 107) was determined by high‐resolution genotyping of donor‐recipient pairs. We found that in 52% of the patients with preDSA, preDSA spontaneously resolved within the first 3 months posttransplant. PreDSA that persisted posttransplant had higher pretransplant median fluorescence intensity values and more specificity against DQ. Patients with both resolved and persistent DSA had a high incidence of histological picture of antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMRh; 54% and 59% respectively). Patients with preDSA that persisted posttransplant had worse 10‐year graft survival compared to resolved DSA and preDSA‐negative patients. Compared to cases without preDSA, Cox modeling revealed an increased risk of graft failure only in the patients with persistent DSA, in the presence (hazard ratio [HR] = 8.3) but also in the absence (HR = 4.3) of ABMRh. In contrast, no increased risk of graft failure was seen in patients with resolved DSA. We conclude that persistence of preDSA posttransplant has a negative impact on graft survival, beyond ABMRh. Even in the absence of antibody‐targeting therapy, low median fluorescence intensity DSA and non‐DQ preDSA often disappear early posttransplantation and are not deleterious for graft outcome.
In this large cohort study of 924 single kidney recipients, Senev et al investigate the evolution of pretransplant HLA‐DSA determined by high‐resolution HLA genotyping of the transplant pair and conclude that even in the absence of antibody‐targeting therapy, low‐MFI DSA and non‐DQ pretransplant DSA often disappear early posttransplant and are not deleterious for graft outcome. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ajt.15414 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2309502722</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2309502722</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-68ccfc0dd7bfcbd734a13db21e0e68a375f9323af47e3ad1accecd0fba60f95c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLlOAzEQhi0EgnAUvACyRIWUw8deKaMICCgSBVCvvPYYHBJ7sb2gdBQ8AM_Ik7AhASqmmdHom2-kH6FjSvq0rYGYxT5NE5psoQ7NCOllNOHbvzNP99B-CDNCaM4Ktov2OCUZS4asg95va5BGG2nisotD9GAf4mMXC6swvLh5E42z2Glce4he2FDPhY1YOev859tH2FzjyXTU3kRTOWUgYAUR_MJYwK6J0i0AC91u8JNRFpb4zyRW_kO0o8U8wNGmH6D7i_O78aQ3vbm8Go-mPcmLIullhZRaEqXySstK5TwRlKuKUSCQFYLnqR5yxoVOcuBCUSElSEV0JTKih6nkB-h07a29e24gxHLmGm_blyXjZJgSljPWUmdrSnoXggdd1t4shF-WlJSrvMs27_I775Y92RibagHql_wJuAUGa-DVzGH5v6kcXd-tlV-8Jo8F</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2309502722</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Specificity, strength, and evolution of pretransplant donor‐specific HLA antibodies determine outcome after kidney transplantation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Senev, Aleksandar ; Lerut, Evelyne ; Van Sandt, Vicky ; Coemans, Maarten ; Callemeyn, Jasper ; Sprangers, Ben ; Kuypers, Dirk ; Emonds, Marie‐Paule ; Naesens, Maarten</creator><creatorcontrib>Senev, Aleksandar ; Lerut, Evelyne ; Van Sandt, Vicky ; Coemans, Maarten ; Callemeyn, Jasper ; Sprangers, Ben ; Kuypers, Dirk ; Emonds, Marie‐Paule ; Naesens, Maarten</creatorcontrib><description>In this cohort study (N = 924), we investigated the evolution and clinical significance of pretransplant donor‐specific HLA antibodies (preDSA), detected in the single‐antigen beads assay but complement‐dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch‐negative. Donor specificity of the preDSA (N = 107) was determined by high‐resolution genotyping of donor‐recipient pairs. We found that in 52% of the patients with preDSA, preDSA spontaneously resolved within the first 3 months posttransplant. PreDSA that persisted posttransplant had higher pretransplant median fluorescence intensity values and more specificity against DQ. Patients with both resolved and persistent DSA had a high incidence of histological picture of antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMRh; 54% and 59% respectively). Patients with preDSA that persisted posttransplant had worse 10‐year graft survival compared to resolved DSA and preDSA‐negative patients. Compared to cases without preDSA, Cox modeling revealed an increased risk of graft failure only in the patients with persistent DSA, in the presence (hazard ratio [HR] = 8.3) but also in the absence (HR = 4.3) of ABMRh. In contrast, no increased risk of graft failure was seen in patients with resolved DSA. We conclude that persistence of preDSA posttransplant has a negative impact on graft survival, beyond ABMRh. Even in the absence of antibody‐targeting therapy, low median fluorescence intensity DSA and non‐DQ preDSA often disappear early posttransplantation and are not deleterious for graft outcome.
In this large cohort study of 924 single kidney recipients, Senev et al investigate the evolution of pretransplant HLA‐DSA determined by high‐resolution HLA genotyping of the transplant pair and conclude that even in the absence of antibody‐targeting therapy, low‐MFI DSA and non‐DQ pretransplant DSA often disappear early posttransplant and are not deleterious for graft outcome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1600-6135</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-6143</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15414</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31062492</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>alloantibody ; Antibodies ; antibody‐mediated (ABMR) ; clinical research/practice ; Cohort Studies ; Cytotoxicity ; deceased ; donors and donation ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Genotyping ; Graft rejection ; Graft Rejection - etiology ; Graft Rejection - mortality ; Graft Rejection - pathology ; Graft Survival ; Grafts ; health services and outcomes research ; histocompatibility ; Histocompatibility antigen HLA ; Histocompatibility testing ; HLA Antigens - immunology ; Humans ; Isoantibodies - adverse effects ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - surgery ; Kidney transplantation ; Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects ; kidney transplantation/nephrology ; Kidney transplants ; major histocompatibility complex (MHC) ; Male ; Middle Aged ; organ procurement and allocation ; Prognosis ; rejection ; risk assessment/risk stratification ; Risk Factors ; ROC Curve ; Survival ; Tissue Donors - supply & distribution</subject><ispartof>American journal of transplantation, 2019-11, Vol.19 (11), p.3100-3113</ispartof><rights>2019 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons</rights><rights>2019 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-68ccfc0dd7bfcbd734a13db21e0e68a375f9323af47e3ad1accecd0fba60f95c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-68ccfc0dd7bfcbd734a13db21e0e68a375f9323af47e3ad1accecd0fba60f95c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9748-4069 ; 0000-0003-3937-7190 ; 0000-0002-2653-8656 ; 0000-0002-6196-4669 ; 0000-0002-5625-0792 ; 0000-0003-1314-9675 ; 0000-0001-5546-9680 ; 0000-0001-8442-3673 ; 0000-0003-2235-9842</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fajt.15414$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fajt.15414$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31062492$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Senev, Aleksandar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerut, Evelyne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Sandt, Vicky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coemans, Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callemeyn, Jasper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sprangers, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuypers, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emonds, Marie‐Paule</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naesens, Maarten</creatorcontrib><title>Specificity, strength, and evolution of pretransplant donor‐specific HLA antibodies determine outcome after kidney transplantation</title><title>American journal of transplantation</title><addtitle>Am J Transplant</addtitle><description>In this cohort study (N = 924), we investigated the evolution and clinical significance of pretransplant donor‐specific HLA antibodies (preDSA), detected in the single‐antigen beads assay but complement‐dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch‐negative. Donor specificity of the preDSA (N = 107) was determined by high‐resolution genotyping of donor‐recipient pairs. We found that in 52% of the patients with preDSA, preDSA spontaneously resolved within the first 3 months posttransplant. PreDSA that persisted posttransplant had higher pretransplant median fluorescence intensity values and more specificity against DQ. Patients with both resolved and persistent DSA had a high incidence of histological picture of antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMRh; 54% and 59% respectively). Patients with preDSA that persisted posttransplant had worse 10‐year graft survival compared to resolved DSA and preDSA‐negative patients. Compared to cases without preDSA, Cox modeling revealed an increased risk of graft failure only in the patients with persistent DSA, in the presence (hazard ratio [HR] = 8.3) but also in the absence (HR = 4.3) of ABMRh. In contrast, no increased risk of graft failure was seen in patients with resolved DSA. We conclude that persistence of preDSA posttransplant has a negative impact on graft survival, beyond ABMRh. Even in the absence of antibody‐targeting therapy, low median fluorescence intensity DSA and non‐DQ preDSA often disappear early posttransplantation and are not deleterious for graft outcome.
In this large cohort study of 924 single kidney recipients, Senev et al investigate the evolution of pretransplant HLA‐DSA determined by high‐resolution HLA genotyping of the transplant pair and conclude that even in the absence of antibody‐targeting therapy, low‐MFI DSA and non‐DQ pretransplant DSA often disappear early posttransplant and are not deleterious for graft outcome.</description><subject>alloantibody</subject><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>antibody‐mediated (ABMR)</subject><subject>clinical research/practice</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Cytotoxicity</subject><subject>deceased</subject><subject>donors and donation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Genotyping</subject><subject>Graft rejection</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - etiology</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - mortality</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - pathology</subject><subject>Graft Survival</subject><subject>Grafts</subject><subject>health services and outcomes research</subject><subject>histocompatibility</subject><subject>Histocompatibility antigen HLA</subject><subject>Histocompatibility testing</subject><subject>HLA Antigens - immunology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Isoantibodies - adverse effects</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - surgery</subject><subject>Kidney transplantation</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>kidney transplantation/nephrology</subject><subject>Kidney transplants</subject><subject>major histocompatibility complex (MHC)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>organ procurement and allocation</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>rejection</subject><subject>risk assessment/risk stratification</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tissue Donors - supply & distribution</subject><issn>1600-6135</issn><issn>1600-6143</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kLlOAzEQhi0EgnAUvACyRIWUw8deKaMICCgSBVCvvPYYHBJ7sb2gdBQ8AM_Ik7AhASqmmdHom2-kH6FjSvq0rYGYxT5NE5psoQ7NCOllNOHbvzNP99B-CDNCaM4Ktov2OCUZS4asg95va5BGG2nisotD9GAf4mMXC6swvLh5E42z2Glce4he2FDPhY1YOev859tH2FzjyXTU3kRTOWUgYAUR_MJYwK6J0i0AC91u8JNRFpb4zyRW_kO0o8U8wNGmH6D7i_O78aQ3vbm8Go-mPcmLIullhZRaEqXySstK5TwRlKuKUSCQFYLnqR5yxoVOcuBCUSElSEV0JTKih6nkB-h07a29e24gxHLmGm_blyXjZJgSljPWUmdrSnoXggdd1t4shF-WlJSrvMs27_I775Y92RibagHql_wJuAUGa-DVzGH5v6kcXd-tlV-8Jo8F</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Senev, Aleksandar</creator><creator>Lerut, Evelyne</creator><creator>Van Sandt, Vicky</creator><creator>Coemans, Maarten</creator><creator>Callemeyn, Jasper</creator><creator>Sprangers, Ben</creator><creator>Kuypers, Dirk</creator><creator>Emonds, Marie‐Paule</creator><creator>Naesens, Maarten</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9748-4069</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3937-7190</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2653-8656</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6196-4669</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5625-0792</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1314-9675</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5546-9680</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8442-3673</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2235-9842</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Specificity, strength, and evolution of pretransplant donor‐specific HLA antibodies determine outcome after kidney transplantation</title><author>Senev, Aleksandar ; Lerut, Evelyne ; Van Sandt, Vicky ; Coemans, Maarten ; Callemeyn, Jasper ; Sprangers, Ben ; Kuypers, Dirk ; Emonds, Marie‐Paule ; Naesens, Maarten</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-68ccfc0dd7bfcbd734a13db21e0e68a375f9323af47e3ad1accecd0fba60f95c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>alloantibody</topic><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>antibody‐mediated (ABMR)</topic><topic>clinical research/practice</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Cytotoxicity</topic><topic>deceased</topic><topic>donors and donation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Genotyping</topic><topic>Graft rejection</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - etiology</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - mortality</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - pathology</topic><topic>Graft Survival</topic><topic>Grafts</topic><topic>health services and outcomes research</topic><topic>histocompatibility</topic><topic>Histocompatibility antigen HLA</topic><topic>Histocompatibility testing</topic><topic>HLA Antigens - immunology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Isoantibodies - adverse effects</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - surgery</topic><topic>Kidney transplantation</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>kidney transplantation/nephrology</topic><topic>Kidney transplants</topic><topic>major histocompatibility complex (MHC)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>organ procurement and allocation</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>rejection</topic><topic>risk assessment/risk stratification</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tissue Donors - supply & distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Senev, Aleksandar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerut, Evelyne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Sandt, Vicky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coemans, Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callemeyn, Jasper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sprangers, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuypers, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emonds, Marie‐Paule</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naesens, Maarten</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>American journal of transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Senev, Aleksandar</au><au>Lerut, Evelyne</au><au>Van Sandt, Vicky</au><au>Coemans, Maarten</au><au>Callemeyn, Jasper</au><au>Sprangers, Ben</au><au>Kuypers, Dirk</au><au>Emonds, Marie‐Paule</au><au>Naesens, Maarten</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Specificity, strength, and evolution of pretransplant donor‐specific HLA antibodies determine outcome after kidney transplantation</atitle><jtitle>American journal of transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Transplant</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3100</spage><epage>3113</epage><pages>3100-3113</pages><issn>1600-6135</issn><eissn>1600-6143</eissn><abstract>In this cohort study (N = 924), we investigated the evolution and clinical significance of pretransplant donor‐specific HLA antibodies (preDSA), detected in the single‐antigen beads assay but complement‐dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch‐negative. Donor specificity of the preDSA (N = 107) was determined by high‐resolution genotyping of donor‐recipient pairs. We found that in 52% of the patients with preDSA, preDSA spontaneously resolved within the first 3 months posttransplant. PreDSA that persisted posttransplant had higher pretransplant median fluorescence intensity values and more specificity against DQ. Patients with both resolved and persistent DSA had a high incidence of histological picture of antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMRh; 54% and 59% respectively). Patients with preDSA that persisted posttransplant had worse 10‐year graft survival compared to resolved DSA and preDSA‐negative patients. Compared to cases without preDSA, Cox modeling revealed an increased risk of graft failure only in the patients with persistent DSA, in the presence (hazard ratio [HR] = 8.3) but also in the absence (HR = 4.3) of ABMRh. In contrast, no increased risk of graft failure was seen in patients with resolved DSA. We conclude that persistence of preDSA posttransplant has a negative impact on graft survival, beyond ABMRh. Even in the absence of antibody‐targeting therapy, low median fluorescence intensity DSA and non‐DQ preDSA often disappear early posttransplantation and are not deleterious for graft outcome.
In this large cohort study of 924 single kidney recipients, Senev et al investigate the evolution of pretransplant HLA‐DSA determined by high‐resolution HLA genotyping of the transplant pair and conclude that even in the absence of antibody‐targeting therapy, low‐MFI DSA and non‐DQ pretransplant DSA often disappear early posttransplant and are not deleterious for graft outcome.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><pmid>31062492</pmid><doi>10.1111/ajt.15414</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9748-4069</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3937-7190</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2653-8656</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6196-4669</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5625-0792</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1314-9675</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5546-9680</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8442-3673</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2235-9842</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1600-6135 |
ispartof | American journal of transplantation, 2019-11, Vol.19 (11), p.3100-3113 |
issn | 1600-6135 1600-6143 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2309502722 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | alloantibody Antibodies antibody‐mediated (ABMR) clinical research/practice Cohort Studies Cytotoxicity deceased donors and donation Female Follow-Up Studies Genotyping Graft rejection Graft Rejection - etiology Graft Rejection - mortality Graft Rejection - pathology Graft Survival Grafts health services and outcomes research histocompatibility Histocompatibility antigen HLA Histocompatibility testing HLA Antigens - immunology Humans Isoantibodies - adverse effects Kidney Failure, Chronic - surgery Kidney transplantation Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects kidney transplantation/nephrology Kidney transplants major histocompatibility complex (MHC) Male Middle Aged organ procurement and allocation Prognosis rejection risk assessment/risk stratification Risk Factors ROC Curve Survival Tissue Donors - supply & distribution |
title | Specificity, strength, and evolution of pretransplant donor‐specific HLA antibodies determine outcome after kidney transplantation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T01%3A38%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Specificity,%20strength,%20and%20evolution%20of%20pretransplant%20donor%E2%80%90specific%20HLA%20antibodies%20determine%20outcome%20after%20kidney%20transplantation&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20transplantation&rft.au=Senev,%20Aleksandar&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3100&rft.epage=3113&rft.pages=3100-3113&rft.issn=1600-6135&rft.eissn=1600-6143&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ajt.15414&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2309502722%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2309502722&rft_id=info:pmid/31062492&rfr_iscdi=true |