Isolation of Arcobacter species from animal feces
A previously developed Arcobacter isolation protocol for poultry skin and meat was validated for the isolation of Arcobacter from feces of livestock animals. Good repeatability, in-lab reproducibility and sensitivity were achieved and the specificity was improved by additional incorporation of cyclo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | FEMS microbiology letters 2003-12, Vol.229 (2), p.243-248 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 248 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 243 |
| container_title | FEMS microbiology letters |
| container_volume | 229 |
| creator | Ellen Van Driessche Houf, Kurt Jan Van Hoof De Zutter, Lieven Vandamme, Peter |
| description | A previously developed Arcobacter isolation protocol for poultry skin and meat was validated for the isolation of Arcobacter from feces of livestock animals. Good repeatability, in-lab reproducibility and sensitivity were achieved and the specificity was improved by additional incorporation of cycloheximide and increase of the novobiocin concentration in the selective supplement. The limit of detection of quantitative and qualitative analysis was 102 and 100 cfu g−1 feces, respectively. From fecal samples collected at slaughterhouse. Arcobacter was isolated from 43.9% of porcine, 39.2% of bovine, 16.1% of ovine and 15.4% of equine samples. All three animal-associated Arcobacter species were isolated and levels up to 103 cfu g−1 feces were determined. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0378-10970300840-1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2309377884</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2309377884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_23093778843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyr0KwjAUQOGLKFh_nsAl4By9aWKSjiKKzrqXGBJoaZuatO-vgzg7neF8ABuGO4ZM7u_IlaYMC4UcUQukbAIZOyhBZSH1FLIfmMMipRoRRY4yA3ZLoTFDFToSPDlGG57GDi6S1DtbuUR8DC0xXdWahnhnXVrBzJsmufW3S9hezo_TlfYxvEaXhrIOY-w-q8w5FlwprQX_T70BtdM6Pw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2309377884</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Isolation of Arcobacter species from animal feces</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ellen Van Driessche ; Houf, Kurt ; Jan Van Hoof ; De Zutter, Lieven ; Vandamme, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Ellen Van Driessche ; Houf, Kurt ; Jan Van Hoof ; De Zutter, Lieven ; Vandamme, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>A previously developed Arcobacter isolation protocol for poultry skin and meat was validated for the isolation of Arcobacter from feces of livestock animals. Good repeatability, in-lab reproducibility and sensitivity were achieved and the specificity was improved by additional incorporation of cycloheximide and increase of the novobiocin concentration in the selective supplement. The limit of detection of quantitative and qualitative analysis was 102 and 100 cfu g−1 feces, respectively. From fecal samples collected at slaughterhouse. Arcobacter was isolated from 43.9% of porcine, 39.2% of bovine, 16.1% of ovine and 15.4% of equine samples. All three animal-associated Arcobacter species were isolated and levels up to 103 cfu g−1 feces were determined.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-1097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1574-6968</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0378-10970300840-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Abattoirs ; Arcobacter ; Cycloheximide ; Feces ; Livestock ; Meat ; Microbiology ; Novobiocin ; Qualitative analysis ; Reproducibility</subject><ispartof>FEMS microbiology letters, 2003-12, Vol.229 (2), p.243-248</ispartof><rights>2003 Federation of European Microbiological Societies</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ellen Van Driessche</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houf, Kurt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jan Van Hoof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Zutter, Lieven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandamme, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Isolation of Arcobacter species from animal feces</title><title>FEMS microbiology letters</title><description>A previously developed Arcobacter isolation protocol for poultry skin and meat was validated for the isolation of Arcobacter from feces of livestock animals. Good repeatability, in-lab reproducibility and sensitivity were achieved and the specificity was improved by additional incorporation of cycloheximide and increase of the novobiocin concentration in the selective supplement. The limit of detection of quantitative and qualitative analysis was 102 and 100 cfu g−1 feces, respectively. From fecal samples collected at slaughterhouse. Arcobacter was isolated from 43.9% of porcine, 39.2% of bovine, 16.1% of ovine and 15.4% of equine samples. All three animal-associated Arcobacter species were isolated and levels up to 103 cfu g−1 feces were determined.</description><subject>Abattoirs</subject><subject>Arcobacter</subject><subject>Cycloheximide</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Novobiocin</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><issn>0378-1097</issn><issn>1574-6968</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyr0KwjAUQOGLKFh_nsAl4By9aWKSjiKKzrqXGBJoaZuatO-vgzg7neF8ABuGO4ZM7u_IlaYMC4UcUQukbAIZOyhBZSH1FLIfmMMipRoRRY4yA3ZLoTFDFToSPDlGG57GDi6S1DtbuUR8DC0xXdWahnhnXVrBzJsmufW3S9hezo_TlfYxvEaXhrIOY-w-q8w5FlwprQX_T70BtdM6Pw</recordid><startdate>20031201</startdate><enddate>20031201</enddate><creator>Ellen Van Driessche</creator><creator>Houf, Kurt</creator><creator>Jan Van Hoof</creator><creator>De Zutter, Lieven</creator><creator>Vandamme, Peter</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031201</creationdate><title>Isolation of Arcobacter species from animal feces</title><author>Ellen Van Driessche ; Houf, Kurt ; Jan Van Hoof ; De Zutter, Lieven ; Vandamme, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_23093778843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Abattoirs</topic><topic>Arcobacter</topic><topic>Cycloheximide</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Novobiocin</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ellen Van Driessche</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houf, Kurt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jan Van Hoof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Zutter, Lieven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandamme, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>FEMS microbiology letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ellen Van Driessche</au><au>Houf, Kurt</au><au>Jan Van Hoof</au><au>De Zutter, Lieven</au><au>Vandamme, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Isolation of Arcobacter species from animal feces</atitle><jtitle>FEMS microbiology letters</jtitle><date>2003-12-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>229</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>243</spage><epage>248</epage><pages>243-248</pages><issn>0378-1097</issn><eissn>1574-6968</eissn><abstract>A previously developed Arcobacter isolation protocol for poultry skin and meat was validated for the isolation of Arcobacter from feces of livestock animals. Good repeatability, in-lab reproducibility and sensitivity were achieved and the specificity was improved by additional incorporation of cycloheximide and increase of the novobiocin concentration in the selective supplement. The limit of detection of quantitative and qualitative analysis was 102 and 100 cfu g−1 feces, respectively. From fecal samples collected at slaughterhouse. Arcobacter was isolated from 43.9% of porcine, 39.2% of bovine, 16.1% of ovine and 15.4% of equine samples. All three animal-associated Arcobacter species were isolated and levels up to 103 cfu g−1 feces were determined.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1016/S0378-10970300840-1</doi></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0378-1097 |
| ispartof | FEMS microbiology letters, 2003-12, Vol.229 (2), p.243-248 |
| issn | 0378-1097 1574-6968 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2309377884 |
| source | Access via Wiley Online Library; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Abattoirs Arcobacter Cycloheximide Feces Livestock Meat Microbiology Novobiocin Qualitative analysis Reproducibility |
| title | Isolation of Arcobacter species from animal feces |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T03%3A38%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Isolation%20of%20Arcobacter%20species%20from%20animal%20feces&rft.jtitle=FEMS%20microbiology%20letters&rft.au=Ellen%20Van%20Driessche&rft.date=2003-12-01&rft.volume=229&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=248&rft.pages=243-248&rft.issn=0378-1097&rft.eissn=1574-6968&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0378-10970300840-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2309377884%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2309377884&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |