A physical model of the high‐frequency seismic signal generated by debris flows
We propose a physical model for the high‐frequency (>1 Hz) spectral distribution of seismic power generated by debris flows. The modeled debris flow is assumed to have four regions where the impact rate and impulses are controlled by different mechanisms: the flow body, a coarser‐grained snout, a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Earth surface processes and landforms 2019-10, Vol.44 (13), p.2529-2543 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2543 |
---|---|
container_issue | 13 |
container_start_page | 2529 |
container_title | Earth surface processes and landforms |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Farin, Maxime Tsai, Victor C. Lamb, Michael P. Allstadt, Kate E. |
description | We propose a physical model for the high‐frequency (>1 Hz) spectral distribution of seismic power generated by debris flows. The modeled debris flow is assumed to have four regions where the impact rate and impulses are controlled by different mechanisms: the flow body, a coarser‐grained snout, a snout lip where particles fall from the snout on the bed, and a dilute front composed of saltating particles. We calculate the seismic power produced by this impact model in two end‐member scenarios, a thin‐flow and thick‐flow limit, which assume that the ratio of grain sizes to flow thicknesses are either near unity or much less than unity. The thin‐flow limit is more appropriate for boulder‐rich flows that are most likely to generate large seismic signals. As a flow passes a seismic station, the rise phase of the seismic amplitude is generated primarily by the snout while the decay phase is generated first by the snout and then the main flow body. The lip and saltating front generate a negligible seismic signal. When ground properties are known, seismic power depends most strongly on both particle diameter and average flow speed cubed, and also depends on length and width of the flow. The effective particle diameter for producing seismic power is substantially higher than the median grain size and close to the 73rd percentile for a realistic grain size distribution. We discuss how the model can be used to estimate effective particle diameter and average flow speed from an integrated measure of seismic power. © 2019 The Authors. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. © 2019 The Authors. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
We model the high‐frequency seismic signal generated by a debris flow composed of four regions where particle interactions are different. The seismic signal is dominated by the snout for incoming flows and by the snout or the body as the flow propagates away from the station. The effective particle diameter or the mean flow speed can be deduced from integrated seismic power provided ground parameters are known. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/esp.4677 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2309156596</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2309156596</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4167-c54b10c25b569cf95f33ad19b12d1586bba41d9f4f4a67bf9b83cb4db9a83c953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKAzEYBeAgCtYq-AgBN26mJpPbZFlKvUBBRV2HJJN0UqadMWmR2fkIPqNPYmrduvr_xcfhcAC4xGiCESpvXOonlAtxBEYYSV7IiohjMEJYikISIk7BWUorhDCmlRyB5ynsmyEFq1u47mrXws7DbeNgE5bN9-eXj-595zZ2gMmFtA4WprDcZLx0Gxf11tXQDLB2JoYEfdt9pHNw4nWb3MXfHYO32_nr7L5YPN49zKaLQlPMRWEZNRjZkhnGpfWSeUJ0jaXBZY1ZxY3Jrpaeeqq5MF6ailhDayN1fiQjY3B1yO1jlyumrVp1u5irJVUSJDHjTPKsrg_Kxi6l6LzqY1jrOCiM1H4wlQdT-8EyLQ70I7Ru-Nep-cvTr_8Bl3ttmA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2309156596</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A physical model of the high‐frequency seismic signal generated by debris flows</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Farin, Maxime ; Tsai, Victor C. ; Lamb, Michael P. ; Allstadt, Kate E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Farin, Maxime ; Tsai, Victor C. ; Lamb, Michael P. ; Allstadt, Kate E.</creatorcontrib><description>We propose a physical model for the high‐frequency (>1 Hz) spectral distribution of seismic power generated by debris flows. The modeled debris flow is assumed to have four regions where the impact rate and impulses are controlled by different mechanisms: the flow body, a coarser‐grained snout, a snout lip where particles fall from the snout on the bed, and a dilute front composed of saltating particles. We calculate the seismic power produced by this impact model in two end‐member scenarios, a thin‐flow and thick‐flow limit, which assume that the ratio of grain sizes to flow thicknesses are either near unity or much less than unity. The thin‐flow limit is more appropriate for boulder‐rich flows that are most likely to generate large seismic signals. As a flow passes a seismic station, the rise phase of the seismic amplitude is generated primarily by the snout while the decay phase is generated first by the snout and then the main flow body. The lip and saltating front generate a negligible seismic signal. When ground properties are known, seismic power depends most strongly on both particle diameter and average flow speed cubed, and also depends on length and width of the flow. The effective particle diameter for producing seismic power is substantially higher than the median grain size and close to the 73rd percentile for a realistic grain size distribution. We discuss how the model can be used to estimate effective particle diameter and average flow speed from an integrated measure of seismic power. © 2019 The Authors. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. © 2019 The Authors. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
We model the high‐frequency seismic signal generated by a debris flow composed of four regions where particle interactions are different. The seismic signal is dominated by the snout for incoming flows and by the snout or the body as the flow propagates away from the station. The effective particle diameter or the mean flow speed can be deduced from integrated seismic power provided ground parameters are known.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-9337</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9837</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/esp.4677</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Average flow ; Debris flow ; Detritus ; Earth ; Earth surface ; Electric power distribution ; Grain size ; Grain size distribution ; Landforms ; Particle size ; Particle size distribution ; Seismic activity ; Size distribution ; Unity</subject><ispartof>Earth surface processes and landforms, 2019-10, Vol.44 (13), p.2529-2543</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4167-c54b10c25b569cf95f33ad19b12d1586bba41d9f4f4a67bf9b83cb4db9a83c953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4167-c54b10c25b569cf95f33ad19b12d1586bba41d9f4f4a67bf9b83cb4db9a83c953</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1809-6672</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fesp.4677$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fesp.4677$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farin, Maxime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Victor C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamb, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allstadt, Kate E.</creatorcontrib><title>A physical model of the high‐frequency seismic signal generated by debris flows</title><title>Earth surface processes and landforms</title><description>We propose a physical model for the high‐frequency (>1 Hz) spectral distribution of seismic power generated by debris flows. The modeled debris flow is assumed to have four regions where the impact rate and impulses are controlled by different mechanisms: the flow body, a coarser‐grained snout, a snout lip where particles fall from the snout on the bed, and a dilute front composed of saltating particles. We calculate the seismic power produced by this impact model in two end‐member scenarios, a thin‐flow and thick‐flow limit, which assume that the ratio of grain sizes to flow thicknesses are either near unity or much less than unity. The thin‐flow limit is more appropriate for boulder‐rich flows that are most likely to generate large seismic signals. As a flow passes a seismic station, the rise phase of the seismic amplitude is generated primarily by the snout while the decay phase is generated first by the snout and then the main flow body. The lip and saltating front generate a negligible seismic signal. When ground properties are known, seismic power depends most strongly on both particle diameter and average flow speed cubed, and also depends on length and width of the flow. The effective particle diameter for producing seismic power is substantially higher than the median grain size and close to the 73rd percentile for a realistic grain size distribution. We discuss how the model can be used to estimate effective particle diameter and average flow speed from an integrated measure of seismic power. © 2019 The Authors. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. © 2019 The Authors. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
We model the high‐frequency seismic signal generated by a debris flow composed of four regions where particle interactions are different. The seismic signal is dominated by the snout for incoming flows and by the snout or the body as the flow propagates away from the station. The effective particle diameter or the mean flow speed can be deduced from integrated seismic power provided ground parameters are known.</description><subject>Average flow</subject><subject>Debris flow</subject><subject>Detritus</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Earth surface</subject><subject>Electric power distribution</subject><subject>Grain size</subject><subject>Grain size distribution</subject><subject>Landforms</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>Particle size distribution</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Size distribution</subject><subject>Unity</subject><issn>0197-9337</issn><issn>1096-9837</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MtKAzEYBeAgCtYq-AgBN26mJpPbZFlKvUBBRV2HJJN0UqadMWmR2fkIPqNPYmrduvr_xcfhcAC4xGiCESpvXOonlAtxBEYYSV7IiohjMEJYikISIk7BWUorhDCmlRyB5ynsmyEFq1u47mrXws7DbeNgE5bN9-eXj-595zZ2gMmFtA4WprDcZLx0Gxf11tXQDLB2JoYEfdt9pHNw4nWb3MXfHYO32_nr7L5YPN49zKaLQlPMRWEZNRjZkhnGpfWSeUJ0jaXBZY1ZxY3Jrpaeeqq5MF6ailhDayN1fiQjY3B1yO1jlyumrVp1u5irJVUSJDHjTPKsrg_Kxi6l6LzqY1jrOCiM1H4wlQdT-8EyLQ70I7Ru-Nep-cvTr_8Bl3ttmA</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Farin, Maxime</creator><creator>Tsai, Victor C.</creator><creator>Lamb, Michael P.</creator><creator>Allstadt, Kate E.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1809-6672</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>A physical model of the high‐frequency seismic signal generated by debris flows</title><author>Farin, Maxime ; Tsai, Victor C. ; Lamb, Michael P. ; Allstadt, Kate E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4167-c54b10c25b569cf95f33ad19b12d1586bba41d9f4f4a67bf9b83cb4db9a83c953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Average flow</topic><topic>Debris flow</topic><topic>Detritus</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Earth surface</topic><topic>Electric power distribution</topic><topic>Grain size</topic><topic>Grain size distribution</topic><topic>Landforms</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>Particle size distribution</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Size distribution</topic><topic>Unity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farin, Maxime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Victor C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamb, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allstadt, Kate E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Earth surface processes and landforms</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farin, Maxime</au><au>Tsai, Victor C.</au><au>Lamb, Michael P.</au><au>Allstadt, Kate E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A physical model of the high‐frequency seismic signal generated by debris flows</atitle><jtitle>Earth surface processes and landforms</jtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>2529</spage><epage>2543</epage><pages>2529-2543</pages><issn>0197-9337</issn><eissn>1096-9837</eissn><abstract>We propose a physical model for the high‐frequency (>1 Hz) spectral distribution of seismic power generated by debris flows. The modeled debris flow is assumed to have four regions where the impact rate and impulses are controlled by different mechanisms: the flow body, a coarser‐grained snout, a snout lip where particles fall from the snout on the bed, and a dilute front composed of saltating particles. We calculate the seismic power produced by this impact model in two end‐member scenarios, a thin‐flow and thick‐flow limit, which assume that the ratio of grain sizes to flow thicknesses are either near unity or much less than unity. The thin‐flow limit is more appropriate for boulder‐rich flows that are most likely to generate large seismic signals. As a flow passes a seismic station, the rise phase of the seismic amplitude is generated primarily by the snout while the decay phase is generated first by the snout and then the main flow body. The lip and saltating front generate a negligible seismic signal. When ground properties are known, seismic power depends most strongly on both particle diameter and average flow speed cubed, and also depends on length and width of the flow. The effective particle diameter for producing seismic power is substantially higher than the median grain size and close to the 73rd percentile for a realistic grain size distribution. We discuss how the model can be used to estimate effective particle diameter and average flow speed from an integrated measure of seismic power. © 2019 The Authors. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. © 2019 The Authors. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
We model the high‐frequency seismic signal generated by a debris flow composed of four regions where particle interactions are different. The seismic signal is dominated by the snout for incoming flows and by the snout or the body as the flow propagates away from the station. The effective particle diameter or the mean flow speed can be deduced from integrated seismic power provided ground parameters are known.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/esp.4677</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1809-6672</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0197-9337 |
ispartof | Earth surface processes and landforms, 2019-10, Vol.44 (13), p.2529-2543 |
issn | 0197-9337 1096-9837 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2309156596 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Average flow Debris flow Detritus Earth Earth surface Electric power distribution Grain size Grain size distribution Landforms Particle size Particle size distribution Seismic activity Size distribution Unity |
title | A physical model of the high‐frequency seismic signal generated by debris flows |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T06%3A57%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20physical%20model%20of%20the%20high%E2%80%90frequency%20seismic%20signal%20generated%20by%20debris%20flows&rft.jtitle=Earth%20surface%20processes%20and%20landforms&rft.au=Farin,%20Maxime&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=2529&rft.epage=2543&rft.pages=2529-2543&rft.issn=0197-9337&rft.eissn=1096-9837&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/esp.4677&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2309156596%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2309156596&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |