Test and analysis of reinforced concrete (RC) precast shear wall assembled using steel shear key (SSK)

Summary Reinforced concrete (RC) precast shear walls are extensively applied in practical engineering, owing to their fast construction speed. However, because of the transport conditions, RC precast shear walls have to be separated into small wall segments during the factory prefabrication procedur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics 2019-11, Vol.48 (14), p.1595-1612
Hauptverfasser: Shen, Shao‐Dong, Pan, Peng, Miao, Qi‐Song, Li, Wen‐Feng, Gong, Run‐Hua
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1612
container_issue 14
container_start_page 1595
container_title Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics
container_volume 48
creator Shen, Shao‐Dong
Pan, Peng
Miao, Qi‐Song
Li, Wen‐Feng
Gong, Run‐Hua
description Summary Reinforced concrete (RC) precast shear walls are extensively applied in practical engineering, owing to their fast construction speed. However, because of the transport conditions, RC precast shear walls have to be separated into small wall segments during the factory prefabrication procedure before being assembled on site. Typically, wet‐type jointing methods are adopted to link the segments, which is time‐consuming and results in unreliable post‐pouring area strength. To overcome this problem, the novel scheme of the steel shear key (SSK) featuring steel shear panels and combined fillet and plug welding is proposed. Three RC precast shear wall specimens with different linking strength, termed as weakened SSK wall, standard SSK wall, and strengthened SSK wall, respectively, and an integrated shear wall specimen were designed. Quasi‐static cyclic loading was applied to investigate the specimens' dynamic properties. The test results suggest the prefabricated wall segments equipped with SSKs showed reliable stiffness and bearing capacity and were improved in energy dissipation ability, compared with conventional shear walls. As the shear stiffness and number of equipped SSKs increased, the specimens exhibited higher strength, but their ductility and energy dissipation were slightly decreased. Most importantly, the standard SSK wall specimen could achieve satisfactory bearing capacity and deformability and is thus recommended for precast building structures. Finite element method (FEM) models were established to validate the test results, and parametric study analysis was conducted based on the coupling ratio of the SSK walls. Finally, an appropriate coupling ratio range is recommended for practical engineering applications.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/eqe.3215
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2307581069</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2307581069</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-9fc48763820721cf6d8df8f4d57f8b54689b5cc8028cced890b4d84726ad314f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LAzEQBuAgCtYq-BMCXtrD1kn2KzlKqR9YEG09h2x2olu3u22ypey_N7W9ehhyeSbM-xJyy2DCAPg9bnESc5aekQEDmUVSJOk5GQBIEQmR5JfkyvsVAMQZ5ANil-g7qpsyjK57X3naWuqwamzrDJbUtI1x2CEdfUzHdOPQ6LDgv1E7utd1TbX3uC7qQHe-ar6o7xDrE_jBno4Wi9fxNbmwuvZ4c3qH5PNxtpw-R_O3p5fpwzwyXMZpJK1JRJ7FgkPOmbFZKUorbFKmuRVFmmRCFqkxArgw4TghoUjKEIpnuoxZYuMhuTv-u3HtdheiqVW7cyGZVzyGPBUMMhnU6KiMa713aNXGVWvtesVAHVpUoUV1aDHQ6Ej3VY39v07N3md__hd3hXIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2307581069</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Test and analysis of reinforced concrete (RC) precast shear wall assembled using steel shear key (SSK)</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Shen, Shao‐Dong ; Pan, Peng ; Miao, Qi‐Song ; Li, Wen‐Feng ; Gong, Run‐Hua</creator><creatorcontrib>Shen, Shao‐Dong ; Pan, Peng ; Miao, Qi‐Song ; Li, Wen‐Feng ; Gong, Run‐Hua</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Reinforced concrete (RC) precast shear walls are extensively applied in practical engineering, owing to their fast construction speed. However, because of the transport conditions, RC precast shear walls have to be separated into small wall segments during the factory prefabrication procedure before being assembled on site. Typically, wet‐type jointing methods are adopted to link the segments, which is time‐consuming and results in unreliable post‐pouring area strength. To overcome this problem, the novel scheme of the steel shear key (SSK) featuring steel shear panels and combined fillet and plug welding is proposed. Three RC precast shear wall specimens with different linking strength, termed as weakened SSK wall, standard SSK wall, and strengthened SSK wall, respectively, and an integrated shear wall specimen were designed. Quasi‐static cyclic loading was applied to investigate the specimens' dynamic properties. The test results suggest the prefabricated wall segments equipped with SSKs showed reliable stiffness and bearing capacity and were improved in energy dissipation ability, compared with conventional shear walls. As the shear stiffness and number of equipped SSKs increased, the specimens exhibited higher strength, but their ductility and energy dissipation were slightly decreased. Most importantly, the standard SSK wall specimen could achieve satisfactory bearing capacity and deformability and is thus recommended for precast building structures. Finite element method (FEM) models were established to validate the test results, and parametric study analysis was conducted based on the coupling ratio of the SSK walls. Finally, an appropriate coupling ratio range is recommended for practical engineering applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-8847</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9845</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/eqe.3215</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Bearing capacity ; Construction ; Coupling ; coupling ratio ; Cyclic loading ; Cyclic loads ; Deformability ; Ductility ; Energy dissipation ; Energy exchange ; Engineering ; Finite element method ; Fish fillets ; Formability ; Jointing ; Mathematical models ; Precast concrete ; Prefabricated buildings ; Prefabrication ; quasi‐static cyclic test ; RC precast shear wall ; Reinforced concrete ; Reinforcing steels ; Seafoods ; Segments ; Shear ; Shear stiffness ; Shear walls ; Steel ; steel shear key ; Welding</subject><ispartof>Earthquake engineering &amp; structural dynamics, 2019-11, Vol.48 (14), p.1595-1612</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-9fc48763820721cf6d8df8f4d57f8b54689b5cc8028cced890b4d84726ad314f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-9fc48763820721cf6d8df8f4d57f8b54689b5cc8028cced890b4d84726ad314f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5723-6477</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Feqe.3215$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Feqe.3215$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shen, Shao‐Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Peng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miao, Qi‐Song</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Wen‐Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Run‐Hua</creatorcontrib><title>Test and analysis of reinforced concrete (RC) precast shear wall assembled using steel shear key (SSK)</title><title>Earthquake engineering &amp; structural dynamics</title><description>Summary Reinforced concrete (RC) precast shear walls are extensively applied in practical engineering, owing to their fast construction speed. However, because of the transport conditions, RC precast shear walls have to be separated into small wall segments during the factory prefabrication procedure before being assembled on site. Typically, wet‐type jointing methods are adopted to link the segments, which is time‐consuming and results in unreliable post‐pouring area strength. To overcome this problem, the novel scheme of the steel shear key (SSK) featuring steel shear panels and combined fillet and plug welding is proposed. Three RC precast shear wall specimens with different linking strength, termed as weakened SSK wall, standard SSK wall, and strengthened SSK wall, respectively, and an integrated shear wall specimen were designed. Quasi‐static cyclic loading was applied to investigate the specimens' dynamic properties. The test results suggest the prefabricated wall segments equipped with SSKs showed reliable stiffness and bearing capacity and were improved in energy dissipation ability, compared with conventional shear walls. As the shear stiffness and number of equipped SSKs increased, the specimens exhibited higher strength, but their ductility and energy dissipation were slightly decreased. Most importantly, the standard SSK wall specimen could achieve satisfactory bearing capacity and deformability and is thus recommended for precast building structures. Finite element method (FEM) models were established to validate the test results, and parametric study analysis was conducted based on the coupling ratio of the SSK walls. Finally, an appropriate coupling ratio range is recommended for practical engineering applications.</description><subject>Bearing capacity</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Coupling</subject><subject>coupling ratio</subject><subject>Cyclic loading</subject><subject>Cyclic loads</subject><subject>Deformability</subject><subject>Ductility</subject><subject>Energy dissipation</subject><subject>Energy exchange</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Fish fillets</subject><subject>Formability</subject><subject>Jointing</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Precast concrete</subject><subject>Prefabricated buildings</subject><subject>Prefabrication</subject><subject>quasi‐static cyclic test</subject><subject>RC precast shear wall</subject><subject>Reinforced concrete</subject><subject>Reinforcing steels</subject><subject>Seafoods</subject><subject>Segments</subject><subject>Shear</subject><subject>Shear stiffness</subject><subject>Shear walls</subject><subject>Steel</subject><subject>steel shear key</subject><subject>Welding</subject><issn>0098-8847</issn><issn>1096-9845</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10E1LAzEQBuAgCtYq-BMCXtrD1kn2KzlKqR9YEG09h2x2olu3u22ypey_N7W9ehhyeSbM-xJyy2DCAPg9bnESc5aekQEDmUVSJOk5GQBIEQmR5JfkyvsVAMQZ5ANil-g7qpsyjK57X3naWuqwamzrDJbUtI1x2CEdfUzHdOPQ6LDgv1E7utd1TbX3uC7qQHe-ar6o7xDrE_jBno4Wi9fxNbmwuvZ4c3qH5PNxtpw-R_O3p5fpwzwyXMZpJK1JRJ7FgkPOmbFZKUorbFKmuRVFmmRCFqkxArgw4TghoUjKEIpnuoxZYuMhuTv-u3HtdheiqVW7cyGZVzyGPBUMMhnU6KiMa713aNXGVWvtesVAHVpUoUV1aDHQ6Ej3VY39v07N3md__hd3hXIQ</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Shen, Shao‐Dong</creator><creator>Pan, Peng</creator><creator>Miao, Qi‐Song</creator><creator>Li, Wen‐Feng</creator><creator>Gong, Run‐Hua</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5723-6477</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Test and analysis of reinforced concrete (RC) precast shear wall assembled using steel shear key (SSK)</title><author>Shen, Shao‐Dong ; Pan, Peng ; Miao, Qi‐Song ; Li, Wen‐Feng ; Gong, Run‐Hua</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-9fc48763820721cf6d8df8f4d57f8b54689b5cc8028cced890b4d84726ad314f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bearing capacity</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Coupling</topic><topic>coupling ratio</topic><topic>Cyclic loading</topic><topic>Cyclic loads</topic><topic>Deformability</topic><topic>Ductility</topic><topic>Energy dissipation</topic><topic>Energy exchange</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Fish fillets</topic><topic>Formability</topic><topic>Jointing</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Precast concrete</topic><topic>Prefabricated buildings</topic><topic>Prefabrication</topic><topic>quasi‐static cyclic test</topic><topic>RC precast shear wall</topic><topic>Reinforced concrete</topic><topic>Reinforcing steels</topic><topic>Seafoods</topic><topic>Segments</topic><topic>Shear</topic><topic>Shear stiffness</topic><topic>Shear walls</topic><topic>Steel</topic><topic>steel shear key</topic><topic>Welding</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shen, Shao‐Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Peng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miao, Qi‐Song</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Wen‐Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Run‐Hua</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Earthquake engineering &amp; structural dynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shen, Shao‐Dong</au><au>Pan, Peng</au><au>Miao, Qi‐Song</au><au>Li, Wen‐Feng</au><au>Gong, Run‐Hua</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Test and analysis of reinforced concrete (RC) precast shear wall assembled using steel shear key (SSK)</atitle><jtitle>Earthquake engineering &amp; structural dynamics</jtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>1595</spage><epage>1612</epage><pages>1595-1612</pages><issn>0098-8847</issn><eissn>1096-9845</eissn><abstract>Summary Reinforced concrete (RC) precast shear walls are extensively applied in practical engineering, owing to their fast construction speed. However, because of the transport conditions, RC precast shear walls have to be separated into small wall segments during the factory prefabrication procedure before being assembled on site. Typically, wet‐type jointing methods are adopted to link the segments, which is time‐consuming and results in unreliable post‐pouring area strength. To overcome this problem, the novel scheme of the steel shear key (SSK) featuring steel shear panels and combined fillet and plug welding is proposed. Three RC precast shear wall specimens with different linking strength, termed as weakened SSK wall, standard SSK wall, and strengthened SSK wall, respectively, and an integrated shear wall specimen were designed. Quasi‐static cyclic loading was applied to investigate the specimens' dynamic properties. The test results suggest the prefabricated wall segments equipped with SSKs showed reliable stiffness and bearing capacity and were improved in energy dissipation ability, compared with conventional shear walls. As the shear stiffness and number of equipped SSKs increased, the specimens exhibited higher strength, but their ductility and energy dissipation were slightly decreased. Most importantly, the standard SSK wall specimen could achieve satisfactory bearing capacity and deformability and is thus recommended for precast building structures. Finite element method (FEM) models were established to validate the test results, and parametric study analysis was conducted based on the coupling ratio of the SSK walls. Finally, an appropriate coupling ratio range is recommended for practical engineering applications.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/eqe.3215</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5723-6477</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0098-8847
ispartof Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 2019-11, Vol.48 (14), p.1595-1612
issn 0098-8847
1096-9845
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2307581069
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Bearing capacity
Construction
Coupling
coupling ratio
Cyclic loading
Cyclic loads
Deformability
Ductility
Energy dissipation
Energy exchange
Engineering
Finite element method
Fish fillets
Formability
Jointing
Mathematical models
Precast concrete
Prefabricated buildings
Prefabrication
quasi‐static cyclic test
RC precast shear wall
Reinforced concrete
Reinforcing steels
Seafoods
Segments
Shear
Shear stiffness
Shear walls
Steel
steel shear key
Welding
title Test and analysis of reinforced concrete (RC) precast shear wall assembled using steel shear key (SSK)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T05%3A59%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Test%20and%20analysis%20of%20reinforced%20concrete%20(RC)%20precast%20shear%20wall%20assembled%20using%20steel%20shear%20key%20(SSK)&rft.jtitle=Earthquake%20engineering%20&%20structural%20dynamics&rft.au=Shen,%20Shao%E2%80%90Dong&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=1595&rft.epage=1612&rft.pages=1595-1612&rft.issn=0098-8847&rft.eissn=1096-9845&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/eqe.3215&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2307581069%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2307581069&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true