Genomic insights into the evolution and ecology of botulinum neurotoxins

Abstract Clostridial neurotoxins, which include botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) and tetanus neurotoxins, have evolved a remarkably sophisticated structure and molecular mechanism fine-tuned for the targeting and cleavage of vertebrate neuron substrates leading to muscular paralysis. How and why did th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pathogens and disease 2018-06, Vol.76 (4)
Hauptverfasser: Mansfield, Michael J, Doxey, Andrew C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page
container_title Pathogens and disease
container_volume 76
creator Mansfield, Michael J
Doxey, Andrew C
description Abstract Clostridial neurotoxins, which include botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) and tetanus neurotoxins, have evolved a remarkably sophisticated structure and molecular mechanism fine-tuned for the targeting and cleavage of vertebrate neuron substrates leading to muscular paralysis. How and why did this toxin evolve? From which ancestral proteins are BoNTs derived? And what is, or was, the primary ecological role of BoNTs in the environment? In this article, we examine these questions in light of recent studies identifying homologs of BoNTs in the genomes of non-clostridial bacteria, including Weissella, Enterococcus and Chryseobacterium. Genomic and phylogenetic analysis of these more distantly related toxins suggests that they are derived from ancient toxin lineages that predate the evolution of BoNTs and are not limited to the Clostridium genus. We propose that BoNTs have therefore evolved from a precursor family of BoNT-like toxins, and ultimately from non-neurospecific toxins that cleaved different substrates (possibly non-neuronal SNAREs). Comparison of BoNTs with these related toxins reveals several unique molecular features that underlie the evolution of BoNT’s unique function, including functional shifts involving all four domains, and gain of the BoNT gene cluster associated proteins. BoNTs then diversified to produce the existing serotypes, including TeNT, and underwent repeated substrate shifts from ancestral VAMP2 specificity to SNAP25 specificity at least three times in their history. Finally, similar to previous proposals, we suggest that one ecological role of BoNTs could be to create a paralytic phase in vertebrate decomposition, which provides a competitive advantage for necrophagous scavengers that in turn facilitate the spread of Clostridium botulinum and its toxin. This article discusses the molecular evolution and ecology of clostridial neurotoxins in light of recently discovered homologs of these toxins in non-clostridial genomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/femspd/fty040
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2307395194</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/femspd/fty040</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2307395194</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-74e44b390a679f9b5179c71c8604bad6424a864b0ef0d4ee02e6bf1a0ce2d8053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EolXpyIossbCEnmPHiUdU0RapEgtIbFE-zm2qJA6xjei_JygFsXHLvcNz70kPIdcM7hkovtDY2K5caHcEAWdkGoJQgeTh2_mfPCFzaw8wTBKxJJaXZBIqmQjGYUo2a2xNUxW0am212zs7BGeo2yPFD1N7V5mWZm1JsTC12R2p0TQ3ztdV6xvaou-NM5_D8RW50FltcX7aM_K6enxZboLt8_pp-bANCq64C2KBQuRcQSZjpVUesVgVMSsSCSLPSilCkSVS5IAaSoEIIcpcswwKDMsEIj4jt2Nv15t3j9alB-P7dniZhhxiriKmxEAFI1X0xtoeddr1VZP1x5RB-q0uHdWlo7qBvzm1-rzB8pf-ETUAdyNgfPdP1xcjHno5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2307395194</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genomic insights into the evolution and ecology of botulinum neurotoxins</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mansfield, Michael J ; Doxey, Andrew C</creator><creatorcontrib>Mansfield, Michael J ; Doxey, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Clostridial neurotoxins, which include botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) and tetanus neurotoxins, have evolved a remarkably sophisticated structure and molecular mechanism fine-tuned for the targeting and cleavage of vertebrate neuron substrates leading to muscular paralysis. How and why did this toxin evolve? From which ancestral proteins are BoNTs derived? And what is, or was, the primary ecological role of BoNTs in the environment? In this article, we examine these questions in light of recent studies identifying homologs of BoNTs in the genomes of non-clostridial bacteria, including Weissella, Enterococcus and Chryseobacterium. Genomic and phylogenetic analysis of these more distantly related toxins suggests that they are derived from ancient toxin lineages that predate the evolution of BoNTs and are not limited to the Clostridium genus. We propose that BoNTs have therefore evolved from a precursor family of BoNT-like toxins, and ultimately from non-neurospecific toxins that cleaved different substrates (possibly non-neuronal SNAREs). Comparison of BoNTs with these related toxins reveals several unique molecular features that underlie the evolution of BoNT’s unique function, including functional shifts involving all four domains, and gain of the BoNT gene cluster associated proteins. BoNTs then diversified to produce the existing serotypes, including TeNT, and underwent repeated substrate shifts from ancestral VAMP2 specificity to SNAP25 specificity at least three times in their history. Finally, similar to previous proposals, we suggest that one ecological role of BoNTs could be to create a paralytic phase in vertebrate decomposition, which provides a competitive advantage for necrophagous scavengers that in turn facilitate the spread of Clostridium botulinum and its toxin. This article discusses the molecular evolution and ecology of clostridial neurotoxins in light of recently discovered homologs of these toxins in non-clostridial genomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-632X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-632X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/femspd/fty040</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29684130</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Chryseobacterium - classification ; Chryseobacterium - genetics ; Chryseobacterium - pathogenicity ; Clostridium botulinum - classification ; Clostridium botulinum - genetics ; Clostridium botulinum - pathogenicity ; Clostridium tetani - classification ; Clostridium tetani - genetics ; Clostridium tetani - pathogenicity ; Domains ; Ecology ; Enterococcus - classification ; Enterococcus - genetics ; Enterococcus - pathogenicity ; Evolution ; Evolution, Molecular ; Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial ; Genetic Loci ; Genome, Bacterial ; Genomes ; Homology ; Host-Pathogen Interactions ; Humans ; Metalloendopeptidases - biosynthesis ; Metalloendopeptidases - genetics ; Molecular structure ; Multigene Family ; Neurotoxins ; Paralysis ; Phylogeny ; Proteins ; Serotypes ; SNAP-25 protein ; Substrates ; Tetanus ; Tetanus Toxin - biosynthesis ; Tetanus Toxin - genetics ; Toxins ; Vertebrates ; Weissella - classification ; Weissella - genetics ; Weissella - pathogenicity</subject><ispartof>Pathogens and disease, 2018-06, Vol.76 (4)</ispartof><rights>FEMS 2018. 2018</rights><rights>FEMS 2018.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-74e44b390a679f9b5179c71c8604bad6424a864b0ef0d4ee02e6bf1a0ce2d8053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-74e44b390a679f9b5179c71c8604bad6424a864b0ef0d4ee02e6bf1a0ce2d8053</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2015-099X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29684130$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mansfield, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doxey, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><title>Genomic insights into the evolution and ecology of botulinum neurotoxins</title><title>Pathogens and disease</title><addtitle>Pathog Dis</addtitle><description>Abstract Clostridial neurotoxins, which include botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) and tetanus neurotoxins, have evolved a remarkably sophisticated structure and molecular mechanism fine-tuned for the targeting and cleavage of vertebrate neuron substrates leading to muscular paralysis. How and why did this toxin evolve? From which ancestral proteins are BoNTs derived? And what is, or was, the primary ecological role of BoNTs in the environment? In this article, we examine these questions in light of recent studies identifying homologs of BoNTs in the genomes of non-clostridial bacteria, including Weissella, Enterococcus and Chryseobacterium. Genomic and phylogenetic analysis of these more distantly related toxins suggests that they are derived from ancient toxin lineages that predate the evolution of BoNTs and are not limited to the Clostridium genus. We propose that BoNTs have therefore evolved from a precursor family of BoNT-like toxins, and ultimately from non-neurospecific toxins that cleaved different substrates (possibly non-neuronal SNAREs). Comparison of BoNTs with these related toxins reveals several unique molecular features that underlie the evolution of BoNT’s unique function, including functional shifts involving all four domains, and gain of the BoNT gene cluster associated proteins. BoNTs then diversified to produce the existing serotypes, including TeNT, and underwent repeated substrate shifts from ancestral VAMP2 specificity to SNAP25 specificity at least three times in their history. Finally, similar to previous proposals, we suggest that one ecological role of BoNTs could be to create a paralytic phase in vertebrate decomposition, which provides a competitive advantage for necrophagous scavengers that in turn facilitate the spread of Clostridium botulinum and its toxin. This article discusses the molecular evolution and ecology of clostridial neurotoxins in light of recently discovered homologs of these toxins in non-clostridial genomes.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Chryseobacterium - classification</subject><subject>Chryseobacterium - genetics</subject><subject>Chryseobacterium - pathogenicity</subject><subject>Clostridium botulinum - classification</subject><subject>Clostridium botulinum - genetics</subject><subject>Clostridium botulinum - pathogenicity</subject><subject>Clostridium tetani - classification</subject><subject>Clostridium tetani - genetics</subject><subject>Clostridium tetani - pathogenicity</subject><subject>Domains</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Enterococcus - classification</subject><subject>Enterococcus - genetics</subject><subject>Enterococcus - pathogenicity</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolution, Molecular</subject><subject>Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial</subject><subject>Genetic Loci</subject><subject>Genome, Bacterial</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Homology</subject><subject>Host-Pathogen Interactions</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Metalloendopeptidases - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Metalloendopeptidases - genetics</subject><subject>Molecular structure</subject><subject>Multigene Family</subject><subject>Neurotoxins</subject><subject>Paralysis</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Serotypes</subject><subject>SNAP-25 protein</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Tetanus</subject><subject>Tetanus Toxin - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Tetanus Toxin - genetics</subject><subject>Toxins</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>Weissella - classification</subject><subject>Weissella - genetics</subject><subject>Weissella - pathogenicity</subject><issn>2049-632X</issn><issn>2049-632X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EolXpyIossbCEnmPHiUdU0RapEgtIbFE-zm2qJA6xjei_JygFsXHLvcNz70kPIdcM7hkovtDY2K5caHcEAWdkGoJQgeTh2_mfPCFzaw8wTBKxJJaXZBIqmQjGYUo2a2xNUxW0am212zs7BGeo2yPFD1N7V5mWZm1JsTC12R2p0TQ3ztdV6xvaou-NM5_D8RW50FltcX7aM_K6enxZboLt8_pp-bANCq64C2KBQuRcQSZjpVUesVgVMSsSCSLPSilCkSVS5IAaSoEIIcpcswwKDMsEIj4jt2Nv15t3j9alB-P7dniZhhxiriKmxEAFI1X0xtoeddr1VZP1x5RB-q0uHdWlo7qBvzm1-rzB8pf-ETUAdyNgfPdP1xcjHno5</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Mansfield, Michael J</creator><creator>Doxey, Andrew C</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2015-099X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Genomic insights into the evolution and ecology of botulinum neurotoxins</title><author>Mansfield, Michael J ; Doxey, Andrew C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-74e44b390a679f9b5179c71c8604bad6424a864b0ef0d4ee02e6bf1a0ce2d8053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Chryseobacterium - classification</topic><topic>Chryseobacterium - genetics</topic><topic>Chryseobacterium - pathogenicity</topic><topic>Clostridium botulinum - classification</topic><topic>Clostridium botulinum - genetics</topic><topic>Clostridium botulinum - pathogenicity</topic><topic>Clostridium tetani - classification</topic><topic>Clostridium tetani - genetics</topic><topic>Clostridium tetani - pathogenicity</topic><topic>Domains</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Enterococcus - classification</topic><topic>Enterococcus - genetics</topic><topic>Enterococcus - pathogenicity</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolution, Molecular</topic><topic>Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial</topic><topic>Genetic Loci</topic><topic>Genome, Bacterial</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Homology</topic><topic>Host-Pathogen Interactions</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Metalloendopeptidases - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Metalloendopeptidases - genetics</topic><topic>Molecular structure</topic><topic>Multigene Family</topic><topic>Neurotoxins</topic><topic>Paralysis</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Serotypes</topic><topic>SNAP-25 protein</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Tetanus</topic><topic>Tetanus Toxin - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Tetanus Toxin - genetics</topic><topic>Toxins</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>Weissella - classification</topic><topic>Weissella - genetics</topic><topic>Weissella - pathogenicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mansfield, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doxey, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Pathogens and disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mansfield, Michael J</au><au>Doxey, Andrew C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genomic insights into the evolution and ecology of botulinum neurotoxins</atitle><jtitle>Pathogens and disease</jtitle><addtitle>Pathog Dis</addtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>4</issue><issn>2049-632X</issn><eissn>2049-632X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Clostridial neurotoxins, which include botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) and tetanus neurotoxins, have evolved a remarkably sophisticated structure and molecular mechanism fine-tuned for the targeting and cleavage of vertebrate neuron substrates leading to muscular paralysis. How and why did this toxin evolve? From which ancestral proteins are BoNTs derived? And what is, or was, the primary ecological role of BoNTs in the environment? In this article, we examine these questions in light of recent studies identifying homologs of BoNTs in the genomes of non-clostridial bacteria, including Weissella, Enterococcus and Chryseobacterium. Genomic and phylogenetic analysis of these more distantly related toxins suggests that they are derived from ancient toxin lineages that predate the evolution of BoNTs and are not limited to the Clostridium genus. We propose that BoNTs have therefore evolved from a precursor family of BoNT-like toxins, and ultimately from non-neurospecific toxins that cleaved different substrates (possibly non-neuronal SNAREs). Comparison of BoNTs with these related toxins reveals several unique molecular features that underlie the evolution of BoNT’s unique function, including functional shifts involving all four domains, and gain of the BoNT gene cluster associated proteins. BoNTs then diversified to produce the existing serotypes, including TeNT, and underwent repeated substrate shifts from ancestral VAMP2 specificity to SNAP25 specificity at least three times in their history. Finally, similar to previous proposals, we suggest that one ecological role of BoNTs could be to create a paralytic phase in vertebrate decomposition, which provides a competitive advantage for necrophagous scavengers that in turn facilitate the spread of Clostridium botulinum and its toxin. This article discusses the molecular evolution and ecology of clostridial neurotoxins in light of recently discovered homologs of these toxins in non-clostridial genomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>29684130</pmid><doi>10.1093/femspd/fty040</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2015-099X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2049-632X
ispartof Pathogens and disease, 2018-06, Vol.76 (4)
issn 2049-632X
2049-632X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2307395194
source MEDLINE; Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Bacteria
Chryseobacterium - classification
Chryseobacterium - genetics
Chryseobacterium - pathogenicity
Clostridium botulinum - classification
Clostridium botulinum - genetics
Clostridium botulinum - pathogenicity
Clostridium tetani - classification
Clostridium tetani - genetics
Clostridium tetani - pathogenicity
Domains
Ecology
Enterococcus - classification
Enterococcus - genetics
Enterococcus - pathogenicity
Evolution
Evolution, Molecular
Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial
Genetic Loci
Genome, Bacterial
Genomes
Homology
Host-Pathogen Interactions
Humans
Metalloendopeptidases - biosynthesis
Metalloendopeptidases - genetics
Molecular structure
Multigene Family
Neurotoxins
Paralysis
Phylogeny
Proteins
Serotypes
SNAP-25 protein
Substrates
Tetanus
Tetanus Toxin - biosynthesis
Tetanus Toxin - genetics
Toxins
Vertebrates
Weissella - classification
Weissella - genetics
Weissella - pathogenicity
title Genomic insights into the evolution and ecology of botulinum neurotoxins
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T15%3A05%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genomic%20insights%20into%20the%20evolution%20and%20ecology%20of%20botulinum%20neurotoxins&rft.jtitle=Pathogens%20and%20disease&rft.au=Mansfield,%20Michael%20J&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=4&rft.issn=2049-632X&rft.eissn=2049-632X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/femspd/fty040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2307395194%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2307395194&rft_id=info:pmid/29684130&rft_oup_id=10.1093/femspd/fty040&rfr_iscdi=true