The farming-inequality nexus: new insights from ancient Western Eurasia

This article advances the hypothesis that the transformation of farming from a labour-limited form to a land-limited form facilitated the emergence of substantial and sustained wealth inequalities in many ancient agricultural societies. Using bioarchaeological and other relevant evidence for the nat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Antiquity 2019-10, Vol.93 (371), p.1129-1143
Hauptverfasser: Bogaard, Amy, Fochesato, Mattia, Bowles, Samuel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1143
container_issue 371
container_start_page 1129
container_title Antiquity
container_volume 93
creator Bogaard, Amy
Fochesato, Mattia
Bowles, Samuel
description This article advances the hypothesis that the transformation of farming from a labour-limited form to a land-limited form facilitated the emergence of substantial and sustained wealth inequalities in many ancient agricultural societies. Using bioarchaeological and other relevant evidence for the nature of ancient agrosystems, the authors characterise 90 Western Eurasian site-phases as labour- vs land-limited. Their estimates of wealth inequality (the Gini coefficient), which incorporate data on house and household storage size and individual grave goods—adjusted for comparability using new methods—indicate that land-limited farming systems were significantly more unequal than labour-limited ones.
doi_str_mv 10.15184/aqy.2019.105
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2307379247</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2307379247</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-bdc0b4da64f201015bca38f55913bc66b44a5ba7a071a10d2f4ea648866af00d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkM1LAzEQxYMoWKtH7wHPqZNNsh_epNQqFLxU9BZmd5M2pc22yS7a_77RepnHPH7MPB4h9xwmXPFSPuLhOMmAVxMO6oKMeCEVS0NekhEACKaq8uua3MS4SasEWY7IfLk21GLYOb9izpvDgFvXH6k3P0N8SvJNnY9ute4jtaHbUfSNM76nnyb2Jng6GwJGh7fkyuI2mrt_HZOPl9ly-soW7_O36fOCNQJkz-q2gVq2mEubggJXdYOitEpVXNRNntdSoqqxQCg4cmgzK02CyzLP0QK0Ykweznf3oTsMKYPedEPw6aXOBBSiqDJZJIqdqSZ0MQZj9T64HYaj5qD_utKpK_3bVXKUOAG5R1zu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2307379247</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The farming-inequality nexus: new insights from ancient Western Eurasia</title><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Bogaard, Amy ; Fochesato, Mattia ; Bowles, Samuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Bogaard, Amy ; Fochesato, Mattia ; Bowles, Samuel</creatorcontrib><description>This article advances the hypothesis that the transformation of farming from a labour-limited form to a land-limited form facilitated the emergence of substantial and sustained wealth inequalities in many ancient agricultural societies. Using bioarchaeological and other relevant evidence for the nature of ancient agrosystems, the authors characterise 90 Western Eurasian site-phases as labour- vs land-limited. Their estimates of wealth inequality (the Gini coefficient), which incorporate data on house and household storage size and individual grave goods—adjusted for comparability using new methods—indicate that land-limited farming systems were significantly more unequal than labour-limited ones.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-598X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-1744</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15184/aqy.2019.105</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Ancient civilizations ; Archaeology ; Economic inequality ; Ethnography ; Farming ; Grave goods ; Hypotheses ; Inequality ; Land ; Land use ; Transformation ; Wealth</subject><ispartof>Antiquity, 2019-10, Vol.93 (371), p.1129-1143</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-bdc0b4da64f201015bca38f55913bc66b44a5ba7a071a10d2f4ea648866af00d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-bdc0b4da64f201015bca38f55913bc66b44a5ba7a071a10d2f4ea648866af00d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bogaard, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fochesato, Mattia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowles, Samuel</creatorcontrib><title>The farming-inequality nexus: new insights from ancient Western Eurasia</title><title>Antiquity</title><description>This article advances the hypothesis that the transformation of farming from a labour-limited form to a land-limited form facilitated the emergence of substantial and sustained wealth inequalities in many ancient agricultural societies. Using bioarchaeological and other relevant evidence for the nature of ancient agrosystems, the authors characterise 90 Western Eurasian site-phases as labour- vs land-limited. Their estimates of wealth inequality (the Gini coefficient), which incorporate data on house and household storage size and individual grave goods—adjusted for comparability using new methods—indicate that land-limited farming systems were significantly more unequal than labour-limited ones.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Ancient civilizations</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Economic inequality</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Grave goods</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Transformation</subject><subject>Wealth</subject><issn>0003-598X</issn><issn>1745-1744</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PQHSC</sourceid><recordid>eNotkM1LAzEQxYMoWKtH7wHPqZNNsh_epNQqFLxU9BZmd5M2pc22yS7a_77RepnHPH7MPB4h9xwmXPFSPuLhOMmAVxMO6oKMeCEVS0NekhEACKaq8uua3MS4SasEWY7IfLk21GLYOb9izpvDgFvXH6k3P0N8SvJNnY9ute4jtaHbUfSNM76nnyb2Jng6GwJGh7fkyuI2mrt_HZOPl9ly-soW7_O36fOCNQJkz-q2gVq2mEubggJXdYOitEpVXNRNntdSoqqxQCg4cmgzK02CyzLP0QK0Ykweznf3oTsMKYPedEPw6aXOBBSiqDJZJIqdqSZ0MQZj9T64HYaj5qD_utKpK_3bVXKUOAG5R1zu</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Bogaard, Amy</creator><creator>Fochesato, Mattia</creator><creator>Bowles, Samuel</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>8XN</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EHMNL</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQHSC</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>The farming-inequality nexus: new insights from ancient Western Eurasia</title><author>Bogaard, Amy ; Fochesato, Mattia ; Bowles, Samuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-bdc0b4da64f201015bca38f55913bc66b44a5ba7a071a10d2f4ea648866af00d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Ancient civilizations</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Economic inequality</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Grave goods</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Transformation</topic><topic>Wealth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bogaard, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fochesato, Mattia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowles, Samuel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>UK &amp; Ireland Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>History Study Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Antiquity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bogaard, Amy</au><au>Fochesato, Mattia</au><au>Bowles, Samuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The farming-inequality nexus: new insights from ancient Western Eurasia</atitle><jtitle>Antiquity</jtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>371</issue><spage>1129</spage><epage>1143</epage><pages>1129-1143</pages><issn>0003-598X</issn><eissn>1745-1744</eissn><abstract>This article advances the hypothesis that the transformation of farming from a labour-limited form to a land-limited form facilitated the emergence of substantial and sustained wealth inequalities in many ancient agricultural societies. Using bioarchaeological and other relevant evidence for the nature of ancient agrosystems, the authors characterise 90 Western Eurasian site-phases as labour- vs land-limited. Their estimates of wealth inequality (the Gini coefficient), which incorporate data on house and household storage size and individual grave goods—adjusted for comparability using new methods—indicate that land-limited farming systems were significantly more unequal than labour-limited ones.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.15184/aqy.2019.105</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-598X
ispartof Antiquity, 2019-10, Vol.93 (371), p.1129-1143
issn 0003-598X
1745-1744
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2307379247
source Cambridge Journals
subjects Agricultural production
Agriculture
Ancient civilizations
Archaeology
Economic inequality
Ethnography
Farming
Grave goods
Hypotheses
Inequality
Land
Land use
Transformation
Wealth
title The farming-inequality nexus: new insights from ancient Western Eurasia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T20%3A26%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20farming-inequality%20nexus:%20new%20insights%20from%20ancient%20Western%20Eurasia&rft.jtitle=Antiquity&rft.au=Bogaard,%20Amy&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=371&rft.spage=1129&rft.epage=1143&rft.pages=1129-1143&rft.issn=0003-598X&rft.eissn=1745-1744&rft_id=info:doi/10.15184/aqy.2019.105&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2307379247%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2307379247&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true