The farming-inequality nexus: new insights from ancient Western Eurasia
This article advances the hypothesis that the transformation of farming from a labour-limited form to a land-limited form facilitated the emergence of substantial and sustained wealth inequalities in many ancient agricultural societies. Using bioarchaeological and other relevant evidence for the nat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Antiquity 2019-10, Vol.93 (371), p.1129-1143 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1143 |
---|---|
container_issue | 371 |
container_start_page | 1129 |
container_title | Antiquity |
container_volume | 93 |
creator | Bogaard, Amy Fochesato, Mattia Bowles, Samuel |
description | This article advances the hypothesis that the transformation of farming from a labour-limited form to a land-limited form facilitated the emergence of substantial and sustained wealth inequalities in many ancient agricultural societies. Using bioarchaeological and other relevant evidence for the nature of ancient agrosystems, the authors characterise 90 Western Eurasian site-phases as labour-
vs
land-limited. Their estimates of wealth inequality (the Gini coefficient), which incorporate data on house and household storage size and individual grave goods—adjusted for comparability using new methods—indicate that land-limited farming systems were significantly more unequal than labour-limited ones. |
doi_str_mv | 10.15184/aqy.2019.105 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2307379247</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2307379247</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-bdc0b4da64f201015bca38f55913bc66b44a5ba7a071a10d2f4ea648866af00d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkM1LAzEQxYMoWKtH7wHPqZNNsh_epNQqFLxU9BZmd5M2pc22yS7a_77RepnHPH7MPB4h9xwmXPFSPuLhOMmAVxMO6oKMeCEVS0NekhEACKaq8uua3MS4SasEWY7IfLk21GLYOb9izpvDgFvXH6k3P0N8SvJNnY9ute4jtaHbUfSNM76nnyb2Jng6GwJGh7fkyuI2mrt_HZOPl9ly-soW7_O36fOCNQJkz-q2gVq2mEubggJXdYOitEpVXNRNntdSoqqxQCg4cmgzK02CyzLP0QK0Ykweznf3oTsMKYPedEPw6aXOBBSiqDJZJIqdqSZ0MQZj9T64HYaj5qD_utKpK_3bVXKUOAG5R1zu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2307379247</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The farming-inequality nexus: new insights from ancient Western Eurasia</title><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Bogaard, Amy ; Fochesato, Mattia ; Bowles, Samuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Bogaard, Amy ; Fochesato, Mattia ; Bowles, Samuel</creatorcontrib><description>This article advances the hypothesis that the transformation of farming from a labour-limited form to a land-limited form facilitated the emergence of substantial and sustained wealth inequalities in many ancient agricultural societies. Using bioarchaeological and other relevant evidence for the nature of ancient agrosystems, the authors characterise 90 Western Eurasian site-phases as labour-
vs
land-limited. Their estimates of wealth inequality (the Gini coefficient), which incorporate data on house and household storage size and individual grave goods—adjusted for comparability using new methods—indicate that land-limited farming systems were significantly more unequal than labour-limited ones.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-598X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-1744</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15184/aqy.2019.105</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Ancient civilizations ; Archaeology ; Economic inequality ; Ethnography ; Farming ; Grave goods ; Hypotheses ; Inequality ; Land ; Land use ; Transformation ; Wealth</subject><ispartof>Antiquity, 2019-10, Vol.93 (371), p.1129-1143</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-bdc0b4da64f201015bca38f55913bc66b44a5ba7a071a10d2f4ea648866af00d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-bdc0b4da64f201015bca38f55913bc66b44a5ba7a071a10d2f4ea648866af00d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bogaard, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fochesato, Mattia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowles, Samuel</creatorcontrib><title>The farming-inequality nexus: new insights from ancient Western Eurasia</title><title>Antiquity</title><description>This article advances the hypothesis that the transformation of farming from a labour-limited form to a land-limited form facilitated the emergence of substantial and sustained wealth inequalities in many ancient agricultural societies. Using bioarchaeological and other relevant evidence for the nature of ancient agrosystems, the authors characterise 90 Western Eurasian site-phases as labour-
vs
land-limited. Their estimates of wealth inequality (the Gini coefficient), which incorporate data on house and household storage size and individual grave goods—adjusted for comparability using new methods—indicate that land-limited farming systems were significantly more unequal than labour-limited ones.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Ancient civilizations</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Economic inequality</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Grave goods</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Transformation</subject><subject>Wealth</subject><issn>0003-598X</issn><issn>1745-1744</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PQHSC</sourceid><recordid>eNotkM1LAzEQxYMoWKtH7wHPqZNNsh_epNQqFLxU9BZmd5M2pc22yS7a_77RepnHPH7MPB4h9xwmXPFSPuLhOMmAVxMO6oKMeCEVS0NekhEACKaq8uua3MS4SasEWY7IfLk21GLYOb9izpvDgFvXH6k3P0N8SvJNnY9ute4jtaHbUfSNM76nnyb2Jng6GwJGh7fkyuI2mrt_HZOPl9ly-soW7_O36fOCNQJkz-q2gVq2mEubggJXdYOitEpVXNRNntdSoqqxQCg4cmgzK02CyzLP0QK0Ykweznf3oTsMKYPedEPw6aXOBBSiqDJZJIqdqSZ0MQZj9T64HYaj5qD_utKpK_3bVXKUOAG5R1zu</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Bogaard, Amy</creator><creator>Fochesato, Mattia</creator><creator>Bowles, Samuel</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>8XN</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EHMNL</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQHSC</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>The farming-inequality nexus: new insights from ancient Western Eurasia</title><author>Bogaard, Amy ; Fochesato, Mattia ; Bowles, Samuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-bdc0b4da64f201015bca38f55913bc66b44a5ba7a071a10d2f4ea648866af00d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Ancient civilizations</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Economic inequality</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Grave goods</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Transformation</topic><topic>Wealth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bogaard, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fochesato, Mattia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowles, Samuel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>UK & Ireland Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>History Study Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Antiquity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bogaard, Amy</au><au>Fochesato, Mattia</au><au>Bowles, Samuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The farming-inequality nexus: new insights from ancient Western Eurasia</atitle><jtitle>Antiquity</jtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>371</issue><spage>1129</spage><epage>1143</epage><pages>1129-1143</pages><issn>0003-598X</issn><eissn>1745-1744</eissn><abstract>This article advances the hypothesis that the transformation of farming from a labour-limited form to a land-limited form facilitated the emergence of substantial and sustained wealth inequalities in many ancient agricultural societies. Using bioarchaeological and other relevant evidence for the nature of ancient agrosystems, the authors characterise 90 Western Eurasian site-phases as labour-
vs
land-limited. Their estimates of wealth inequality (the Gini coefficient), which incorporate data on house and household storage size and individual grave goods—adjusted for comparability using new methods—indicate that land-limited farming systems were significantly more unequal than labour-limited ones.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.15184/aqy.2019.105</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-598X |
ispartof | Antiquity, 2019-10, Vol.93 (371), p.1129-1143 |
issn | 0003-598X 1745-1744 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2307379247 |
source | Cambridge Journals |
subjects | Agricultural production Agriculture Ancient civilizations Archaeology Economic inequality Ethnography Farming Grave goods Hypotheses Inequality Land Land use Transformation Wealth |
title | The farming-inequality nexus: new insights from ancient Western Eurasia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T20%3A26%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20farming-inequality%20nexus:%20new%20insights%20from%20ancient%20Western%20Eurasia&rft.jtitle=Antiquity&rft.au=Bogaard,%20Amy&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=371&rft.spage=1129&rft.epage=1143&rft.pages=1129-1143&rft.issn=0003-598X&rft.eissn=1745-1744&rft_id=info:doi/10.15184/aqy.2019.105&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2307379247%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2307379247&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |