Hebephrenia is dead, long live hebephrenia, or why Hecker and Chaslin were on to something
Since its first description in 1863, ‘hebephrenia’ has highlighted a group of patients characterised by an early onset of illness, formal thought disorder, bizarre behaviour and incongruent emotional expression. A proportion of patients with the most severe form of mental illness have a clinical pre...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BJPsych advances 2019-11, Vol.25 (6), p.373-376 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 376 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 373 |
container_title | BJPsych advances |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Barrera, Alvaro Curwell-Parry, Owen Raphael, Marie-Claire |
description | Since its first description in 1863, ‘hebephrenia’ has highlighted a group of patients characterised by an early onset of illness, formal thought disorder, bizarre behaviour and incongruent emotional expression. A proportion of patients with the most severe form of mental illness have a clinical presentation that is best captured by this diagnosis. Here, we outline the construct of hebephrenia and two of its core overlapping constituent parts: bizarre behaviour and the disorganisation dimension. We argue that, despite the removal of hebephrenia (disorganised schizophrenia) from DSM-5, clinicians should consider it as a differential diagnosis, particularly in suspected personality disorder. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1192/bja.2019.24 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2307317392</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1192_bja_2019_24</cupid><sourcerecordid>2307317392</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-28f3988460b407976cdf2bd80fc37a342cdc64d2d31d22ac3a7cf93aea44a5f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkMFKAzEURYMoWGpX_kDApZ2avKSTyVKKWqHgRjduQibJdFKnk5pMLf17p7TYjat34R3uhYPQLSUTSiU8lCs9AULlBPgFGgCZ5hnPi_zyL4viGo1SWhFCaAFUcDJAn3NXuk0dXes19glbp-0YN6Fd4sb_OFyf32McIt7Vezx35stFrFuLZ7VOjW_xzkWHQ4u7gFNYu6727fIGXVW6SW50ukP08fz0Pptni7eX19njIjMgZZdBUTFZFDwnJSdCitzYCkpbkMowoRkHY03OLVhGLYA2TAtTSaad5lxPK8KG6O7Yu4nhe-tSp1ZhG9t-UgEjglHBJPTU_ZEyMaQUXaU20a913CtK1MGf6v2pgz8FvKezE63XZfR26c6l__G_25hxEQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2307317392</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hebephrenia is dead, long live hebephrenia, or why Hecker and Chaslin were on to something</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Barrera, Alvaro ; Curwell-Parry, Owen ; Raphael, Marie-Claire</creator><creatorcontrib>Barrera, Alvaro ; Curwell-Parry, Owen ; Raphael, Marie-Claire</creatorcontrib><description>Since its first description in 1863, ‘hebephrenia’ has highlighted a group of patients characterised by an early onset of illness, formal thought disorder, bizarre behaviour and incongruent emotional expression. A proportion of patients with the most severe form of mental illness have a clinical presentation that is best captured by this diagnosis. Here, we outline the construct of hebephrenia and two of its core overlapping constituent parts: bizarre behaviour and the disorganisation dimension. We argue that, despite the removal of hebephrenia (disorganised schizophrenia) from DSM-5, clinicians should consider it as a differential diagnosis, particularly in suspected personality disorder.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2056-4678</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2056-4686</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1192/bja.2019.24</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Clinical reflection ; Dementia ; Hallucinations ; Patients ; Personality disorders ; Psychosis ; Schizophrenia</subject><ispartof>BJPsych advances, 2019-11, Vol.25 (6), p.373-376</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-28f3988460b407976cdf2bd80fc37a342cdc64d2d31d22ac3a7cf93aea44a5f03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-28f3988460b407976cdf2bd80fc37a342cdc64d2d31d22ac3a7cf93aea44a5f03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2056467819000240/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,315,781,785,27926,27927,55630</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barrera, Alvaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curwell-Parry, Owen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raphael, Marie-Claire</creatorcontrib><title>Hebephrenia is dead, long live hebephrenia, or why Hecker and Chaslin were on to something</title><title>BJPsych advances</title><addtitle>BJPsych advances</addtitle><description>Since its first description in 1863, ‘hebephrenia’ has highlighted a group of patients characterised by an early onset of illness, formal thought disorder, bizarre behaviour and incongruent emotional expression. A proportion of patients with the most severe form of mental illness have a clinical presentation that is best captured by this diagnosis. Here, we outline the construct of hebephrenia and two of its core overlapping constituent parts: bizarre behaviour and the disorganisation dimension. We argue that, despite the removal of hebephrenia (disorganised schizophrenia) from DSM-5, clinicians should consider it as a differential diagnosis, particularly in suspected personality disorder.</description><subject>Clinical reflection</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Hallucinations</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Personality disorders</subject><subject>Psychosis</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><issn>2056-4678</issn><issn>2056-4686</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkMFKAzEURYMoWGpX_kDApZ2avKSTyVKKWqHgRjduQibJdFKnk5pMLf17p7TYjat34R3uhYPQLSUTSiU8lCs9AULlBPgFGgCZ5hnPi_zyL4viGo1SWhFCaAFUcDJAn3NXuk0dXes19glbp-0YN6Fd4sb_OFyf32McIt7Vezx35stFrFuLZ7VOjW_xzkWHQ4u7gFNYu6727fIGXVW6SW50ukP08fz0Pptni7eX19njIjMgZZdBUTFZFDwnJSdCitzYCkpbkMowoRkHY03OLVhGLYA2TAtTSaad5lxPK8KG6O7Yu4nhe-tSp1ZhG9t-UgEjglHBJPTU_ZEyMaQUXaU20a913CtK1MGf6v2pgz8FvKezE63XZfR26c6l__G_25hxEQ</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Barrera, Alvaro</creator><creator>Curwell-Parry, Owen</creator><creator>Raphael, Marie-Claire</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Hebephrenia is dead, long live hebephrenia, or why Hecker and Chaslin were on to something</title><author>Barrera, Alvaro ; Curwell-Parry, Owen ; Raphael, Marie-Claire</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-28f3988460b407976cdf2bd80fc37a342cdc64d2d31d22ac3a7cf93aea44a5f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Clinical reflection</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Hallucinations</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Personality disorders</topic><topic>Psychosis</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barrera, Alvaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curwell-Parry, Owen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raphael, Marie-Claire</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>BJPsych advances</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barrera, Alvaro</au><au>Curwell-Parry, Owen</au><au>Raphael, Marie-Claire</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hebephrenia is dead, long live hebephrenia, or why Hecker and Chaslin were on to something</atitle><jtitle>BJPsych advances</jtitle><addtitle>BJPsych advances</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>373</spage><epage>376</epage><pages>373-376</pages><issn>2056-4678</issn><eissn>2056-4686</eissn><abstract>Since its first description in 1863, ‘hebephrenia’ has highlighted a group of patients characterised by an early onset of illness, formal thought disorder, bizarre behaviour and incongruent emotional expression. A proportion of patients with the most severe form of mental illness have a clinical presentation that is best captured by this diagnosis. Here, we outline the construct of hebephrenia and two of its core overlapping constituent parts: bizarre behaviour and the disorganisation dimension. We argue that, despite the removal of hebephrenia (disorganised schizophrenia) from DSM-5, clinicians should consider it as a differential diagnosis, particularly in suspected personality disorder.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1192/bja.2019.24</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2056-4678 |
ispartof | BJPsych advances, 2019-11, Vol.25 (6), p.373-376 |
issn | 2056-4678 2056-4686 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2307317392 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Clinical reflection Dementia Hallucinations Patients Personality disorders Psychosis Schizophrenia |
title | Hebephrenia is dead, long live hebephrenia, or why Hecker and Chaslin were on to something |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T00%3A50%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hebephrenia%20is%20dead,%20long%20live%20hebephrenia,%20or%20why%20Hecker%20and%20Chaslin%20were%20on%20to%20something&rft.jtitle=BJPsych%20advances&rft.au=Barrera,%20Alvaro&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=373&rft.epage=376&rft.pages=373-376&rft.issn=2056-4678&rft.eissn=2056-4686&rft_id=info:doi/10.1192/bja.2019.24&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2307317392%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2307317392&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1192_bja_2019_24&rfr_iscdi=true |