Tropospheric corrections for InSAR: Statistical assessments and applications to the Central United States and Mexico

The rapid expansion of SAR data availability and advancements in InSAR processing methods has enabled the formation of ground displacement time series for many parts of the world where such research was previously hindered by decorrelation due to sparse temporal sampling and SAR operating frequency....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Remote sensing of environment 2019-10, Vol.232, p.111326, Article 111326
Hauptverfasser: Murray, Kyle D., Bekaert, David P.S., Lohman, Rowena B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 111326
container_title Remote sensing of environment
container_volume 232
creator Murray, Kyle D.
Bekaert, David P.S.
Lohman, Rowena B.
description The rapid expansion of SAR data availability and advancements in InSAR processing methods has enabled the formation of ground displacement time series for many parts of the world where such research was previously hindered by decorrelation due to sparse temporal sampling and SAR operating frequency. In particular, free and open data access from the European Sentinel-1 constellation and the future NASA-ISRO SAR (NISAR) mission is encouraging the global community to move towards automated, cloud-based processing that can accommodate these rapidly growing data volumes and facilitate the use of a suite of corrections to the data. A key challenge is related to path delays introduced when the radar signal propagates through the troposphere. Tropospheric corrections estimated from empirical, phase-based methods and those using independent data from weather models, GPS, and radiometers have been included in open-source packages such as TRAIN, PyAPS and GACOS. Users within the InSAR community have reported varying degrees of success using these methods in a range of areas around the world. However, the various statistical metrics used to evaluate the reliability of tropospheric corrections are not consistently applied and often depend on the area and the spatial scale over which they are evaluated. Examination of a simple metric such as the overall reduction in phase variability within an interferogram does not allow the user to determine whether the improvement was at large or short length scales. We present a review of existing tropospheric correction methods and statistical performance metrics, providing guidelines for global assessment and verification of the efficacy of tropospheric correction methods. We summarize the assumptions and limitations for each correction method as well as each statistical performance metric. We examine two regions with different atmospheric characteristics - one Sentinel-1 swath covering the central United States and one swath covering south central Mexico, including part of the Pacific coast. As the SAR community moves towards reliance on global and automated InSAR processing platforms that incorporate tropospheric corrections, approaches such as those examined here can aid researchers in their efforts to evaluate such corrections and include their uncertainties in derived products such as surface displacement time series, coseismic offsets, processes that correlate with topography, and signals with smaller magnitude or larger spa
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111326
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2306797895</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0034425719303451</els_id><sourcerecordid>2306797895</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-718a52b7c97a9b64b5a6b7f23afdf8fdf926df62b5c1cacdcb9bca8171ce35063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxAewssU6wncSOYVVVPCoVIdF2bTnORHXVxsF2Efw9LmHNYjSLuWdmdBC6oSSnhPK7be4D5IxQmVNKC8ZP0ITWQmZEkPIUTQgpyqxklThHFyFsCaFVLegExZV3gwvDBrw12DjvwUTr-oA75_G8X07f7_Ey6mhDtEbvsA4BQthDHwPWfYv1MOzSYGSiw3EDeJamPmXXvY3Q_uIwpl_hyxp3hc46vQtw_dcv0frpcTV7yRZvz_PZdJGZsmYxE7TWFWuEkULLhpdNpXkjOlboru3qVJLxtuOsqQw12rSmkY3RNRXUQFERXlyi23Hv4N3HAUJUW3fwfTqpWEG4kKKWVUrRMWW8C8FDpwZv99p_K0rUUa7aqiRXHeWqUW5iHkYG0vufFrwKxkJvoLVHgap19h_6B-1HhKY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2306797895</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tropospheric corrections for InSAR: Statistical assessments and applications to the Central United States and Mexico</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Murray, Kyle D. ; Bekaert, David P.S. ; Lohman, Rowena B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Murray, Kyle D. ; Bekaert, David P.S. ; Lohman, Rowena B.</creatorcontrib><description>The rapid expansion of SAR data availability and advancements in InSAR processing methods has enabled the formation of ground displacement time series for many parts of the world where such research was previously hindered by decorrelation due to sparse temporal sampling and SAR operating frequency. In particular, free and open data access from the European Sentinel-1 constellation and the future NASA-ISRO SAR (NISAR) mission is encouraging the global community to move towards automated, cloud-based processing that can accommodate these rapidly growing data volumes and facilitate the use of a suite of corrections to the data. A key challenge is related to path delays introduced when the radar signal propagates through the troposphere. Tropospheric corrections estimated from empirical, phase-based methods and those using independent data from weather models, GPS, and radiometers have been included in open-source packages such as TRAIN, PyAPS and GACOS. Users within the InSAR community have reported varying degrees of success using these methods in a range of areas around the world. However, the various statistical metrics used to evaluate the reliability of tropospheric corrections are not consistently applied and often depend on the area and the spatial scale over which they are evaluated. Examination of a simple metric such as the overall reduction in phase variability within an interferogram does not allow the user to determine whether the improvement was at large or short length scales. We present a review of existing tropospheric correction methods and statistical performance metrics, providing guidelines for global assessment and verification of the efficacy of tropospheric correction methods. We summarize the assumptions and limitations for each correction method as well as each statistical performance metric. We examine two regions with different atmospheric characteristics - one Sentinel-1 swath covering the central United States and one swath covering south central Mexico, including part of the Pacific coast. As the SAR community moves towards reliance on global and automated InSAR processing platforms that incorporate tropospheric corrections, approaches such as those examined here can aid researchers in their efforts to evaluate such corrections and include their uncertainties in derived products such as surface displacement time series, coseismic offsets, processes that correlate with topography, and signals with smaller magnitude or larger spatial scales such as those associated with small earthquakes, aseismic creep and slow slip events. We found that the GACOS products (leveraging the operational high resolution ECMWF weather model) outperform the other correction methods explored here on average, but this result is highly dependent on location, acquisition time, and data availability. We found spatial structure functions to be most useful for performance assessment because of their ability to convey information about performance at discrete spatial scales. •We examine tropospheric corrections in two regions with very different tropospheric characteristics.•We compare three different metrics for assessment of the efficacy of the corrections.•Spatial structure functions are the most informative assessment approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-4257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0704</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111326</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Atmosphere ; Atmospheric models ; Automation ; Business metrics ; Communities ; Corrections ; Earthquakes ; elevation dependence ; Evaluation ; GACOS ; GPS ; Ground motion ; InSAR ; Interferometric synthetic aperture radar ; MODIS ; Offsets ; Performance assessment ; Performance measurement ; Radar ; Radiometers ; Reliability analysis ; Satellite constellations ; Seismic activity ; Signal processing ; Spatial data ; Statistical methods ; Statistics ; Synthetic aperture radar interferometry ; Time dependence ; Time series ; Troposphere ; Tropospheric noise ; Weather ; weather models</subject><ispartof>Remote sensing of environment, 2019-10, Vol.232, p.111326, Article 111326</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Oct 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-718a52b7c97a9b64b5a6b7f23afdf8fdf926df62b5c1cacdcb9bca8171ce35063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-718a52b7c97a9b64b5a6b7f23afdf8fdf926df62b5c1cacdcb9bca8171ce35063</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0408-0488 ; 0000-0002-6624-4599</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111326$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murray, Kyle D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bekaert, David P.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lohman, Rowena B.</creatorcontrib><title>Tropospheric corrections for InSAR: Statistical assessments and applications to the Central United States and Mexico</title><title>Remote sensing of environment</title><description>The rapid expansion of SAR data availability and advancements in InSAR processing methods has enabled the formation of ground displacement time series for many parts of the world where such research was previously hindered by decorrelation due to sparse temporal sampling and SAR operating frequency. In particular, free and open data access from the European Sentinel-1 constellation and the future NASA-ISRO SAR (NISAR) mission is encouraging the global community to move towards automated, cloud-based processing that can accommodate these rapidly growing data volumes and facilitate the use of a suite of corrections to the data. A key challenge is related to path delays introduced when the radar signal propagates through the troposphere. Tropospheric corrections estimated from empirical, phase-based methods and those using independent data from weather models, GPS, and radiometers have been included in open-source packages such as TRAIN, PyAPS and GACOS. Users within the InSAR community have reported varying degrees of success using these methods in a range of areas around the world. However, the various statistical metrics used to evaluate the reliability of tropospheric corrections are not consistently applied and often depend on the area and the spatial scale over which they are evaluated. Examination of a simple metric such as the overall reduction in phase variability within an interferogram does not allow the user to determine whether the improvement was at large or short length scales. We present a review of existing tropospheric correction methods and statistical performance metrics, providing guidelines for global assessment and verification of the efficacy of tropospheric correction methods. We summarize the assumptions and limitations for each correction method as well as each statistical performance metric. We examine two regions with different atmospheric characteristics - one Sentinel-1 swath covering the central United States and one swath covering south central Mexico, including part of the Pacific coast. As the SAR community moves towards reliance on global and automated InSAR processing platforms that incorporate tropospheric corrections, approaches such as those examined here can aid researchers in their efforts to evaluate such corrections and include their uncertainties in derived products such as surface displacement time series, coseismic offsets, processes that correlate with topography, and signals with smaller magnitude or larger spatial scales such as those associated with small earthquakes, aseismic creep and slow slip events. We found that the GACOS products (leveraging the operational high resolution ECMWF weather model) outperform the other correction methods explored here on average, but this result is highly dependent on location, acquisition time, and data availability. We found spatial structure functions to be most useful for performance assessment because of their ability to convey information about performance at discrete spatial scales. •We examine tropospheric corrections in two regions with very different tropospheric characteristics.•We compare three different metrics for assessment of the efficacy of the corrections.•Spatial structure functions are the most informative assessment approach.</description><subject>Atmosphere</subject><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Business metrics</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Corrections</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>elevation dependence</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>GACOS</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Ground motion</subject><subject>InSAR</subject><subject>Interferometric synthetic aperture radar</subject><subject>MODIS</subject><subject>Offsets</subject><subject>Performance assessment</subject><subject>Performance measurement</subject><subject>Radar</subject><subject>Radiometers</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Satellite constellations</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Signal processing</subject><subject>Spatial data</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Synthetic aperture radar interferometry</subject><subject>Time dependence</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Troposphere</subject><subject>Tropospheric noise</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>weather models</subject><issn>0034-4257</issn><issn>1879-0704</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxAewssU6wncSOYVVVPCoVIdF2bTnORHXVxsF2Efw9LmHNYjSLuWdmdBC6oSSnhPK7be4D5IxQmVNKC8ZP0ITWQmZEkPIUTQgpyqxklThHFyFsCaFVLegExZV3gwvDBrw12DjvwUTr-oA75_G8X07f7_Ey6mhDtEbvsA4BQthDHwPWfYv1MOzSYGSiw3EDeJamPmXXvY3Q_uIwpl_hyxp3hc46vQtw_dcv0frpcTV7yRZvz_PZdJGZsmYxE7TWFWuEkULLhpdNpXkjOlboru3qVJLxtuOsqQw12rSmkY3RNRXUQFERXlyi23Hv4N3HAUJUW3fwfTqpWEG4kKKWVUrRMWW8C8FDpwZv99p_K0rUUa7aqiRXHeWqUW5iHkYG0vufFrwKxkJvoLVHgap19h_6B-1HhKY</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Murray, Kyle D.</creator><creator>Bekaert, David P.S.</creator><creator>Lohman, Rowena B.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0408-0488</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6624-4599</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Tropospheric corrections for InSAR: Statistical assessments and applications to the Central United States and Mexico</title><author>Murray, Kyle D. ; Bekaert, David P.S. ; Lohman, Rowena B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-718a52b7c97a9b64b5a6b7f23afdf8fdf926df62b5c1cacdcb9bca8171ce35063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Atmosphere</topic><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Business metrics</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Corrections</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>elevation dependence</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>GACOS</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Ground motion</topic><topic>InSAR</topic><topic>Interferometric synthetic aperture radar</topic><topic>MODIS</topic><topic>Offsets</topic><topic>Performance assessment</topic><topic>Performance measurement</topic><topic>Radar</topic><topic>Radiometers</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Satellite constellations</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Signal processing</topic><topic>Spatial data</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Synthetic aperture radar interferometry</topic><topic>Time dependence</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Troposphere</topic><topic>Tropospheric noise</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>weather models</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murray, Kyle D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bekaert, David P.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lohman, Rowena B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Remote sensing of environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murray, Kyle D.</au><au>Bekaert, David P.S.</au><au>Lohman, Rowena B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tropospheric corrections for InSAR: Statistical assessments and applications to the Central United States and Mexico</atitle><jtitle>Remote sensing of environment</jtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>232</volume><spage>111326</spage><pages>111326-</pages><artnum>111326</artnum><issn>0034-4257</issn><eissn>1879-0704</eissn><abstract>The rapid expansion of SAR data availability and advancements in InSAR processing methods has enabled the formation of ground displacement time series for many parts of the world where such research was previously hindered by decorrelation due to sparse temporal sampling and SAR operating frequency. In particular, free and open data access from the European Sentinel-1 constellation and the future NASA-ISRO SAR (NISAR) mission is encouraging the global community to move towards automated, cloud-based processing that can accommodate these rapidly growing data volumes and facilitate the use of a suite of corrections to the data. A key challenge is related to path delays introduced when the radar signal propagates through the troposphere. Tropospheric corrections estimated from empirical, phase-based methods and those using independent data from weather models, GPS, and radiometers have been included in open-source packages such as TRAIN, PyAPS and GACOS. Users within the InSAR community have reported varying degrees of success using these methods in a range of areas around the world. However, the various statistical metrics used to evaluate the reliability of tropospheric corrections are not consistently applied and often depend on the area and the spatial scale over which they are evaluated. Examination of a simple metric such as the overall reduction in phase variability within an interferogram does not allow the user to determine whether the improvement was at large or short length scales. We present a review of existing tropospheric correction methods and statistical performance metrics, providing guidelines for global assessment and verification of the efficacy of tropospheric correction methods. We summarize the assumptions and limitations for each correction method as well as each statistical performance metric. We examine two regions with different atmospheric characteristics - one Sentinel-1 swath covering the central United States and one swath covering south central Mexico, including part of the Pacific coast. As the SAR community moves towards reliance on global and automated InSAR processing platforms that incorporate tropospheric corrections, approaches such as those examined here can aid researchers in their efforts to evaluate such corrections and include their uncertainties in derived products such as surface displacement time series, coseismic offsets, processes that correlate with topography, and signals with smaller magnitude or larger spatial scales such as those associated with small earthquakes, aseismic creep and slow slip events. We found that the GACOS products (leveraging the operational high resolution ECMWF weather model) outperform the other correction methods explored here on average, but this result is highly dependent on location, acquisition time, and data availability. We found spatial structure functions to be most useful for performance assessment because of their ability to convey information about performance at discrete spatial scales. •We examine tropospheric corrections in two regions with very different tropospheric characteristics.•We compare three different metrics for assessment of the efficacy of the corrections.•Spatial structure functions are the most informative assessment approach.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.rse.2019.111326</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0408-0488</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6624-4599</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0034-4257
ispartof Remote sensing of environment, 2019-10, Vol.232, p.111326, Article 111326
issn 0034-4257
1879-0704
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2306797895
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Atmosphere
Atmospheric models
Automation
Business metrics
Communities
Corrections
Earthquakes
elevation dependence
Evaluation
GACOS
GPS
Ground motion
InSAR
Interferometric synthetic aperture radar
MODIS
Offsets
Performance assessment
Performance measurement
Radar
Radiometers
Reliability analysis
Satellite constellations
Seismic activity
Signal processing
Spatial data
Statistical methods
Statistics
Synthetic aperture radar interferometry
Time dependence
Time series
Troposphere
Tropospheric noise
Weather
weather models
title Tropospheric corrections for InSAR: Statistical assessments and applications to the Central United States and Mexico
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T06%3A16%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tropospheric%20corrections%20for%20InSAR:%20Statistical%20assessments%20and%20applications%20to%20the%20Central%20United%20States%20and%20Mexico&rft.jtitle=Remote%20sensing%20of%20environment&rft.au=Murray,%20Kyle%20D.&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=232&rft.spage=111326&rft.pages=111326-&rft.artnum=111326&rft.issn=0034-4257&rft.eissn=1879-0704&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111326&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2306797895%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2306797895&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0034425719303451&rfr_iscdi=true