Critical review and illustrative examples of office occupant modelling formalisms

It is widely understood that occupants can have a significant impact on building performance. Accordingly, the field has benefited extensively from research efforts in the past decade. However, the methods and terminology involved in modelling occupants in buildings remains fragmented across a large...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Building Services Engineering Research and Technology 2019-11, Vol.40 (6), p.732-757
Hauptverfasser: D'Oca, Simona, Gunay, H Burak, Gilani, Sara, O'Brien, William
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 757
container_issue 6
container_start_page 732
container_title Building Services Engineering Research and Technology
container_volume 40
creator D'Oca, Simona
Gunay, H Burak
Gilani, Sara
O'Brien, William
description It is widely understood that occupants can have a significant impact on building performance. Accordingly, the field has benefited extensively from research efforts in the past decade. However, the methods and terminology involved in modelling occupants in buildings remains fragmented across a large number of studies. This fragmentation represents a major obstacle to those who intend to join in this research endeavor as well as for the convergence and standardization of methods. To address this issue, this paper investigates occupant modelling methods for the key domains of electric lighting, blinds, operable windows, thermostats, plug loads, and occupancy. In the reviewed literature, five broad categories of occupant model formalisms were identified: schedules, Bernoulli models, discrete-time Markov models, discrete-event Markov models, and survival models. Illustrative examples were provided from two independent datasets to demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of these model forms. It was shown that Markov models are suitable to represent occupants' adaptive behaviors, while survival models are suitable to represent occupancy, non-adaptive behaviors, and infrequently executed adaptive behaviors, such as the blinds opening behavior. Practical application : The engineering application of the occupant modelling formalisms that are critically reviewed in this paper is that these models are highly beneficial for incorporating occupants' presence and behaviors into building design and control. Building design can be improved significantly regarding energy use and occupant comfort when the most suitable occupant models are implemented in simulation-aided building design process. Ultimately, like for any modelling domain, the most suitable model is dependent on the modelling objective (e.g. optimizing passive design, equipment sizing), building type and size, occupant-related domain (e.g. occupancy, window-opening behavior), and climate zones. Furthermore, there is great potential in improving occupant comfort and energy savings of existing buildings when occupants' presence and interactions with buildings' systems and components are predicted accurately using occupant models.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0143624419827468
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2306776392</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0143624419827468</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2306776392</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-9e10167fe4e387d05142b8d9f52e077db8439e12d346582454af1f54c15191363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LxDAUxIMoWFfvHgOeq3lJ2qRHWfyCBRH0XLLpy5Il_TBpV_3v7bKCIAgP5jC_mQdDyCWwawClbhhIUXIpodJcyVIfkQykUjnTsjom2d7O9_4pOUtpyxgowVhGXpbRj96aQCPuPH5Q0zXUhzClMZrR75Dip2mHgIn2bj7nLdLe2mkw3UjbvsEQfLehro-tCT616ZycOBMSXvzogrzd370uH_PV88PT8naVWyH1mFcIDErlUKLQqmEFSL7WTeUKjkypZq2lmBneCFkWmstCGgeukBYKqECUYkGuDr1D7N8nTGO97afYzS9rLlipVCkqPlPsQNnYpxTR1UP0rYlfNbB6P1z9d7g5kh8iyWzwt_Rf_hsnNWxp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2306776392</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Critical review and illustrative examples of office occupant modelling formalisms</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>D'Oca, Simona ; Gunay, H Burak ; Gilani, Sara ; O'Brien, William</creator><creatorcontrib>D'Oca, Simona ; Gunay, H Burak ; Gilani, Sara ; O'Brien, William</creatorcontrib><description>It is widely understood that occupants can have a significant impact on building performance. Accordingly, the field has benefited extensively from research efforts in the past decade. However, the methods and terminology involved in modelling occupants in buildings remains fragmented across a large number of studies. This fragmentation represents a major obstacle to those who intend to join in this research endeavor as well as for the convergence and standardization of methods. To address this issue, this paper investigates occupant modelling methods for the key domains of electric lighting, blinds, operable windows, thermostats, plug loads, and occupancy. In the reviewed literature, five broad categories of occupant model formalisms were identified: schedules, Bernoulli models, discrete-time Markov models, discrete-event Markov models, and survival models. Illustrative examples were provided from two independent datasets to demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of these model forms. It was shown that Markov models are suitable to represent occupants' adaptive behaviors, while survival models are suitable to represent occupancy, non-adaptive behaviors, and infrequently executed adaptive behaviors, such as the blinds opening behavior. Practical application : The engineering application of the occupant modelling formalisms that are critically reviewed in this paper is that these models are highly beneficial for incorporating occupants' presence and behaviors into building design and control. Building design can be improved significantly regarding energy use and occupant comfort when the most suitable occupant models are implemented in simulation-aided building design process. Ultimately, like for any modelling domain, the most suitable model is dependent on the modelling objective (e.g. optimizing passive design, equipment sizing), building type and size, occupant-related domain (e.g. occupancy, window-opening behavior), and climate zones. Furthermore, there is great potential in improving occupant comfort and energy savings of existing buildings when occupants' presence and interactions with buildings' systems and components are predicted accurately using occupant models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-6244</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0849</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0143624419827468</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Blinds ; Building design ; Buildings ; Computer simulation ; Design optimization ; Domains ; Energy consumption ; Formalism ; Markov chains ; Model forms ; Modelling ; Occupancy ; Schedules ; Standardization ; Survival ; Thermostats</subject><ispartof>Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, 2019-11, Vol.40 (6), p.732-757</ispartof><rights>The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-9e10167fe4e387d05142b8d9f52e077db8439e12d346582454af1f54c15191363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-9e10167fe4e387d05142b8d9f52e077db8439e12d346582454af1f54c15191363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0143624419827468$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143624419827468$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,776,780,788,21798,27899,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>D'Oca, Simona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunay, H Burak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilani, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, William</creatorcontrib><title>Critical review and illustrative examples of office occupant modelling formalisms</title><title>Building Services Engineering Research and Technology</title><description>It is widely understood that occupants can have a significant impact on building performance. Accordingly, the field has benefited extensively from research efforts in the past decade. However, the methods and terminology involved in modelling occupants in buildings remains fragmented across a large number of studies. This fragmentation represents a major obstacle to those who intend to join in this research endeavor as well as for the convergence and standardization of methods. To address this issue, this paper investigates occupant modelling methods for the key domains of electric lighting, blinds, operable windows, thermostats, plug loads, and occupancy. In the reviewed literature, five broad categories of occupant model formalisms were identified: schedules, Bernoulli models, discrete-time Markov models, discrete-event Markov models, and survival models. Illustrative examples were provided from two independent datasets to demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of these model forms. It was shown that Markov models are suitable to represent occupants' adaptive behaviors, while survival models are suitable to represent occupancy, non-adaptive behaviors, and infrequently executed adaptive behaviors, such as the blinds opening behavior. Practical application : The engineering application of the occupant modelling formalisms that are critically reviewed in this paper is that these models are highly beneficial for incorporating occupants' presence and behaviors into building design and control. Building design can be improved significantly regarding energy use and occupant comfort when the most suitable occupant models are implemented in simulation-aided building design process. Ultimately, like for any modelling domain, the most suitable model is dependent on the modelling objective (e.g. optimizing passive design, equipment sizing), building type and size, occupant-related domain (e.g. occupancy, window-opening behavior), and climate zones. Furthermore, there is great potential in improving occupant comfort and energy savings of existing buildings when occupants' presence and interactions with buildings' systems and components are predicted accurately using occupant models.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Blinds</subject><subject>Building design</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Domains</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Formalism</subject><subject>Markov chains</subject><subject>Model forms</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Occupancy</subject><subject>Schedules</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Thermostats</subject><issn>0143-6244</issn><issn>1477-0849</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1LxDAUxIMoWFfvHgOeq3lJ2qRHWfyCBRH0XLLpy5Il_TBpV_3v7bKCIAgP5jC_mQdDyCWwawClbhhIUXIpodJcyVIfkQykUjnTsjom2d7O9_4pOUtpyxgowVhGXpbRj96aQCPuPH5Q0zXUhzClMZrR75Dip2mHgIn2bj7nLdLe2mkw3UjbvsEQfLehro-tCT616ZycOBMSXvzogrzd370uH_PV88PT8naVWyH1mFcIDErlUKLQqmEFSL7WTeUKjkypZq2lmBneCFkWmstCGgeukBYKqECUYkGuDr1D7N8nTGO97afYzS9rLlipVCkqPlPsQNnYpxTR1UP0rYlfNbB6P1z9d7g5kh8iyWzwt_Rf_hsnNWxp</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>D'Oca, Simona</creator><creator>Gunay, H Burak</creator><creator>Gilani, Sara</creator><creator>O'Brien, William</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Critical review and illustrative examples of office occupant modelling formalisms</title><author>D'Oca, Simona ; Gunay, H Burak ; Gilani, Sara ; O'Brien, William</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-9e10167fe4e387d05142b8d9f52e077db8439e12d346582454af1f54c15191363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Blinds</topic><topic>Building design</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Domains</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Formalism</topic><topic>Markov chains</topic><topic>Model forms</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Occupancy</topic><topic>Schedules</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Thermostats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>D'Oca, Simona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunay, H Burak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilani, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, William</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Building Services Engineering Research and Technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>D'Oca, Simona</au><au>Gunay, H Burak</au><au>Gilani, Sara</au><au>O'Brien, William</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Critical review and illustrative examples of office occupant modelling formalisms</atitle><jtitle>Building Services Engineering Research and Technology</jtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>732</spage><epage>757</epage><pages>732-757</pages><issn>0143-6244</issn><eissn>1477-0849</eissn><abstract>It is widely understood that occupants can have a significant impact on building performance. Accordingly, the field has benefited extensively from research efforts in the past decade. However, the methods and terminology involved in modelling occupants in buildings remains fragmented across a large number of studies. This fragmentation represents a major obstacle to those who intend to join in this research endeavor as well as for the convergence and standardization of methods. To address this issue, this paper investigates occupant modelling methods for the key domains of electric lighting, blinds, operable windows, thermostats, plug loads, and occupancy. In the reviewed literature, five broad categories of occupant model formalisms were identified: schedules, Bernoulli models, discrete-time Markov models, discrete-event Markov models, and survival models. Illustrative examples were provided from two independent datasets to demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of these model forms. It was shown that Markov models are suitable to represent occupants' adaptive behaviors, while survival models are suitable to represent occupancy, non-adaptive behaviors, and infrequently executed adaptive behaviors, such as the blinds opening behavior. Practical application : The engineering application of the occupant modelling formalisms that are critically reviewed in this paper is that these models are highly beneficial for incorporating occupants' presence and behaviors into building design and control. Building design can be improved significantly regarding energy use and occupant comfort when the most suitable occupant models are implemented in simulation-aided building design process. Ultimately, like for any modelling domain, the most suitable model is dependent on the modelling objective (e.g. optimizing passive design, equipment sizing), building type and size, occupant-related domain (e.g. occupancy, window-opening behavior), and climate zones. Furthermore, there is great potential in improving occupant comfort and energy savings of existing buildings when occupants' presence and interactions with buildings' systems and components are predicted accurately using occupant models.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0143624419827468</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-6244
ispartof Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, 2019-11, Vol.40 (6), p.732-757
issn 0143-6244
1477-0849
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2306776392
source SAGE Complete
subjects Behavior
Blinds
Building design
Buildings
Computer simulation
Design optimization
Domains
Energy consumption
Formalism
Markov chains
Model forms
Modelling
Occupancy
Schedules
Standardization
Survival
Thermostats
title Critical review and illustrative examples of office occupant modelling formalisms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T12%3A30%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Critical%20review%20and%20illustrative%20examples%20of%20office%20occupant%20modelling%20formalisms&rft.jtitle=Building%20Services%20Engineering%20Research%20and%20Technology&rft.au=D'Oca,%20Simona&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=732&rft.epage=757&rft.pages=732-757&rft.issn=0143-6244&rft.eissn=1477-0849&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0143624419827468&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2306776392%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2306776392&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0143624419827468&rfr_iscdi=true