Prosecuting non-physical abuse between current intimate partners: Are stalking laws an under-utilised resource?
The prevention of family violence - including economic and psychological abuse - is currently a major priority for governments in Australia and New Zealand. Traditionally, the criminal law in those jurisdictions has focused exclusively on physical violence. However, there is increasing interest in a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Melbourne University law review 2019-01, Vol.42 (2), p.551-592 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 592 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 551 |
container_title | Melbourne University law review |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | McMahon, Marilyn McGorrery, Paul Burton, Kelley |
description | The prevention of family violence - including economic and psychological abuse - is currently a major priority for governments in Australia and New Zealand. Traditionally, the criminal law in those jurisdictions has focused exclusively on physical violence. However, there is increasing interest in also targeting non-physical forms of abuse. Many of these behaviours are indirectly criminalised via family violence legislation, which requires an intervention order to be in place before the behaviour is deemed criminal. This article investigates whether those behaviours are also directly criminalised by stalking laws, particularly in the context of an ongoing intimate relationship, where the partners are cohabitating. The extent to which stalking laws can be, and are being, used to prosecute offenders for psychologically or emotionally abusing their intimate partners is investigated, as well as the broader issue of whether stalking laws are an adequate mechanism for dealing with this form of abuse. We conclude that, although stalking provisions can be used to prosecute non-physical family violence against current intimate partners, restricted community and expert understandings of stalking suggest that a more appropriate solution would be to construct a new family violence-specific offence to deal with this form of abuse. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2306439062</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A610419228</galeid><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20191001017764</informt_id><sourcerecordid>A610419228</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g612t-3d309542247c6d1a7058c7394095fc544868953a0ea21612a03812afe0b13acc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkV1rFDEUhgex0HXb_xDweiQf8-mNLEXbQkEFvQ5nM2emWbPJmJOh-O-bdkUrroiSi8A5z3lyXvKsWIlO9aXqBH9erDiXddn1qjstXhDtOBe8rdpVET7EQGiWZP3EfPDlfPuNrAHHYLsQsi2mO0TPzBIj-sSsT3YPCdkMMXmM9JptIjJK4L48KBzcEQPPFj9gLLPWWcKBRaSwRINvzoqTERzh-fd7XXx-9_bTxVV58_7y-mJzU06NkKlUg-J9XUlZtaYZBLS87kyr-ipXR1NXVdd0fa2AI0iRJ4DnnBJG5FuhwBi1Ll4evHMMXxekpHd5AZ-f1FLxplI9b-RPagKH2voxpAhmb8noTSN4JXopu0yVR6gJc3xwweNoc_kX_tURPp8B99YcHfh4GIh7m7QJzqFJNnjaQSJNCNHcPnoe-yFOeghWC66VEo2GydKctOSiFw__Kto251sX10-cMMOY_mr60fjNdfnPrj9tdfXUdGD-T3UPkBroFg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2306439062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prosecuting non-physical abuse between current intimate partners: Are stalking laws an under-utilised resource?</title><source>HeinOnline</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>McMahon, Marilyn ; McGorrery, Paul ; Burton, Kelley</creator><creatorcontrib>McMahon, Marilyn ; McGorrery, Paul ; Burton, Kelley</creatorcontrib><description>The prevention of family violence - including economic and psychological abuse - is currently a major priority for governments in Australia and New Zealand. Traditionally, the criminal law in those jurisdictions has focused exclusively on physical violence. However, there is increasing interest in also targeting non-physical forms of abuse. Many of these behaviours are indirectly criminalised via family violence legislation, which requires an intervention order to be in place before the behaviour is deemed criminal. This article investigates whether those behaviours are also directly criminalised by stalking laws, particularly in the context of an ongoing intimate relationship, where the partners are cohabitating. The extent to which stalking laws can be, and are being, used to prosecute offenders for psychologically or emotionally abusing their intimate partners is investigated, as well as the broader issue of whether stalking laws are an adequate mechanism for dealing with this form of abuse. We conclude that, although stalking provisions can be used to prosecute non-physical family violence against current intimate partners, restricted community and expert understandings of stalking suggest that a more appropriate solution would be to construct a new family violence-specific offence to deal with this form of abuse.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-8938</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1839-3810</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne: Melbourne University Law Review</publisher><subject>Assaults ; Behavior ; Criminal law ; Criminal liability ; Domestic violence ; Emotional abuse ; Family violence ; Law and legislation ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Legislation ; Perceptions ; Prevention ; Prosecutions ; Psychological abuse ; Psychology ; Remedies ; Sex crimes ; Stalking</subject><ispartof>Melbourne University law review, 2019-01, Vol.42 (2), p.551-592</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Melbourne University Law Review</rights><rights>Copyright Melbourne University Law Review Association Inc. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McMahon, Marilyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGorrery, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burton, Kelley</creatorcontrib><title>Prosecuting non-physical abuse between current intimate partners: Are stalking laws an under-utilised resource?</title><title>Melbourne University law review</title><description>The prevention of family violence - including economic and psychological abuse - is currently a major priority for governments in Australia and New Zealand. Traditionally, the criminal law in those jurisdictions has focused exclusively on physical violence. However, there is increasing interest in also targeting non-physical forms of abuse. Many of these behaviours are indirectly criminalised via family violence legislation, which requires an intervention order to be in place before the behaviour is deemed criminal. This article investigates whether those behaviours are also directly criminalised by stalking laws, particularly in the context of an ongoing intimate relationship, where the partners are cohabitating. The extent to which stalking laws can be, and are being, used to prosecute offenders for psychologically or emotionally abusing their intimate partners is investigated, as well as the broader issue of whether stalking laws are an adequate mechanism for dealing with this form of abuse. We conclude that, although stalking provisions can be used to prosecute non-physical family violence against current intimate partners, restricted community and expert understandings of stalking suggest that a more appropriate solution would be to construct a new family violence-specific offence to deal with this form of abuse.</description><subject>Assaults</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Criminal law</subject><subject>Criminal liability</subject><subject>Domestic violence</subject><subject>Emotional abuse</subject><subject>Family violence</subject><subject>Law and legislation</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Prosecutions</subject><subject>Psychological abuse</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Remedies</subject><subject>Sex crimes</subject><subject>Stalking</subject><issn>0025-8938</issn><issn>1839-3810</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqdkV1rFDEUhgex0HXb_xDweiQf8-mNLEXbQkEFvQ5nM2emWbPJmJOh-O-bdkUrroiSi8A5z3lyXvKsWIlO9aXqBH9erDiXddn1qjstXhDtOBe8rdpVET7EQGiWZP3EfPDlfPuNrAHHYLsQsi2mO0TPzBIj-sSsT3YPCdkMMXmM9JptIjJK4L48KBzcEQPPFj9gLLPWWcKBRaSwRINvzoqTERzh-fd7XXx-9_bTxVV58_7y-mJzU06NkKlUg-J9XUlZtaYZBLS87kyr-ipXR1NXVdd0fa2AI0iRJ4DnnBJG5FuhwBi1Ll4evHMMXxekpHd5AZ-f1FLxplI9b-RPagKH2voxpAhmb8noTSN4JXopu0yVR6gJc3xwweNoc_kX_tURPp8B99YcHfh4GIh7m7QJzqFJNnjaQSJNCNHcPnoe-yFOeghWC66VEo2GydKctOSiFw__Kto251sX10-cMMOY_mr60fjNdfnPrj9tdfXUdGD-T3UPkBroFg</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>McMahon, Marilyn</creator><creator>McGorrery, Paul</creator><creator>Burton, Kelley</creator><general>Melbourne University Law Review</general><general>Melbourne University Law Review Association Inc</general><scope>ILT</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AYAGU</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Prosecuting non-physical abuse between current intimate partners: Are stalking laws an under-utilised resource?</title><author>McMahon, Marilyn ; McGorrery, Paul ; Burton, Kelley</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g612t-3d309542247c6d1a7058c7394095fc544868953a0ea21612a03812afe0b13acc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Assaults</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Criminal law</topic><topic>Criminal liability</topic><topic>Domestic violence</topic><topic>Emotional abuse</topic><topic>Family violence</topic><topic>Law and legislation</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Prosecutions</topic><topic>Psychological abuse</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Remedies</topic><topic>Sex crimes</topic><topic>Stalking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McMahon, Marilyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGorrery, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burton, Kelley</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Australia & New Zealand Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Melbourne University law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McMahon, Marilyn</au><au>McGorrery, Paul</au><au>Burton, Kelley</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prosecuting non-physical abuse between current intimate partners: Are stalking laws an under-utilised resource?</atitle><jtitle>Melbourne University law review</jtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>551</spage><epage>592</epage><pages>551-592</pages><issn>0025-8938</issn><eissn>1839-3810</eissn><abstract>The prevention of family violence - including economic and psychological abuse - is currently a major priority for governments in Australia and New Zealand. Traditionally, the criminal law in those jurisdictions has focused exclusively on physical violence. However, there is increasing interest in also targeting non-physical forms of abuse. Many of these behaviours are indirectly criminalised via family violence legislation, which requires an intervention order to be in place before the behaviour is deemed criminal. This article investigates whether those behaviours are also directly criminalised by stalking laws, particularly in the context of an ongoing intimate relationship, where the partners are cohabitating. The extent to which stalking laws can be, and are being, used to prosecute offenders for psychologically or emotionally abusing their intimate partners is investigated, as well as the broader issue of whether stalking laws are an adequate mechanism for dealing with this form of abuse. We conclude that, although stalking provisions can be used to prosecute non-physical family violence against current intimate partners, restricted community and expert understandings of stalking suggest that a more appropriate solution would be to construct a new family violence-specific offence to deal with this form of abuse.</abstract><cop>Melbourne</cop><pub>Melbourne University Law Review</pub><tpages>42</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0025-8938 |
ispartof | Melbourne University law review, 2019-01, Vol.42 (2), p.551-592 |
issn | 0025-8938 1839-3810 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2306439062 |
source | HeinOnline; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free E- Journals |
subjects | Assaults Behavior Criminal law Criminal liability Domestic violence Emotional abuse Family violence Law and legislation Laws, regulations and rules Legislation Perceptions Prevention Prosecutions Psychological abuse Psychology Remedies Sex crimes Stalking |
title | Prosecuting non-physical abuse between current intimate partners: Are stalking laws an under-utilised resource? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T10%3A03%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prosecuting%20non-physical%20abuse%20between%20current%20intimate%20partners:%20Are%20stalking%20laws%20an%20under-utilised%20resource?&rft.jtitle=Melbourne%20University%20law%20review&rft.au=McMahon,%20Marilyn&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=551&rft.epage=592&rft.pages=551-592&rft.issn=0025-8938&rft.eissn=1839-3810&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA610419228%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2306439062&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A610419228&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20191001017764&rfr_iscdi=true |